Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Tenderness: a spiritual ‘currency’?
Tenderness: a spiritual ‘currency’?
Feb 18, 2026 12:49 PM

Pope Francis intelligently realizes that Christ, our model for winning the hearts and good will of others, was a tender listener who carefully and constantly invested his gentle concern and advice in others. The return on such investment paid off as the poor and suffering sinners who listened to him – and still do through his vicars on earth – were converted by the tender Lamb of God.

Read More…

On March 18, in a meeting with representatives from the Camillan Charismatic Family of healthcare operators, Pope Francis said that Christianity simply “does not work” without practicing tenderness. He said tenderness is a virtue so little exercised in our charitable “encounters” with the sick, poor and suffering that it “risks being dropped from the dictionary” of our everyday language.

“We must take it up again and put it into practice anew. Christianity without tenderness does not work,” the pope said. “Tenderness is a properly Christian attitude: it is also the very marrow of our encounter with people who suffer,” the pope said.

To be tender (from the Latin “tener” and old French “tendre”) means reaching out, listening and eventually helping others “in gentle, soft way”. Hence, virtuous persons who excel in tenderness develop a “soft touch” for those who are suffering. They naturally, then, passion while delicately addressing problems of the suffering.

In English, we also use the word “tender”, perhaps bizarrely so, in connection with financial and business transactions, as in “to tender bids” for projects and “legal tender” to spend on cash acquisitions.

Is there a way in which the spirit, human virtue and business dealings unite in a unique semantical use of the word “tender”?

Reading some of the more quirky moral-spiritual literature this Lent, I came across analogous expressions of dealing with persons’ dignity in terms of a making a carefully considered “investment” in them. This is to say, in dealing with and eventually helping uplift our neighbors’ lives out of injustice, our moral courage to persevere with and listen to the afflicted as well as to give gentle advice “pays dividends”. What’s more, this charitable interaction es a form of “currency”. It affords others who receive just spiritual payment and healing to “pay back” or “pay forward” the tender generosity received empathetically to others who suffer. The so-called “spiritual currency” might even be paid back to the person who originally gave his tender support when it is his time to be the sufferer.

Indeed, though it may seem vulgar to connect transactional and investment terminology to true acts of self-less charity – a theological virtue that requires God’s abundant grace – I am ever the more convinced that there is real value in relating the economic and virtue/spiritual meanings.

For example, if we treat others we help as mere objects of our sympathy, then strictly speaking no charitable interaction occurs between the benefactor and the recipient. It may do good to the other, but it is not the self-less love that is charity. However, if we treat the needy and suffering in a service-orientated capacity – which we find so prevalent in market exchange economies – and in the way morally scrupulous business persons carefully invest their legal tender in worthy protagonists of their cooperative venture, then this economic meaning is much closer to the affective solidarity and tenderness that Pope Francis says is so vital to a loving Christian life.

In the latter example, the poor and suffering are raised to dignified levels of respectful partnership and are truly served by persons who are genuinely concerned about their well-being and improvement. In the former case, the poor are merely used to make ourselves feel good, with our sentiments being gratified in and of themselves.

Pope Francis intelligently realizes Christ is our model for winning the hearts and good will of others, since he is a most tender listener who carefully invests his soft touch in others. The return on the spiritual investment paid off manifold: poor and suffering sinners to whom he listened were eventually converted and became loyal followers of the tender Lamb of God. 2000 years on, Christian believers from all over the world are still paying this “spiritual currency” forward while evangelizing God’s love and winning hearts for Him.

Photo credit (courtesy of Paul Haring/CNS)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Advanced Studies in Freedom Tuesday Edition
BRYN MAWR, July 11, 2006 – One school of libertarian political thought is that of the so-called anarcho-capitalists. Here’s a good summary: “Anarcho-capitalists reject the state as an unjustified monopolist and systematic aggressor against sovereign individuals, and would replace it with cooperatives, neighborhood associations, private businesses and similar non-monopolistic organizations.” I think this view is patible with biblical Christianity. Perhaps you think that this conclusion is rather uncontroversial and obvious. Even so, Christians who are broadly in favor of limited...
Protestants and Natural Law, Part 4
In Part 3, we examined why many contemporary Protestants have something of a bad conscience when es to natural law. But, of course, the blame for this cannot be laid fully upon Karl Barth. Even a hint of a fuller explanation has to address intellectual currents that begin to gather momentum in the so-called Enlightenment. One popular explanation within the academic mainstream for the demise of the natural-law tradition in modern Protestant theology attributes it to a form of implosion....
Advanced Studies in Freedom Monday Edition
BRYN MAWR, July 10, 2006 – Things are progressing smoothly for me here at the Advanced Studies in Freedom seminar. Our daily schedule includes four major lectures from seminar faculty, each with built in small group discussion time as well as Q&As with the presenting faculty. One of our first activities was to try and self-identify in terms of our view of the role of government (if any). I identified with the endorsement of a limited government, whose main role...
Advanced Studies in Freedom Wednesday Edition
BRYN MAWR, July 12, 2006 – Yesterday I outlined in brief a biblical case for the legitimate and even divine institution of civil government. Having established that the State is a valid social institution, the next step in what is broadly called social ethics is to outline the scope of the State’s authority and its relations to other social institutions. A valuable place to start might be in defining what the role of the State ought to be, rather than...
Buffett, Gates, and Stewardship
It is one thing to create wealth by using our gifts. This is a matter of knowledge. It is quite a different thing to know what to do with the wealth that has been created. That is where es into the picture. Rev. Zandstra, a Senior Fellow with the Acton Institute, examines Warren Buffett’s recent gift of $31 billion to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and offers words of hope that the Gates Foundation can use this wealth with...
Protestants and Natural Law, Part 3
In Part 2, we saw that modern Protestant skepticism toward reason is one of the most significant factors in the rejection of natural law. mand ethics, particularly of the variety espoused by Karl Barth, quickly came to dominate the field of Protestant theological ethics in the middle decades of the twentieth century. Karl Barth rejected every form of natural theology and, simultaneously, pulled the rug out from under natural law. But among neoorthodox theologians of the 1930s, only Barth and...
Advanced Studies in Freedom Wrap-up Edition
BRYN MAWR, July 13, 2006 – Over the course of the week I have offered my reflections that have arisen within the context of the Advanced Studies in Freedom seminar offered by the Institute for Humane Studies (previous editons: Weekend, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday). The presentations by the faculty have been in great part engaging, intellectually rigorous, and valuable. I’ll conclude with an observation about the necessity for any intellectual endeavor to pursue scholarship in a rigorous and serious way. This...
Cyber Communication
Ever since the popularization of the Internet, a debate has raged—within and without Christian circles—about the effect of the medium on human development and relationships. A serious and plausible charge against the Web came from those who thought its mode of munication would alter the form of human interaction for the worse. (See, for example, Quentin Schultze’s Habits of the High-Tech Heart, reviewed in the Journal of Markets & Morality by Megan Maloney.) As is usually the case with new...
Nipsey Russell on Social Security
Nipsey Russell (1918-2005) I was flipping stations tonight and passed the Game Show Network, which was showing reruns of Match Game ’74. Nipsey Russell, the so-called “Poet Laureate of Television,” began the show with this poem for prosperity: To slow down this recession, and make this economy thrive, give us our social security now, we’ll go to work when we’re sixty-five. ...
Charity vs. Philanthropy
Philanthropy, for all its good intentions, does not necessarily imply a personal connection with the needy person. It can and often does, but it doesn’t have to. Philanthropy is the more institutional, “big-picture” cousin of charity, which is the personal and direct connection to those in need. Andrew Carnegie building hundreds of libraries with the wealth he made in the steel industry, and being celebrated for it to this day, is philanthropy. Your Aunt Evelyn volunteering at the local church-operated...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved