Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Rush Limbaugh, RIP: 6 quotations on socialism, the Founding Fathers, and life
Rush Limbaugh, RIP: 6 quotations on socialism, the Founding Fathers, and life
Jan 26, 2026 7:27 PM

The most popular conservative personality of modern times, Rush Limbaugh, passed away this morning at the age of 70 plications due to lung cancer. While neither an intellectual nor a writer – he did not earn a college degree – his quick wit and pithy turn of municated the message of a free and virtuous society to their largest consistent audience.

His widow, Kathryn, announced Limbaugh’s death on his syndicated talk radio show this afternoon.

Rush Hudson Limbaugh III was born on January 12, 1951, in Cape Girardeau, Missouri. He entered radio at age 16 and, after a stint working for the Kansas City Royals, made his mark as a broadcasting legend. His Sacramento-based program went national in 1988, and the popularity of his conservative views and humorous delivery single-handedly revived the fading fortunes of AM radio. The ratings garnered by his television show – produced by future Fox News CEO Roger Ailes – paved the way for the success of the Fox News Channel, Fox Business, and other conservative networks. He wrote two bestselling books – The Way Things Ought to Be and See, I Told You So – before beginning his Rush Revere series of children’s history books, which were designed to teach youngsters the glory of America as founded. President Donald Trump awarded Rush Limbaugh the Presidential Medal of Freedom at the 2020 State of the Union Address on February 4, 2020.

Here are six of Rush Limbaugh’s most enduring quotations, pulled from the hundreds of hours of broadcasting he plished by using “talent on loan from God.”

Rush Limbaugh on clergy who accept socialism:

When the Left convinced the clergy that socialism is charity, it was over. So much of the clergy is leftist, because to them it’s all charity. “It’s taking from the haves and distributing to the have-nots. Who could oppose that? That’s what we’re here to do. That’s what the Lord said ….” Ever since the redistribution of wealth ceased being seen as confiscating people’s money, and instead was seen as charity, it was over.

(July 16, 2018)

Socialism creates a society of slaves:

Socialism is essentially where the citizens of a country give over their freedom and their individuality to the state, and the state runs and controls – maybe not owns, but runs and controls – virtually all of a society’s needs, and some wants. But the needs [are] key, because it turns everybody into a dependent-on-government-for-survival person. It strips them of self-reliance and individuality – and that’s just the opener.

(May 12, 2017)

Rush Limbaugh’s definition of capitalism:

Here’s what it is. We want an economic arrangement – We want a country, we want a society, we want a place – where people provide what other people need and want as efficiently as possible and are rewarded for how well they do it. Meaning innovators invent products, they create new services, what have you, that people end up wanting or needing and are willing to pay for, if they’re priced fairly.

And that “priced fairly” results in the innovator being rewarded with a profit so that he can continue — or she — can continue to make and provide and earn a profit and then hire other people as the business grows.

(November 3, 2020)

The greatest engine of wealth creation is the free market:

Poverty is by far the economic circumstance most people are born into and live in, in the world. Again, the U.S. is the exception. Poverty, the default condition, is the given. What needs explaining is wealth — and the greatest engine of wealth creation is the free market. The United States of America stands as proof. This is not somebody’s opinion. It is economic fact. The greatest creation of wealth, the greatest engine of wealth is the capitalism, the free market.

Government doesn’t have any money ’til it takes it from somebody, or prints it. But that’s not real money. The money government prints doesn’t have any value until it goes to the private sector, or it’s exchanged for goods and services. That is a key point, by the way. The money government prints does not have value. It says $100 on the bills, and that’s what it’ll buy once it gets into the market, but it’s the market that determines what a hundred dollars is worth, not the fact that it says $100 on the bill. … The market determines value, and the value that’s determined in the market is real. It’s not artificially set unless you live in munist or socialist country.

(December 9, 2013)

Life is not fair:

Life is not fair by definition. Life isn’t fair. I mean, it just isn’t, and there’s no way that you can change certain aspects that make life unfair to make them fair. Life is not equal. Sometimes people earn more than others. Some people have children when other people can’t. There’s nothing unfair about that. That’s just the way it is. Unspeakable tragedies happen to some families; they don’t happen to others. Some people live a long time; some people don’t. There’s no explaining any of this. Nobody’s in charge of this. There’s no government that can change this, although we have plenty of busybodies trying to … [Life is] certainly unfair, certainly unequal but it’s not because America’s unfair. It’s not because America’s Constitution is unjust. …

None of these inequities or inequalities or unfairness means that the United States of America is unjust and immoral. None of it means that the way we’ve governed ourselves is unfair. It doesn’t mean that somebody owes you something. It doesn’t mean that you’re a victim of anything. It’s just called life.

(August 5, 2010)

The Founding Fathers’ genius created a Constitution that limits government:

The Founding Fathers designed gridlock. The Founding Fathers were highly suspicious of government because they understood human nature. And they understood the human quest for power. They were fleeing what they thought were the worst aspects of the human quest for power. They were fleeing a monarch. They were fleeing a tyrannical king in Britain. They founded pletely opposite.

They founded a government — for the first time in the history of humanity — that limited the government’s reach and power over citizens. … There isn’t a founding document, an organizing document like the U.S. Constitution anywhere which limits the government while promoting the individual American citizen’s freedom and liberty.

(November 8, 2018)

Bonus 1: Abortion triggered ‘the slow devolution’ of American culture

If you don’t have a government that is willing to stand up for life wherever it is, particularly of its own citizens – and if you have a population that is not oriented in the same direction – then you’re gonna watch the slow devolution of anything of value. If life is not worth fighting for … We all only get one, and if we’re not gonna even engage the battle to snuff out life – if we’re not even gonna be able to engage the people that want to get rid of “undesirable lives” — then what else is gonna fall by the wayside?

And that is what we’re seeing. … [A]s the fight against all kinds of crimes and injustices are suddenly given up or proclaimed normal, then we have the declining moral foundation of our society.

(January 28, 2019)

Bonus 2: Rush’s morning routine: “Every morning, I open my eyes – and I thank God that I do.”

Rush Limbaugh, requiescat in pace. May his memory be eternal.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
How Would St. Francis Vote?
Denver Bishop Charles Chaput, whom I had the personal joy of meeting and hearing speak a few years ago, gave an address at a mass for Catholic public officials in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, just before the November elections. Chaput, who is one of my favorite bishops, makes profound and clear moral sense of chaotic sub-Christian thinking on a regular basis. “The world does need to change, and in your vocation as public leaders, God is calling you to pursue that task...
Two Career Marriages
A genuinely thorny pastoral issue that often arose in the course of my counseling was the question of two-career marriages. What should a couple do if the wife wanted/needed to work outside the home when children were present, especially when the children were young? Because I served suburban churches (from 1972-1992) some of my congregants needed to be e families just to survive. Others did not but made a choice to pursue two careers anyway. The scenario always varies from...
Costly Coal Clean-up
Coal has long been a target of environmentalist anger. Soot, strip-mining, smokestacks—so many ugly features. Much of that opposition is overblown, of course (we’ve got to get energy from somewhere), but some of it has merit. This story from Ohio exhibits one of the genuine problems. The state’s taxpayers have to foot a $300 million bill for cleaning up the environmental messes panies have left. Some, but only a small part, of that is being paid for by corporate fees...
Objective and Subjective Well-Being
Gary Becker and Richard Posner examine the increasing gap between the rich and poor in terms of wealth and e. This gap was most recently highlighted in a report that “the richest 2% of adults in the world own more than half of global household wealth,” and the richest 1% hold 40% of wealth. The report was issued by the World Institute for Development Economics Research of the United Nations University (PDF). Becker seems to accept that wealth inequality is...
Bozell’s Odd Understanding of Coercion
According to the Church Report’s Jennifer Morehouse, Parents Television Council President L. Brent Bozell is renewing an argument for the FCC to require a la carte cable programming. “It’s time to let the market decide what it wants on cable programming,” says Bozell. I’m sympathetic to this view. I would prefer the option to be able to pick and choose which cable channels I pay for and get access to, instead of having to decide on subscription levels which include...
Government Works to Protect Tithing
Following up on the story from a couple months back about restrictions to bankruptcy filings prohibiting filers from budgeting for tithing, and in the midst of the controversy surrounding Rick Warren’s invitation to Sen. Barack Obama to appear at a Saddleback Church event, es both houses of Congress have passed the “Obama-Hatch Tithing Bill.” The bill would “protect an individual’s right to continue reasonable charitable contributions, including religious tithing, during the course of consumer bankruptcy. The measure passed the United...
Passing on the Pork
As noted at WorldMagBlog (among many other places), the ing Democratic majority in Congress is suspending the process of earmarking, at least temporarily. Rep. David Obey, D-Wis., and Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., the ing chairmen of the House and Senate mittees, have pledged that “there will be no congressional earmarks” in the ing budget. Earmarks will be available again in the 2008 budget cycle, after “reforms of the earmarking process are put in place.” There’s a lot of smoke right...
Trimming the Fat
As I’ve noted previously, it is probably best for the cause of limited government that political power be divided rather than in the hands of a single party, no matter which party. This AP story offers evidence in support of that claim from early action by the newly Democratic Congress. At the same time, a close reading of the article indicates that congressional Democrats’ cutting of Republican pork may not result in any meaningful or lasting scaling back of needless...
‘Pimpin’ Ain’t Easy,’ and Neither is Parenting
During a recent family trip to visit relatives, we settled down for a night of wholesome family entertainment to watch “Inside Man” (well, maybe not all that wholesome; it is a film about a bank robbery, after all). This post has almost nothing to do with the plot of the movie, so if you haven’t seen it, don’t fret. It is a film worth queuing on your Netflix, however, and I mend it despite the fact that I don’t much...
Check out this Energy Debate
A debate about the future of energy policy is being held over at sp!ked, sponsored by Research Councils UK. From their notice: THE FUTURE OF ENERGY Expanding supply or managing demand? In the opening articles, mentators address the question from different viewpoints. ADAM VAUGHAN, online editor, New Consumer magazine argues that saving energy is the way forward: ‘By taking a number of simple steps, consumers can save energy and money – and help save the planet.’ JOE KAPLINSKY, science writer,...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved