Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Student Loans and the Sin of Usury
Student Loans and the Sin of Usury
Jul 14, 2025 10:30 PM

President Biden’s attempts to erase large portions of student loan debt miss the larger moral picture.

Read More…

A new school year has just begun, and students and their parents are faced once again with the high cost of higher education.

The Supreme Court ruled President Biden’s executive order on student loan forgiveness unconstitutional. Undeterred, the president has since expanded e-based repayment. Predictably, Democrats defended it and Republicans attacked it.

Meanwhile, many continue to struggle with student debt. Tuition has nearly tripled since the introduction of federal loans in the 1980s. Predicted earnings for graduates have diminished. For some majors, according to Forbes, bachelor’s degrees now underperform even an associate’s degree or just a high school diploma.

Christian theology, however, can cut through partisan debates on loan debt to the underlying moral issues through its teaching on the sin of usury.

Usury cannot be reduced to excessive interest. Doing so misses the spirit of traditional Christian concern with interest-bearing loans.

Historically defined as the charging of any interest, before the Protestant Reformation usury was generally forbidden by church authorities based on promised position of borrowers. The Scholastics recognized some payment beyond the principle to be justified, but the general ban on interest, despite a few exceptions, stifled financial progress. However, the prohibition was rooted in a genuine moral rationale.

In a time before bankruptcy protections, default on a loan could result in destitution, imprisonment, or slavery. Jesus even used debtors’ prison to represent hell, warning, “You will by no means get out of there till you have paid the last penny” (Matthew 5:26).

Elites consolidated wealth through lending to distressed borrowers. The Scriptures condemn those who “take usury and increase [and] have made profit from [their] neighbors by extortion” (Ezekiel 22:12). Saint Augustine described a “cruel usurer” as one “desiring to wring gain from other’s tears.”

Absent bankruptcy protections, lenders retain a contractual right to repayment even when investment isn’t profitable. We see this asymmetry in St. Gregory Nazianzen’s claim that a usurer “farm[s], not the land, but the necessity of the needy.” Lenders were not required to take pity on borrowers who couldn’t repay.

By contrast, modern bankruptcy laws limit exploitation, and petition among lenders reduces interest rates. Yet subjugation through lending still affects some borrowers who lack bankruptcy protections: students.

Student loans may be provided by the Department of Education or private investors. The federal government guarantees repayment for private investors. As detailed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, backed by the state and exempt from many bankruptcy protections, lenders do not share the hardship of borrowers, incentivizing moral hazard.

According to Sallie Mae, “You don’t need a strong credit history to get federal student loans” and “You don’t need a cosigner.” Lending standards are practically nonexistent.

Between 100 and 150 billion dollars annually are lent to borrowers with no collateral or consideration of credit history or repayment prospects. The expected value of the education received is not considered. GPA requirements do not consider the difficulty of classes. The pensates lenders for the uncertainty of borrower quality by making more difficult the delay of repayment and the discharge of student loans in bankruptcy.

According to the Department of Education, default will result in garnished wages, with the employer “withhold[ing] up to 15 percent.” Discharge is only possible if borrowers can’t “maintain a minimal standard of living … for a significant portion of the loan repayment period,” and they previously “made good faith efforts to repay.” Of those who do qualify for discharge, the adversary proceeding determines if borrowers must still repay a portion of the loan, possibly at a lower interest rate.

Over the past decade, borrowers with credit scores lower than 620 received about a third of all funds lent via federal student loans. Including all borrowers considered less than prime (credit score below 660), the number of borrowers falls between 40% and 50%. Under current institutional arrangements, lending to low-rated borrowers without regard to the expected value generated looks a lot like premodern usurious exploitation, an attempt “to wring gain from other’s tears,” as St. Augustine put it.

Biden’s most recent action might provide some relief to e borrowers, but it misses the real problem: the usurious structure of federal student loans crowding out alternate aid and career paths for e, high-risk students and swelling college costs for everyone. We need to do more than treat the symptom. We should start this new school year right by repenting of the cause and reforming the system that incentivizes the sin in the first place.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Build yourself, build society
One of Christ’s best-known parables is the Parable of the Talents, but its familiarity disguises just how strange and unsettling its message is. It is a parable of a master who departs on a journey and entrusts three servants, each according to his ability, with his property. Each receives five, two, or one talent(s), respectively. The ablest servant departed, immediately put the money to work, and doubled his master’s talents. The servant entrusted with two talents did the same. But...
Cooperation, not coercion, will defeat COVID-19
As the COVID-19 crisis rolls on, many of America’s governors have continued to impose, extend, or add new restrictions to stay-at-home orders. This has led to increasingly arbitrary rule-making and growing criticism over the prudence and practicality of such measures. Thankfully, individuals and institutions rely on more than government diktats to guide their behavior. In turn, amid the government overreach and tense ideological debates, civil society appears to be self-governing rather well—marked by plenty of individual restraint, collective wisdom, and...
Marx vs. the universal basic income
While a universal basic e has been advocated by everyone from Bernie Sanders to Charles Murray and Pope Francis, the name most associated with wealth redistribution is Marx. However, in a little-known writing Marx specifically opposed the UBI, calling it inefficient and counterproductive. The policy would leave many of its intended beneficiaries worse off, he wrote. Of course, we’re discussing Ive Marx, an economist and sociology professor at the University of Antwerp. Marx’s scholarly work focuses on wealth redistribution and...
Acton Line podcast: Randy Barnett and David French on ‘common-good Constitutionalism’
On March 31, The Atlantic published an article titled “Beyond Originalism,” written by Adrian Vermeule, professor of Constitutional law at Harvard Law School. In this piece, Vermeule argues that “the dominant conservative philosophy for interpreting the constitution has served its purpose and scholars ought to develop a more moral framework.” Originalist interpretations of the Constitution simply no longer serve mon good, Vermeule says. What does he mean by this, and is he correct? In this episode, we’re featuring two different...
Weekend viewing: Watch ‘America Lost’ for free
For a few moments, filmmaker Christopher Rufo’s documentary America Lost seemed in danger of ing an anachronism. But in the age of coronavirus shutdown orders, his portrait of life in the forgotten, jobless corners of America could not be more timely. Rufo spent years interviewing and documenting the lives of struggling people in the depressed cities of Youngstown, Ohio; Memphis, Tennessee; and Stockton, California. (You can read our review here.) Rufo—who serves as director of theDiscovery Institute’s Center on Wealth,...
COVID-19 reminds us of the humanizing aspect of work
With “shelter-in-place” orders across the country during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, most employees are not allowed to enter their work places unless their work is considered “essential” by their state and local governments. Opportunities for normal employment have been disrupted for millions of people around the world. Sadly, many workers have been furloughed, others laid off entirely, and the fortunate ones, thanks to advances in technology, are able to work from home. Beyond the obvious financial implications for individuals, and...
Cooperation vs. coercion amid COVID-19
As the COVID-19 crisis rolls on, many of America’s governors have continued to impose, extend or add new restrictions to stay-at-home orders, leading to increasingly arbitrary rule-making and growing criticism over the prudence and practicality of such measures. Thankfully, individuals and institutions rely on more than government diktats to guide their behavior. In turn, amid the government overreach and tense ideological debates, civil society appears to be self-governing rather well — marked by plenty of individual restraint, collective wisdom and...
COVID-19, socialized medicine and ‘deaths of despair’
The American healthcare industry is undergoing a massive stress test known as the coronavirus. For months and years e, analysts will be issuing their opinions about just how well that industry performed under the incredible, sudden surge of the pandemic. Given the massive influx of stimulus funding for healthcare and programs like Medicare, no one should be surprised about a “barrage” of new lobbying activity and a surge of activism for single payer or universal health care. Getting just ahead...
Acton Line podcast: Responding to a Harvard prof’s call to ban homeschooling
Homeschooling is growing in popularity. In fact, the U.S. Department of Education has shown that it’s grown at a rate of over 60% in the last decade, as many families are deciding that educating their children at home is better than sending them to public or private schools. But Harvard University has a different opinion. In Harvard Magazine’s May/June 2020 issue, one Harvard Law School professor calls for a ban on homeschooling, saying it may keep children from “contributing positively...
What to do about China?
Crises are not only opportunities which should, to paraphrase Rahm Emmanuel, never be allowed go to waste. They also serve as clarifying moments. Unexpected events can shatter even the strongest consensus on a given topic. The coronavirus pandemic is such a moment when es to America’s relationship with China. Until relatively recently, most Western policymakers calculated that a steady integration of China into the global economy would be of mutual economic benefit for China and Western nations. Trade with other...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved