Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Rich People Are Big Meanies Who Just Don’t Care, Right?
Rich People Are Big Meanies Who Just Don’t Care, Right?
Nov 8, 2025 1:31 AM

In a New York Times op-ed, Daniel Goleman, a psychologist and author, declared, “Rich People Just Care Less.” How does he know this? Because studies have been done. So there. Rich people lack empathy, don’t listen to people lower on the social ladder than themselves, and

…seem to pay particularly little attention to those with the least power. To be sure, high-status people do attend to those of equal rank — but not as well as those low of status do.

Except, it’s not quite true. It’s a little off. Skewed. Downright…flawed.

Diana Furchtgott-Roth, at Real Clear Markets, demonstrates that the data used as the basis for Goleman’s claim was terrible. There’s really no other word for it.

To support his theory, Goleman cites research by psychology professors Dacher Keltner of University of California (Berkeley) and Michael Kraus of the University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign). One of their articles, entitled “Social Class, Contextualism, and Empathic Accuracy,” appeared in the 2010 edition of Psychological Science. They conclude on the basis of three psychological studies that “lower-class individuals should be more accurate judges of the emotions of others than upper-class individuals are.”

However, there are major problems with the three studies in the paper. First, no e nor e individuals were included in the experiments. The subjects are relatively small samples of university students or employees, who are role-playing upper- and e individuals. The authors admit that “these samples likely underrepresent individuals from the richest and poorest sectors of society.” This is an understatement-the samples do not even contain rich and poor people. (Emphasis added.)

That’s right: they didn’t actually ask people who were rich or poor. It was all just pretend. Hypothetical. Imagined.

It would be lovely if we could simply titter about this and dismiss it, but we can’t. People read a headline, a by-line, a few sentences and it es “truth.” Rich people don’t care – I read it in the New York Times. It must be true, right?

Read “The Rich Don’t Care For The Poor? What A Laugh” at .

[product sku=1153]

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Acton Commentary: The Legalism of Political Christianity
In today’s Acton Commentary I explore “The Legalism of Political Christianity.” This quote from Ernest Lefever (not included in the piece but which does appear in my book) represents the basic position well: It is dangerous for any Christian body to identify itself fully with any specific political cause or order, whether the prevailing one or a challenge to it. In identifying with a secular power or agency, the church runs the risk of losing its critical distance and of...
Acton at ETS 2010
A number of Acton staffers, including myself, had the pleasure of attending the 2010 meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society held in Atlanta, Georgia. There will be more on some of the goings-on at this event e, but to get a sense of what our presence was like in the exhibition space, check out the pictures below. Kudos especially to Kara Eagle who did a great job with design (assisted by Melissa Burkholder) and execution of our exhibit space. We...
Catholic Social Teaching and the Tea Party Movement
Kevin J. Jones of the Catholic News Agency interviewed Acton’s Rev. Robert A. Sirico and Dr. Steven Schneck, Director of the Institute for Policy Research & Catholic Studies at the Catholic University of America, to find out how the Tea Party lines up with Catholic Social Teaching. Here’s a snip: Fr. Sirico described the Tea Party as “an amorphous thing” with a lot of variety and as a “populist, spontaneous movement.” He thought mon themes include a desire for less...
Secular Waste Lands and Hollow Men
Joseph Epstein’s essay, “T.S. Eliot and the Demise of the Literary Culture,” in the November issue of Commentary, strengthens the case for The Waste Land author’s enduring legacy. Epstein captures the high points of Eliot’s biographical and literary plishments in only eight pages – an admirable feat given the extent of Eliot’s influence on the past century. After filling out the checklist of Eliot’s early poetry, friendships, jobs, marriages, alleged anti-Semitism, and criticism by rote, Epstein concludes Eliot was a...
Neal Johnson: When Charity Shames
There’s a story that I heard, of a miner, a family down in– it was in the Appalachia area and the church there really thought that they were doing a great deal because they would go in, they said they would pick the poorest families and they would take them Christmas gifts and turkeys and that sort of thing. So they did. They went to this family and they presented them with all the gifts and gave them to them...
Morse on Redeeming Economics
An exciting new book for anyone interested in the intersection of morality/theology and economics is John Mueller’s Redeeming Economics. I haven’t yet seen the book myself, but Acton Senior Fellow Jennifer Morse reviews it here. Drawing on Aristotle, Augustine, and Aquinas, Mueller argues for recovering a fourth element of economics (besides consumption, production, and exchange): gift. He calls his approach neo-scholastic economics. Here’s Morse: The enemies of the state who ought to resist state encroachment of the family’s domain have...
Republocrat Review: A Sneak Peek
I just sent off a draft of a brief review of Carl Trueman‘s new book Republocrat: Confessions of a Liberal Conservative to appear in the next issue of Religion & Liberty. (You can get plimentary subscription here). I mend the book as a very incisive and insightful challenge to any facile and uncritical identification of the Christian faith with particular political and economic ideologies. Here’s a snippet of the review: [Trueman’s] project is not about demonizing capitalism, wealth, or profits...
Wealth and Poverty in Portugal — Part II
I’ve just returned to Rome following our Lisbon conference on Catholic Social Teaching, Free Enterprise and Poverty. Judging from the crowded auditorium and the ments from the audience, it was a very successful event. Here I’ll mention a few of my personal highlights from the event: — Bishop Filippo Santoro gave an excellent presentation on the errors of using e transfers to achieve a more equal society, and especially the dependency the poor develop on the state. — Professor Raúl...
Debate: The Source of Human Morality
The University of Maryland — Baltimore County Orthodox Christian Fellowship and the school’s Secular Student Alliance sponsored a Nov. 16 debate on the subject of “The Source of Human Morality” with about 450 people in attendance. Fr. Hans Jacobse, an Orthodox Christian priest and president of the American Orthodox Institute (he blogs here), squared off with Matt Dillahunty, the president of the Atheist Community of Austin, and host of the public access television and Internet show The Atheist Experience. The...
The Ecumenical Future
Today is my last day at the Evangelical Theological Society (ETS) meeting in Atlanta. I plan to make my purchases from the various book sellers this morning, having already reconnoitered the exhibits and mapped out my plan of attack. One thing that has struck me is that there are a number of new books discussing ecumenism and Christian unity from host of different perspectives. On the one hand this shouldn’t be surprising. The unity of the church is a constant...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved