Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY
/
Summoning Up the State
Summoning Up the State
Jul 18, 2025 7:59 PM

  Every new regime not born from revolutionary violence must win the support of an elite to survive. Mere theories of sound social arrangements do not suffice. A powerful cohort must be invested in the regime’s success, ready to uphold its ideals. Lacking allies to enforce its vision, a regime’s framework may ironically undermine the principles it is designed to uphold. An entrenched opposing elite can turn the discretion inherent in all political settlements against the objectives of their proponents.

  In American history, for instance, consider how a Federalist elite, entrenched in the federal judiciary, was able to preserve a Hamiltonian understanding of the Constitution and judicial role even against a widespread Jeffersonian revolt. But that was a contingent fact. If the legal elite had held antagonistic views, the Constitution would not likely have worked in practice, however good it was in theory.

  Consider the contrast with today’s New Right which has grand ambitions but lacks an elite ready to back them. As a result, their program may be counterproductive, however laudable some of their goals are.

  The New Right is opposed to the classical liberal right which has dominated the movement since the Reagan era. While the New Right contains many different strands and emphases, they share an interest, unlike classical liberals, in using and enlarging the scope of state power to pursue their ends. Many National Conservatives (Nat-Cons), for instance, want to raise tariffs and other trade barriers to protect domestic industry. They want to require public schools to teach a curriculum that celebrates American history and promotes family values. Some strands of the New Right, including senators like Josh Hawley, favor greater regulation to break up large companies and regulate social media.

  Many, if not most, are fine with the larger administrative state that greater government intrusion for their desired ends will entail. Indeed, Adrian Vermeule’s most recent book, Common Good Constitutionalism, is a legal manifesto for a new conservative jurisprudence opposed to originalism, the jurisprudence identified with classical liberalism. It undergirds a vision of far more expansive and unrestrained state power that he hopes will serve a conservative, Christian moral and political order. Thus, while classical liberals want to constrain the modern administrative state, Vermeule celebrates its operation—including the delegation of substantial discretion to bureaucrats and relatively light judicial review of that discretion.

  The desire to use state power, public schools, and administrative agencies for conservative purposes puts one in mind of Hotspur’s jibe in Shakespeare’s Henry IV. His ally Owen Glendower claims that he could summon “spirits from the vasty deep.” To this, Hotspur replies, “So can I or so can any man: But will they come when you do call for them?” The pursuit of the New Right’s goals would require a sympathetic elite to move its contemplated levers of power and it is unclear to say the least that they can be called forth today.

  We know from studies that bureaucrats are very largely left-liberal Democrats. The bureaucracy holds views about the common good that are uncommon and distinctly uncongenial to the New Right.

  Empowering the government to regulate big tech, for instance, may actually make it harder for conservatives to get out unorthodox views on social media. One reason that tech companies engage in content moderation at the behest of government is fear that government power will be used against them in the future if they do not comply. And the bureaucrats who control the day-to-day operation of that power are hostile to the New Right.

  It is true that the bureaucracy is subject to political control, but that control is imperfect as political appointees must compromise with the bureaucracy to get things done. And thus, the bureaucracy has an enduring influence, even when (as will not always be the case in a two-party system) the President is sympathetic to the New Right.

  Paradoxically, an intensification of the classical liberal program may be more likely to achieve indirectly the objectives of the New Right than its own misguided program for more state power.

  One response is to give more power to the government to fire bureaucrats. In the waning days of his administration, President Trump suggested new a Schedule F designation for thousands of civil servants who influence policy. Those so designated would lose traditional job protections and could be easily fired by administrations who found them unsympathetic. President Biden has recently countered with a formal rule making it harder to fire these civil servants, impeding the kind of restructuring Trump sought. But even if the bureaucracy lost civil servant protections and could be replaced, who would replace it? The kind of people with the qualifications and the interest to be in the bureaucracy are unlikely to work for this new regime.

  This weakness would exacerbate a problem of competence already evident in a populist administration like Trump’s. For instance, agencies were not careful in two key administrative law decisions—one on counting illegal immigrants in the census and another in reversing DAPA (Deferred Actions for Parents of Americans or Lawful Permanent Residents). As a result, the Supreme Court found procedural errors in the decision-making. Lack of competence is another form of counterproductivity, alienating support.

  Expanding regulations empowers not only government adversaries but also those within the corporate sphere. More red tape means more power for lawyers, rather than producers. For instance, the greater the scope for antitrust law, the more executives must share decision-making about key business matters with lawyers. Lawyers and compliance officers, moreover, lean left more than the business executives. They affect the culture of the corporation they inhabit, making it, for instance, more likely to support left-liberal corporate initiatives, like DEI and ESG in our day.

  Those who influence and direct public education—teachers, teacher union officials, and ed-school faculty—are also not well disposed toward the goals of the New Right. And it is much harder to monitor what teachers do in the classroom than what civil servants do in the bureaucracy. It is also difficult to fire teachers, particularly given the national teacher shortage. The result is a scholastic front where the message of the New Right will struggle to take root. Some more sophisticated supporters of a new conservative movement have recognized that it is impossible to govern without elites. Patrick Deneen, for instance, in his recent book Regime Change: Toward a Postliberal Future, calls for an “aristopopulism” led by a new elite in concert with the working class to replace our current order. But Deneen is not at all clear about where he will find this elite, making his argument particularly susceptible to Hotspur’s retort.

  When nineteenth-century counterparts of today’s New Right, like Joseph De Maistre, offered an alternative to bourgeois classical liberalism, they could call on the remnants of an established hierarchy in Europe to counter the entire liberal project—those connected to the throne and altar. And even if there was no king in the United States, organized religion had substantial sway. But traditional hierarchies have far less influence today. The aristocracy of Europe is gone and the WASP hierarchy that was once important to American social governance is no longer ascendant. The most substantial and organized of religions—the Catholic Church—is riven against itself with conservative and liberal factions in disagreement on social issues from same-sex marriage to capitalism. The Evangelicals have no formal structure and currently lack the intellectual reach into political discourse of previous elites.

  As a result of the New Right’s mismatch problem, an intensification of the classical liberal program may paradoxically be more likely to achieve indirectly the objectives of the New Right than its own misguided program for more state power. For instance, if the momentum of school choice programs continues, competition may naturally deliver a more patriotic and family-friendly education than government schools, because that is what most parents want. The policy matches sociology: school choice empowers a group more friendly to the New Right (parents) and disempowers a group (teachers—who are more hostile to it).

  Similarly, a program of deregulation disempowers bureaucracy and groups within a corporation that are hostile to conservative views. The result is likely to be a less woke corporate world. To be sure, this alignment with New Right objectives is not perfect. A classical liberal regime allows much more room for dissenters from patriotism and family values. But it also seems more likely to generate an elite on which the New Right can then build. In any event, America’s new forms of conservativism should realize that without appealing for support from a relevant, existing elite, they are erecting an elaborate new edifice on sand.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY
Acton Briefs: Summer 2018
A collection of short essays by Acton writers, click a link to jump to that article: AU and building the free society by Jenna Suchyta Westminster Abbey praises God for the NHS by Noah Gould President Trump nominates Judge Brett Kavanaugh by Joe Carter AU and building the free society Jenna Suchyta, Acton Institute Intern Over 1,000 people flocked to Grand Rapids June 18-21 to listen to more than 80 inspiring faculty members lecture on a wide variety of...
Arvo Pärt and the universal soul of music
Sacred music is not only a devotional posed and performed to honor our Creator but also a bulwark against human sinfulness and frailties. Composer Arvo Pärt has been creating music of faith that inspires while at the same time subverts several of the most oppressive systems of government of the past century. poser’s lifelong development as a poser also led him to a deeper faith. He converted to Orthodox Christianity in 1972. Theologian Peter Bouteneff observed that Pärt is...
The return of nature worship
We live in decadent times. Universal human rights have not been fully attained, yet radical environmentalists insist that flora, fauna and even geological features and structures should be deemed legal persons, a meme known as “nature rights.” The drive to grant rights to the entirety of the natural world has already achieved stunning victories. In 2008, Ecuador granted human-type rights to “nature” in its constitution back, while Bolivia recently passed a law to the same effect. More than 30...
Editor's Note: Summer 2018
In early July, an Indian court issued a ruling that accorded the status of “legal person or entity” to animals in the state, saying “they have a distinct persona with corresponding rights, duties and liabilities of a living person.” With this measure, designed to prevent cruelty to animals, justices of the Uttarakhand High Court in northern India declared that “the entire animal kingdom, including avian and aquatic ones, are declared as legal entities having a distinct persona with corresponding...
Editor's Note: Fall 2018
When I accepted the new position as managing editor of Religion & Liberty, only one thing had been set in stone: Caroline Roberts’ article on Walker Percy would be the cover story. Everything else remained to be determined. Her essay is one of the first e from Acton’s new longform journalism platform, bines extensive reporting with beautiful photography to give readers an immersive understanding of the subject. This project continues to grow and improve. Curt Biren analyzes economic and...
Nature, technology, and Pompeii
The primary mission of the Acton Institute since its inception has been identifying and revealing both traditional and innovative tonics to ward off Lord Acton’s dictum: “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” In fact, the manner in which we wield our power over one another, our environment and God’s other creatures defines our humanity, or, in other words, who we are as individuals and social creatures. bined tradition teaches us that humanity was not created by...
The politics of apocalypse
Disarmageddon” is what The Economist earlier this year called placent, reckless leaders” who “have forgotten how valuable it is to restrain nuclear weapons.” The politics of nuclear weapons – deterrence doctrines, mutually assured destruction and so on – have been the obsessive stuff of international politics since the Manhattan Project. There is, as Alissa Wilkinson and I argue in our 2015 book How to Survive the Apocalypse, something unique about the nuclear age, in which it es terrifyingly clear...
Power, people and things in 'Westworld'
Since I was a child I’ve always loved a good story. I believed that stories helped us to ennoble ourselves, to fix what was broken in us, and to help us e the people we dreamed of being.” So begins Anthony Hopkin’s character, Robert Ford, in his speech marking the finale of the first season of HBO’s mind-bending, techno-philosophical series “Westworld.” Ford is the brilliant co-creator of Westworld, a theme park set several decades in the future in which...
Labor unions, yesterday and today
Along-cherished predisposition on the part of the Roman Catholic Church is that labor unions act as a protection against the exploitation of workers. From Pope Leo XIII’s 1891 encyclical Rerum Novarum forward, the Church has been an outspoken proponent of organized labor, worker safety and human dignity. Thus, es as little surprise that the U.S. Catholic Conference of Bishops weighed-in when the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in February regarding the Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and...
Sister Mary Kenneth Keller
For the first time, we can now mechanically simulate the cognitive process. –Sister Mary Kenneth Keller Sister Mary Kenneth Keller established herself as a strong influence in the world puter science at a time when women in the field were unheard of. At the same time, her work paved the way for what we now understand as the information economy – a key driver of wealth creation. She was the first woman in the United States to earn a...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved