Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Should We Subdue Our ‘Dominion’ Enthusiasm?
Should We Subdue Our ‘Dominion’ Enthusiasm?
Feb 1, 2026 10:17 PM

The topic of mankind’s “dominion” over God’s created order is one that has been misunderstood by entire generations of Americans in the last half century. Many conscientious people of faith worry that the traditional Judeo-Christian values system in the West has dropped the ball when es to the environment and our usage of natural resources. While there are more than a few grains of truth in these charges, the emotional appeal of being on the side of Mother Nature can take its intellectual (and eventually, moral) toll on even the most sincere of Believers.

Let’s take a quick look at what Scripture has to say about all of this.

Genesis 1:26-28:

Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth”

In the verses above God says what He is going to do (i.e. make man in His image, let him have dominion over the earth), does what He said He would do, and then, a few verses later (31), says that what He did was “good.”

Dominion is a good thing. Before sin entered the world Adam was given work to do. He was made the foreman of planet earth. In Genesis 3, after The Fall, Adam is still the foreman, still has dominion, and again manded to “subdue” the earth. It is at this point, however, that God warns him of how difficult and toilsome his work will now e.

But what does dominion mean? What does subduing the earth look like?

The term “subdue” (in Hebrew, “kabash”) is used in the Old Testament to describe when someone takes control of a piece of land or group of people and subjugates it (or them) with the express purpose of yielding a benefit from it (or them).

One of the most important implications of this verse is that human beings are supposed to cultivate, investigate, develop, and look after the planet and its resources. This would reasonably include the cultivation and development of ideas themselves. Certain ways of doing things are verifiably better than others. It’s not good subjugation to continually re-tread ineffective (and in some cases, disastrous) ideas.

In short, we are to derive benefits from what God has blessed us with and given us stewardship over.

God knew that mankind would feel tempted to worship nature because of how awe-inspiring it can be, and because the worship of nature carries with it pulsory moral code to bind us. He knew that we would mistake (or intentionally replace) the creation for the Creator.

This, I believe, is a big reason He made sure to give us dominion over nature. If we could adequately appreciate that it (nature) is subservient to us, we might be more inclined to remember that we, in turn, are subservient to Him. We might then, perhaps, learn to thank Him in light of the former and worship Him in light of the latter.

There is a pecking order in God’s universe, and while He is over and above all things, He graciously gave us rank and responsibility over and above nature.

As is the case with all positions of leadership and responsibility, there are perks and there are duties. I would venture to say that one perk of having dominion over nature is that we can subdue the earth to the extent that we establish civilizations, which affords us the opportunity to create things like art and poetry and Dostoevsky novels. But it’s not supposed to be all fun and games. Our duties include the aforementioned “toilsome” work that, thousands of years after the events of Genesis, Saint Paul will teach that “a man shall not eat” if he won’t do.

Will Rogers once wrote, “Freedom isn’t free.” Well, neither is dominion.

To many modern Americans, the very notion of human beings being more important than nature may be jolting to the senses. In truth, this notion shouldn’t be anything but an interesting blend of humbling forting. Christ speaks of our superior worth in Matthew 7 when he says:

Look at the birds of the air: they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not of more value than they?

I can’t tell you why everything is the way it is, but I can tell you how things are. God made us in His image, and subsequently we have (conditional) dominion, responsibility to subdue the earth, and the capabilities to create, innovate, develop, and improve the world around us. This dominion isn’t unlimited. Human beings can’t fix, solve or control everything. Human beings also cannot simply do whatever they want to the earth and its resources. Stewardship is an impediment not only to exploitation, but to indifference to exploitation.

So what are the practical worldview implications here? Scripture doesn’t just suggest dominion, productivity, and development of natural resources – mands it. Appreciating that we live in an imperfect world, and that we won’t always get to reside in the most God-honoring system of government and/or economy, the primary concern of a follower of Christ ought to be what God’s standard is. Christians living in China, Iran, and even Socialist Europe have very little say or sway in terms of how their governments and economic marketplaces function. Traditionally, Americans have had much more opportunity to mold and shape their culture, and as the saying goes: “politics” is down-stream of culture.

Therefore, I believe that part of my job as a believer in the public square is to –as best I can – advocate and vote for people, ideas, and mechanisms that – as best they can – honor and pursue my biblical worldview.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
True diversity seen at Acton University, says college president
On Friday, Glenn Arbery, president of Wyoming Catholic College in Lander, Wyoming, praised Acton University for the “good diversity” that it demonstrated. Arbery argues that diversity today is too often pursued for its own ends, rather than for the truly virtuous end of coherence, of “unity in the good.” At Acton University, he says, there is true diversity, not simply “praising… the colors on a palette.” ments follow, with permission, in full: Good Diversity Many good Catholics in their critique...
If Masterpiece Cakeshop has right to associate, so does the Red Hen
When the owners of the Red Hen restaurant in Lexington, Virginia asked White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders to leave because she works for President Trump, the mob of public opinion on both sides promptly took up their torches, pitchforks, and Twitter accounts. Charlie Kirk and others condemned the Red Hen as “backward thinking intolerant leftists.” But were the actions of the Red Hen really so much more “intolerant” than those of Jack Phillips, owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop? In...
It’s official: the United States has entered a trade war
What do soybeans and washing machines have mon? One is grown in the United States, and the other produced in China, but both are affected by the recent clash on trade. A trade war is defined as, “a situation in which countries try to damage each other’s trade, typically by the imposition of tariffs or quota restrictions.” Yet, adjustments to trade are mon occurrence, so when do trade disagreements e trade wars? A trade war begins when a country institutes...
Charles Krauthammer on America as a ‘commercial republic’
“We are not an imperial power. We are mercial republic. We don’t take food; we trade for it. Which makes us something unique in history, an anomaly, a hybrid.” –Charles Krauthammer This week, wereceived the sad newsthat Charles Krauthammer has passed away due to a recent battle with cancer.As a longtime conservative columnist and media pundit, Krauthammer was known for his clear and mentary. Although he focused his attention on matters of foreign policy, Krauthammer had a memorable way of...
Radio Free Acton redux: Why Abraham Kuyper matters
On this episode of Radio Free Acton, we revisit a segment aired 2 years ago. Marc Vander Maas, Audio/Visual Manager at Acton, talks to Jordan Ballor, Senior Research Fellow and Director of Publishing at Acton, about why the Dutch theologian and statesman Abraham Kuyper remains relevant to this day. Check out these additional resources on this week’s podcast topics: Read “How Kuyper can bring evangelicals and Catholics together” by Joe Carter Watch abook discussion on Kuyper and Islam Read “Themelios...
6 Quotes: Free speech and the Supreme Court’s ruling in ‘NIFLA v. Becerra’
Earlier today the Supreme Court handed down a ruling inNIFLA v. Becerra, one of the most important free speech cases of the year. Althoughthe case was a challenge to a California law that imposed two different sets of requirements on pro-life pregnancy centers, the ruling issued by the Court has broad implications for the free expression of almost all Americans. Here are six quotes from the ruling that you should know about. Justice Thomas: “Although the licensed notice is content-based,...
North Korea: Another ‘mode of development’? (video)
As noted, some members of the Alt-Right have an unusual affinity for North Korea as a bastion of nationalist, anti-imperialist, racial collectivism. Not all of the Kim dynasty’s supporters are utterly powerless. Aleksandr Dugin has stated North Korea represents another “mode of development” in opposition to Western capitalism and liberal democracy, one it may wage nuclear war to preserve. Dugin has been described as Vladimir “Putin’s Brain” or, because of his beard, “Putin’s Rasputin.” In 2008, it was Dugin who...
Kubrick, Clarke, and the Higher Power of 2001: A Space Odyssey
Much analogy is made between the artistic plishments of James Joyce and Stanley Kubrick in Michael Benson’s 50th anniversary examination of 2001: A Space Odyssey, the 1968 sci-fi classic film directed by Kubrick and co-written by Arthur C. Clarke. For one, both Joyce and Kubrick tip their respective hats to Homer’s Odyssey in both title and content. Joyce’s 1922 novel Ulysses requires no explanation as it updates the journeys of Odysseus and crew in a 20th century Dublin setting. Kubrick’s...
Explainer: Supreme Court upholds free speech and free association for public sector workers
What just happened? In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled today in the case of Janus v. AFSCMEthat government employees who are represented by a public sector union to which they do not belong cannot be required to pay a fee to cover the costs of collective bargaining. The ruling overturned a forty-year-old precedent first set inAbood v. Detroit Board of Educationthat allows government agencies to mandate union dues or agency fees as a condition of employment. What was...
Statement from Rev. Robert A. Sirico on the Supreme Court’s Janus Decision
The Catholic Church has supported workers’ rights from Pope Leo XIII’s 1891 encyclical Rerum Novarum to the present day when es to defending worker safety and human dignity. Catholic social teaching has never said that people may be forced to join unions or financially support unions, private or public. Such coercion would violate the principle of free association upon which popes from Leo XIII have grounded the right to form and join unions. What the Supreme Court determined in the...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved