Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Sports Journalism, Cultural Marxism, and the Miami Dolphins
Sports Journalism, Cultural Marxism, and the Miami Dolphins
Feb 3, 2025 7:45 PM

Class struggle. Racially-charged rhetoric. Anti-capitalist diatribes. Sounds like the lineup to a “Fantasy Diversity” team from a sociology professor at Wellesley College, right?

Alas, I’m merely referring tothe controversysurrounding ex-Miami Dolphins players Jonathan Martin (black) and Richie Incognito (white). For those who haven’t been paying attention – and thank your lucky stars that you haven’t – Martin left the team for personal reasons and his fellow offensive lineman Incognito was released by the Dolphins for allegedly being the bully who broke the spirit of the younger Martin.

I’m not here interested in solving the intra-team dynamics of a professional football team (comprised of giant men who willingly smash into each other for a living), but instead wanted to share with you a very telling quote from the media’s coverage of this story.

es from a sports “journalist” (term used loosely) namedJason Whitlockwho works for ESPN. Mr. Whitlock is no stranger to controversy or inflammatory remarks, having made many of his own through the years via his columns and various radio shows. On Tuesday’s episode ofThe Tony Kornheiser Showon ESPN 980 (out of Washington D.C.), Whitlock was asked by Kornheiser to explain why the Dolphins players would want to harass and “cannibalize” a promising young player like Martin when they need all the help they can get on the actual football field.

Jason’s response?

“Because that’s what we do in America. That’s what capitalism does. It’s preys upon the weak.”

Interesting leap there for a sub-genre of journalist who, as Matt K. Lewis of The Daily Caller points out today, is supposedly covering a-political stuff. When asked about bullying in a locker room of grown men, Comrade Whitlock jumps right to class struggle, economic exploitation, and the evils of free enterprise. Almost as if he’d be indoctrinated at an impressionable age with Marxist-infused ideology that is designed to be the lenses through which its adherents observe and understand the world around them…

And here, where you least expect it, attacks against free market capitalism – based squarely on flawed understandings of everything from economics to human behavior – leave their indelible mark on the psyche of unsuspecting Americans. But ain’t that the way it always is?

I’ve never been a big believer in conspiracy theories that put scheming progressives in aDr. Strangelove-like war room, deciding to change the world. Sure, there may be some of that here and there, but the problem those of us who cherish economic freedom and limited government face is more insidious than that. We’re “battling” (term used loosely) people who have been raised in environments where cultural Marxism is the air that they breathe. They reach ages like 46 – Whitlock’s age – and have never been confronted with clear articulations of the other side’s worldview.

And so they grow deeper in love with the self-satisfied, emotions-based responses about class, race and gender that explain everything for someone on the Left.

We need to introduce an intoxicating intellectual mistress into their midst. We need to reinvigorate the primal, instinctual cravings of Creator-endowed sub-creators. The love affair with progressivism clouds the decision-making ability of millions of Americans in a million different daily scenarios that have nothing to do with the arenas of politics and economics that we typically think they exclusively reside.

A boring discussion on the merits of lower marginal tax rates can’t be our best line of defense against something that potent.

———-

“We must make the building of a free society once more an intellectual adventure, a deed of courage.” -F.A. Hayek

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Obama’s Remarks At National Prayer Breakfast
The National Prayer Breakfast, a D.C.-event going back to 1953, was held this morning. The keynote was USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah, and President Obama added remarks. Obama chose to focus on religious freedom, calling it a matter of “national security,” menting that he was looking forward to his trip to the Vatican next month to meet with Pope Francis. Obama also said, Yet even as our faith sustains us, it’s also clear that around the world freedom of religion is...
Religion & Liberty: An Interview with Fr. James Schall
In the editor’s notes of the new issue of Religion & Liberty, I mentioned Time magazine’s iconic 1964 photo spread “War on Poverty: Portraits From an Appalachian Battleground.” Appalachia was a major target of America’s war on poverty. Today many of those same problems persist despite the steady stream of federal dollars. Unfortunately, unintended consequences from government spending, has expanded many of the problems, as Kevin D. Williamson covered so well in the piece “The White Ghetto” for National Review....
‘Finally, a Conservative Leader’
Acton’s Director of Research, Samuel Gregg, recently wrote a special report, Finally, a Conservative Leader over at The American Spectator. Last year, a reporter asked Gregg who the current “outstanding center-right head of government” is. He responded that Margaret Thatcher was his first thought, though Australian Prime Minister “Tony Abbott is the real thing like no one since Margaret Thatcher.” He goes on, “thus far Abbott has matched his open adherence to distinctly conservative convictions by implementing policies that reflect...
Why Natural Law Arguments Are Necessary
A few weeks ago I asked why natural law arguments more persuasive. Natural law advocates intend for such argument to persuade both believers and non-believers, so how do they account for the relative ineffectualness of such arguments? Why don’t more people find them to be persuasive? In response to my question (as well as questions and criticisms from others), Sherif Girgis proffered a defense and explanation: Yes. Over the last few years, my coauthors and I have heard from many...
What Liberal Evangelicals Should Know About the Economic Views of Conservative Evangelicals (Part 2)
Why do liberal and conservative evangelicals tend to disagree so often about economic issues? This is the second in a series of posts that addresses that question by examining 12 principles that generally drive the thinking of conservative evangelicals when es to economics. The first in the series can be found here.A PDF/text version of the entire series can be foundhere. In my first post, I covered the first four principles (#1 – Good intentions are often trumped by unintended...
The Boring Work Of Development
Helping people get out of poverty is hard, dirty work. It isn’t glamorous. Most of those involved do not get to wander around the developing world wearing cool blue shades and giving sound bites. In fact, the Campaign for Boring Development is so insistent on this, they’ve written a manifesto to drive home the point: development work can be…boring. Development Does Not Photograph Well. Watching a family till their land does not make for riveting video. It’s just plain ole...
We Coddle Teens By Not Holding Them Accountable For Their Actions
In the book A Conflict Of Visions, Thomas Sowell explains that progressives look for the cause of crime because they believe human beings to be essentially good and not prone to self-interest or moral failings. For progressives, “It is hard to understand how anyone mit a terrible crime without some special cause at work, if only blindness,” observes Sowell. Progressives “see human nature as itself adverse to crime, and society as undermining this natural aversion through its own injustices, insensitivities,...
The Mirage of Disability
Annette Gabbedy is a business ownerand expert designer andgoldsmith. She was also born without fingers, a disposition many might consider a “disability,” particularly in her line of work. Yet, as you’ll see in the following video, having created and traded her wares for 23 years, Gabbedy sees no reason for this to inhibit her creativity and contribution to society. As Gabbedy explains: I tend to really look at people with fingers and think: Well, how can you manage with fingers,...
Obamacare and the Laffer Curve Napkin
During a meeting in a restaurant with two officials from the Ford Administration — Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld — a young economist sketched a curve on a napkin to illustrate an argument he was making. Arthur Laffer was explaining to the policymakers the concept of taxable e elasticity—i.e., taxable e will change in response to changes in the rate of taxation. By 1974, the idea was already ancient. Ibn Khaldun, a 14th century Muslim philosopher, wrote in his work...
It’s Not Only the Poor Who Need Moral Leadership
“Oral histories often paint a rosy picture of the moral fiber of previous generations,” write Anthony Bradley and Sean Spurlock in this week’s Acton Commentary. “But close attention to history reveals the truth about human condition: that regardless of our social status, everyone is in need of moral formation – and thus it has always been.” In Britain and elsewhere, as the contrast between the publicly held moral code and private behavior became clear, the code itself was discredited. The...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved