Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Support for Government Redistribution Has Fallen (Except Among Liberals)
Support for Government Redistribution Has Fallen (Except Among Liberals)
Jan 30, 2026 7:45 PM

A new report from the liberal Brookings Institute finds that “despite the large increases in economic inequality since 1970”, American survey respondents exhibit no increase in support for redistribution. This holds true even for the two groups who have historically been most reliant on redistribution: the elderly and blackAmericans.

The report expresses surprise by the results, as does the Washington Post. As the Post‘sMax Ehrenfreund says,

Thepolling data challenges mon-sense ideathat voters support policies that are in their material interest, the authors write. Yet there don’t seem to be any good explanations for the trends, which are shown in the chart above.

It’s not that blacks or the elderly on the whole are ing wealthier and thus less dependent on government assistance. Black and elderly peoplewere just as likely to change their views on the question whether they were rich or poor. Nor are members of these groups ing more conservativeon other questions.

Notice the pattern of thought embedded in those two paragraphs:

1. It’s in the material interest of the elderly and African Americans to support wealth redistribution.

2. Redistribution of wealth has not madethe elderly and African Americans more wealthy.

Perhaps the elderly and African Americans have changed their opinion on redistribution because they recognize, as Ehrenfreund says, that increased redistribution doesn’t make them wealthier or less dependent on government.Ehrenfreund almost appears to recognize this, for in his conclusion he writes, “[T]he figures raise fortable questions for liberals. Their efforts to establish public support for generous redistributive policies are failing among the groups that have the most to gain from them.”

Here’s the thing: Liberals would still support “generous redistributive policies” even if the new policies didn’t make the poor better off materially. If you doubt that’s true, just ask them. When pressed, many will admit helping the poor is merely one reason among many to support redistribution (and not necessarily the primary justification). They are also concerned with “fairness” and it’s simply unfair, in their view, that some people have much more wealth than others (i.e., than they do). Much ofthe concern about “economic inequality” is about trying to make people less envious by making some people poorer.

The elderly and African Americans are beginning to recognize they are not necessarily “among the groups that have the most to gain” from redistribution, at least not from additional redistributivepolicies. The ones that truly have the most to gain are liberals who can’t stand the idea that some people have more than they do.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Who is Theresa May?
A true feminist, a devout Christian, and a leader mon sense will soon move into 10 Downing Street. As excitement—and dismay—surrounded Britain’s decision to leave the European Union, Remainer and (former) prime minister, David Cameron announced his resignation from British parliament’s highest position. Today he officially leaves office, allowing Theresa May to e the next British Prime Minister. Originally, Cameron planned to wait until October to pass the torch to the next leader, but on Monday he stated that, “we...
What Christians Should Know About Consumption Smoothing
Note: This is the latest entry in the Acton blog series, “What Christians Should Know About Economics.” For other entries inthe series seethis post. The Term: Consumption Smoothing What It Means: Consumption is the use of goods and services by households. Consumption smoothing is the balancing out of spending and saving over a period of time to maintain the highest possible standard of living (measured in consumption) over the course of one’s life. Why It Matters: Consumption is one of...
Video: Rev. Robert A. Sirico at Acton University 2016
On June 17th, Acton Institute President and Co-founder Rev. Robert A. Sirico delivered the final evening plenary address of Acton University 2016. We’re pleased to present the video of his address here on the PowerBlog. ...
Unemployment for Black Male Teens Spikes. Are Minimum Wage Increases to Blame?
The most recent jobs report appeared to present a positive impression of our current employment situation. As the New York Times headline read, “Jobs Roar Back With Gain of 287,000 in June, Easing Worry.” Of course whether it eased your worry or not largely depended on whether or not you’re a young African American man. For black male teens (aged 16-19 years), the jobless rate dramatically spiked to 40.1 percent in June from 28.1 percent in May. As Mark J....
3 Myths About Capitalism
What is capitalism? Why is it controversial? Dr. Jeffrey Miron from Harvard University breaks down 3 myths of Capitalism. ...
Examining Suspension Policies in the South
In Dothan, Alabama, school officials are meeting to make changes to the Dothan City Schools suspension policies because of disparities between the rates of suspensions between black and white students. Across the American South, these suspension disparities are among the greatest. The terms for how students are punished are largely subjective, and this punishment increasingly falls harder on minority pared to their white counterparts. An August 2015 report published by the University of Pennsylvania highlighted some of the disparities in...
Free eBook: ‘One and Indivisible’
From today until Sunday (July 14 – 17), the Acton Institute’s book One and Indivisible: The Relationship between Religious and Economic Freedom will be available to download for free. The book is a collection of essays, which is, according to editor Kevin Schmiesing, organized around the central theme: “What is the relationship between economic freedom and religious freedom?” As Schmiesing writes: In light of the urgent need both to understand the relationship between religious and economic liberty and to bolster...
Nobel Laureates Plead with Greenpeace to Drop Opposition to GMOs
“A group of more than 100 Nobel Laureates have publicly declared Greenpeace’s anti-GMO campaign a crime against humanity,” says Allison Gilbert in this week’s Acton Commentary. “These men and women say the science is clear — the world needs GMOs, and objecting to the production of genetically modified foods both denies scientific evidence and exacerbates the suffering of the world’s poor.” “We call upon Greenpeace to cease and desist in its campaign against Golden Rice specifically, and crops and foods...
Man Is Not the Measure: Whittaker Chambers on Tyson’s ‘Rationalia’
“Men have never been so educated, but wisdom, even as an idea, has conspicuously vanished from the world.” –Whittaker Chambers The vain self-confidence of high-minded planners and politicians has caused great harm throughout human history, much of it done in the name of “reason” and “science” and “progress.” In an information age such as ours, the technocratic temptation is stronger than ever. As the Tower of Babel confirms, we have always had a disposition to think we can know more...
Protectionism leads to turmoil, strife, and disorder
Proponents of protectionism often ground their support in a quasi-nationalism; trade should be restricted for the benefit of the nation. Economically, the argument holds little weight. The benefits of more trade, like more and cheaper goods, outweigh the costs, like some temporary unemployment that results from the closing of a factory that pete with panies. Some protectionists may accept this, and still urge tariffs, quotas, and other restrictions. They argue that a nation can still benefit, even with economic disadvantages....
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved