Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Teaching Kids About Work in a Prosperous Age
Teaching Kids About Work in a Prosperous Age
May 1, 2026 5:48 PM

Last Saturday was hot and humid in our corner of the world, and thus, my wife and I quickly decreed a pool day on the front lawn. The kids were ecstatic, particularly our four-year-old boy, who watched and waited anxiously as I got things prepared.

All was eventually set — pool inflated, water filled, toys deployed — but before he could play, I told him he needed to help our neighbor pick up the fallen apples strewn across his lawn.

With energy and anticipation, he ran to grab his “favorite bucket,” and the work menced. Less than three minutes later, however, his patience wore off.

“This is boring, Daddy,” plained. “Can I be done now?”

More than anything else, the response ical. Within mere minutes, this simple, ten-minute task had e a heavy burden he simply could not bear.

But it also signaled something profound about our basic attitudes about work, and how early they begin to form.Our kids are only beginning to edge upon the golden ages of chorehood, but as these situations continue to arise, I’ve e increasingly aware of a peculiar set of challenges faced by parents raising children in a prosperous age.

In a society wherein hard and rough work, or any work for that matter, has e less and less necessary, particularly among youngsters, how might its relative absence alter the long-term character of a nation? What is the role of work and toil in the development and formation of our children, and what might we miss if we fail to embrace, promote, and contextualize it accordingly? In a culture such as ours, increasingly propelled by hedonism, materialism, and a blind allegiance to efficiency and convenience, what risks do we face by ignoring, avoiding, or subverting the “boring” and the “mundane” acrossall areas of life, and particularly as it relates to work?

Alas, for the bulk of human history and in many parts of the modern world, parents have been largely exempt from these questions. Children toiled as soon as they could for as long as they could, whether in home, field, or factory, leaving little time for much else. Such constraints meant missing out on a host of valuable experiences, but up until recently, those fundamental lessons about work, service, and duty were built-in features of human existence.

In the years since, and particularly for those of us in the industrialized West, we’ve been blessed with many a frill and fancy as it relates to child-rearing (front-yard pool parties not excluded). But as time, leisure, and wealth continue to increase, we ought not fall prey to similarly lopsided approaches that value hard play or even hard study to the detriment of good old-fashioned physical labor.Now more than ever before, teaching these matters demands heightened levels of attention, intentionality, discipline, and practice, and I fear that many parents, myself included, aren’t thinking about it nearly as much as they should.

We do, of course, routinely hear about work’s many benefits for adults: how providing for oneself and achieving earned success can yield personal happiness and fulfillment, how delivering needed services can bring meaning and dignity to one’s life, as well as the lives of others (and so on). Indeed, before and beyond mere material gain, there is something profound and life-altering in the ways we occupy and employ our God-given gifts and talents in the mundane, day-to-day bustle of life. When we render ourselves useful to the family of humanity, our very souls and spirits are shaped.

Why, then, in those earliest and most formative moments of a child’s life, would we not seek to elevate the value work earlier and more effectively? We see parent upon parent obsessing over their children’s athletic abilities or musical proficiency, or spelling knowledge, but less and less do we find the time or place to simply give our kids a shovel and say “dig.” If mundane work provides such a powerful form of meaning and purpose for an adult, how much more of an impact and foundation might it provide for a child whose character, imagination, and very soul is crying out for cultivation?

As a parent just beginning to ask these questions, I don’t have many “solutions” and am eager to learn from you. But having encountered my own small sample of situations, I can imagine more than a few possibilities.

For example, what if we were to rethink our approach to “allowances,” or paid labor in the household in general? If work is often a thankless task with little guaranteed reward, and further, if the most important reward of our work stretches beyondmaterial gain, we should probably avoid assigning a dollar amount to every single household chore. Work is in and of itselfdignifying,meaningful, and God-glorifying, and thus, we do our children no favors by pretending the flavor of its fruit is green and green alone.

Or take our schools and educational systems, in which we have grown to prize and prioritize “intellectual” work to the detriment of practical knowledge and physical labor. What are some ways we might we impact our educational institutions in this regard? If we have resources and options available, what educational alternatives might we consider for our children? If we are limited in such resources or opportunities, how might pensate for such skewed emphases in the areas we can control?

Finally, consider our approach to policy. While we should celebrate the drastic declines in child labor and the working conditions many Americans were once subjected to, we have e so risk-averse, insulated, and privileged in our mindset that it’s e difficult for even a 15-year-old to find a legitimate paying job. In my home state of Minnesota, a local labor union has decided to take up the task of watch-dogging and ridiculinga pany for (potentially) hiring young teenagers. As parents, the policy world surely sees hard to change or control, but there are a host of misaligned incentives, legal restrictions, wage fixings, and regulations that lead our children to work less and work later.

We could dive into any number of other areas and avenues, and each situation will certainly vary. But while we should be careful, prudent, and prayerful as we disciple and shepherd our children in ways that cultivates their character, this does not mean running blindly from the world of work, or the boredom, sweat, and pain that it will demand.

Thus, amid the numerous other activities and opportunities we’ve been blessed to pursue —sports, music lessons, language camps, etc. —and in active response to the confines of the modern educational system and the consumeristic allure of peting forces, how might we teach our children the glories of labor and service in new and profound ways?

The answers will be varied plex, but as I’m beginning to learn, “This is boring, Daddy,” isn’t a bad place to start.

[product sku=”1192″]

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
‘For Love of Neighbor’: the documentary that explores authentic Christian political witness
In the heat of each political season, we are bombarded by arguments about which candidate is the moral choice and which political platform is patible with Christian values and beliefs. Such arguments typically place a heavy emphasis on specific issues and policies – and rightly so. But throughout our debates about short-term goals and final es, we should also consider the more foundational aspects of such actions. As Christians, our political responsibility involves more than filling circles on ballots or...
Race and covenant: recovering the religious roots of American reconciliation
In January 1862, Frederick Douglass, a former slave who became America’s greatest sociopolitical prophet of the nineteenth century, declared that America was facing Armageddon. “The fate of the greatest of all Modern Republics trembles in the balance.” God was in control of the nations, and America was particularly a subject of His providence. “We are taught as with the emphasis of an earthquake,” Douglass told his listeners at Philadelphia’s National Hall, “that nations, not less than individuals, are subjects of...
Kamala Harris’ ‘Equality vs. Equity’ video endorses injustice and discrimination
With 48 hours to go before the 2020 election, the Biden campaign unveiled a rare, cogent glimpse into its philosophy and plans should it prevail. Naturally, it did e from Joe Biden but from an animated video narrated by Kamala Harris titled “Equality vs. Equity.” The ticket made the unusual decision to close its campaign by taking a firm stance against equality. On Sunday, Harris tweeted out a video showing a white mountain climber beginning well above a black mountain...
DOJ: Government grants induced Christians to commit fraud
Even the federal government now admits that its federal financial aid policy is so immoral it can turn theology students into criminals. The Justice Department accuses a Christian theological institute of creating phantom students in order to cash in on federal college funding. According to prosecutors, the North Carolina-based Apex School of Theology set up a satellite in Georgia to serve students in Georgia, Alabama, and Florida. There’s just one problem: There were no students. The DOJ says that Apex’s...
After her ‘Vanity Fair’ shoot, AOC must hear this speech from Fr. Robert Sirico
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has touched off fresh controversy in a Vanity Fair cover story. Although she called the president of the United States a “motherf—er” and expresses her interest in seeking a “higher position” in politics, what caught the public imagination is its panying photo shoot in which the democratic socialist’s apparel in no way resembled the clothing of the proletariat. AOC wore clothing designed byAliette, Carolina Herrera, Wales Bonner, Christian Louboutin, and a $2,850 dress from Loewe, which the magazine...
Peaceful transfer of power is more important than Biden or Trump
Whether rooting for Joe Biden or Donald Trump, all Americans should hope for a peaceful transfer of power on January 20. While the U.S. has historically enjoyed peaceful transfers, many pundits have predicted scenarios of uncertainty after the election. A peaceful e is endangered by forces both on the Right and the Left. For one half of the nation, a Biden win would spell disaster, while for the other half, a Trump win would initiate the five stages of grief....
The browning of the Golden State
Native Californians used to tell ers to the state a little joke: “Of course, California has four seasons: earthquake, brushfire, mudslide, and drought.” Alas, that dark humor is too accurate to be funny anymore. Progressive environmental policies have so deleteriously impacted the state’s ability to manage its infrastructure and husband its bounteous resources that the Golden State is withering brown. California was once our richest and most beautiful state. It became the nation’s most populous, because it was a land...
A British view of the 2020 presidential election
When es to elections, my preference is for an “ideas person” – someone who can articulate a vision for political and economic liberty, a constitutionalist, someone with a moral outlook informed by faith and advocacy for small government. I am usually disappointed. Ideas people are rarely elected – in the UK, the last such example was Margaret Thatcher, the prime minister from 1979-1990. She understood that, in the same way that a household must balance its budget, so too must...
How Amy Coney Barrett could save America
Although Amy Coney Barrett has only been a Supreme Court justice for a matter of days, she has the potential to act as the harbinger of a renewed America. She is not only potentially a new role model for working women, but she may also serve as the apostle who introduces Americans to a refreshingly positive view of their own Constitution. In the process, she may reverse the nation’s headlong rush to embrace socialism. With her unassailable credentials, personal popularity,...
Do economists agree?
Listen to politicians or cable news, and you will get the impression that economics is merely a thin veil for partisanship, the greatest mercenary discipline for justifying any policy. You can seemingly find at least one economist to agree with you; liberal economists favor liberal policies, while conservative economists favor conservative policies. While there are certainly some economists who make their discipline mercenary to politics, there is a surprising amount of agreement within the discipline. Jay Richards makes the case...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved