Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Study: Socialism turns people into liars
Study: Socialism turns people into liars
Mar 16, 2026 12:25 AM

Socialism’s appeal is largely moral, not economic – not just because it doesn’t work economically, but because few people find pelling. Among their exaggerated claims, socialists argue that redistribution of wealth will create more moralpeople, not merely better living conditions.

“We must develop among Soviet people Communist morality,” said Nikita Khrushchevin 1959, “at the foundation of which lie … the voluntary observation of the fundamental rules of munal radely mutual help, honesty, and truthfulness.”

But does socialism make people more truthful? A team of five researchers from the U.S. and Germany, led by Dan Ariely of Duke University, conducted an experiment to find out.

The team rewarded Germans with payouts based on predicting dice rolls, but it gave them an option to lie about their answer. Then pared the es of those raised in socialist East Germany with those raised in capitalist West Germany. They published their findings in theEuropean Journal of Political Economylast month.

Their results? Those raised under socialism “cheat significantly more” than those raised under the capitalist/free enterprise system.” Moreover, our results indicate that the longer individuals had experienced socialist East Germany, the more likely they were to cheat on the behavioural task,” they found.

The team speculated the reasons behind this discrepancy in a similar 2014 study.“In many instances, socialism pressured or forced people to work around official laws.” Only the black market provided life’s necessities, and those who failed to toe the party line in public disappeared.

“In East Germany, the secret service (Staatssicherheit) kept records on more than one third of the citizens,” they wrote. “Unlike in democratic societies, freedom of speech did not represent a virtue in socialist regimes, and it was therefore often necessary to misrepresent your thoughts to avoid repressions from the regime.”

Lying is the least of Marxism’s failures.Yet this study proves, once again, prehensively wrong Karl Marx was. Marxwroteto his father that people living under socialism would gladly make “sacrifices for the benefit of all; then we shall experience no petty, limited, selfish joy, but our happiness will belong to millions.” But those reared under his philosophy would not even forsake goods they had never earned.

From either a utilitarian or a moral perspective, deceit harms human flourishing. In fact, Friedrich von Hayek said that prosperity – which is inextricably linked with honesty – sped the adoption of traditional morality.

“We do not owe our morals to our intelligence: we owe them to the fact that some groups prehendingly accepted certain rules of conduct — the rules of private property, of honesty, and of the family — that enabled the groups practicing them to prosper, multiply, and gradually to displace the others,” Hayek said during a lecture at the Heritage Foundation.“It was a process of cultural selection, analogous to the process of biological selection, which made those groups and their practices prevail.”

Even in the inculcation of virtue, organic development beats central planning. Socialism encourages dark impulses, while the free market restrains our passions. In a free economy, being known as an honest broker furthers the seller’s self-interest.

Lies, which cripple social interaction, have an eternal significance in the Hebrew and Christian Scriptures.Proverbs 6:16-19states:

These six things doth theLordhate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,an heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief,a false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.

Jesus brands liars as children of the devil (St. John 8:44), and the New Testament forecasts that they will share the same eschatological end (Revelation 21:8).

Any society interested in its own success, much less the moral fabric of its citizens, must jettison socialism.

(H/T:Tim Worstall, Continental Telegraph.)

This photo has been cropped. CC BY 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Opposing viewpoints on democracy
A mentary of mine was featured in a recent book, Democracy: Opposing Viewpoints, published earlier this year by Greenhaven Press, an imprint of Thomson Gale. My contribution appears as part of Chapter 2: What Should Be the Relationship Between Religion and Democracy? Following a pair of items by Clark Moeller and Bill O’Reilly arguing that democracy is based on secular and religious foundations respectively, I take the affirmative side of my issue in a section titled, “Politicians Should Voice Their...
A swiftly tilting economics
I was waiting for the shuttle this morning when it struck me–an idea, I mean, not the shuttle. We talk a lot here at the Acton Institute about how economics needs morality and morality needs economics; or, as Fr. Sirico phrased it in his NRO salute to Ed Opitz, “Christianity qua Christianity [offers] no specific economic model any more than economics qua economics has any specific moral model to proffer—which is precisely why they both need each other.” I’ve thought...
A time of flux for Electrolux
An interesting news story on local Grand Rapids television last night concerning the long awaited closing of an Electrolux plant. While the story was fair and optimistic, I got a bit of a kick out of soundbite from Chicago writer Richard Longworth who said: “A wonderfully decent way of life is now just being undermined by productivity, by the global economy.” Now, losing a job can be a terrible thing (its worth noting, though, that one of the workers in...
‘It’s capitalism or a habitable planet—you can’t have both’
. . . Or so claims Robert Newman in this article in The Guardian from February 2. It makes a great subject for a game of “Find-the-Fallacy.” Newman’s breezy inferences are reminiscent of The Communist Manifesto, edited to conform to trendy deep ecology. Here’s my favorite line: “Capitalism is not sustainable by its very nature. It is predicated on infinitely expanding markets, faster consumption and bigger production in a finite planet.” Well, I guess somebody has to shoot fish in...
Economic advice pro Bono
An interesting piece in Tuesday’s Financial Times (registration req.) by Jagdish Bhagwati, economist at Columbia University. In the form of a letter to U2 front man Bono, Dr. Bhagwati offers a (I think) stinging criticism of attempts to save Africa through appeals for more governmental spending. (This is especially interesting since Bono plays off the songsheet of another Columbia economist Jeffrey Sachs.) If you can find a copy of the article, I highly mend it, but in the meantime, here...
Dueling mommies
In her column this week, Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse, Acton senior fellow in economics, takes Linda Hirshman, a retired professor at Brandeis University, to task. Hirshman has been making the news circuit touting her claims about negative trends among working women. She says that educated women who e stay at home moms will create the future result that “expensively educated, upper-class moms will be leading lesser lives.” According to an ABC News article, Hirshman views this as “a tragedy not...
Offshoring spurs productivity
Here’s a brief note about a recent National Bureau of Economic Research working paper, “Service Offshoring and Productivity: Evidence from the United States.” According to the NBER digest, “service outsourcing is doing more than fueling an economic boom in the tech-savvy provinces of India. It is also playing a major role in one of the big economic stories of the last decade: the surging productivity of American manufacturing firms.” For more on this, check out Anthony mentary, “Productivity and the...
Spurning the ‘supernatural’
In a recent post on the evangelical outpost, Joe Carter makes the case for discarding, or at least severely restricting, the use of the descriptive term supernatural by Christians. He notes that in using the term to refer, for example, to angels and demons, “we are implying that they belong on the same plane or realm of existence as God.” One source of this implication is due to the fact that “we buy into the modernist notion that all of...
The ‘Crunchy’ Con-versation
If you haven’t seen it yet, NRO is hosting a special blog worth taking a look at: CrunchyCon. The discussion is on the thesis of Rod Dreher’s new book, Crunchy Cons: How Birkenstocked Burkeans, gun-loving organic gardeners, evangelical free-range farmers, hip homeschooling mamas, right-wing nature lovers and their diverse tribe of countercultural conservatives plan to save America (or at least the Republican Party). Participants include the author, NRO’s Jonah Goldberg, Caleb Stegall (editor of the New Pantagruel), Frederica Mathewes-Green, and...
God and GM foods
In the latest issue of Science & Spirit magazine, Acton director of research Samuel Gregg is interviewed about the ethical aspects of the genetic engineering of food. In “God and the New Foodstuffs,” author Trey Popp writes about the opposition to such endeavors: Some scientists and environmentalists fear GM crops may have unforeseen consequences. Many organic and small-scale farmers see the new crops as an economic threat; there have been cases in which GM corn has contaminated nearby fields, ruining...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved