Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Rush Limbaugh, RIP: 6 quotations on socialism, the Founding Fathers, and life
Rush Limbaugh, RIP: 6 quotations on socialism, the Founding Fathers, and life
Dec 31, 2025 2:10 PM

The most popular conservative personality of modern times, Rush Limbaugh, passed away this morning at the age of 70 plications due to lung cancer. While neither an intellectual nor a writer – he did not earn a college degree – his quick wit and pithy turn of municated the message of a free and virtuous society to their largest consistent audience.

His widow, Kathryn, announced Limbaugh’s death on his syndicated talk radio show this afternoon.

Rush Hudson Limbaugh III was born on January 12, 1951, in Cape Girardeau, Missouri. He entered radio at age 16 and, after a stint working for the Kansas City Royals, made his mark as a broadcasting legend. His Sacramento-based program went national in 1988, and the popularity of his conservative views and humorous delivery single-handedly revived the fading fortunes of AM radio. The ratings garnered by his television show – produced by future Fox News CEO Roger Ailes – paved the way for the success of the Fox News Channel, Fox Business, and other conservative networks. He wrote two bestselling books – The Way Things Ought to Be and See, I Told You So – before beginning his Rush Revere series of children’s history books, which were designed to teach youngsters the glory of America as founded. President Donald Trump awarded Rush Limbaugh the Presidential Medal of Freedom at the 2020 State of the Union Address on February 4, 2020.

Here are six of Rush Limbaugh’s most enduring quotations, pulled from the hundreds of hours of broadcasting he plished by using “talent on loan from God.”

Rush Limbaugh on clergy who accept socialism:

When the Left convinced the clergy that socialism is charity, it was over. So much of the clergy is leftist, because to them it’s all charity. “It’s taking from the haves and distributing to the have-nots. Who could oppose that? That’s what we’re here to do. That’s what the Lord said ….” Ever since the redistribution of wealth ceased being seen as confiscating people’s money, and instead was seen as charity, it was over.

(July 16, 2018)

Socialism creates a society of slaves:

Socialism is essentially where the citizens of a country give over their freedom and their individuality to the state, and the state runs and controls – maybe not owns, but runs and controls – virtually all of a society’s needs, and some wants. But the needs [are] key, because it turns everybody into a dependent-on-government-for-survival person. It strips them of self-reliance and individuality – and that’s just the opener.

(May 12, 2017)

Rush Limbaugh’s definition of capitalism:

Here’s what it is. We want an economic arrangement – We want a country, we want a society, we want a place – where people provide what other people need and want as efficiently as possible and are rewarded for how well they do it. Meaning innovators invent products, they create new services, what have you, that people end up wanting or needing and are willing to pay for, if they’re priced fairly.

And that “priced fairly” results in the innovator being rewarded with a profit so that he can continue — or she — can continue to make and provide and earn a profit and then hire other people as the business grows.

(November 3, 2020)

The greatest engine of wealth creation is the free market:

Poverty is by far the economic circumstance most people are born into and live in, in the world. Again, the U.S. is the exception. Poverty, the default condition, is the given. What needs explaining is wealth — and the greatest engine of wealth creation is the free market. The United States of America stands as proof. This is not somebody’s opinion. It is economic fact. The greatest creation of wealth, the greatest engine of wealth is the capitalism, the free market.

Government doesn’t have any money ’til it takes it from somebody, or prints it. But that’s not real money. The money government prints doesn’t have any value until it goes to the private sector, or it’s exchanged for goods and services. That is a key point, by the way. The money government prints does not have value. It says $100 on the bills, and that’s what it’ll buy once it gets into the market, but it’s the market that determines what a hundred dollars is worth, not the fact that it says $100 on the bill. … The market determines value, and the value that’s determined in the market is real. It’s not artificially set unless you live in munist or socialist country.

(December 9, 2013)

Life is not fair:

Life is not fair by definition. Life isn’t fair. I mean, it just isn’t, and there’s no way that you can change certain aspects that make life unfair to make them fair. Life is not equal. Sometimes people earn more than others. Some people have children when other people can’t. There’s nothing unfair about that. That’s just the way it is. Unspeakable tragedies happen to some families; they don’t happen to others. Some people live a long time; some people don’t. There’s no explaining any of this. Nobody’s in charge of this. There’s no government that can change this, although we have plenty of busybodies trying to … [Life is] certainly unfair, certainly unequal but it’s not because America’s unfair. It’s not because America’s Constitution is unjust. …

None of these inequities or inequalities or unfairness means that the United States of America is unjust and immoral. None of it means that the way we’ve governed ourselves is unfair. It doesn’t mean that somebody owes you something. It doesn’t mean that you’re a victim of anything. It’s just called life.

(August 5, 2010)

The Founding Fathers’ genius created a Constitution that limits government:

The Founding Fathers designed gridlock. The Founding Fathers were highly suspicious of government because they understood human nature. And they understood the human quest for power. They were fleeing what they thought were the worst aspects of the human quest for power. They were fleeing a monarch. They were fleeing a tyrannical king in Britain. They founded pletely opposite.

They founded a government — for the first time in the history of humanity — that limited the government’s reach and power over citizens. … There isn’t a founding document, an organizing document like the U.S. Constitution anywhere which limits the government while promoting the individual American citizen’s freedom and liberty.

(November 8, 2018)

Bonus 1: Abortion triggered ‘the slow devolution’ of American culture

If you don’t have a government that is willing to stand up for life wherever it is, particularly of its own citizens – and if you have a population that is not oriented in the same direction – then you’re gonna watch the slow devolution of anything of value. If life is not worth fighting for … We all only get one, and if we’re not gonna even engage the battle to snuff out life – if we’re not even gonna be able to engage the people that want to get rid of “undesirable lives” — then what else is gonna fall by the wayside?

And that is what we’re seeing. … [A]s the fight against all kinds of crimes and injustices are suddenly given up or proclaimed normal, then we have the declining moral foundation of our society.

(January 28, 2019)

Bonus 2: Rush’s morning routine: “Every morning, I open my eyes – and I thank God that I do.”

Rush Limbaugh, requiescat in pace. May his memory be eternal.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Audio: Samuel Gregg Discusses ‘Tea Party Catholic’
Acton Institute Director of Research Samuel Gregg joined host Mike Murray on his show “Faith, Culture and Politics” on the Guadalupe Radio Network to discuss his latest book, Tea Party Catholic. The interview lasted nearly a half an hour, and you can listen to it via the audio player below. ...
Business and the Option for the Poor
There is no reason to assume that the preferential option for the poor is somehow a preferential option for big government, says Acton research director Samuel Gregg. Gregg writes that lifting people out of poverty — and not just material poverty but also moral and spiritual poverty — does not necessarily mean that the most effective action is to implement yet another welfare program: What does living out the option for the poor mean in practice? We must engage in...
‘Breeders:’ A Cautionary Tale
The Center for Bioethics and Culture (CBC) is an mitted to “bioethical issues” such as surrogacy, stem cell research and human cloning, amongst other issues. They have recently produced a documentary entitled “Breeders: a subclass of women?” It is a cautionary tale, and a very sad one. The film focuses on women who chose to be surrogates (one chose surrogacy several times), and the turmoil that arose. The issue of es down to the buying and selling of children, one...
A Wesleyan Approach to Faith, Work, and Economic Transformation
“[Wealth] is an excellent gift of God, answering the noblest ends. In the hands of his children, it is food for the hungry, drink for the thirsty, raiment for the naked: It gives to the traveller and the stranger where to lay his head. By it we may supply the place of an husband to the widow, and of a father to the fatherless. We may be a defence for the oppressed, a means of health to the sick, of...
Stewardship and Thanksgiving
Today at Ethika Politika, I reflect on what it might look like to adopt thanksgiving as one’s orientation toward human experience and society: We may think of gratitude … as an appreciation of the joy that es from what is virtuous and the recognition of “what God has done or is doing.” Now we have a hermeneutic for our experience, grounded in the God-given “‘eucharistic’ function of man,” to borrow from Fr. Alexander Schmemann. It is not enough to simply...
What Does Religious Liberty Stand Upon?
With everything from the HHS mandate to Duck Dynasty to Sister Wives, there is much in the news regarding religious liberty. What are we to make of it? Is religious liberty simply being tolerant of others’ religious choices? Michael Therrien, at First Things, wants to clear up the discussion, from the Catholic point of view. He starts by looking at an article quoting Camille Paglia, atheist, lesbian and university professor. In it, Paglia rushes to the defense of Phil Robertson,...
Post-Super Bowl Thoughts on Theology and America
How ’bout them Seahawks? As a Chicago Bears fan the answer to that question means very little to me, but I did enjoy the annual ritual of binge-eating and loudly talking over friends and loved ones who gathered together around the TV for Super Bowl 48. One thing that stood out was the tradition of having various NFL players and civil servants recite the Declaration of Independence before the game. Some of the powerful (and unmistakably religious) lines from our...
Video & Audio: Why Libertarians Need God
The 2014Acton Lecture Seriesgot underway last week with an address from Jay Richards on the topic of “Why Libertarians Need God.” In his address, Richards argued that core libertarian principles of individual rights, freedom and responsibility, reason, moral truth, and limited government make little sense in an atheistic and materialist context, but make far more sense when grounded in a theistic belief system. The video of the full lecture is available below; I’ve embedded the audio after the jump. ...
Hobby Lobby Owners Speak Out on HHS Mandate
In a new video from the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, the Green Family, owners of the embattled retail chain, Hobby Lobby, discusses the religious foundation of their business and the threat the federal government now poses to those who share their beliefs. “What’s at stake here is whether you’re able to keep your religious freedom when you open a family business,” says Lori Windham, Senior Council at The Becket Fund, “whether you can continue to live out your faith...
What Liberal Evangelicals Should Know About the Economic Views of Conservative Evangelicals
We read the same Bible and follow the same Jesus. We go to the same churches and even agree on the same social issues. So why then do liberal and conservative evangelicals tend to disagree so often about economic issues? The answer most frequently given is that both sides simply baptize whatever political and economic views they already believe. While this is likely to be partially true, I don’t think it is a sufficient explanation for the views of more...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved