Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Study: Socialism turns people into liars
Study: Socialism turns people into liars
Mar 12, 2026 2:24 PM

Socialism’s appeal is largely moral, not economic – not just because it doesn’t work economically, but because few people find pelling. Among their exaggerated claims, socialists argue that redistribution of wealth will create more moralpeople, not merely better living conditions.

“We must develop among Soviet people Communist morality,” said Nikita Khrushchevin 1959, “at the foundation of which lie … the voluntary observation of the fundamental rules of munal radely mutual help, honesty, and truthfulness.”

But does socialism make people more truthful? A team of five researchers from the U.S. and Germany, led by Dan Ariely of Duke University, conducted an experiment to find out.

The team rewarded Germans with payouts based on predicting dice rolls, but it gave them an option to lie about their answer. Then pared the es of those raised in socialist East Germany with those raised in capitalist West Germany. They published their findings in theEuropean Journal of Political Economylast month.

Their results? Those raised under socialism “cheat significantly more” than those raised under the capitalist/free enterprise system.” Moreover, our results indicate that the longer individuals had experienced socialist East Germany, the more likely they were to cheat on the behavioural task,” they found.

The team speculated the reasons behind this discrepancy in a similar 2014 study.“In many instances, socialism pressured or forced people to work around official laws.” Only the black market provided life’s necessities, and those who failed to toe the party line in public disappeared.

“In East Germany, the secret service (Staatssicherheit) kept records on more than one third of the citizens,” they wrote. “Unlike in democratic societies, freedom of speech did not represent a virtue in socialist regimes, and it was therefore often necessary to misrepresent your thoughts to avoid repressions from the regime.”

Lying is the least of Marxism’s failures.Yet this study proves, once again, prehensively wrong Karl Marx was. Marxwroteto his father that people living under socialism would gladly make “sacrifices for the benefit of all; then we shall experience no petty, limited, selfish joy, but our happiness will belong to millions.” But those reared under his philosophy would not even forsake goods they had never earned.

From either a utilitarian or a moral perspective, deceit harms human flourishing. In fact, Friedrich von Hayek said that prosperity – which is inextricably linked with honesty – sped the adoption of traditional morality.

“We do not owe our morals to our intelligence: we owe them to the fact that some groups prehendingly accepted certain rules of conduct — the rules of private property, of honesty, and of the family — that enabled the groups practicing them to prosper, multiply, and gradually to displace the others,” Hayek said during a lecture at the Heritage Foundation.“It was a process of cultural selection, analogous to the process of biological selection, which made those groups and their practices prevail.”

Even in the inculcation of virtue, organic development beats central planning. Socialism encourages dark impulses, while the free market restrains our passions. In a free economy, being known as an honest broker furthers the seller’s self-interest.

Lies, which cripple social interaction, have an eternal significance in the Hebrew and Christian Scriptures.Proverbs 6:16-19states:

These six things doth theLordhate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,an heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief,a false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.

Jesus brands liars as children of the devil (St. John 8:44), and the New Testament forecasts that they will share the same eschatological end (Revelation 21:8).

Any society interested in its own success, much less the moral fabric of its citizens, must jettison socialism.

(H/T:Tim Worstall, Continental Telegraph.)

This photo has been cropped. CC BY 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Audio: Dr. Carl Trueman on Christians and Politics
If you weren’t able to make it to Derby Station on Wednesday for our latest Acton On Tap event, have no fear: we’re pleased to present the full recording of the evening’s festivities featuring Dr. Carl Trueman of Westminister Seminary via the audio player below. If you’re unfamiliar with Dr. Trueman or his work, check out Jordan Ballor’s introduction right here. Considering that the PowerBlog’s focus over the past few days has been on how Christians are approaching the debt...
Taking His Name in Vain: What Would Jesus Cut?
Ray’s post pointed to something that’s been bugging me about Jim Wallis’ “What Would Jesus Cut?” campaign. As with the “What Would Jesus Drive?” campaign (“Transportation is a moral issue.” What isn’t these days?), Wallis’ campaign assumes the moral high ground by appropriating the Holy Name of Jesus Christ to advance his highly politicized, partisan advocacy. Jesus es an advertising slogan. And what is implicit here is that those who oppose Wallis are somehow at odds with the Gospel of...
Unintended Consequences and Wind Turbines
With the surge in oil prices, there’s renewed interest in alternative energy options. Numerous countries have gradually taken steps to promoting renewable or clean energy technologies, and it seems the United States is drifting more towards favoring alternative energy options as the Obama Administration is looking at banning off shore drilling along the continental shelf until 2012 and beyond. However, before we move farther down this road, a critical analysis of the pros and cons is a must. A more...
Shane Claiborne’s Budget Babbling
Writing for the Huffington Post, Shane Claiborne is also asking “What Would Jesus Cut?” I’m still opposed to the whole notion of reducing Christ to budget director, as my earlier post points out. But Jesus as Secretary of Defense of the United States or rather, Jesus as secretary of peace as proposed by Congressman Dennis Kucinich is equally unhelpful. Mark Tooley, president of IRD, has already weighed in on Shane Claiborne’s not so brilliant drafting of Jesus for president. As...
‘A Call for Intergenerational Justice’ and the Question of Economic Growth
While there is much to applaud in the Center for Public Justice and Evangelicals for Social Action’s “A Call for Intergenerational Justice,” the lack of discussion of the problem of economic growth is troubling. I believe Don Peck is correct when he writes in The Atlantic: If it persists much longer, this era of high joblessness will likely change the life course and character of a generation of young adults—and quite possibly those of the children behind them as well....
A Response to ‘What Would Jesus Cut?’
Jim Wallis and a number of other Christians involved in politics are trying to gain attention for the question, “What would Jesus cut?” The answer to this question is supposed to be as obvious as it is in other moral contexts. For example, would Jesus lie about the useful life of a refrigerator he was selling for Best Buy? No way. Would he bully a kid into giving away his lunch money? Not a chance. Would you find him taking...
Abortion and Intergenerational Justice
I’m not sure I have ever really encountered the term intergenerational justice before this discussion over “A Call for Intergenerational Justice,” at least in any substantive way. This unfamiliarity is what lay behind my initial caveat regarding the term, my concern that it not be understood as “code for something else.” The Call itself provides a decent definition of the concept, or at least of its implications: “…that one generation must not benefit or suffer unfairly at the cost of...
Opposing Views: America’s Debt Crisis and ‘A Call for Intergenerational Justice’
Last week’s issuance of “A Call for Intergenerational Justice: A Christian Proposal on the American Debt Crisis” has occasioned a good bit of discussion on the topic, both here at the PowerBlog and around various other blogs and social media sites. It has been interesting to see the reaction that ments about the Call have generated. Many have said that I simply misunderstood or misread the document. I have taken the time to reread the document and do some reassessment...
Budgets, the Church, and the Welfare State
In this mentary, which will appear tomorrow, I summarize and explore a bit more fully some of the discussion surrounding evangelical and religious engagement of the budget battles in Washington. One of my core concerns is that the approaches seem to assume too much ongoing and primary responsibility on the part of the federal government for providing direct material assistance to the poor. As “A Call for Intergenerational Justice” puts it, “To reduce our federal debt at the expense of...
Archbishop Chaput: The American experience and global religious liberty
A brilliant assessment of where we are. (HT: American Orthodox Institute Observer). Subject to the governor of the universe: The American experience and global religious liberty March 1, 2011 – Most Rev. Charles J. Chaput, O.F.M. Cap., Archbishop of Denver, addressed the Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs at Georgetown University. A friend once said – I think shrewdly — that if people want to understand the United States, they need to read two documents. Neither one is...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved