Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Shareholder Activists More Goliath than David
Shareholder Activists More Goliath than David
Jul 8, 2025 2:16 AM

When graying cohorts of nuns, priests, clergy and other religious proxy shareholders hitched their wagon to the Center for Political Accountability’s crusade against Citizens United and corporate political spending, it was reported by most news sources as cute and endearing. After all, it’s a bit of the David v. Goliath scenario playing out as the faith-based underdogs take panies with sinister motives and deep pockets full of “dark money” which they spread around to the American Legislative Exchange Council, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Republican candidates and other bêtes noires of the left.

If one reads the media reports following the release this week of the 2013 “CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Policy Accountability and Disclosure” you’d think little David scored big-time with a single stone fired from CPA’s sling at the corporate American Goliath. Well . . . yes. And no. Yes, in that panies capitulated to CPA and proxy shareholders for more transparency. No, in that many panies held fast to privacies guaranteed by Citizens United despite the onslaught of proxy resolutions submitted by a matrix of leftist organizations, which includes the nominally religious-based investment groups As You Sow and the Interfaith Council on Corporate Responsibility. Little David is indeed far more of a Goliath than the general public has been led to believe.

This Goliath’s “transparency” endgame is but a smokescreen for “name-and-shame” crusades panies that dare support candidates, trade associations and causes antithetical to the left’s agenda. For example, the CPA-Zicklin Index ominously warns that “nonprofit 501(c)(4) groups … labeled ‘dark money’ conduits when they make independent expenditures without disclosing donors, have increased significantly in number and magnitude.” But that “dark money” cloud has lifted significantly, claims CPA:

Almost one out of every panies in the top echelons of the S&P 500 has opened up about payments made to trade associations. Eighty-four of the panies (43 percent) made disclosure of their payments to trade associations and the amounts used for political (and lobbying) purposes, while 14 (seven percent) said they asked trade associations not to use their payments for political purposes. In 2012, the overall figure was 41 percent. That included 36 percent that made some disclosure, and five percent that restricted their payments.

But how can this be? According to the Manhattan Institute’s Center for Legal Policy’s 2013 Proxy Monitor report, released earlier this summer, CPA is simply wrong when it claims increasing shareholder support for proxy resolutions related to political spending. MI’s independent evaluation of proxy resolutions at Fortune panies found:

Proposals related to political spending or lobbying continue to receive relatively modest support from shareholders: proposals in this class, on average, received support from only 18 percent of shareholders in 2013, unchanged from 2012. Moreover, the average support for shareholder proposals relating to political spending but not lobbying fell from 17 percent to 16 percent year over year, and the support for proposals relating to lobbying dropped from 22 percent to 20 percent. Thus, the support for this class of proposals overall appears to be falling, a trend masked by the greater share of 2013 proposals related to lobbying, which tend to attract marginally more shareholder support than those devoted purely to political spending.

Thus, even though the total number of proposals related to political spending and lobbying at Fortune panies increased—and there is often increased media attention on the issue—shareholder support is declining.

Private corporate donations to associations such as ALEC that oppose such things as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, hydraulic fracturing or renewable energy mandates based on inconclusive climate-change theories are anathema to Goliath. Once donations to trade organizations are made transparent – ostensibly to “protect the reputation of pany” – activist shareholders then can use that information to smear pany’s reputation, which poses a major threat to the integrity of shareholder value.

Ultimately, the transparency goal of CPA and its shareholder acolytes can be boiled down to quieting all opposition to the left’s agenda. Got that? Activists engaged in all manner of political activities want to silence all parties with whom they disagree. Readers may note that unions raised $400 million for the 2012 election cycle, spending it on a variety of liberal causes and candidates at the national, state and local levels. Not a peep from CPA or its “faith based” activists on that. Billionaire donor George Soros – no conservative he – also was onboard, donating “$1 million each to America Votes, a group that coordinates political activity for left-leaning environmental, abortion rights and civil rights groups, and American Bridge 21st Century, a super PAC that focuses on election-oriented research,” according to the New York Times.

And tell me again: Which party won that last presidential election and is hard at work guaranteeing the continued regulatory morass of such government agencies as the Environmental Protection Agency, the Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Trade Commission? It should bear mentioning here that Mr. Soros’ Open Society Institute has been funding – you guessed it – Bruce Freed’s Center for Public Accountability, which is responsible not only for the “CPA-Zicklin Index” but as well authorship of the shareholder proxy resolutions submitted by AYS and ICCR. As reported by Mike Ciandella in a 2012 essay for the Media Research Center’s Business and Media Institute, “The Center for Political Accountability itself received $995,000 in Soros funds since 2004.”

Keep this in mind the next time you see or read cute “news” reports about so-called “religious” shareholder activists fulminating from their buses against the political speech of corporate America. The reality is that they’re real-life Goliaths pretending to be David with a slingshot.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Ecumenical Witness or Ecumenical Tyranny?
Robert Joustra, writing on the website of the Canadian think tank Cardus, has published a thoughtful review of Jordan Ballor’s Ecumenical Babel: Confusing Economic Ideology and the Church’s Social Witness. The reviewer understands that when, … controversial social science infiltrates ecclesial confessions, twin dangers promising the integrity of the Gospel, and splitting the church on political and economic issues. Ecumenical superstructures claiming to speak with ecclesial authority on technical matters worry me, even when technical experts are enlisted. The point...
Review: Whittaker Chambers
Whittaker Chambers began Witness, the classic account of his time in the American Communist underground, with the declaration: “In 1937, I began, like Lazarus, the impossible return.” The line was most of all a deep recognition of the power of God to redeem what was once dead. Witness was a landmark account of the evils of Communism but most importantly a description of the bankruptcy of freedom outside of the sacred. “For Chambers, God was always the prime mover in...
Public Accountability for Public Officials
Via TechDirt: …a judge has tossed out the wiretapping claims pointing out that there was no expectation of privacy out in public. “Those of us who are public officials and are entrusted with the power of the state are ultimately accountable to the public,” the judge wrote. “When we exercise that power in public fora, we should not expect our actions to be shielded from public observation.” There’s more here and here on the question of law enforcement and ‘citizen...
A Federal Tax Receipt
There’s an old saying to the effect: “Show me a man’s checkbook and I’ll show you what’s important to him.” It may not be quite the same as a checkbook, but NPR’s Planet Money passes along what a receipt from the federal government might look like for an average taxpayer (HT): As Third Way, who put together the taxpayer receipt, argues: An electorate unschooled in basic budget facts is a major obstacle to controlling the nation’s deficit, not to mention...
Trailer: Doing the Right Thing
The Colson Center for Christian Worldview is preparing to release a new study DVD this fall titled, Doing the Right Thing: A Six-Part Exploration of Ethics. The DVD is designed as a resource for small-group studies and features leading thinkers who explore the need for ethical behavior in the marketplace, public square, political life and other areas. Hosts Brit Hume, Chuck Colson, Dr. Robert George and a distinguished panel — including Acton’s Rev. Robert Sirico and Michael Miller — undertake...
Mere Comments: The Neo-Anabaptist Temptation
Today at Mere Comments I highlight what I’m calling the “Neo-Anabaptist temptation.” Check it out. ...
Samuel Gregg: Europe’s Broken Economies
Acton’s Research Director in the American Spectator: Europe’s Broken Economies By Samuel Gregg During September this year, much of Europe descended into mild chaos. Millions of Spaniards and French went on strike (following, of course, their return from six weeks vacation) against austerity measures introduced by their governments. Across the continent, there are deepening concerns about possible sovereign-debt defaults, stubbornly-high unemployment, Ireland’s renewed banking woes, and the resurgence of right-wing populist parties (often peddling left-wing economic ideas). Indeed, the palpable...
Global Warming Consensus Alert: KILL ‘EM ALL
I’ll admit – it’s been a long time since I’ve posted a Global Warming Consensus Alert because, frankly, any “consensus” that existed was blown apart by the release of the University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit e-mails, which revealed a whole bunch of underhanded activity on the part of scientists promoting the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis. What’s the point anymore? The unshakeable climate “consensus” has been shown to be the fraud that it always was, and the catastrophic climate...
German Freedom and the Danger of Socialism
In this week’s Acton Commentary, I remember German reunification and reflect on its relevance for the present. Twenty years ago this Sunday, East and West Germany reunited, capping one of the most extraordinary transformations in modern history. Communism in the Soviet Union and its eastern European satellites had collapsed; the oppressed nations of Europe rejoined the “free world.” My generation was the last to straddle the two worlds, pre- and post-Soviet Union. When I was in elementary and high school,...
Questions on Work and Intellectual Development
Carl Trueman has a lengthy reflection and asks some pertinent and pressing questions on the nature of work and human intellectual development. Recalling his job at a factory as a young man in the 1980s, Trueman writes concerning those who were still at their positions on the line when he had moved on: Their work possessed no intrinsic dignity: it was unskilled, repetitive, poorly paid, and provided no sense of achievement. Yes, it gave them a wage; but not a...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved