Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Socialism’s three-legged stool: Envy, ignorance, and faith
Socialism’s three-legged stool: Envy, ignorance, and faith
Mar 15, 2025 9:03 PM

When democratic socialists were asked what they would build in place of Amazon’s HQ2 now that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez had chased it out of Queens, the response was “a guillotine.” That reply, contained in an insightful and in-depth portrait of young socialists in New York magazine, perfectly illustrates the difference between the worldview of secular collectivists and those who believe in the free market.

One may take from Simon van Zuylen-Wood’s thorough essay that today’s socialism is built on the three-legged stool of envy, ignorance, and faith.

As their casual embrace of decapitation may insinuate, for all their talk about solidarity with suffering humanity young socialists disregard the fundamental human dignity of their opponents. The ment is no mere aberration. “The magazineJacobin— named for the insurgents who led France’s murderous Reign ofTerror during the Revolution — has only grown in influence since its 2010 founding,” writes van Zuylen-Wood.

Escorting Jeff Bezos to the gallows for the crime of offering people jobs seems unduly harsh unless one has polarized the world into hermetically sealed camps of oppressors and liberators. One hears this contempt echo in the counsel of Chapo Trap House podcast host Will Menaker. He warned young socialists that they e up with “a smart response” when asked how they plan to pay for their policies:

“The smart response is: ‘All the numbers are correct. All this is true about the deficit. But, f–k the deficit because it’s not real and it doesn’t matter.’” The audience whooped. Another option, he said, is to “turn all the existing billionaires into millionaires. Or Soylent.” (The original article did not censor the curse word.)

ments betray not only a chilling inhumanity but a widespread ignorance found among socialists – not only of economics but of exactly what socialism is.

Widespread acceptance mand economics is due in part to the fact that a nebulous socialism has e most popular with those born after the end of the Cold War. “[T]he word had lost its meaning by the time it got hot again,” writes van Zuylen-Wood, and its idealistic adherents eagerly project their hopes and desires onto it. A recent Gallup poll showed only 17 percent of Americans properly defined socialism – and the confusion is not merely limited to everyday Americans but also on popularized by its most ardent proselytizers.

Ash Sarkar – the young British polemicist lionized by Teen Vogue for screaming “I’m literally a Communist” at Piers Morgan – promotes a brand of “fun Communism” to her followers. “Communism is a belief in the power of people to organize their lives as individuals – their social lives, their political and their economic lives – without being managed by a state,” she told fellow leftist Owen Jones. In another context, she explainedthat Communism is “the desire to see the coercive structures of state dismantled, while also having fun.”

To describe a totalitarian philosophy that systematically starved, enslaved, and murdered hundreds of millions of people for a century as a minimal state is, to put it mildly, ahistorical. To characterize Communism as “fun” reveals either the depths of one’s ignorance or sadism.

…Or faith. Van Zuyen-Wood concludes his article by noting that he attended a recent Democratic Socialists of America meeting where, before the members could endorse a candidate, they had to engage in a convoluted and boring bureaucratic process. (This should give them a tiny window into life under socialism.) However, he writes rades sat through the ordeal enthusiastically, “[l]ike devoted members of a social club, or a church parish.”

Engaging with today’s young socialists begins with the realization that their proposals are not merely unrealistic, but that they are deliberately so. The thirst munion with God and man, placed in the heart by our Creator, is ineradicable. When belief in religion wanes, faith seeks new vessels of adoration. Socialists vulgarize munion of saints into “solidarity” with the proletariat. They swap asceticism aimed at purging their sinful passions for political activism on behalf of those they deem historically oppressed. (The article humorously notes the DSA’s “demographic makeup, as usual” is “considerably whiter” than the neighborhoods its members purportedly represent.) They switch a reasoned dialogue to discover the good, the true, and the beautiful with an endless array of censorious codes aimed at curbing the expression of proscribed thoughts.

Socialists’ proximate exchange of productive, good-paying jobs for publicly beheading billionaires reflects their offering an economic idol in place of their deeply religious yearning for their meaning, purpose, and significance as children of God. They replace their hungering to enter the kingdom of Heaven with fantasies of erecting an earthly Utopia – and tragedy inevitably follows.

Faiths that have historically rejected socialism encourage humanity to build. They want to see businesses open, new ventures attempted, and individuals peacefully coexist politically and economically through free exchange.

Free enterprise, if far from perfect, respects the individual dignity of every child of God by assuring his or her agency. Virtue constrains that agency – which is just another term for “free will” – within socially beneficial outlets. And faith is so apparently the surest ground for virtue that Gouverneur Morris, one of the most virulent opponents of slavery among the Founding Fathers, wrote that “[r]eligion is the only solid basis of good morals.”

Those who believe in the free market, irrespective of whether they believe in a higher power, should hope that the mass of their fellow citizens do. And adherents of true faith should do all in their power to gain adherents before their religion is eclipsed by a misguided, and barbarous, pretender.

Shankbone. This photo has been cropped. CC BY 3.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Video: Bill McGurn’s Keynote Address at Acton University
We’re still working on finishing production on the audio and video captured last week at Acton University 2013. Here’s William McGurn, Editorial Page Editor at the New York Post and former speechwriter for President George W. Bush, addressing Acton U participants last Thursday night: ...
How the Quality of Marriages Affects a Country’s Economy
The quality of children and our future society, depends directly on the quality of the marriage of their parents, says Pat Fagan of the Family Research Council speaking at the recent World Congress of Families: Fagan notes that society is made up of five facets: the family, church, school, the marketplace and government. The first three mentioned are the places that “grow the people” so to speak, and are closely interrelated. The last two areas of society are those into...
Acton University on Ancient Faith Radio
The audio of four lectures from Acton University last week focusing on topics related to the Orthodox Christian Tradition — two by Fr. Michael Butler, one by Fr. Gregory Jensen, and one by Fr. Hans Jacobse — is now available to stream free of charge on Ancient Faith Radio (here). The lectures are as follows (click to listen): Fr. Michael Butler, “Orthodoxy, Church, and State” Fr. Michael Butler, “Orthodoxy and Natural Law”Fr. Gregory Jensen, “East Meets West: Consumerism and Asceticism”Fr....
The Rise of the $10 Philanthropist
Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen, a lecturer at Stanford University, on what makes a philanthropist: WSJ: How do you define a philanthropist? Ms. Arrillaga-Andreessen: A philanthropist is anyone who gives time, money, experience, skills, networks [or] passion. The only thing that you need is generosity. For example, [recently] after class I counseled a puter science student who wanted to talk about how he could play a role in changing how engineering is taught globally. So we started developing a strategy for how he...
Are Socially Responsible Businesses Bad for Society?
In Foreign Policy, Daniel Altman argues that over the long-term panies are often better for society than so-called socially responsible business initiatives: As Jonathan Berman and I have written in the past, panies that take a long time horizon in their decision-making are likely to make more social and environmental investments. Things like training workers, munities, and protecting ecosystems can take a long time to pay off for panies. When they do, the return — including a stronger labor pool,...
Video: Samuel Gregg Closes Acton University 2013
Acton’s Director of Research Samuel Gregg took to the podium on the final night of Acton University 2013 to deliver the closing plenary address for the conference. Below, Gregg closes the conference with a reflection on modern threats to religious liberty, and how the faithful can respond. ...
Natural Resources are Human Resources
If the PowerBlog has a favorite atheist libertarian economist, it’s probably George Mason professor Don Boudreaux. Although he isn’t a believer, he sometimes stumbles upon what I would consider to be Christian insights. Consider, for instance, his take on the term “natural resources”: In nearly all contexts, words and phrases inevitably convey not only information (such as, as Deirdre would say, “telephone numbers”), but also ideas – notions – interpretations – perspectives – biases – prejudices – spins -approval or...
Sex Trafficking, China’s One-Child Policy And Gendercide
As reported here last week, the US State Department has released its 2013 “Trafficking In Persons” or Tip Report. In it, China has been reduced to a Tier 3 ranking, the lowest ranking a nation can receive. That means the nation is doing little or nothing ply with international laws regarding the trafficking of persons. According to the Population Research Institute, the State Department acknowledges that China’s one-child policy (which is directly linked to gendercide) has heavily influenced that nation’s...
Anthony Bradley on Sustainability and Stewardship
At Acton University last week, Anthony Bradley gave a lecture titled, “Beyond the Sustainability Complex.” In his lecture, he explored Christian stewardship and addressed some mon fallacies about sustainability. Bradley began with this statement: “Being less bad is not good stewardship.” As Christians, we are not called to damage the environment less than our neighbor, but we are called to do good. The main way that we attempt to be “less bad” is through recycling. Bradley spoke at length about...
Fr. Gregory Jensen: East Meets West: Asceticism and Consumerism
Last Friday at Acton University, Fr. Gregory Jensen gave an engaging lecture on the dual subject of asceticism and consumerism. The “East Meets West” part might not be what many would expect. Rather than contrast a consumerist West with an ascetic East, Fr. Gregory insists that both consumerism and asceticism transcend cultures and traditions. Inasmuch as all people take part in consumption, an ascetic answer to the challenge of consumerism is (or ought to be) where East meets West. The...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved