Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Support for Government Redistribution Has Fallen (Except Among Liberals)
Support for Government Redistribution Has Fallen (Except Among Liberals)
Jan 29, 2026 2:58 AM

A new report from the liberal Brookings Institute finds that “despite the large increases in economic inequality since 1970”, American survey respondents exhibit no increase in support for redistribution. This holds true even for the two groups who have historically been most reliant on redistribution: the elderly and blackAmericans.

The report expresses surprise by the results, as does the Washington Post. As the Post‘sMax Ehrenfreund says,

Thepolling data challenges mon-sense ideathat voters support policies that are in their material interest, the authors write. Yet there don’t seem to be any good explanations for the trends, which are shown in the chart above.

It’s not that blacks or the elderly on the whole are ing wealthier and thus less dependent on government assistance. Black and elderly peoplewere just as likely to change their views on the question whether they were rich or poor. Nor are members of these groups ing more conservativeon other questions.

Notice the pattern of thought embedded in those two paragraphs:

1. It’s in the material interest of the elderly and African Americans to support wealth redistribution.

2. Redistribution of wealth has not madethe elderly and African Americans more wealthy.

Perhaps the elderly and African Americans have changed their opinion on redistribution because they recognize, as Ehrenfreund says, that increased redistribution doesn’t make them wealthier or less dependent on government.Ehrenfreund almost appears to recognize this, for in his conclusion he writes, “[T]he figures raise fortable questions for liberals. Their efforts to establish public support for generous redistributive policies are failing among the groups that have the most to gain from them.”

Here’s the thing: Liberals would still support “generous redistributive policies” even if the new policies didn’t make the poor better off materially. If you doubt that’s true, just ask them. When pressed, many will admit helping the poor is merely one reason among many to support redistribution (and not necessarily the primary justification). They are also concerned with “fairness” and it’s simply unfair, in their view, that some people have much more wealth than others (i.e., than they do). Much ofthe concern about “economic inequality” is about trying to make people less envious by making some people poorer.

The elderly and African Americans are beginning to recognize they are not necessarily “among the groups that have the most to gain” from redistribution, at least not from additional redistributivepolicies. The ones that truly have the most to gain are liberals who can’t stand the idea that some people have more than they do.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
This politician nails entrepreneurship and the importance of work
The news highlights from Theresa May’s speech this morning at the Conservative Party’s 2018 conference may be that she branded Labour the “Jeremy Corbyn Party” mitting her party to “ending austerity,” increasing spending on the NHS (which, she said, “embodies our principles as Conservatives more profoundly” than any other institution), and suspending the national gasoline tax for the ninth year – a move that saved British taxpayers £9 billion a year. But there’s a section noteworthy for its rarity in...
Russell Kirk: Where does virtue come from?
This is the first in a series celebrating the work of Russell Kirk in honor of his 100th birthday this October. Read more from the series here. How can human society form and raise up virtuous people? In the Summer/Fall 1982 issue of Modern Age, Russell Kirk explored this perennial question in an essay titled, “Virtue: Can It Be Taught?” Kirk defined virtues as “the qualities of full humanity: strength, courage, capacity, worth, manliness, moral excellence,” particularly qualities of “moral...
8 quotations from Walter Laqueur on Europe’s future, statism, and the allure of evil
One of the preeminent international analysts and students of the transatlantic area, Walter Ze’ev Laqueur, died Sunday at the age of 97. Born on May 26, 1921, in what was then Breslau, Germany (and now Wrocław, Poland), he fled his homeland days before Kristallnacht; his family would die in the Holocaust. He moved to an Israeli kibbutz, to London, and eventually to the United States – moving as seamlessly from journalism, to foreign affairs, to academia. He spoke a half-dozen...
Explainer: What you should know about the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA)
What just happened? Shortly before midnight on September 30, the United States and Canada agreed to a deal to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement(NAFTA). The new trilateral trade agreement is called the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). When does it take effect? Before it can take effect, leaders from each of the three countries must sign it and get it approved by their nation’s legislatures. Because this process is expected to take several months, the main provisions of USMCA...
Walmart removes hammer-and-sickle merchandise
After backlash from across the globe, Walmart has stopped selling items bearing the hammer-and-sickle insignia of the Soviet Union. This followed strongly worded letters from Baltic leaders and a U.S. educational effort largely spearheaded by Mari-Ann Kelam through the Acton Institute. The controversy burst into public consciousness when Kelam wrote an Acton Commentary titled, “Walmart’s T-shirt homage to mass murder,” published on September 5. A number of news outlets picked up the story, both in print and on radio. Lithuania’s...
Jesus would vote for socialism: German socialist party
Marxism taught that religion is the opiate of the people and tried to indoctrinate children in atheism from their earliest days. Yet a socialist party in Germany has erected a billboard stating, “Jesus would have voted for us.” The fifth-place party in the German Bundestag, Die Linke (“The Left”), “is the direct successor of the Socialist Unity Party of Germany (SED) which held East Germany in an iron grip for many decades,” writes Kai Weiss of the Austrian Economics Center....
C.S. Lewis on the necessity of chivalry
There are few concepts today more dismissed—and yet more necessary—than chivalry. During the Middle Ages chivalry was a moral system bined a warrior ethos, knightly piety, and courtly manners. As C.S. Lewis writes in “The Necessity of Chivalry“—my favorite essay of his—the medieval ideal brought together fierceness and meekness, “two things which have no natural tendency to gravitate towards one another.” “It brought them together for that very reason,” says Lewis. “It taught humility and forbearance to the great warrior...
The failure of ‘good intentions’ in America’s entitlement state
Amid the flurry of anti-poverty activism gone wrong, we are routinely reminded thatgood intentions aren’t enough. Although the motives of our hearts often serve as fuel for positive transformation, our corresponding efforts also require reason, wisdom, discernment, and a healthy recognition of real-world ripple effects and constraints. In public policy, we see an unfortunate mix of good intentions and unintended harm across a range of issues, from disaster relief to foreign aid to healthcare policy and beyond. At present, however,...
Why you should diversify your investments
Note: This is post #95 in a weekly video series on basic economics. Before it went bankrupt in 2001, many of Enron’s employees had most or all of their retirement funds pany stock. When pany collapsed, as Alex Tabarrok notes, employees who were once multimillionaires ended up with almost nothing. They failed to heed the most basic rule of investing:Don’t put all your eggs in one basket. In this video by Marginal Revolution University, Tabarrok explains why diversification is essential...
Amazon paying higher wages is smart—forcing everyone to do so is dumb
Amazon recently announced pany will pay all of its U.S. employees a minimum of $15 an hour—more than double the federal minimum wage of $7.25. “We listened to our critics, thought hard about what we wanted to do, and decided we want to lead,” said Amazon’s founder and CEO Jeff Bezos. “We’re excited about this change and encourage petitors and other large employers to join us.” The decision is a smart move for Amazon. Unfortunately, the pany wants to force...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved