Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Revising American History For Our Best And Brightest Students
Revising American History For Our Best And Brightest Students
Dec 25, 2025 4:06 AM

What do these things have mon: Gloria Steinem, Yiddish theater, Gospel of Wealth, U.S. Fish Commission, the cult of domesticity and smallpox? They are all highlights of American history for Advanced Placement (AP) high school students. AP classes are typically for college-bound students, and considered to be “tougher” classes. The College Board administers AP classes in high schools, and is releasing its American history framework effective this fall.

Here are some things students won’t see: the Founding Fathers, Abraham Lincoln (other than a brief mention of his Emancipation Proclamation), or the “Greatest Generation” of World War II. Instead, students will learn:

“European exploration and conquest were fueled by a desire for new sources of wealth, increased power and status, and converts to Christianity”

“With little experience dealing with people who were different from themselves, Spanish and Portuguese explorers poorly understood the native peoples they encountered in the Americas”

“The resulting [American] independence movement was fueled by established colonial elites”

“The idea of Manifest Destiny, which asserted U.S. power in the Western Hemisphere and supported U.S. expansion westward, was built on a belief in white racial superiority and a sense of American cultural superiority”

Teachers are instructed to spend 90 percent of class time on the years 1607-1980, with the other 10 percent to the eras before and after those dates. One can certainly argue there isn’t much U.S. history prior to 1607, but 5 percent for the past 34 years? Larry Krieger, a history teacher and author of several college prep test books, found the new framework severely lacking.

Leaving aside its very leftist bias, it is a very poorly written, unprofessional document,” said Krieger, adding he found it “boring” and “dispiriting.”

Krieger says teachers have been contacting him with their concerns.

At the same time, teachers are “very afraid of repercussions for speaking out.” They fear, Krieger said, negative consequences from either the College Board or their local school system.

One teacher who attended a gathering of some 1,000 AP exam “readers” – those who read and evaluate student AP exam essays – told Krieger 90 percent of teachers there either detested the new framework or viewed it with skepticism.

The framework…emphatically states that the new AP U.S. history exam will be limited to information in the framework.

In boldface and underlined text, the College Board states: “Beginning with the May 2015 AP U.S. History Exams, no AP U.S. History Exam question will require students to know historical content that falls outside this concept outline.”

The College Board’s Debbie Pennington has said that U.S. history is not about “dead, white men as taught by almost dead, white men.” Pennington says there must be room for “flexibility” and “flavor.”

As a former high school teacher, I know how difficult it can be to get everything you know needs to be taught into a short school year. Of course, a person can spend a lifetime studying U.S. history. However, there is something deeply flawed about a history framework for high schoolers that makes no mention of Martin Luther King, Jr., the Gettysburg Address, Susan B. Anthony, the Korean and Vietnam Wars, 9/11 or the technological advances in the past 35 years. By focusing on themes of the specious nature of Christianity, elitism, racial superiority and power, the College Board is creating a revisionist, skewed view of American history. What would Thomas Jefferson think? If the College Board has its way, that’s a question American high school students won’t get to ponder.

Read “U.S. history takes drastic left turn this fall” at .

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Devil Doesn’t Like Institutions
“In a cynical age that tends to glorify ‘startups’ and celebrate anti-institutional suspicion, faith in institutions will sound dated, stodgy, old-fashioned, even (gasp) ‘conservative.’,” says James K.A. Smith. “Christians who are eager to be progressive, hip, relevant, and creative tend to buy into such anti-institutionalism, thus mirroring and mimicking wider cultural trends. . . And yet those same Christians are rightly concerned about mon good.” But here’s the thing: if you’re really passionate about fostering mon good, then you should...
Are Human Beings Simply A Collection Of Body Parts?
There is nothing simple about Bl. John Paul II’s writings, and yet, his work collectively called the Theology of the Body offers a remarkable chance to reflect on the unique creation that is man. In modern culture, we see humanity reduced to a collection of parts (a lung to transplant, a womb to be rented) or as an instrument to be used (for lust or for slavery.) The human body has e “treachery”, as George Orwell notes in 1984, not...
Where Is All That ‘Dark Money’ Coming From?
Your writer possesses well-meaning friends forever vigilant in my best interests. Most recently, one such kind soul sent an email alerting me to the dangers of so-called “dark money” in the political process. Believing himself on the side of the angels – and fully onside with activist nuns, priests and other religious – my friend sought my assistance in the fight against “evil” corporations participating in the political process. So I got the following in my inbox. And all I...
Creation and the Heart of Man: ‘Orthodox and not Libertarian’
Today at Ethika Politika, Alfred Kentigern Siewers reviews Creation and the Heart of Man: An Orthodox Christian Perspective on Environmentalism, Acton’s recent Orthodox Christian social thought monograph by Fr. Michael Butler and Prof. Andrew Morriss. Siewers offers a nuanced and critical review, being well-read in the literature himself, and ultimately es the monograph as a missing voice in the broader conversation of Orthodox Christianity and creation care. Siewers writes, [I]n its introductory opening chapter, the authors clearly set forth their...
Hope, Success: With Obamacare, It’s All Relative
For one Obama supporter, Obamacare was such a relief, she wrote the President to thank him. The hope and success of Obamacare wasn’t all she thought it would be. ...
Mamas, Don’t Let Your Babies Grow Up To Be Newspaper Reporters. Let ‘Em Be Actuaries and Optometrists and Such.
What’s the deal with actuaries? Whenever a new list of the best jobs piled—like the rankings by Career Cast—they are always near the top of the list. What could really be so great about interpreting statistics to determine probabilities of accidents, sickness, and death, and loss of property from theft and natural disasters? And why have I never actually met an actuary? Are their jobs so exceedingly awesome that they don’t take time to associate with non-actuaries? Anyway, here are...
What Will Your Religious Liberty Cost You? Obamacare Edition
We know freedom isn’t free. And apparently, we are now going to find out exactly how much our religious freedom is going to cost. Matthew Clark at Charisma News says that “refusal to violate your faith” under Obamacare is going to cost you…a lot. If you value your faith;if you are one of the millions of Americans who believe that abortion pills cause the destruction of innocent, God-given human life; if you are an employer who believes that being forced...
How Would You Like An ‘Affordable Healthy Food Act?’
The government is now in the health care business. Trans fats may be on their way out, and New York is trying to tell us to stop buying buckets of soda to drink. Can you imagine a land of the “Affordable Healthy Food Act?” Jacqueline Isaacs can. Imagine with me, a hypothetical world where a politician was running for the office of President of the United States on the platform that everyone deserved a healthy diet. Not so far-fetched of...
‘Tea Party Catholic:’ The Necessity of Faith and Liberty
Fr. C John McCloskey, research fellow at the Faith and Reason Institute, recently reviewed Sam Gregg’s Tea Party Catholic at the National Catholic Register. In “Life, Liberty and Faith,” McCloskey says, “Gregg builds an argument for free economy and human flourishing that is a must-read, regardless of your political affiliation or whether you are Catholic or a serious Christian concerned about the rapidly diminishing religious liberty in the United States.” McCloskey points out at the book focuses on the only...
Calhoun vs. Heinlein for the Soul of American Libertarianism
John C. Calhoun was a 19th century American vice president who supported slavery and championed state’s rights. Robert A. Heinlein was a 20th century American science-fiction writer who opposed racism and championed space policy. The pair aren’t often mentioned together, but Breitbart’s pseudonymous “Hamilton” claims they represent two kinds of libertarianism. Today in America, we see two kinds of libertarianism, which we might call “Calhounian” and “Heinleinian.” Both kinds believe in freedom, but they are very different in their emphasis—and...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved