Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Ride sharing in Nepal: a story of bottom-up empowerment
Ride sharing in Nepal: a story of bottom-up empowerment
Jul 14, 2025 3:22 PM

Over the past decade, ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft have led a transformative wave of gig-economy disruption, allowing drivers to work independently from taxi panies and the unions and bureaucracies that control them. It’s an inspiring story of bottom-up innovation and human empowerment in the face of entrenched interests and outdated laws. And in our increasingly technological and globalized age, it’s a story that continues to spread across countless industries and contexts.

In a short film from Dignity Unbound, we see one such example in the story of Tootle, a scooter pany based in Kathmandu, Nepal.

Tucked in a narrow valley between mountain ranges, Kathmandu’s 3 million residents have long dealt with traffic congestion, high transportation costs, and poor public transit services. Recognizing the struggle, Tootle founder Sixit Bhatta developed the pany as a way to e the constraints of the city’s existing infrastructure and systems.

“Public transit in Kathmandu is unreasonably unreliable and inefficient,” explains Akash Shrestha, a research manager for Samriddhi Foundation, a Nepalese entrepreneur advocacy group. “Tootle is this new, really innovative and amazing ride-sharing platform that allows people without any means of transportation to just hop in on somebody else’s motorcycle and go around the city.”

Bhatta founded pany not just to meet a munity need, but also to challenge the city’s systemic barriers and change munity’s mindset when es to innovation, entrepreneurship, and empowerment.

“I think entrepreneurship is more like a creative art,” Bhatta explains. “So every feature that you develop, every product that you develop, you not only develop these products and features to make lives easy for people – you also develop these products to inspire a generation. … Mobility has a power to not only shape up how people move, but in the long term, it also has the power to [shape] how our societies and munities and our infrastructure evolves.”

The startup has gained significant traction among its customers, but it continues to face legal barriers and significant institutional resistance. As explained in an article from the filmmakers, pany is still “technically illegal,” even though it is allowed to freely operate (for now):

Nepal’s laws don’t allow citizens to register businesses in nontraditional industries. These barriers make it difficult for aspiring entrepreneurs such as Sixit to innovate, create opportunities, and solve problems.

Last year, traffic officers would use Tootle to hail rides, and then fine the drivers for illegal activity. Many were furious. It led to a public outcry. Luckily, Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli instructed the Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transport to back off.

Sixit was able to get Tootle back online, but Tootle’s legal status remains ambiguous.

Through such resistance, Nepal’s government isn’t just favoring panies or controlling prices and products. It is actively stifling innovation and hindering access, both to new jobs among creators and needed services among consumers. As the film explains, the social benefits of Tootle have gone well beyond simple petitiveness and convenience.

For example, Tootle has provided new opportunities for women in a country where gender stereotypes persist and only 22% of women are employed outside the home. For Bhim Maya Sunuwar, a mother who manages her Tootle customers during the school day, pany has opened new paths of empowerment for her and her family.

“Before Tootle, I pletely on my husband for my expenses,” she says. “But now, with Tootle, every day I get a satisfying feeling for having worked all day and earned something.”

For Bhatta, this is all part of pany’s strategy. “I think this is a rebellious move where you can see a woman giving a ride to other people where even simple employment opportunities are not being given to them,” says Bhatta. “I think this is a big move that can change the gender stereotypes and empower women. And that empowerment can lead to a massive change in the future.”

The disruption has also expanded access for the city’s blind population. For a visually impaired owner of a local massage parlor, Tootle has greatly helped him and his employees, many of whom also have disabilities. “Chiran, a masseur at the parlor, said blindness made him a target on public transit,” the article explains. “Now he worries less, moves more freely, and saves rupees on his mute.”

For another visually impaired Tootle user, the service gave him an affordable way to travel to outside the city’s heavily polluted corridor. “For that man, and many others like him, Tootle has brought about the freedom and opportunity to breathe clean air for the first time,” the article explains.

Of course, ride-sharing is not the only area where technology and innovation have worked to bring services closer to consumers, tightening human connection while freeing producers and creators along the way. It is also not the only area where business interests and political forces continue to collaborate and conspire to resist and interrupt such trends.

In discussions about poverty alleviation, policymakers and philanthropists tend to ignore the mundane realities of restrictive regulations. Yet it is here where empowerment can actually begin.

As Shrestha explains: “At a time where the concept of shared economy is growing – where service seekers and service providers are able to connect by use of some technology – we need to actually capitalize on the existing opportunities that are being created by technology rather than creating hindrances that restrict people from improving their own lives and the lives of those that surround them. Until we make it easy for people to do business, we will not be able to solve the biggest crisis of Nepal that is poverty.”

For the entrenched business interests and the political powers who strive to protect them, it’s not about service but self-preservation. Likewise, for the entrepreneurs and challengers at the center, it’s not ultimately about new conveniences and cost savings, but liberation and widespread empowerment.

“One entrepreneur doesn’t solve all the problems,” concludes Robin Sitoula, executive director of the Samriddhi Foundation. “But if we allow or create an environment that creates millions of entrepreneurs, millions of our problems will be solved. That’s the beauty of the market.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Catholics and Health Care
The Detroit News published mentary on Catholics and health care reform in today’s newspaper. A slightly longer version of the article will appear in tomorrow’s Acton News & Commentary: Catholic America is about as divided about health care reform as the rest of the country. But there are a small number of non-negotiables for Catholics that principally concern any provisions that facilitate or encourage the intentional termination of innocent human life or diminish existing conscience exemptions. These issues dwarf everything...
What hath Vienna to do with Colorado Springs?
Working as we do here at the intersection between economics and theology, the relationship between various kinds of classically liberal, libertarian, Austrian, and other economic modifiers and religion in general and Christianity in particular is in constant view. Sometimes the conversation is friendly, sometimes not so much. Sometimes the differences are less apparent, sometimes more. Once in awhile a piece will appear on the Acton site or from an Acton writer that brings this discussion to the fore. Last mentary...
Healthcare and Catholics: True and False Arguments
This week’s Acton Commentary: Healthcare reform – it’s one of those causes almost everyone favors, but which almost automatically produces sharp arguments when we ask what it means and how it might be realized. You would have had to be living in a cave for the past eight months to be unaware that Americans are deeply divided on this matter, and that the division runs clean through the middle of munities. That includes Catholic America. Of course, there are a...
Journal of Markets & Morality, Spring 2009
We’re happy to announce that the latest print issue of the Journal of Markets & Morality is available online. The Spring 2009 issue includes a noteworthy study by Alan T. Y. Chan and Shu-kam Lee. In “Christ and Business Culture: Another Classification of Christians in Workplaces According to an Empirical Study in Hong Kong,” Chan and Lee outline four types of Christians at work: Christian soldiers, panic followers, strugglers, and Sunday Christians. Following the classification, Chan and Lee “develop a...
Capitalism is Not Based on Greed
In a new essay at The American, Jay Richards explains why capitalism isn’t based on greed. In Acton’s first documentary, The Call of the Entrepreneur, Richards along Rev. Robert Sirico, Sam Gregg, Michael Novak and others touch on this matter in making the moral case for the free economy. ...
Review: Billy Graham and the Rise of the Republican South
Explaining the realignment of American Southern politics is often a favorite area of study among historians and scholars. A region that was once dominated by yellow dog Democrats, has for the most part continued to expand as a loyal region for the Grand Old Party. Among the earliest and mon narrative among liberal historians and writers is the belief that the realignment in the South had to do with a backlash against desegregation. Steven P. Miller in his new book...
Potential and the Peace Prize
In his book Elements of Justice (reviewed in the Journal of Markets & Morality here), University of Arizona philosophy and economics professor David Schmidtz introduces the idea of desert not simply as pensatory notion, but also as including a promissory aspect. That is, what we deserve isn’t always about only what we have done. There might be a real sense in which what we do after an opportunity provides a kind of retroactive justification for having been given a chance....
America’s Uncontrolled Debt and Spending is the Real ‘Waterloo’
In mentary this week, “America’s Uncontrolled Debt and Spending is the Real ‘Waterloo,’” I offer the well known point that debt and spending threatens our liberty and prosperity. It is ing very evident that it will be up to citizens to demand accountability from their lawmakers, as I mentioned. What has been tried before has not worked. In terms of liberty, Thomas Jefferson declared, “The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground.” What...
Kling on Conservatism and Authority
Arnold Kling continued last week’s conversation about the relationship between conservatism and libertarianism over at EconLog. Kling’s analysis is worth reading, and he concludes that the divide between conservatives and libertarians has to do with respect (or lack thereof) for hierarchical authority. Kling does allow for the possibility of a “secular conservative…someone who respects the learning embodied in traditional values and beliefs, without assigning them a divine origin.” I’m certainly inclined to agree, and I think there are plenty of...
The Economics Nobel
My response to the awarding of the Nobel Prize in Economics to Elinor Ostrom and Oliver Williamson was published on National Review Online: Unlike a certain other Nobel Prize, the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel actually requires evidence of substantial achievement. Mere aspirations and lofty rhetoric count for nothing. This year’s Nobel Prize in Economics has been given to two economists, Elinor Ostrom and Oliver Williamson, who have deepened our understanding of economic governance....
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved