Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Basic Principles of Wealth Creation Have Not Changed
The Basic Principles of Wealth Creation Have Not Changed
Jul 4, 2026 1:48 PM

No matter how scary the economy may look today, you have more control over your economic future than you think. Get back to basics: both principle and habits.

Read More…

The need for economic education has never been more apparent. In an inflationary economy with housing costs outpacing first-time homebuyer budgets, banking collapses, and a popping tech bubble, the need for sound economics is self-evident. St. Thomas Aquinas defined self-evident as that which the intellect clearly apprehends; today, it is easy to apprehend the need for better economic thinking, and the way such a need es a reality is by taking concrete steps to change the status quo.

In the status quo, economics is often treated like a mathematical mystery that only the initiated can understand. Modern economics with plex formulas has grown far from its origins as the oiko-nomos, or rules for managing one’s home. Instead of the ancient wisdom (spend less than you make), adherents of modern monetary theory contend that value itself, and the money that represents it, are both symbols that the government can play with. Paired with a Keynesian view of government’s role in heating up or cooling down the economy, modern monetary theory contributes to rampant inflation, only then to claim that further manipulation of the monetary supply should be the response. We need to get back to the basics.

To help on that score, Brian Balfour of the John Locke Foundation has published a new edition of his Economics in Action through Thales Press. (In the interest of full disclosure, I am an editor and author for Thales Press.) Balfour approaches economics from an Austrian stance, and his writing makes clear the concepts students need to learn. Following Euclid’s method, Balfour introduces a series of axioms from which he builds an economic system. Balfour presents the Action Axiom as the initial premise for his study: “Human beings utilize means according to an idea to achieve ends.” His focus is on developing what he calls “the economic way of thinking” while also equipping students to better understand human nature. “Using deductive logic to arrive at economic laws empowers the student to know why these laws must be true, instead of simply accepting them as true.” Working through deduction helps students cultivate the habits of economic analysis and to see economic laws at work in the world around them.

Economics in Action is structured as 22 chapters, each beginning with a concept outline and providing key terms defined in a glossary as well prehension and application questions for students to consider. By the book’s conclusion, students should have a working knowledge of the following economic concepts: exchange, division of labor, the market, price formation, supply, demand, petition, profit and loss, the business cycle, mon economic fallacies. The textbook works for both those with a strong knowledge of Austrian principles and those new to the formal study of economics. Balfour’s examples make this an imminently teachable book. e with sufficient questions for the dialogical classroom, enabling a classical pedagogical approach to the study of economics.

Balfour uses the building blocks of previous chapters to address economic harms in the closing section. He walks readers through the logical flaws inherent to socialism, for example. If the previously taught principles are true, then “socialism suffers from several ings that condemn it to failure no matter when and where it is tried, and regardless of who is in charge. Perhaps the three most significant ings are the incentive problem, the knowledge problem and the lack of economic calculation.” It’s not that socialism does not appeal, but rather that socialism by its nature violates the laws of economic interaction.

In his final chapter, Balfour applies the same method to address mon economic fallacies as “job creation is wealth creation” and “the rich get richer on the backs of the poor.” Balfour argues that “the goal, instead of focusing exclusively on jobs, is to focus on productivity and the wealth creation it brings” and that “job creation is a by-product of a growing economy and production structure.” When we focus not just on job growth but also wealth creation, economic flourishing results, enabling a rising standard of living.

In short, Balfour demonstrates that economics is not a mysterious exercise in mathematical wizardry but rather the application of sound principles. Adam Smith stands in the tradition of Euclid, Aristotle, and Aquinas; through careful perception and description of natural laws deducible through study, the logical application of those laws results in an increased wisdom for living well.

Economics is not only the macro-level study of value exchanges; it also operates as a means of individual wealth-building. Dave Ramsey has recently republished a classic that addresses just that: George S. Clason’s The Richest Man in Babylon, originally published in 1930. The argument is straightforward: Arkad, the richest man in Babylon, explains his method of building wealth across several short stories: spend less than is earned, make money work for you, only invest in trustworthy opportunities you understand, and prepare for opportunity e knocking.

The Richest Man in Babylon opens with Bansir the charioteer, who could be a Millennial stereotype. He sees all the riches around him and bemoans the fact that his work seems to bring him only just enough money to pay his bills.

Bah! Are we more than dumb sheep? We live in the richest city in all the world. The travelers do say none equals it in wealth. About us is much display of wealth, but of it we ourselves have nought. After half a lifetime of hard labor, thou, my best of friends, hast an empty purse and sayest to me, “May I borrow such a trifle as two shekels until after the noblemen’s feast this night?” … No, I admit my purse is as empty as thine. What is the matter? Why cannot we acquire silver and gold—more than enough for food?

How can Bansir get a grasp on the good life? He wishes to be a “man of means. I wish to own lands and cattle, to have fine robes and coins in my purse. I am willing to work for these things with all the strength in my back, with all the skill in my hands, with all the cunning in my mind, but I wish my labors to be rewarded. What is the matter with us? Again, I ask you!” Such a question is both timeless and answerable. Economic analysis explaining why young adults are inheriting a worse economic position than the Baby Boomers abounds, but the desire and opportunity for economic advancement remains. Bansir is presented as an ancient Babylonian, but he could just as easily be an entry-level hire in a bank wondering how he could move up in the world.

Clason establishes a clear framework for acquiring money: “Money is the medium by which earthly success is measured. Money makes possible the enjoyment of the best of life. [And] money is plentiful for those who understand the simple laws which govern its acquisition.” By setting his stories in the Ancient Near East, Clason suggests the timelessness of his principles. His advice does not depend on the stability of cryptocurrency or the chance of an angel ing through. Rather than building an incubator program, he argues that people ought to use their e to make money work for them: “A fat purse empties quickly if there be no golden stream to refill it. Arkad has an e that constantly keeps his purse full no matter how liberally he spends.”

The remainder of the book posed of short stories through which Arkad dispenses wisdom on how to build wealth. The formula is convicting for an era addicted to building wealth through debt: exercise discipline to live on 9/10 of an e; save the tenth as an investment fund; invest wisely; create a “wealth tree” that bears much fruit. Clason’s argument fits much of the advice offered by Ramsey himself and by Robert Kiyosaki—money is a tool to give freedom, and managed wisely it can create a life of leisure. Wealth is a product of discipline over time, not merely a matter of luck or inheritance.

Balfour and Clason illustrate two different pedagogical approaches. Balfour’s writing is didactic: the principles are clear, the examples apply the ideas taught, and the book’s layout makes it impossible for an attentive reader to miss the point. Clason takes a different approach: his narratives draw on the imagination of the reader to build a world and play out the possibilities of economic interactions within that imaginative space. These methods engage different kinds of readers; a bright middle-grade reader could benefit from reading The Richest Man in Babylon. The archaic language and romantic setting draw in the reader who typically gravitates toward fantasy, young adult, or historical fiction novels. Balfour’s textbook is ideal for supporting a high school class or a reading group of mitted to discussing economic ideas. Both books capture timeless wisdom and help readers develop prudence for their own economic action.

This past June, David Bahnsen of The Bahnsen Group spoke at Acton University. He provided strong negative analysis of the present American and global macroeconomic status. The housing bubble of 2008, the increase in the national debt, and the weakening of the dollar all contribute to a bleak macroeconomic forecast. After his presentation, Bahnsen was asked what the outlook is for the individual. His aspect changed. He believes that this is a great time for individuals acting on a microeconomic level, because the same economic laws that have always governed wealth creation remain true today. Those who work hard, steward their opportunities, and exercise virtue in the market will outperform their counterparts who fail to act virtuously. Bahnsen contends that the future is bright for the wise steward.

That bright economic future depends on individuals knowing and understanding economic ways of thought and the basic principles that allow each person to take dominion of his personal economic world. In that sense, we live in a golden age of economic information. Balfour’s Economics in bines contemporary economic research with Austrian economic principles. The Richest Man in Babylon makes for a great gift, reminding readers that the secrets of how to build wealth are readily available to all who seek them. As the 2024 election cycle heats up, economic counternarratives are sure to abound. The best way to prevent bad economic ideas from taking root is to read works of sound economics. Both Balfour and Clason provide the resources for the American public to educate itself about the timeless principles of economic action.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Wealth of Nations Depends on the Health of Families
Family, church, and school are the three basic people-forming institutions, says Pat Fagan, so it’s no wonder that they produce the best results—including economic and political ones—when they cooperate: Besides marriage, the other foundational institution that fosters human flourishing is religion. The effects of religious worship are dramatically visible in U.S. national survey correlational studies and increasingly in causational studies in areas like education, crime reduction, and health. Religious practice and prayer are good for marriage, but when marriage and...
Parenting under Poverty and Affluence
In Businessweek late last year, Jason Zinoman noted the Broadway revival of Glengarry Glen Ross with Al Pacino as Levine. The play, says Zinoman, “speaks as directly to the economic anxieties of today as when it opened on Broadway in 1984, at the end of Ronald Reagan’s first term. Then, the play was widely seen by critics as a left-wing attack on a free-market system run amok.” But as he also notes, Glengarry Glen Ross is pared to Arthur Miller’s...
Donald Trump, Ed Koch, and the Ice Skating Rink: A Tale of Bureaucracy
James Q. Wilson’s terrific book Bureaucracy has an interesting story about Donald Trump and New York mayor Ed Koch. The year was 1986. The city of New York had spent six years and $13 million failing to build an ice skating rink in Central Park. In early summer that year, Donald Trump proposed to Mayor Ed Koch that he take over the project for $3 million and promised to cover any excess amounts himself rather than go back to the...
Audio: Samuel Gregg Discusses ‘Becoming Europe’ on the Jack Riccardi Show
Recently Samuel Gregg talked with Jack Riccardi from KTSA 550 San Antonio about Gregg’s new book ing Europe. Listen to the entire interview here: [audio: Theodore Dalrymple also recently reviewed ing Europe on the Library of Law and Liberty’s Liberty Law Blog. He said: In this well-written book, Samuel Gregg explains what can only be called the dialectical relationship between the interests of the European political class and the economic beliefs and wishes of the population as a whole. The...
The Return of Intercollegiate Review
The Intercollegiate Studies Institute (ISI) recently relaunched their flagship publication, Intercollegiate Review, and added a brand new daily website, . As panion site to the decades-old magazine, the online daily will mainly serve undergraduate readers interested in learning more about the principles of conservatism. Here are some of the featured stories you should check out: ·The Five Lamest Core Courses in America: In lieu of a solid core curriculum, what courses do students take at elite schools in America to...
Faith and Football: Patriots’ Zoltan Mesko
New England Patriots’ punter Zoltan Mesko is undoubtedly upset that his team didn’t make it to the Super Bowl again this year, but it’s hardly the toughest ordeal of his life. As Romanian refugees, Mesko’s family endured Communist oppression, deprivation and violent revolution. Mesko, who holds an M.A. from the University of Michigan, shared his family’s experience and how faith plays a role in his life in an interview with the National Catholic Register. When asked if he found it...
The Moral Case for Conservatism
Lee Habeeb and Mike Leven explain why it’s essential to make the moral case for conservatism: If there is a single reason why conservatives continue to lose the battle of ideas, it’s because we don’t make the moral case for freedom and free markets. Our political class instead makes the economic case for our philosophy. Our smart guys are so impressed with their own intelligence, they think we can win the debate using numbers and data, charts and graphs, and...
No Race Bias In The Sciences
Ge Wang, adjunct professor of biomedical engineering at the Virginia Tech/Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, and seven of his colleagues published a study refuting early claims that affirmative actions should be taken to protect against racial discrimination when grants are dispersed. The discussions about research grants and race escalated when a 2011 issue of Science magazine reported “that Asians were four percentage points and black or African American applicants 13 percentage points ‘less likely to receive...
When Little Government Foxes Spoil the Vines of Business and Ministry
Joe Carter has done a marvelous jobofoutlining the details surrounding the Obama administration’s abortion/contraceptive mandate. In a recent cover story for WORLD Magazine, these details are brought to life through a series of snapshots of real businesses and non-profits facing a real choice to either violate their Christian consciences or e economic martyrs. Thus far, Hobby Lobby has received much of the national spotlight—due in part to their visibility in the marketplace and corresponding outspokenness. In the WORLD article, we...
Why Government Workers Should Get Pay Decreases for Longevity
Imagine that you have a series of plumbing problems in your house—clogged sinks, backed up toilets—and decide to hire a plumber. Which of these two incentive structures would you choose? (A) The plumber only gets paid when the problems are fixed. (B) The plumber will continue to be paid indefinitely for working on the problem, and will continue to get paid as long as the problem persists Most of us would choose option A since we are more interested in...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved