Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY
/
Sweden’s coronavirus response defies— and promotes—big government
Sweden’s coronavirus response defies— and promotes—big government
Apr 4, 2025 5:17 PM

Thanks to its unique response to the coronavirus, Sweden is once again being discussed as an international oddity. Sweden seemingly relishes its status as a global anomaly: It is the world’s most secular-individualistic nation but has a strong apparatus of state control. For most of its history, it has been ruled by the Social Democratic Party. Today, Sweden is praised or disparaged, because it is one of few nations in the Western world that has not enforced a national lockdown in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

To be sure, Swedish universities, high schools, and churches responded by meeting online. But kindergartens pulsory schools have carried on as usual. As of this writing, only five restaurants in the nation have been shut down by the authorities for being too crowded. (Two of them were allowed to reopen again within less than 48 hours.) In general, the Swedish Social Democrat-led government has more or less followed the motto: “Stay at home or stay apart. But if you don’t follow this rule, we won’t punish you.”

It is too early to state conclusively whether Sweden’s relaxed attitude towards the pandemic has been successful. Some nations with stricter lockdowns have higher death tolls, while others have a lower number of deaths by infection. It must be noted, however, that at this time parisons between Sweden and other coronavirus-stricken nations or regions show that Sweden has a distinctly smaller increase in the number of deaths. Therefore, it is not evident that this state-sanctioned openness has had worse effects than the strict lockdowns enjoined elsewhere.

How did this laissez-faire model emerge in one of the West’s most pronounced social assistance states? The peculiar Swedish model of a strong welfare bined with broad and robust individual autonomy may at first glance appear contradictory. But actually, the Swedish coronavirus strategy constitutes a practical example of what could be called Swedish “state individualism.”

Several causes lie behind this particular model of national organization, but it is largely the product of political decisions. Sweden is characterized by the uniquely long hegemony of a single political party. The Social Democrats ruled the nation from 1932 to 1976 and for many years since then. During their tenure, the power of the church, family, and civil society was gradually weakened. Civil society and apolitical connections steadily eroded. All rivals that pete with the political order’s claim on the citizen fell by the wayside.

The Social Democratic vision of government connected an isolated individual to a strong, collectivist state. After Sweden’s unique archetype, which accords the highest place to the isolated individual, permeated so many branches of society for so many decades, it became difficult to change perspective even during a crisis. The Social Democratic/Green coalition government’s path of permitting greater personal choice when es to social distancing and virus-reducing behaviour grows out of this history.

Swedish state individualism does, however, accord strong powers to governmental decrees. This is why Anders Tegnell, a state epidemiologist at the Public Health Agency, has seemingly replaced Prime Minister Stefan Löfven as leader of the nation during this outbreak. When Tegnell speaks, both government officials and private citizens obey. This may sound contradictory, but it follows the state-individualistic principle. The Swedish people are ready to follow almost any rule proclaimed from above—as long as it maintains the independence of the detached individual as a basic virtue.

The future of this relationship between the individual and the state will largely rest on the social consequences it produces as a result of this health crisis. Sweden could join in the backlash against postwar individualism which has swept parts of the plete with the rise of authoritarian leaders. However, such a development remains remote in Sweden. Here, the critical attitude against different forms of authority has permeated Swedish society for so long, and coercive measures are considered so foreign, that they will not be embraced even to stop the spread of the coronavirus.

Still, Swedes’ frustration over the practical consequences of their nation’s secular-individualistic dynamic has grown in recent years. It remains unclear whether the coronavirus outbreak will provide new impetus for “state individualism” or whether it will strengthen these concerns, awakening a thirst for another way of life. There are signs that people are beginning to resist Sweden’s peculiar, purely autonomous pattern and seek new ways to forge relationships within munities during this time of isolation. They long to end their loneliness by building up Burke’s “little platoons,” although they would never use that phrase.

In the long run, the COVID-19 crisis will be the pivotal factor in evaluating Sweden’s ingrained perspective of the isolated individual dominated by a paternalistic, secular government. Will the global pandemic create new criticisms of the ideological and practical materialism pervading Western culture? Will the populace find state-dominated, autonomous individualism less appealing? Will the need to cooperate within families and civil society open up space for the spiritual values embedded within munity-based way of life distinct from the state? These relationships could allow subsidiarity to replace the anachronism of Europe’s most atomized, government-dominated society.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY
Double-edged sword: The power of the Word - Romans 8:38-39
Romans 8:38-39 For I am persuaded that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord. One of the great truths and victories of Christianity is that it removes for all time the divine-human alienation. In many religions it’s the people who make...
Why did the Acton Institute produce "The Birth Of Freedom?"
We produced “The Birth of Freedom” to keep alive the knowledge of the role religion has played historically in the “birth,” growth and securing of freedom. While this historic reality would have been at one time monly held understanding, today it is not. We want to suggest something else through this film, namely that freedom cannot long prosper outside of morality—that not only did the Judeo-Christian tradition bring liberty to fruition, it must remain vibrant to sustain it. This...
The scandal of evangelical politics
In The Scandal of Evangelical Politics, Ronald J. Sider attempts to construct a methodology for evangelical Christians to participate faithfully in the political process. His construct is a backlash—to a degree—of the political monopolization of the religious right and its influence in politics. The book is a response to past evangelical involvement, which Sider sees as largely being a failure and highly contradictory. And while his methodology does not necessarily contradict any political goals of Christian conservatives, and is...
Eliot, Kirk and the moral imagination
The following is adapted from a speech on the occasion of the republication of Russell Kirk's Eliot and His Age, given to the Intercollegiate Studies Institute student group at Central Michigan University in September 2008. What makes T. S. Eliot and Russell Kirk so important that we should be here tonight to discuss them? Well, for one, both fathered ages--the twentieth century was, according to Kirk, The Age of Eliot and Kirk himself inaugurated the contem- porary Conservative Age...
Deeds not words: The good works reader
In a time of blockbuster television specials about the discovery of “lost” gospels, Jesus seminars, and a steady stream of theological fads designed to make celebrities out of seminary professors, the thought piling a collection of patristic writings on the practice of good works seems slightly out of the mainstream, if not countercultural. But that is exactly what Thomas C. Oden has done with The Good Works Reader, a book that succeeds as an introduction, a guide, and a...
Ethics and the job market
The job market e under pressure of late as the economic shake-up continues. We are reminded that the world of the past, in which workers held one job their entire lives and slowly ascended the corporate ladder until retiring plete security, no longer exists. This is probably a good thing to the extent that it represents a new economic vibrancy. In the world of economics, another name plete security is economic stagnation. Still, changing jobs can introduce great challenges...
Editor's note
This issue of Religion & Liberty offers perhaps a more international perspective than past issues, and that is beneficial since we live in a very globalized society today. We are fortunate to offer an interview with Mustafa Akyol, who spoke at last summer's Acton University. Akyol, a critic of Islamic extremism and Turkish secularism, is also a defender of free markets and the positive role Islam can play in a democratic society with a greater interest in economic freedom....
The Pope on "Love in Truth"
In his much anticipated third encyclical, Caritas in Veritate (Love in Truth), Pope Benedict XVI does not focus on specific systems of economics—he is not attempting to shore up anyone’s political agenda. He is rather concerned with morality and the theological foundation of culture. The context is, of course, a global economic crisis—a crisis that’s taken place in a moral vacuum, where the love of truth has been abandoned in favor of a crude materialism. The pope urges that...
Why did The Acton Institute develop the 'Effective Stewardship Curriculum'?
One of the best ways to reach people of faith is in their places of worship and munities. Church and lay leaders of many different Christian traditions are often looking for quality and affordable curriculum materials that can equip their own members to act and think biblically about important social issues such as care of creation, poverty relief, financial stewardship, and giving. Acton’s purpose in developing the Effective Stewardship Curriculum and NIV Stewardship Bible was to take the best...
William F. Buckley
“The best defense against surpatory government is an assertive citizenry.” William F. Buckley, Jr., grew up in an era that was embracing the ascendancy of government expansion under President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal. Buckley’s heroic battle against modern liberalism was so pronounced and effective because of the seriousness of his ideas and the intellectual weight they carried. His 1951 book God and Man at Yale: The Superstitions of Academic Freedom, which highlighted the efforts of professors to indoctrinate...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved