Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Sunset Blvd. Is Your New Year’s Sanity Test
Sunset Blvd. Is Your New Year’s Sanity Test
Jan 28, 2026 2:21 PM

Will 2023 be one more year of gaudy daydreams and alternate realities, another misguided escape from reality? Or will we wake up before we’re facedown in history’s pool of spoiled lives?

Read More…

Last New Year’s Eve, I wrote about Billy Wilder’s The Apartment. It’s the best movie on the ambivalence with which we e the end of one year and ing of a new one, worrying whether it promises that our dreams e true, whether we will live up to our resolutions to be better. This year I’ll take up that subject with Wilder’s most famous movie, Sunset Blvd. (1950), a story, almost a film noir, about trying to live the American dream in Hollywood rather than Manhattan, the setting for The Apartment.

Maybe it’s best to start with this contrast between the two coasts of America, once symbols of the past and the future. Jack Lemmon is the sad sack protagonist in The Apartment, alone in an overcrowded metropolis with a rather strict hierarchy symbolized by the skyscraper, the climbing of which debases his character. William Holden in Sunset Blvd. is a confident, cynical screenwriter trying to make it to success in an industry that seems to be nothing but puzzles. Who knows what the public will like? This makes life seem a game of chance.

The glamour of L.A. is nothing as inaccessible as NYC, but the endless expanse of canyons conceals so much that you’re bound to get lost. One place is as crammed and vertically expanding as the other is sparsely populated and endlessly unfolding horizontally. On the East Coast, an apartment in a row house is Lemmon’s prized possession; on the West Coast, Holden is busy trying to save his car from the repo men because he’s behind on his payments.

California in the movie looks like American freedom: beautiful, bustling with activity, full of the promise of the postwar era. But Hollywood especially is not a happy place, precisely because it sells fantasies of happiness to the nation. It’s not just that it’s not easy to find work; it’s how fickle it all is. Maybe selling fantasies means you live in a fantasy. The love that creates stars is the opposite of what we call meritocracy.

It’s certainly not working out for our protagonist. Holden is just about washed up even though he’s in his prime. At the beginning of the film, he’s desperate for work. His agent, who seems already to be enjoying paradise, despises him as a nuisance in the middle of his golf game. The only producer to whom he has access, a man full of worries, lets a young lady mock him. She’s a script reader who thinks he’s got nothing but clichés to offer, and maybe she’s right. He ended up that way by trying to please. He went from cocky to cynical when he learned that nobody cares about his talent or aspirations and that, absent success, he might as well not exist.

This is a harsh lesson to learn, but many have learned it. It’s time for our protagonist to hit the road back to the America whence he came, back to the paper where he started, but he feels humiliated by the prospect. He thinks, too, of everyone back home. He impressed them by leaving for Hollywood and getting some script work in pictures that actually got made. They would resent him for daring to rise above them and mock him for falling back to their level. His own ambition, moreover, won’t allow him to try to live an ordinary American life. It goes without saying: He now has no family.

As with any great movie, properly attending to the introductory sequences of Sunset Blvd. reveals, even more than an overture would for an opera, the great drama about to unfold. Billy Wilder brings out of the details of ordinary business life a grand tale of the desperate ambition of a beautiful man, artistic and vigorous. Then he adds the touches of noir, which he had perfected in Double Indemnity (1944), by making it a crime story and having the protagonist narrate it. This role is almost a religious one—in the opening shots, after all, he looks down at himself, dead on-screen, and pronounces a judgment, in voice-over. It’s a confession, too. We are also invited to judge this life and this death.

The occasion for the drama seems a bination of the mundane, even sordid, and the fairy tale. Holden is on the run from the repo men, and after a car chase ends up in a driveway on Sunset Blvd. with a tire blown but a chance to hide the vehicle on what looks like an abandoned property. But it’s also leaving the sunny California we’d seen before and finding a European palatial ruin in the virgin American land. How is this possible? He’s entered, unwittingly, a fantasy world—the world of the silent pictures, full of drama and appeals to awe. It might as well be Dracula’s castle.

Here he meets, initially with amusement and distaste, Norma Desmond, once a silver screen queen. She is ugly and looks menacing, but was once worshipped by men and by millions, wealthy beyond the dreams of avarice because of her beauty and manding contempt for everyone staring up at her. She was not in show business—she was an idol in an attempted cult. Men were willing mit suicide for her or dedicate their lives to her. The exalted, not just the sordid, es Holden in this other world where he might learn the truth about the origins of Hollywood.

Holden es a scriptwriter, panion, even a servant to this woman, lost in the glamorous past for which he longed. Fitting punishment for his hubris. Yet there is a shining moment in the story. After a depressing New Year’s Eve party in the morbid palace, Holden escapes to a friend’s party full of young people, hopeful and joyous, noisy and cramped with people eager to be together, who have left the business of the movies aside to celebrate. He meets the script reader again, a pretty young woman, Betty (Nancy Olson). Gradually, they fall in love and write a script together, based on the America he knew when he grew up. That memory, properly dramatized, could make for a great movie, or at least make him successful and in a way redeem him, as could this young woman’s innocent love.

Yet New Year’s Eve is a very ambivalent celebration, so full of hints of our mortality. Holden lets go of his cynicism in working and falling in love with Betty, her decency reminding him of the bracing character and the rewards of an honest life. Yet Wilder refuses us the happy ends we wish for, especially at the end of the year. Holden is doomed precisely by his encounter with this angelic figure. Her beauty can replace the glamour but not the corruption of Hollywood. She is above the sordid realities he’s stuck with. Whereas The Apartment leaves its humbled protagonists together and in love, Sunset Blvd. ends in madness and crime. We see the consequences of living in a fantasy, leaving reality behind. I think Wilder wants us to reflect on the dangers Hollywood poses to national sanity, since it attracts so many people who go mad there staring at the beautiful visions on their screens.

Happy New Year. May the next one be … saner.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Moral Paper Route
AEI recently held a contest challenging people to make a video that could articulate a moral case for free markets in two minutes or less. The $40,000 top prize was won by Jared Fuller with this entry, “The Moral Paper Route.” At AEI’s Values & Capitalism blog, Julia Thompson talks to Fuller about the making of the video. ...
A State That Co-opts and Crushes Civil Society?
John Zmirak, author and Editor-in-Chief of The Intercollegiate Review, wants voters to know exactly what is at stake in the looming Presidential election. In a guest blogger piece at the National Catholic Register, Zmirak pointedly states that the choice between the two candidates isn’t just about whose economic agenda seems more reasonable or who won which debate: …it’s about what America means: At heart of our Constitutional democracy is the freedom of individuals, even those with unpopular opinions, to pursue...
Monks, Beer, and the Labor of their Hands
Fr. Z’s Blog has a great post highlighting the Benedictine Monks at Norcia and their new brew. Here is the motto from the Birra Nursia site. Wonderful stuff, really: plete harmony with the centuries old tradition, the monks of Norcia have sought to share with the world a product which came about in the very heart of the monastic life, one which reminds us of the goodness of creation and the potential that it contains. For the monks of Norcia,...
Tracing the Logic of Liberalism
In the Western world there are conservative liberals, liberal liberals, and radical liberals, says David T. Koyzis, but all adhere to the basic principles of liberalism: The liberalism of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Of Thomas Jefferson and John Stuart Mill. After all, the Declaration of Independence is a liberal document, unquestioningly accepting that popular consent stands at the origin of political authority. As Alasdair MacIntyre has put it, in the Western world there are conservative liberals, liberal liberals, and...
ResearchLinks – 10.26.12
Call for Papers: “Intellectual Property and Religious Thought” University of St. Thomas School of Law, April 5, 2013. The University of St. Thomas will hold a conference titled “Intellectual Property and Religious Thought,” on April 5, 2013, co-sponsored by the Terrence J. Murphy Institute for Catholic Thought, Law, and Public Policy and The University of St. Thomas Law Journal. The conference will be held at the University of St. Thomas School of Law building in downtown Minneapolis. Call for Papers:...
Bono, Babel, and the Myth of Economist as Savior
Bono, lead singer of U2 and co-founder of charity-group ONE, recently offered some positive words about the role of markets in reducing global poverty and spurring economic development (HT): The Irish singer and co-founder of ONE, a campaigning group that fights poverty and disease in Africa, said it had been “a humbling thing for me” to realize the importance of capitalism and entrepreneurialism in philanthropy, particularly as someone who “got into this as a righteous anger activist with all the...
Acton Commentary: Desiccated Christianity
“When Christian institutions attempt to mitigate promise this understanding of their mission–often as the result of the political pressure–they morph into shadowy versions of their former selves,” writes Rev. Robert A. Sirico.In this week’s Acton Commentary (published October 24), Rev. Sirico explains that by losing theChristological dimension,Christiancharitable work es essentially secular.The full text of his essay follows. Subscribe to the free, weekly Acton News & Commentary and other publicationshere. Desiccated Christianity byRev. Robert A. Sirico Mother Teresa was once asked...
Samuel Gregg: Paul Ryan’s Way
Acton’s Director of Research, Samuel Gregg, notes in a recent NRO article that vice-presidential candidate Paul Ryan has avoided “emotivist nonsense” and presented a clear moral vision for our country. Among other things, Ryan, ever so politely but unambiguously, underlined the immense damage inflicted by sometimes well-intentioned government welfare programs upon those in need. Yet he did so in a manner that detailed the economic costs but also went beyond a narrowly materialist reckoning. Ryan pointed to the manifold ways...
Equality of Opportunity vs. Sameness of Opportunity
Conservatives should embrace the cause of equality of opportunity, says David Azerrad, not sameness of opportunity. [W]e must not confuseequalityof opportunity withsamenessof opportunity. Equality of opportunity is a moral imperative and a requirement of just government. Spending money on programs that aim to expand opportunity for the poor is a charitable pursuit to which some may aspire but which government is not bound to deliver. Justice demands that we uphold the rule of law, secure the rights of all, and...
Is Religious Freedom a “Natural Right”?
Over at The Claremont Institute, Hadley Arkes considers whether religious freedom is a “natural right.” His exploration of the question is lengthy plex and, as with everything Prof. Arkes writes, worthy of serious consideration. Here is his conclusion: It may be jarring in some quarters to say it, but it is eminently reasonable to be a theist, and quite as reasonable to understand that not everything done in the name of religion and theism is reasonable and defensible. What else...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved