Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Student loan forgiveness is unforgivable
Student loan forgiveness is unforgivable
Apr 4, 2025 7:11 AM

Don’t kid yourselves: Those student loans will be paid back. The question is by whom? And is that in any way fair?

Read More…

The first iron law of economics is that we live in a world of scarcity. Because of this, economics puts constraints on our utopias. Rinse and repeat. This is how we discern between good and disastrous policies. Student-loan bailouts fall into the disastrous category. There are two arguments to be made here: the moral and the economic, and the moral is just as important, if not more so. After all, economics is the study of the pursuit of human flourishing.

First, let’s recap the situation. President Biden announced late last week a plan that will forgive up to $10,000 in personal student loan debt for individuals earning up to $125,000, or $250,000 for married couples who file tax returns jointly. And if your loans are in the form of Pell grants, up to $20,000 will be forgiven. The Biden plan will also continue the pause on federal student-loan repayments, instituted during the pandemic, through the end of this year. Additionally, the plan, in an attempt “to make the student loan system more manageable for current and future borrowers,” proposes an e-driven repayment plan. This caps monthly repayment plans for undergraduate loans at 5% of the borrower’s discretionary e—half the current rate.

The White House announced that this will cost $24 billion per year, depending on the participation rate, with a total cost of $240 billion. Private estimates tell a different story. According to a Penn Wharton analysis:

We estimate that debt cancellation alone will cost up to $519 billion, with about 74% of the benefit accruing to households making $88,000 or less. Loan forbearance will cost another $16 billion. The new e-driven repayment (IDR) program would cost another $70 billion, increasing the total plan cost to $605 billion under strict “static” assumptions. However, depending on the future IDR program details to be released and potential behavioral (i.e., “non-static”) changes, total plan costs could exceed $1 trillion.

We are talking anywhere between $240 billion and $1 trillion in added public costs. No big deal, especially considering that we are teetering on a recession, we’ve endured a global pandemic with catastrophic lockdowns and business closures, inflation is 8.5 percent, and we have $31 trillion in U.S. national debt, amounting to $244,000 owed per taxpayer. Moreover, Social Security and Medicare are on the brink of insolvency. So … what’s another trillion? (And by the way, you can forget any attempt to shrink the federal deficit.)

Again, we cannot make the economic argument without first making the moral argument, which is quite simple: You took out a loan, therefore you have a fiduciary responsibility to repay it. An institution vetted you for this loan, assessed that you were worthy of the risk, and in taking the loan you made mitment. People cannot thrive and societies cannot grow in environments where you can renege on contracts without penalty. Moreover, you do not have to attend college to have a full life or to grow your e. Many top trade jobs bring six-figure es and require no college degree. Each person who makes this decision to attend college or not, to take a loan or not, engages in this cost-benefit analysis. Everyone who took out a loan knows they are expected to repay that loan.

In addition, what does this say to the suckers poor souls who saved up for college and didn’t take out loans to begin with? Or those who worked two, three jobs to pay them back? Or those who took out private loans, which are not included in this debt-relief scheme (which is limited strictly to federally backed loans)?

Here is where the economic argument emerges and coincides with the moral argument.

Remember our first iron law of economics? We live in a world of scarce resources. We have unlimited desires and limited means to satisfy those desires. The decision of whether to attend a four-year college must be ranked against the opportunity costs and the expected long-term benefits. Another way of thinking about this is to say there is no free lunch. College costs you both time and money. Using supply-and-demand curve analysis is helpful here. There is a downward-sloping demand curve for college attendance and an upward-sloping supply curve. The intersection of those two helps us to understand the current equilibrium quantity and price of college.

The bigger issue is that college does not represent what we would call a “free market.” There are many government interventions and subsidies in higher education. If we want college to e more accessible and better in quality, we need to think about increasing the supply. The White House’s simply “eliminating” debt doesn’t help increase the supply of high-quality and affordable higher education. It has the opposite effect. It will accelerate the decades-long trend of making college more expensive. The costs of higher education tuition and fees have increased 178% since 2000.

Moreover, debt cannot be “eliminated” with the wave of a president’s wand. The loan is still owed. Some have gone so far as pare student loan forgiveness to the Year of Jubilee in Leviticus. This is nonsense. The biblical Jubilee was never about debt forgiveness—because the debt has already been paid! It’s a celebration of that very repayment. Biden may (although that’s being debated now) have the power to “wipe away” the debt, but the creditors are still owed.

The Biden plan introduces perverse incentives for several parties. Students now have the incentive to take on more college debt, with the assumption that it will be partially forgiven, the precedent having already been set. Colleges have an incentive to increase tuition and fees because the loan-forgiveness program distorts the overall cost calculus of the students. Over time, a college education will e even more out of reach for more Americans.

Don’t be fooled: Those debts will be repaid and American taxpayers are the ones who will foot the bill. Here we circle back to the moral argument. Why should the trade-school graduate pay for the upper-middle-class kid to attend law school? Under the IDR requirements, the biggest beneficiaries will be recent college graduates. So essentially you take out big loans, attend expensive schools, graduate, and get your first job—then promptly negotiate forgiveness and reduce your monthly burden of repayment (although you may get hit with a higher state tax bill!). The rigged system just became more rigged. It’s a highly regressive policy measure that will be financed by all taxpayers but, importantly, the 60% of Americans who did not attend college.

Rather than eliminating student debt, this program will transfer it to those who don’t owe it. It’s a political ploy, not a thoughtful strategy to help those manage their debt. It’s like putting a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. The problem is that higher ed has been getting more expensive for decades. We need to disentangle the government from higher ed, we need to celebrate vocation and trade jobs, and we need to stop pretending that the government can hand out free lunches. I promise you: Someone is paying for the bologna.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Rock N Roll ‘Jesus’
Last night the American Music Awards were televised on ABC. Among the big winners were alumni of the hit TV show, “American Idol,” whose stars won 3 AMAs. Kid Rock, the Rock N Roll “Jesus.” But there was another kind of “idol” on display at the AMAs, as Detroit’s own Kid Rock was a presenter and did a spoof of his fight with rocker Tommy Lee in edy bit with host Jimmy Kimmel. Kid Rock released a new album last...
A Child’s Faith
“People were bringing little children to Jesus to have him touch them, but the disciples rebuked them. When Jesus saw this, he was indignant. He said to them, ‘Let the little e to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these. I tell you the truth, anyone who will not receive the kingdom of God like a little child will never enter it.’ And he took the children in his arms, put...
Wichita Business Journal: The Call of the Entrepreneur
Pat Sangimino wrote an article for the Wichita Business Journal titled, “Documentary seeks to dispel negative images of entrepreneurs ” (subscription required). A premiere of The Call of the Entrepreneur took place in Wichita, Kan., on November 14th. Sangimino noted in his piece: Some consider Wichita to be the Midwest’s cradle of entrepreneurship. Evidence of that is the original Pizza Hut building, which was moved to the Wichita State University campus in 1984 to serve as a reminder of what...
Reports on Globalization and National Capital
Last month the World Bank published a report titled, “Where is the Wealth of Nations?” (HT: From the Heartland). The report describes estimates of wealth and ponents for nearly 120 countries. The book has four sections. The first part introduces the wealth estimates and highlights the level position of wealth across countries. The second part analyzes changes in wealth and their implications for economic policy. The third part deepens the analysis by considering the importance of human and institutional capital,...
Alarmism and Corruption
Regis Nicoll over at The Point notes a WaPo story that is getting a lot of play on the blogosphere about the UN’s downgrade of the estimate of the extent of the AIDS epidemic, “U.N. to Cut Estimate Of AIDS Epidemic: Population With Virus Overstated by Millions.” Nicoll writes that while of course it is good news that fewer people are infected than were previously thought, “The bad news is that previous estimates were inflated because of politics, bad science,...
Giuliani and the Godbloggers
After the jump is the (hyperlinked) text of a column I filed last week from GodblogCon. Here are some related items worth exploring: “Evangelicals and Evil Empires: Religious voters have long had an interest in foreign policy,” OpinionJournal (HT: CT Liveblog).“Rudy’s Gamble: Giuliani’s audacious strategy for the nomination,” OpinionJournal.“Evangelical flocks on their own at the polls,” LA Times (HT: J-Walking).“On second thought, conservatives give Huckabee an amen,” LA Times.“Clarifying Media Distortions,” Focus on the Family.“Robertson for Rudy,” God’s Politics.“The Robertson...
God Hears the Compassionate
“If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he also shall cry himself, but shall not be heard.” Proverbs 21:13 I remember being very young and hearing a minister dramatically describe the flames and fires of hell in a sermon. I know I was somewhere between the age of six and seven. At this time, I also had little knowledge of salvation in Christ, so I worried about my eternal destination. Couple this thought with a...
Black America Is Just As Class Divided As The Rest Of America
The Pew Research Center released a new report stating: “African Americans see a widening gulf between the values of middle class and poor blacks, and nearly four-in-ten say that because of the diversity within munity, blacks can no longer be thought of as a single race.” Here are the key findings: • Asked whether blacks can still be thought of as a single race, given the increasing diversity within the munity, 53% of blacks say they can, but 37% of...
Prosperity, Sexual Sin, and Forgiveness
A recent survey by the Pew Global Attitudes Project finds that “religion is less likely to be central to the lives of individuals in richer nations than poorer ones” (HT). Given the Bible’s many warnings about the danger presented by wealth, specifically the temptation to no longer rely on God and his providential care, that probably isn’t surprising. But what might be more surprising is that “the United States, the wealthiest nation, was ‘most notably’ an exception, scoring higher in...
George Hearst of Deadwood: ‘The-boy-the-earth-talks-to’
In a bit of an addendum to my review of the HBO series Deadwood in the current issue of Religion & Liberty, “A Law Beyond Law: Life Together in Deadwood,” I couldn’t help thinking of this bit from Clement of Alexandria when describing George Hearst, the über-robber baron of the Old West. In that piece I write, “Hearst fancies that he is doing his fellow man a service in his devotion to mining gold, to acquiring ‘the color.'” There’s a...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved