Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Study: Socialism turns people into liars
Study: Socialism turns people into liars
Apr 27, 2026 8:23 AM

Socialism’s appeal is largely moral, not economic – not just because it doesn’t work economically, but because few people find pelling. Among their exaggerated claims, socialists argue that redistribution of wealth will create more moralpeople, not merely better living conditions.

“We must develop among Soviet people Communist morality,” said Nikita Khrushchevin 1959, “at the foundation of which lie … the voluntary observation of the fundamental rules of munal radely mutual help, honesty, and truthfulness.”

But does socialism make people more truthful? A team of five researchers from the U.S. and Germany, led by Dan Ariely of Duke University, conducted an experiment to find out.

The team rewarded Germans with payouts based on predicting dice rolls, but it gave them an option to lie about their answer. Then pared the es of those raised in socialist East Germany with those raised in capitalist West Germany. They published their findings in theEuropean Journal of Political Economylast month.

Their results? Those raised under socialism “cheat significantly more” than those raised under the capitalist/free enterprise system.” Moreover, our results indicate that the longer individuals had experienced socialist East Germany, the more likely they were to cheat on the behavioural task,” they found.

The team speculated the reasons behind this discrepancy in a similar 2014 study.“In many instances, socialism pressured or forced people to work around official laws.” Only the black market provided life’s necessities, and those who failed to toe the party line in public disappeared.

“In East Germany, the secret service (Staatssicherheit) kept records on more than one third of the citizens,” they wrote. “Unlike in democratic societies, freedom of speech did not represent a virtue in socialist regimes, and it was therefore often necessary to misrepresent your thoughts to avoid repressions from the regime.”

Lying is the least of Marxism’s failures.Yet this study proves, once again, prehensively wrong Karl Marx was. Marxwroteto his father that people living under socialism would gladly make “sacrifices for the benefit of all; then we shall experience no petty, limited, selfish joy, but our happiness will belong to millions.” But those reared under his philosophy would not even forsake goods they had never earned.

From either a utilitarian or a moral perspective, deceit harms human flourishing. In fact, Friedrich von Hayek said that prosperity – which is inextricably linked with honesty – sped the adoption of traditional morality.

“We do not owe our morals to our intelligence: we owe them to the fact that some groups prehendingly accepted certain rules of conduct — the rules of private property, of honesty, and of the family — that enabled the groups practicing them to prosper, multiply, and gradually to displace the others,” Hayek said during a lecture at the Heritage Foundation.“It was a process of cultural selection, analogous to the process of biological selection, which made those groups and their practices prevail.”

Even in the inculcation of virtue, organic development beats central planning. Socialism encourages dark impulses, while the free market restrains our passions. In a free economy, being known as an honest broker furthers the seller’s self-interest.

Lies, which cripple social interaction, have an eternal significance in the Hebrew and Christian Scriptures.Proverbs 6:16-19states:

These six things doth theLordhate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,an heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief,a false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.

Jesus brands liars as children of the devil (St. John 8:44), and the New Testament forecasts that they will share the same eschatological end (Revelation 21:8).

Any society interested in its own success, much less the moral fabric of its citizens, must jettison socialism.

(H/T:Tim Worstall, Continental Telegraph.)

This photo has been cropped. CC BY 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Coventry Carol
The Coventry Carol (Words Attributed to Robert Croo, 1534; English Melody, 1591). Click here for MIDI version (and sing along!) Lully, lulla, thou little tiny child, By by, lully lullay. Lully, lulla, thou little tiny child, By by, lully lullay. O sisters, too, how may we do, For to preserve this day; This poor Youngling for whom we sing, By, by, lully, lullay. Herod the King, in his raging, Charged he hath this day; His men of might, in his...
One more reason…
Here’s the best ad hominem (no pun intended) reason to deplore the creation of chimeras: Stalin, the self-proclaimed “Brilliant Genuis of Humanity,” wanted them. The Scotsman reports that “Soviet dictator Josef Stalin ordered the creation of Planet of the Apes-style warriors by crossing humans with apes, according to recently uncovered secret documents.” According to the documents, the order came from Stalin’s wish to create a race of super-soldiers: “I want a new invincible human being, insensitive to pain, resistant and...
Petrol-socialism
Predictions, anyone? Chavez continues to flex his socialist muscles as he has now given ExxonMobil an ultimatum: either give him the controlling interest in pany, or lose their Venezuelan operation altogether. This story is notable because ExxonMobil is the pany who has thus far refused Chavez’s “offer they can’t refuse.” Now, I don’t think anyone had any misconceptions that Chavez would be a ‘nice socialist’, but what was that proverb about being doomed to repeat history? What worries me about...
There’s no such thing as “free” health care
Remember: when you recieve a “free” service from the government, it’s not actually free. You’re paying for that service through your taxes. And when the government sets up a monopoly in an area like health care, it’s probably going to end up being more expensive and cheaper at the same time – more expensive because people are less likely to use a “free” service prudently, and cheaper because the overuse of the service will force officials to impose major restraints...
Perusing Peru
Fr. Philip De Vous, chaplain of Thomas More College in Crestview Hills, KY and an adjunct scholar of public policy at the Acton Institute, writes of a recent trip to see operations of the Doe Run Company in Lima, Peru. It seems that the Doe Run Company has been accosted by “criticism from certain journalists and certain sectors of the Catholic Church and other Christian denominations” regarding its practice of business ethics. What Fr. De Vous experienced in Peru, however,...
“Brain Drain” reconsidered
A while back I mentioned a new ing out questioning conventional wisdom on the “brain drain” problem caused by emigration from developing nations. The book will not be out for a while yet, but the author, Michele Pistone, has a long post on Mirror of Justice describing her findings and how they relate to traditional moral concerns raised by Catholic social teaching. ...
Public v. private services
Fast Company Now is reporting that “for the first time, customer satisfaction with federal agency Websites has surpassed offline government services,” according to an American Customer Satisfaction Index report. What is especially noteworthy, however, is that online private sector services consistently rank higher in satisfaction than their governmental counterparts. “Where the gap between offline public and private services has narrowed, the report said, e-government is trailing far behind the private sector online. That, said ACSI chief Claes Fornell, shows room...
Ethics & Economics reviews
The Acton Institute has placed three titles from the Lexington Books Studies in Ethics & Economics series, edited by Acton director of research Samuel Gregg. The first is Within the Market Strife: American Catholic Economic Thought from Rerum Novarum to Vatican II, by Acton research fellow Kevin Schmiesing. The reviews are here. Daddypundit says, “Schmiesing has made his book accessible to persons of all faiths regardless of their own background. He has meticulously researched his book and it shows in...
A Stark contrast
Kishore has helpfully pointed out the discussions going on elsewhere about Rodney Stark’s piece and the related NYT David Brook’s op-ed. He derides some of menters for their lack of economic understanding, but I’d like to applaud menter’s post. He questions, as I do, the fundamental validity of Stark’s thesis (which essentially ignores such an important strand of Christianity as Eastern Orthodoxy). Among other astute observations, Christopher Sarsfield asks: “Was it the principles of Christianity that put the ‘goddess of...
Amy Welborn’s blog on capitalism and Catholicism
The Acton debate on the relationship has featured blog posts on Rodney Stark and David Brooks’s column on Starks. Amy Welborn’s site has more in these two posts (here and here), with a somewhat lively debate in ments sections. Several of ments regard Max Weber’s thesis on the Protestant work ethic and capitalism, and reveal a misunderstanding of what makes for economic growth in Ireland and the lack of it in Latin America. It’s pretty obvious there are few Actonites...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved