Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Thank God for Virtue
Thank God for Virtue
Jan 28, 2026 6:37 PM

To whom ought we to be thankful—and for what? Ask Abba Isaac.

Read More…

Each night, when it’s my turn to tuck in my littlest kids—Erin (5) and Callaghan (3) … and sometimes Aidan (6)—we say the same traditional prayers together: the “Our Father,” the “Axion Estin,” and the Creed. After the Creed, I ask them, “What are you thankful for tonight?” and “Who should we pray for tonight?”

They’re always thankful for their mom. They’re usually thankful for each other. Sometimes they’re thankful for me. When they’ve finished listing everyone and everything they’re thankful for, we pray, “Thank you, Jesus.”

Thankfulness can be powerful. Most of us have a lot to be thankful for, but often it seems those who have the most to be thankful for are the least prone to gratitude. When you pray each month to make ends meet, you’re much more thankful when they do.

But what is gratitude, really? Two questions seem fundamental: (1) To whom ought we to be thankful? And (2) for whatought we to be thankful?

Every year in the United States, we celebrate Thanksgiving Day on the fourth Thursday of November. It has been a national holiday since President Grant signed the Holidays Act on June 28, 1870. For most of us, that means turkey, family, and football. For many, it also means drinking too much the night before and shopping too much the morning after, though online shopping has dissipated some of the traditional “Black Friday” frenzy in recent years.

All of that might patible with gratitude (yes, even the shopping), but the actual lived experience of Thanksgiving unfortunately doesn’t require it. A slew of vices e to be associated with the holiday, including gluttony, discord, fanaticism, drunkenness, and greed, to name only a few.

This year, I hope all of us will let a more nuanced understanding of the nature of gratitude be our guide. St. John Cassian, in his Conferences, records a meeting with Abba Isaac on the nature of prayer, including “thanksgiving” as one of four distinct types of prayer, referencing 1 Timothy 2:1: “I exhort therefore first of all that supplications, prayers [or ‘vows’], intercessions, thanksgivings be made.”

Thus, as I try to teach my children, the old ascetic taught that thanksgiving is a kind of prayer. As such, it must be directed toward God first of all. Of course, we should always be thankful to anyone in our lives who’s done us good, but always in all things to God, “from whom all blessings flow,” to quote one early modern hymn.

For what, then, ought we to be thankful? Abba Isaac can help us there, too. He distinguishes between these four forms of prayer on the basis of their relation to the four “good” passions (drawing upon Stoic philosophy): contrition, caution (or, in Christian terms, “godly fear”), hope, and joy.

Today, the term “stoic” usually refers to a person who is seemingly unfeeling, like an action hero unphased by violence and explosions all around him. But the ancient Stoics, whose psychological analysis ancient Jews and Christians built upon, actually identified three passions as good—caution, hope, and joy—to which the first-century Jewish philosopher Philo of Alexandria and subsequent Christian theologians added contrition, or “godly sorrow,” to quote St. Paul (see 2 Cor. 7:10).

Why didn’t the Stoics think there could be a good form of grief? Because what made a passion good or bad, to them, was its relation to virtue and vice. Good passions help us avoid vice and act virtuously. But grief—the recognition of a present evil—must be bad because, even when one correctly judges vice to be evil, the presence of vice is itself a bad thing.

The Judeo-Christian tradition of mercy and forgiveness significantly expanded the Stoics’ categories. Grief could be good if the recognition of one’s sin spurred one to “go and sin no more” (John 8:11). It could also be good if in “weep[ing] with those who weep” (Rom. 12:15), one helps turn a neighbor back from despair. Thus, again, virtue is the key.

Joy is the opposite: it isn’t merely a pleasurable feeling. Indeed, drunkenness, gluttony, and greed all revolve around mere pleasure, and much anger and e from the loss of it. For the Stoics and ancient Christians, though, pleasure referred to a mistaken judgment about what’s truly good. Rather, joy is the recognition of the presence of virtue, the only true good. And since goodness is a divine attribute, joy is the acknowledgement of being in the presence of God. As St. Severinus Boethius put it, “God is absolute happiness.”

Thanksgiving, then, is the moral response to true joy. We thank God not for fleeting things in themselves but only to the extent that they are used for virtue, strengthening munion with one another and most of all with God.

Fittingly, as thanksgiving is the proper response to God’s joyful presence, the central sacrament of Christian worship has always been called the Eucharist, literally “thanksgiving.” Each liturgy has been teaching us Abba Isaac’s lesson for the past 2,000 years.

As a corollary, then, true gratitude cannot exist without virtue. Thus, if we find ourselves mired in the sins of this Thanksgiving season, we ought to take some time for supplications—prayers of repentance—so we might be reconciled to one another, and most of all to God, opening ourselves once again to that eternal joy that is the source of all that rightly deserves the name “thanksgiving.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Acton Commentary: Choosing a Prosperous Future
“Focusing on education is not a distraction from the pressing business of economic recovery,” Kevin Schmiesing writes. “It is vital to ensuring it.” This focus should advance school choice and a reduction of administrative red tape. Read mentary at the Acton website, and share ments below. ...
PBR: A Genuine Challenge to Religious Liberty
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” Jordan Ballor kindly asked me to offer a few words in response to this question, as I made it an area of expertise during the previous Administration. I’ve been working up to writing something more formal, but I’ll begin by thinking aloud here, as well as at my my home blog. Without further ado, here’s what I posted over there: By now, you’ve probably heard about the...
Kaarlgard Declares ‘Failure of Morality, Not Capitalism’
In a Forbes blog post titled “Failure of Morality, Not Capitalism,” Rich Kaarlgard counters the critics of supply-side capitalism by pointing to an absence of morality. Kaarlgard declares: Many people do blame capitalism for bringing us to this low moment in the economy. Do they have a point? They do if capitalism, as they define it, is devoid of any underlying morality. True enough, it is hard to see any underlying morality when one surveys the present carnage caused by...
PBR: Public Good and the Faith-Based Initiative
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” I have little confidence in the future of the faith-based initiative because conservatives who gain office are unwilling to take any fire at all in order to advance the cause beyond concept. At the same time, liberals will be unable to make productive use of the idea because of giant fissures regarding public religion in their movement. In theory, President Obama would make an ideal person to...
Dr. Andrew Abela Receives 2009 Novak Award
Maltese-American marketing professor, Dr. Andrew Abela, is the winner of the Acton Institute’s 2009 Novak Award. Dr. Abela’s main research areas include consumerism, marketing ethics, Catholic Social Teaching, and internal munication. Believing that anti-free market perspectives seem to dominate discussion about the social impact of business, Dr. Abela is working to explore Christian ethics further to show how these issues can be resolved more humanely and effectively through market-oriented approaches. To aid this work, Dr. Abela is currently preparing a...
PBR: Monsma and Carlton-Thies Speak Out
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” As part of Christianity Today’s Speaking Out (web-only) feature, Stephen V. Monsma and Stanley Carlson-Thies, of Calvin College’s Henry Institute and the Center for Public Justice respectively, address the future of the faith-based initiative under President Obama. Monsma and Carlton-Thies outline five “encouraging signs” and one “major concern.” The encouraging signs include the naming of the office executive director (Joshua DuBois) and advisory council (including “recognized evangelicals”...
Acton Commentary: Race Alarmists Hijack Black History Month
Ignore those racial disparity studies that point to the “resegregation” of America’s educational system. They advance the lie that minorities cannot survive without whites. “What is best for e black and Latino students is what is best for all students: stable and supportive families, parental options, and high achieving schools with stellar teachers,” Bradley writes. Read mentary at the Acton website, and then discuss it here. ...
PBR: On Faith
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” Perhaps taking a cue from this week’s PBR question (or perhaps not), the On Faith roster of bloggers have been asked to weigh in on the following question this week: “Should the Obama Administration let faith-based programs that receive government grants discriminate against those they hire or serve?” Notable responses include those from Chuck Colson, Al Mohler, and Susan Brooks Thistlewaite, the latter of whom has these...
Debunking the New Deal
It’s long been my contention that the mythology surrounding the New Deal in large swaths of the popular imagination plays an ongoing, important, and harmful role in politics and policy debate. For that reason, I e periodic attempts to debunk the myth. Jonah Goldberg offers a perceptive and enlightening perspective on New Deal historiography and its current uses and abuses. Unlike Daniel Gross (cited by Goldberg), I don’t care whether the analyst is an historian, economist, policy wonk, or journalist,...
America’s Secular Challenge
I’ve been reading America’s Secular Challenge by NYU professor and president of the Hudson Institute Herb London. The book is essentially an extended essay about how elite, left-wing secularism undercuts America’s traditional strengths of patriotism and religious faith during a time when the nation can ill afford it. The assault on public religion and love of es in a period when America faces enemies who have no such crisis of identity and lack the degree of doubt that leaves us...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved