Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Should commerce be tolerated?
Should commerce be tolerated?
Jan 18, 2026 11:21 PM

Should we merce? Should people be allowed to conduct business, buy and sell, make a profit, and even make their livings doing so? The question appears in, of all places, the monumental Theological Commonplaces of the Lutheran scholastic theologian, Johann Gerhard (1582–1637). Gerhard specifically asks merce ought to be tolerated “in a Christian state”—that is, in a state such as the officially Lutheran one in which Gerhard lived and taught in the early seventeenth century. Gerhard raises the question because in his own time there were some who answered the question in the negative. “Anabaptists,” certain radical Protestants, “deny this,” he says. Gerhard then argues that the Christian faith does not merce, or even the pursuit of profit, but that the Scriptures assume the goodness mercial activity, provide rules for it, and mend it. Thus the state—even a Christian state—ought to permit it.

The question of whether we should merce likely sounds bizarre to most people today. It wasn’t bizarre to Gerhard. It was a live issue. In fact, it was a question addressed by Christians in the medieval period, such as Thomas Aquinas, and by theologians in the early modern period, such as Gerhard and the Jesuit scholastic Leonardus Lessius. Though the question may sound odd to us, I don’t think things have changed all that much since the time when these writers raised this question. For example, I remember from my days in retail one co-worker who made a practice of giving away not only all mission to the buyer, but also selling the product at the lowest possible price he could. His reason? He didn’t “feel right” about making money off of people. Our employer, naturally, did not share my co-worker’s philosophy. Had everyone at our store approached sales as my co-worker did, there would have been no store at which to work, and one less place where people could buy our product. I think it’s fair to say that many people look at profit the way my co-worker did. The idea of making a profit makes them feel dirty.

This is where a text from the past, such as Gerhard’s, is helpful. It helps us to see that suspicions merce are not new, nor do they arise from the modern era or the Industrial Revolution. Yes, as Gerhard acknowledges, there are some dirty merchants, but there are also good merchants who pursue profit honestly and keep in mind mon good as well as their own needs. What’s more, Gerhard notes that individual cities and regions often do not have the resources in and of themselves to provide for all the needs of the people who live in them. Thus “trade and the rest mercial activity provide what is needed to sustain human life. For God does not give everything to one region.” To cast merce and the profit-seeking merchants would be to impoverish whole regions and the individuals therein.

So, merce be tolerated? Yes, Gerhard says. It should be tolerated. merce should be ed mended as good for society and consistent with the Christian gospel.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Ineffective Compassion?
Writers on this blog have pointed to a lot of examples of passion when es to charity and public policy. But what can passion, or maybe just a passion, look like? The Lieutenant Governor of South Carolina Andre Bauer made ment saying government assistance programs for the poor was akin to “feeding stray animals.” I’m not highlighting ment just to bash Bauer and you can watch the clip where he clarifies ments. He continues in a follow up interview by...
The Audacity of the Savior State
The current issue of Touchstone magazine features an impressive cover essay by Douglas Farrow, Professor of Christian Thought at McGill University in Montreal, Quebec. In “The Audacity of the State,” Farrow uses the biblical Ichabod motif to examine the crumbling pillars of the family and church, which when properly respected form critical foundations for a flourishing society. In their place, writes Farrow, is the “savior state,” which “presents itself as the people’s guardian, as the guarantor of the citizen’s well-being....
A ‘reckless’ Green Patriarch?
Over at the American Orthodox Institute’s Observer blog, Fr. Hans Jacobse takes Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew to task for jumping on the global warming bandwagon: We warned the Ecumenical Patriarch that endorsing the global warming agenda was reckless. Anyone with eyes to see saw clearly that global warming (since renamed “climate change” — a harbinger that the effort might freeze over) was a political, not scientific, enterprise calculated to centralize the control of the economies of nation-states under bureaucracies. New evidence...
Bernanke bad for limited government and the little guy
This week’s reappointment vote for Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has created some strange bedfellows in Washington. A muddled middle of Republicans and Democrats supports the Keynesian’s reappointment, but the real odd couples are among the opposition. For different if overlapping reasons, free market proponents and far-left figures such as democratic-socialist Bernie Sanders of Vermont are both convinced that Bernanke has done much to hurt our economy, particularly those in the bottom half of our economy. Desmond Lachman of The Enterprise...
Fear the Boom and Bust — rappin’ with Hayek and Keynes
From Econstories.tv: In Fear the Boom and Bust, John Maynard Keynes and F. A. Hayek, two of the great economists of the 20th e back to life to attend an economics conference on the economic crisis. Before the conference begins, and at the insistence of Lord Keynes, they go out for a night on the town and sing about why there’s a “boom and bust” cycle in modern economies and good reason to fear it. Lyrics sample (written by John...
A Reminder
Children are not the property of the state: A Christian family from Germany have been granted political asylum in the US after facing the threat of prison for home schooling their children. Uwe and Hannelore Romeike, who are evangelical Christians, were forced to flee Germany as they wished to educate their five children at home. Home schooling is still illegal in Germany under laws introduced during the Nazi era. The German law means that parents who choose to home school...
Forgive us our deficits
This week’s mentary: As 2010 unfolds, many countries are confronting a public deficit crisis of disturbing proportions. Since 2008, countless politicians have underscored that a cavalier attitude to debt on the part of Main St. and Wall St. contributed significantly to the recent financial crisis. It’s therefore ironic to observe these contemporary preachers of thrift plunging developed economies into an abyss of public liabilities. In 2009, for example, the Obama Administration spent more money on new programs in nine months...
Latin America: After the Left
This week’s mentary: The left is in trouble in Latin America. Sebastián Piñera’s recent election as Chile’s first elected center-right president in decades owes much to the inability of the center-left coalition that governed Chile after 1990 to rejuvenate itself. Yet across Latin America there is, as the Washington Post’s Jackson Diel perceptively observes, a sense that the left’s decade of dominance is unraveling. Future historians may trace the beginning of this decline to the refusal of Honduras’s Congress, Supreme...
Recall Aristide to Haiti? No way.
Jean-Bertrand Aristide, the ex-president of Haiti who has lived lavishly in exile as a guest of the South African government for the past six years, recently announced he was ready to go back and help Haiti rebuild from its catastrophic earthquake. Allowing the former despot Aristide — a long time proponent of liberation theology — back into the country would be the worst thing we could do to Haiti right now. The American government must resist any move by Aristide...
Psychologists confirm: Power corrupts
The Economist reports on a new study by psychologists that looks into the problem of abuse of power. The researchers attempt to “answer the question of whether power tends to corrupt, as Lord Acton’s dictum has it, or whether it merely attracts the corruptible.” These results, then, suggest that the powerful do indeed behave hypocritically, condemning the transgressions of others more than they condemn their own. es as no great surprise, although it is always nice to have everyday observation...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved