Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Ride sharing in Nepal: a story of bottom-up empowerment
Ride sharing in Nepal: a story of bottom-up empowerment
Jan 21, 2026 10:49 PM

Over the past decade, ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft have led a transformative wave of gig-economy disruption, allowing drivers to work independently from taxi panies and the unions and bureaucracies that control them. It’s an inspiring story of bottom-up innovation and human empowerment in the face of entrenched interests and outdated laws. And in our increasingly technological and globalized age, it’s a story that continues to spread across countless industries and contexts.

In a short film from Dignity Unbound, we see one such example in the story of Tootle, a scooter pany based in Kathmandu, Nepal.

Tucked in a narrow valley between mountain ranges, Kathmandu’s 3 million residents have long dealt with traffic congestion, high transportation costs, and poor public transit services. Recognizing the struggle, Tootle founder Sixit Bhatta developed the pany as a way to e the constraints of the city’s existing infrastructure and systems.

“Public transit in Kathmandu is unreasonably unreliable and inefficient,” explains Akash Shrestha, a research manager for Samriddhi Foundation, a Nepalese entrepreneur advocacy group. “Tootle is this new, really innovative and amazing ride-sharing platform that allows people without any means of transportation to just hop in on somebody else’s motorcycle and go around the city.”

Bhatta founded pany not just to meet a munity need, but also to challenge the city’s systemic barriers and change munity’s mindset when es to innovation, entrepreneurship, and empowerment.

“I think entrepreneurship is more like a creative art,” Bhatta explains. “So every feature that you develop, every product that you develop, you not only develop these products and features to make lives easy for people – you also develop these products to inspire a generation. … Mobility has a power to not only shape up how people move, but in the long term, it also has the power to [shape] how our societies and munities and our infrastructure evolves.”

The startup has gained significant traction among its customers, but it continues to face legal barriers and significant institutional resistance. As explained in an article from the filmmakers, pany is still “technically illegal,” even though it is allowed to freely operate (for now):

Nepal’s laws don’t allow citizens to register businesses in nontraditional industries. These barriers make it difficult for aspiring entrepreneurs such as Sixit to innovate, create opportunities, and solve problems.

Last year, traffic officers would use Tootle to hail rides, and then fine the drivers for illegal activity. Many were furious. It led to a public outcry. Luckily, Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli instructed the Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transport to back off.

Sixit was able to get Tootle back online, but Tootle’s legal status remains ambiguous.

Through such resistance, Nepal’s government isn’t just favoring panies or controlling prices and products. It is actively stifling innovation and hindering access, both to new jobs among creators and needed services among consumers. As the film explains, the social benefits of Tootle have gone well beyond simple petitiveness and convenience.

For example, Tootle has provided new opportunities for women in a country where gender stereotypes persist and only 22% of women are employed outside the home. For Bhim Maya Sunuwar, a mother who manages her Tootle customers during the school day, pany has opened new paths of empowerment for her and her family.

“Before Tootle, I pletely on my husband for my expenses,” she says. “But now, with Tootle, every day I get a satisfying feeling for having worked all day and earned something.”

For Bhatta, this is all part of pany’s strategy. “I think this is a rebellious move where you can see a woman giving a ride to other people where even simple employment opportunities are not being given to them,” says Bhatta. “I think this is a big move that can change the gender stereotypes and empower women. And that empowerment can lead to a massive change in the future.”

The disruption has also expanded access for the city’s blind population. For a visually impaired owner of a local massage parlor, Tootle has greatly helped him and his employees, many of whom also have disabilities. “Chiran, a masseur at the parlor, said blindness made him a target on public transit,” the article explains. “Now he worries less, moves more freely, and saves rupees on his mute.”

For another visually impaired Tootle user, the service gave him an affordable way to travel to outside the city’s heavily polluted corridor. “For that man, and many others like him, Tootle has brought about the freedom and opportunity to breathe clean air for the first time,” the article explains.

Of course, ride-sharing is not the only area where technology and innovation have worked to bring services closer to consumers, tightening human connection while freeing producers and creators along the way. It is also not the only area where business interests and political forces continue to collaborate and conspire to resist and interrupt such trends.

In discussions about poverty alleviation, policymakers and philanthropists tend to ignore the mundane realities of restrictive regulations. Yet it is here where empowerment can actually begin.

As Shrestha explains: “At a time where the concept of shared economy is growing – where service seekers and service providers are able to connect by use of some technology – we need to actually capitalize on the existing opportunities that are being created by technology rather than creating hindrances that restrict people from improving their own lives and the lives of those that surround them. Until we make it easy for people to do business, we will not be able to solve the biggest crisis of Nepal that is poverty.”

For the entrenched business interests and the political powers who strive to protect them, it’s not about service but self-preservation. Likewise, for the entrepreneurs and challengers at the center, it’s not ultimately about new conveniences and cost savings, but liberation and widespread empowerment.

“One entrepreneur doesn’t solve all the problems,” concludes Robin Sitoula, executive director of the Samriddhi Foundation. “But if we allow or create an environment that creates millions of entrepreneurs, millions of our problems will be solved. That’s the beauty of the market.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Envy: A Deadly (Economic) Sin
Victor Claar, Acton University lecturer and professor of economics at Henderson State University, will give a talk tonight in Washington, D.C., hosted by AEI, “Grieving the Good of Others: Envy and Economics.” If you are in the area, you are encouraged to attend and hear Dr. Claar as well as two respondents discuss the topic of envy and its moral and economic consequences. Here’s a description of the event: Critics of capitalism often argue that this economic system is irretrievably...
Radio Free Acton: The Stewardship of Art, Part 2
Last week, we posted part 1 of our podcast on the proper Christian stewardship of art; for those who have been waiting for the conclusion, we’re happy to present part 2. David Michael Phelps continues to lead the discussion between Professors Nathan Jacobs and Calvin Seerveld, who previously debated this topic in the Controversy section of our Journal of Markets & Morality. The first portion of that exchange is available at the link for part 1; the remainder of the...
Explaining the New Democratic Logo
“The new Democratic logo is so bad that the intellectual rot in the official announcement went largely unnoticed.” The rest of my piece is here at The American Spectator. ...
Work as if It Mattered
The conversations over the last few weeks here on work have raised a couple of questions. In the context of criticisms on the perspectives on work articulated by Lester DeKoster and defended by menter John E. asks, “…what is it that you hope readers will change in their lives, and why?” I want to change people’s view of their work. I want them to see how it has value not simply as a means to some other end, but in...
The Daily Show Takes on a Union
The Daily Show exposes some union hypocrisy (HT). In the words of the union local head, es down to greed”: ...
Mandating Monolithic Medicine
Among the warnings sounded as the Democratic health care reform bill was being debated was that the federal insurance mandate included in the bill—even though not national health care per se—would essentially give the federal government control of the insurance industry. The reason: If everyone is forced to buy insurance, then the government must deem what sort of insurance qualifies as adequate to meet the mandate. This piece of Obamacare promises to turn every medical procedure into a major political...
Rev. Sirico: Respect others’ rights, but also their values
A new column by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, president and co-founder of the Acton Institute, was published today in the Detroit News. This column will also be linked in tomorrow’s Acton News & Commentary. Sign up for the free weekly Acton newsletter here. +++++++++ Faith and policy: Respect others’ rights, but also their values FATHER ROBERT SIRICO If such an award were to be given for the Most Contentious Religious Story of 2010, the two main contenders would undoubtedly be...
The Politics of Crony Unionism
Last week’s Acton Commentary and blog post focused on my claims about “crony unionism” and how the intimate relationship between Big Labor and Big Government corrupt both. Here’s another instance of the kinds of gross conflicts of interest produced by this relationship: It’s hard to see this as anything but partisan pandering on the part of the largest public sector union, the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). Meanwhile, the Washington Post asks, “Was politics behind the...
Journal of Religion and Business Ethics
The latest issue of the newly launched Journal of Religion and Business Ethics is now available (vol. 1, no. 2). Check out the contents at their website. From the journal’s about page: “The Journal of Religion and Business Ethics is a peer-reviewed journal that examines the ethical and religious issues that arise in the modern business setting. While much attention has been given to the philosophical treatment of business ethics, this is the first journal to address the more inclusive...
A Lesson from Michigan: Time to End Crony Unionism
In this week’s Acton Commentary, I take a look at the prospects of “right-to-work” legislation in Michigan, “A Lesson from Michigan: Time to End Crony Unionism.” One of the things that disturbs me the most about what I call “crony unionism” is the hand-in-glove relationship between the labor unions and big government. We have the same kind of special pleading and rent seeking in this system as we do in crony capitalism, but the labor unions enjoy such special protection...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved