Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Socialists outraged as French president says Christianity can cure economic malaise
Socialists outraged as French president says Christianity can cure economic malaise
Jan 11, 2026 1:20 AM

Faithlessness is so ingrained in French culture that the president’s mere consultation with the nation’s Christian leaders apparently verges on a constitutional crisis. Emmanuel Macron appealed to the nation’s clergy to bring their faith’s insights to bear on national issues, specifically economic stagnation and human dignity. But his decision to meet with the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of France(CEF) and400 guests inside the College des Bernardinsin Paris on Monday set off a national row over whether he had violated the principle of laïcité – a pervasive and legally prescribed secularism.

The English term “secularism” does not adequately express the deeply exclusionary way French authorities have sometimes applied the doctrine, which one former government minister defined as “secular totalitarianism.”

The Third Republic had encroached on the life of the Roman Catholic Church for decades before formally codifying laïcité in the 1905 law “concernant la séparation des Églises et de l’État.” Pope Pius X wrote that the change, which transferred ownership of religious buildings to the government, “tramples under foot the rights of property of the Church … which belongs to her by titles as numerous as they are sacred.” At various times, faithful Catholics were denied promotions in the military, and the Church was perpetually admonished to ment on affairs of state.

“Laïcité has e the first religion of the Republic,” wrote French political scientist DominiqueMoïsi. Last year, when presidential candidate François Fillon said, “I am a Christian,” National Front candidate Marine Le Pendeemedthe sentiment “contrary to the principle oflaïcité.”

Militant secularism has not diminished mankind’s longing to punish heretics. This is verified by ment in Macron’s speech the public has found most offensive: “The link between Church and state has deteriorated, and that it is important for us, and for me, to repair it.”

The backlash came swiftly. “Mr. President, the link with the churches has not been damaged! It was broken in 1905!” tweeted Jean-Luc Mélenchon, leader of the far-Left La France Insoumise. Premeditated dialogue with bishops is “irresponsible” and holds the potential to “unmake the Republic.” The Socialist Party’s 2017 presidential candidate, Benoît Hamon, called Macron’s speech “an unprecedented violation of laïcité.” Olivier Faure, first secretary of the Socialist Party, replied that “laïcité is our jewel.”

And as if to fulfill Moïsi’s words, the former socialist prime minister and Macron supporter Manuel Valls wrote, “Laïcité is France.”

Macron, anticipating this furore, told the bishops that “laïcité certainly does not” have to “require denying the spiritual in the name of the temporal, nor uprooting from our societies the sacred.” Furthermore, “a church claiming to be indifferent to temporal questions would not fulfill its vocation,” and a president “claiming to be uninterested in the Church and Catholics would fail in his duty.”

This is in part because Christianity has motivated so many of his nation’s heroes:

If Catholics … agreed to die, it is not only in the name of humanist ideals. It is not in the name only of a secularized, Judeo-Christian morality. It is because they were driven by their faith in God and by their religious practice.

Macron, having cast the faith in an unfamiliar role as a positive influence, said France needs Christian insights to impart a meaning to life and work. The nation suffers not just from “the economic crisis,” but from “relativism” and “even nihilism,” which “suggests that [effort] is not worth it – no need to learn, no need to work.”

While French economic policy denies people the full exercise of their gifts by not “remunerating work” and by “discouraging initiative,” a renewed emphasis on Catholic social teaching can “restore the first dignity, that of living from his own work.”

Christianity teaches the inherent dignity of all honest labor, the responsibility of earning one’s daily bread, and the unique way each person’s temporal vocation serves the rest of humanity. Such doctrines would prove a powerful arrow in the quiver of a nation currently aspiring to two-percent annual economic growth and watching unemployment dip below nine percent for the first time in nearly a decade.

Macron’s speech – which came as the nation is debating a bioethical law that would have taxpayers underwrite in vitro fertilization for same-sex couples and ease assisted dying – classed these teachings alongside traditional respect for “the dignity of the most fragile” members of society.

Citizens recognize humanity’s innate value when religion, rather than the vague abstract of “European values,” suffuses life with meaning. Macron said:

Our contemporaries, whether they believe or do not believe, need to hear from another perspective on man than the material perspective. They need to quench … a thirst for the Absolute. It is not a question here of conversion, but of a voice which, with others, still dares to speak of man as a living spirit – which dares to speak of something other than the temporal, without abdicating reason or reality.

Macron, the 39-year-old president, asked to be baptized as a Catholic at age 12. While those close to him say he is an agnostic, many consider him a “Zombie Catholic” – one whose faith continues to influence him after formal belief has died.

If so, the wake left his views anything but sectarian. He has cultivated a cordial relationship with members of all religions – France has Europe’ largest population of Muslims and Jews – inviting interfaith leaders to meet at the Elysée last December. Macron made an awkward ecumenical gesture this week, when he told the French bishops it was “impossible to disentangle” the “ardent Catholic faith” of a soldier who gave his life for a civilian during a terrorist attack last month from his patriotic ideals “nourished by his Masonic career.”

But the president’s professed desire to have Christians offer their unique perspective alongside other munities in a respectful national dialogue may flounder. While professed Catholics make up as much as three-quarters of the French population, only 2.9 percent practice their faith – less than the cohort of active Muslims in France’s fast-growing Islamic population which, in its fundamentalist form, has no interest in ecumenism. In the most memorable line of her speech to this year’s CPAC, Marion Maréchal-Le Pen said that France is transforming “from the eldest daughter of the Catholic Church to the little niece of Islam.” If so, an unyielding laïcité played the midwife.

“Do not give up on Europe, whose meaning you have nourished,” President Macron exhorted the Catholic bishops on Monday. “Do not leave the land you have planted fallow.”

As goes Europe’s Christian population, so goes the uniquely transcendent-yet-rational voice that gave birth to its culture.

For the continent not to fall barren requires a greater cultural openness to both the seed and its Sower.

Jarvis.CC BY-SA 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
ExTORTion
S. T. Karnick over at The Reform ments on a recent suit filed against DuPont over Teflon, claiming that “DuPont lied in a massive attempt to continue selling their product.” Karnick observes that abuse of the tort system is rampant, in part because “it has been perverted into a proxy for the criminal justice system: a means of punishing supposed wrongdoers through the use of a weaker standard of proof—preponderance of the evidence instead of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.”...
The school of fish
The recent blogpost by my colleague Jordan Ballor discusses an op-ed written by law professor Stanley Fish. I am more familiar with Stanley Fish from his days as a literary theorist, and perhaps a quick review of a younger Fish will contribute to the conversation. Fish is known for, among other things, an idea of literary interpretation he called munities’ that suggests meaning is not found in the author, nor in the reader, but in munity in which the text...
Animal cruelty?
I’m not quite sure what to make of this local story: “Four people are charged for their alleged involvement in killing two bald eagles.” The details of the alleged crimes are as follows: “Prosecutors say two teenagers shot the eagles in the Muskegon State Game Area with a .22 caliber rifle in April 2004 and then chopped them up with a hatchet.” Since the bald eagle, one of the nation’s revered symbols, is an endangered animal, it is protected by...
The hermeneutical spiral
Mr. Phelps takes issue with my characterization of Stanley Fish’s position as amounting “to a philosophical denial of realism.” Let me first digress a bit and place ment within the larger context of my post. My identification of a position that “words and texts have no meaning in themselves” is really just an aside within the larger and more important question about what measure of authority authorial intent has in the interpretation of documents, specifically public documents like the Constitution....
Labor unions and free association
The Service Employees International Union and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters have broken away from the plaining that the federation has focused too much on political activism in the face of declining union membership and influence. Dr. Charles Baird was a featured guest on yesterday’s edition of Kresta in the Afternoon on Ave Maria Radio, discussing Catholic perspectives on unionism and whether the modern American labor union movement patible with church teachings. Dr. Baird is Chair of the Department of...
Textual interpretation
A week ago Stanley Fish, a law professor at Florida International University, wrote an op-ed in The New York Times about the principles of constitutional interpretation, especially as represented by Justice Antonin Scalia. Fish takes issue especially with the notion that the text can have meaning “as it exists apart from anyone’s intention.” Fish essentially denies that texts are things that can have meanings in themselves, and it amounts to a philosophical denial of realism. Part of Fish’s problem is...
Seeing the trees, missing the forest
The United Nations has released a report on the ongoing upheavals in Zimbabwe, where tyrant Robert Mugabe has been punishing his political opponents under the guise of “cleaning up” the country’s cities. The effect of Operation Murambatsvina (meaning either “Operation Restore Order” or “Operation Drive Out Trash,” depending on who’s translation you believe) has been to leave some 700,000 people homeless, jobless, or both. A downloadable copy of the UN report is available here. While the report does illuminate the...
Great debate
Foreign Policy hosts this exchange on environmental issues and economics. Carl Pope, executive director of the Sierra Club, gets the first word and Bjørn Lomborg, adjunct professor at the Copenhagen Business School, gets the last word. ...
CAFTA/Culture of Life: enemies?
John Paul II gave us all a tremendous gift by endorsing the terms Culture of Life and Culture of Death. But as with all great gifts, we must guard these terms carefully so as not to wear them out with misuse, robbing them of their relevance. Unfortunately, this is precisely what is happening in the current debate over CAFTA. A group called Catholics for Faithful Citizenship (PDF) claims the following: “Clearly, supporting CAFTA is inconsistent with upholding a culture of...
Close call on CAFTA
Close at Home The House of Representatives voted early this morning (12:03 am) to approve the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) after weeks of intense lobbying on both sides. The final vote was a close 217-215. My predictions: somehow, any dip in employment (if there is one) in the next six months will somehow be linked to CAFTA by its detractors. Detractors will attempt to take the moral high ground in American politics in ’06 and ’08, and even...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved