Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Survey Finds We’d Rather be Governed by ‘Ordinary Americans’ Than by Our Elected Officials
Survey Finds We’d Rather be Governed by ‘Ordinary Americans’ Than by Our Elected Officials
Mar 7, 2026 6:26 PM

“I am obliged to confess,” wrote William F. Buckley, Jr. in 1963, “that I should sooner live in a society governed by the first two thousand names in the Boston telephone directory than in a society governed by the two thousand people on the faculty of Harvard University.”

A similar sentiment seems to now be shared by a majority of the American people. A recent survey by Pew Research finds that 55 percent of the public believes “ordinary Americans” would do a better job of solving national problems than would our elected leaders. An even greater percentage (57 percent) say they are frustrated with the federal government, while fewer than 1 in 5 (18 percent) say they are basically content.

Despite this frustration, half or more say the federal government is doing a “very good” or “somewhat good” job in10 of the 13 governmental functionstested in the survey. The areas where the federal government receives the lowest remarks are in managing the nation’s immigration system and helping people get out of poverty. Nearly seven-in-ten (68 percent) say the government does a very or somewhat bad job in managing the immigration system and 61 percent say the government is doing a bad job helping people out of poverty.

The survey also finds that only about a third of Republicans and Republican leaners see a major role for the federal government in helping people get out of poverty (36 percent) and ensuring access to health care (34 percent) while fully 72 percent of Democrats and Democratic leaners say the government should have a major role in helping people out of poverty, and 83 percent say it should play a major role in ensuring access to health care.

Here are some other notable takeaways from the survey:

• The public’s trust in government remains at historic lows. Today, just 19 percent say they trust the federal government to do what is right always or most of the time, which is little changed from recent years.

• Only 29 percent say that “honest” describes elected officials very or fairly well, a much smaller share than those who describe the average American as honest (69 percent).

• The perception that elected officials don’t care about what people think is now held more widely than it has been in recent years. Today, 74 percent say pared with a narrower 55 percent majority who said the same in 2000.

• Majorities see the national news media (65 percent) and the entertainment industry (56 percent) as having a negative impact on the country. By contrast, overwhelming majorities see small businesses (82 percent) and panies (71 percent) as having a positive impact.

• Nearly seven-in-ten liberal Democrats (69 percent) say colleges and universities have a positive impact on the pared with just less than half (48 percent) of conservative Republicans. Conversely, fully three-quarters of conservative Republicans say that churches and religious organizations have a positive impact on the country, while just 41 percent of liberal Democrats agree.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Good intentions aren’t enough
Rev. Robert Sirico spoke with Frank Beckmann today on Detroit-based WJR about faith and politics, emphasizing the proper role of religion in society as providing a solid moral foundation with which to approach political, social, economic decisions. Sirico also talks with the emergence of what Pope Benedict XVI refers to as the dictatorship of relativism – an idea which views the expression of religion as an impedance on liberty – and suggests an understanding of the integration between faith and...
Academic editorializing
The Telegraph reports that there is growing dissent among the ranks of some scientists, whose dissenting viewpoint is unable to find a place in many major academic journals. According to the story, Two of the world’s leading scientific journals e under fire from researchers for refusing to publish papers which challenge fashionable wisdom over global warming. … The controversy follows the publication by Science in December of a paper which claimed to have plete agreement among climate experts, not only...
Game review: Food Force
The United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) has found a new way to get the word out about its efforts. Food Force is a free downloadable video game (for the PC and Mac) designed by the WFP, in which the users will “Play the game, learn about food aid, and help WFP work towards a world without hunger.” Within the context of the fictional nation of Sheylan, the player embarks on a series of missions intended to give users a...
The best kind of charity
A post by Leslie Sillars over at Signs of the Times takes ABC’s show, “Extreme Makeover: Home Edition,” to task. His difficulty, essentially, is this: is this charity in any reasonable sense of the word? It looks like the best kind of charity—unmerited favor for someone in need, out of the blue—yet, ABC makes buckets of money on the program, Sears and the other sponsors get loads of exposure, and Ty and the rest of them are portrayed as angels...
The moral imperative of our time?
In his “Bad Economics, Bad Public Policy and Bad Theology,” columnist Raymond Keating makes the case on OrthodoxyToday.org that the Religious Left offers “assorted biblical passages that speak of aiding the poor, the necessity for charity and justice, or other vague generalities, and then simply assert that these quotations support the particulars of their big government philosophy. Of course, this ranks as either ignorant or disingenuous from a theological standpoint.” Keating examines resurgent activism by liberal/leftist religious leaders on environmental...
Review Acton books
Interested in reading and reviewing various publications for your blog? Head on over to Mind & Media, a blog-based book reviewing service. The Acton Institute has placed three titles from the Lexington Books Studies in Ethics & Economics series, edited by Acton director of research Samuel Gregg. One of the books is Within the Market Strife: American Catholic Economic Thought from Rerum Novarum to Vatican II, by Acton research fellow Kevin Schmiesing. e a reviewer ...
‘Hokey Religions and Ancient Weapons’
This es from Han Solo, which pretty well sums up his critique of Jedi knights in the Star Wars saga, “Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side.” I also wonder whether it might be apt in describing the sometimes contemptuous relationship between scientific progress and religion (Christianity in particular), as the guiding pragmatic ethos of naturalism wars against orthodox Christian belief. Forbes has posted a slideshow giving reviews of the various technologies...
Big story on small loans
Today’s Christian Science Monitor has a story on the increasing use of micro-loans by Christian aid and development groups. According to the story, “Religious organizations are increasingly adopting the Talmudic sentiment that the noblest form of charity is helping others to dispense with it.” Ron Sider, in the twentieth anniversary edition of his book, Rich Christians in an Age of Hunger, strongly endorses the use of micro-loans as a means of getting desperately needed capital to those who need it...
It’s that time of year
Time for the annual spate of “gap between rich and poor increases” stories in the MSM. There are a number of problems with the judgmental assumptions implicit in these kinds of stories. For example, there is a zero-sum view of wealth that pits individuals against each other. It’s essentially the “pie” view of money and wealth: if I take a piece, there’s that much less available for others. This is the distributivist economic model. This is a fundamentally flawed economic...
E-Libraries
A story in the Sunday New York Times highlighted the move of the undergraduate library at the University of Texas at Austin to a predominantly electronic collection. mon reference materials like dictionaries will remain in hard copy, all other stacks of books “will be dispersed to other university collections to clear space for a 24-hour electronic mons, a fast-spreading phenomenon that is transforming research and study on campuses around the country.” This move should not be taken as indicative of...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved