Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Should We Subdue Our ‘Dominion’ Enthusiasm?
Should We Subdue Our ‘Dominion’ Enthusiasm?
Feb 1, 2026 3:53 AM

The topic of mankind’s “dominion” over God’s created order is one that has been misunderstood by entire generations of Americans in the last half century. Many conscientious people of faith worry that the traditional Judeo-Christian values system in the West has dropped the ball when es to the environment and our usage of natural resources. While there are more than a few grains of truth in these charges, the emotional appeal of being on the side of Mother Nature can take its intellectual (and eventually, moral) toll on even the most sincere of Believers.

Let’s take a quick look at what Scripture has to say about all of this.

Genesis 1:26-28:

Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth”

In the verses above God says what He is going to do (i.e. make man in His image, let him have dominion over the earth), does what He said He would do, and then, a few verses later (31), says that what He did was “good.”

Dominion is a good thing. Before sin entered the world Adam was given work to do. He was made the foreman of planet earth. In Genesis 3, after The Fall, Adam is still the foreman, still has dominion, and again manded to “subdue” the earth. It is at this point, however, that God warns him of how difficult and toilsome his work will now e.

But what does dominion mean? What does subduing the earth look like?

The term “subdue” (in Hebrew, “kabash”) is used in the Old Testament to describe when someone takes control of a piece of land or group of people and subjugates it (or them) with the express purpose of yielding a benefit from it (or them).

One of the most important implications of this verse is that human beings are supposed to cultivate, investigate, develop, and look after the planet and its resources. This would reasonably include the cultivation and development of ideas themselves. Certain ways of doing things are verifiably better than others. It’s not good subjugation to continually re-tread ineffective (and in some cases, disastrous) ideas.

In short, we are to derive benefits from what God has blessed us with and given us stewardship over.

God knew that mankind would feel tempted to worship nature because of how awe-inspiring it can be, and because the worship of nature carries with it pulsory moral code to bind us. He knew that we would mistake (or intentionally replace) the creation for the Creator.

This, I believe, is a big reason He made sure to give us dominion over nature. If we could adequately appreciate that it (nature) is subservient to us, we might be more inclined to remember that we, in turn, are subservient to Him. We might then, perhaps, learn to thank Him in light of the former and worship Him in light of the latter.

There is a pecking order in God’s universe, and while He is over and above all things, He graciously gave us rank and responsibility over and above nature.

As is the case with all positions of leadership and responsibility, there are perks and there are duties. I would venture to say that one perk of having dominion over nature is that we can subdue the earth to the extent that we establish civilizations, which affords us the opportunity to create things like art and poetry and Dostoevsky novels. But it’s not supposed to be all fun and games. Our duties include the aforementioned “toilsome” work that, thousands of years after the events of Genesis, Saint Paul will teach that “a man shall not eat” if he won’t do.

Will Rogers once wrote, “Freedom isn’t free.” Well, neither is dominion.

To many modern Americans, the very notion of human beings being more important than nature may be jolting to the senses. In truth, this notion shouldn’t be anything but an interesting blend of humbling forting. Christ speaks of our superior worth in Matthew 7 when he says:

Look at the birds of the air: they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not of more value than they?

I can’t tell you why everything is the way it is, but I can tell you how things are. God made us in His image, and subsequently we have (conditional) dominion, responsibility to subdue the earth, and the capabilities to create, innovate, develop, and improve the world around us. This dominion isn’t unlimited. Human beings can’t fix, solve or control everything. Human beings also cannot simply do whatever they want to the earth and its resources. Stewardship is an impediment not only to exploitation, but to indifference to exploitation.

So what are the practical worldview implications here? Scripture doesn’t just suggest dominion, productivity, and development of natural resources – mands it. Appreciating that we live in an imperfect world, and that we won’t always get to reside in the most God-honoring system of government and/or economy, the primary concern of a follower of Christ ought to be what God’s standard is. Christians living in China, Iran, and even Socialist Europe have very little say or sway in terms of how their governments and economic marketplaces function. Traditionally, Americans have had much more opportunity to mold and shape their culture, and as the saying goes: “politics” is down-stream of culture.

Therefore, I believe that part of my job as a believer in the public square is to –as best I can – advocate and vote for people, ideas, and mechanisms that – as best they can – honor and pursue my biblical worldview.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
We’re doomed. Just accept it.
Whoever wrote this deserves an award for managing to keep all of the various threads together. It’s almost a perfect storm of public policy ineptitude: Just in case you lost track of the bouncing ball, here it is: Virginia has finally put the crisis-ignoring haters of truth in their place by passing a roads package to encourage the use of cars that are destroying the planet, so people can reach their sprawling subdivisions that Virginia is trying to keep in...
Earth Day and the environment
Over the last week I’ve done a couple radio interviews related to my op-ed in the Detroit News, “U.S. must move beyond Earth Day slogans.” Thanks to The Bill Meyer Show out of Medford, Oregon, who had me on in the morning last Thursday. And thanks also to The Paul Edwards Program for having me on yesterday. I spoke with Paul at some length about plications of owning Compact Fluorescent Lightbulbs (CFLs). In the course of the interview (which you...
Google faces free speech resolution
Via Slashdot, es today that Google’s next shareholders meeting will feature a vote on a shareholder resolution to protect free speech bat censorship by intrusive governments. According to the proxy statement, Proposal Number 5 would require the recognition of “minimum standards,” including, that pany will use all legal means to resist demands for censorship. pany will ply with such demands if required to do so through legally binding procedures,” and that pany will not engage in pro-active censorship.” Part of...
If the earth can be God, why can’t Al Gore be a prophet?
Back in September of 2003, Michael Crichton delivered an address in which he made the claim that modern environmentalism has e much more than a desire to be wise stewards of our environment; rather, he said, it has e a full-fledged religion. Here’s a sample: I studied anthropology in college, and one of the things I learned was that certain human social structures always reappear. They can’t be eliminated from society. One of those structures is religion. Today it is...
Global warming consensus alert!
Via Stephen Hayward at Planet es word of another scientist off the “consensus” reservation. According to David Evans (who, according to his bio, is a genuine rocket scientist – sweeeet…), “… in 1999 the evidence that carbon emissions caused global warming seemed pretty conclusive, but since then new evidence has weakened the case that carbon emissions are the main cause. I am now skeptical. As Lord Keynes famously said, ‘When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you...
Free economies and the common good
Could the early socialists have envisioned an organization such as Wal-Mart or predicted the thousands of jobs created by such a firm? In this week’s Acton Commentary, Rev. Robert A. Sirico examines the mon good” and free markets in this excerpt from a recent speech at the first annual Free Market Forum, sponsored by Hillsdale College’s Center for the Study of Monetary Systems and Free Enterprise. Read the mentary here. ...
2007 Samaritan Award call for entries
The Acton Institute is looking for great charities. The Samaritan Award is a $10,000 award given to a charity that is primarily privately funded and whose work is direct, personal and accountable. There are also second and third place prizes of $1,000 as well as a special edition of WORLD Magazine that will feature the top 10 charities in the United States. All programs that apply for the Samaritan Award will be entered into the Samaritan Guide which is prehensive...
Emissions and a new coal boom
One more note related to the week’s reflections on energy and the environment. This brief piece from Marketplace highlights coal’s newfound popularity, “Coal makes eback” (here’s an in-depth and more technical piece from the NYT. HT: Instapundit). Marketplace reporter Jeremy Hobson notes the need for coal to be integrated into an energy policy oriented toward independence: “The U.S. has more coal than any other country. $27 billion worth is mined every year. That’s why everyone, from unions to politicians to...
Global Warming Consensus Watch, Volume II
This week in the PowerBlog’s Global Warming Consensus Watch: A final pass at the Sheryl Crow/Toilet Paper controversy, just to ensure that the issue is wiped clean; The fight against climate change goes to 11; Global warming causes everything, and we’ve got professional athletes to prove it; and finally, what – if anything – are those carbon offsets offsetting? Flushing away the residue of a botched joke: As I noted earlier, Sheryl Crow has decided to inform the rest of...
Archbishop resigns board over Sheryl Crow
Tim Townsend, of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, reports: ST. LOUIS — Rock singer Sheryl Crow ing home to Missouri this weekend to sing her polished, roots-rock songs at the Fox Theater to help raise money for children with cancer. But St. Louis Archbishop Raymond Burke was not interested in Crow’s altruism. He was interested in her activism — specifically her support for embryonic stem cell research, which the Roman Catholic church believes is akin to abortion. On Wednesday, Burke said...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved