Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Revising American History For Our Best And Brightest Students
Revising American History For Our Best And Brightest Students
Jan 28, 2026 7:09 AM

What do these things have mon: Gloria Steinem, Yiddish theater, Gospel of Wealth, U.S. Fish Commission, the cult of domesticity and smallpox? They are all highlights of American history for Advanced Placement (AP) high school students. AP classes are typically for college-bound students, and considered to be “tougher” classes. The College Board administers AP classes in high schools, and is releasing its American history framework effective this fall.

Here are some things students won’t see: the Founding Fathers, Abraham Lincoln (other than a brief mention of his Emancipation Proclamation), or the “Greatest Generation” of World War II. Instead, students will learn:

“European exploration and conquest were fueled by a desire for new sources of wealth, increased power and status, and converts to Christianity”

“With little experience dealing with people who were different from themselves, Spanish and Portuguese explorers poorly understood the native peoples they encountered in the Americas”

“The resulting [American] independence movement was fueled by established colonial elites”

“The idea of Manifest Destiny, which asserted U.S. power in the Western Hemisphere and supported U.S. expansion westward, was built on a belief in white racial superiority and a sense of American cultural superiority”

Teachers are instructed to spend 90 percent of class time on the years 1607-1980, with the other 10 percent to the eras before and after those dates. One can certainly argue there isn’t much U.S. history prior to 1607, but 5 percent for the past 34 years? Larry Krieger, a history teacher and author of several college prep test books, found the new framework severely lacking.

Leaving aside its very leftist bias, it is a very poorly written, unprofessional document,” said Krieger, adding he found it “boring” and “dispiriting.”

Krieger says teachers have been contacting him with their concerns.

At the same time, teachers are “very afraid of repercussions for speaking out.” They fear, Krieger said, negative consequences from either the College Board or their local school system.

One teacher who attended a gathering of some 1,000 AP exam “readers” – those who read and evaluate student AP exam essays – told Krieger 90 percent of teachers there either detested the new framework or viewed it with skepticism.

The framework…emphatically states that the new AP U.S. history exam will be limited to information in the framework.

In boldface and underlined text, the College Board states: “Beginning with the May 2015 AP U.S. History Exams, no AP U.S. History Exam question will require students to know historical content that falls outside this concept outline.”

The College Board’s Debbie Pennington has said that U.S. history is not about “dead, white men as taught by almost dead, white men.” Pennington says there must be room for “flexibility” and “flavor.”

As a former high school teacher, I know how difficult it can be to get everything you know needs to be taught into a short school year. Of course, a person can spend a lifetime studying U.S. history. However, there is something deeply flawed about a history framework for high schoolers that makes no mention of Martin Luther King, Jr., the Gettysburg Address, Susan B. Anthony, the Korean and Vietnam Wars, 9/11 or the technological advances in the past 35 years. By focusing on themes of the specious nature of Christianity, elitism, racial superiority and power, the College Board is creating a revisionist, skewed view of American history. What would Thomas Jefferson think? If the College Board has its way, that’s a question American high school students won’t get to ponder.

Read “U.S. history takes drastic left turn this fall” at .

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Force fathers to stay at home? A warning from Europe
It was a curious sight to see a Wall Street Journal op-ed call for social engineering to change the way families choose to raise newborn babies. It was more curious yet to see right-leaning Catholics endorse the notion “in the name of conservative family values.” This is especially true, as Europe shows the manifest failures and harmful effects of their chosen policy. Joanne Lipman opened the debate with her op-ed titled, “Want Equality? Make New Dads Stay Home.” She highlighted...
What does Amazon’s minimum wage have to do with the Church?
In a recent article for The American Spectator, Rev. Ben Johnson, senior editor at the Acton Institute, addresses some of the problems that arise for the Church as a result of Amazon’s recent wage raises. According to Johnson, “Amazon recently announced that it is raising the wage of its lowest-paid U.S. workers to $15 an hour, and above the proposed ‘real living wage’ in the UK.” es in addition to Amazon’s CEO Jeff Bezos’ “plans to lobby Congress to raise...
D.C. restaurants fight back: When workers oppose a higher minimum wage
Last June, Washington, D.C. residents voted to pass Initiative 77, a ballot measure that raised the minimum wage for all restaurant workers, including those making tips. Driven by Restaurant Opportunities Centers United (ROCUnited), the policy was meant to ensure that “that no one has to experience the financial es with being forced to live off tips.” Yet many of the very workers who the law sought to rescue or protectdidn’t want it in the first place, and fought vociferously to...
Radio Free Acton: The debasement of human rights; Econ quiz on USMCA
On this episode of Radio Free Acton, John Couretas, Director of Communications at Acton, speaks with Aaron Rhodes, a human rights activist based out of Hamburg, Germany, about Aaron’s new book “The Debasement of Human Rights.” Where does the notion of human e from and how can we better defend it? Then Caroline Roberts, Producer of Radio Free Acton, talks to Stephen Smith, Professor of Economics at Hope College, about the new North American trade agreement, the USMCA. They discuss...
Why Columbus is more important than you realize
There is likely no public secular holiday more controversial than Columbus Day. Since the observance first began to be celebrated in the nineteenth century it has been opposed by a diverse rage of groups, from the Ku Klux Klan to the American Indian Movement to the National Council of Churches. The Italian navigator tends to provoke strong reactions throughout the Western Hemisphere, and every year we renew our debates about whether he was a bold and brave explorer or a...
Listen: The Christian case for capitalism
The Institute of Economic Affairs explores the ethical argument for a free economy – and why Christians are not making it. In the latest episode of its podcast, an Anglican priest and a Catholic scholar discuss that question, as well as Archbishop Justin Welby’s homily against Amazon, Jesus’ supposed condemnation of wealth, and why clergy tend to support government intervention into the economy. Fr. Marcus Walker, Rector of St. Bartholomew’s Church (COE) in London, speaks with Religion & Liberty Transatlantic...
Watch Samuel Gregg’s 10 minute defense of religion and freedom
Let me take a moment to brag about my colleagueSamuel Gregg, the Director of Research here at the Acton Institute. Almost every week we post an article or video by Gregg here on the PowerBlog, and yes, that’s partiallybecause he’s one of us. But we’d be promoting his work even if he wasn’t a part of Acton for the simple reason that Gregg is one of the most articulate defenders of ordered liberty in the world. Don’t just take my...
The suffering of Cardinal Zen
This article is written by Moris Polanco, originally published by Instituto Fe y Libertad and republished with permission. The elderly cardinal Zen Ze-kiun, bishop emeritus of Hong Kong, said in his blog on February 5, 2018, “The brothers and sisters of mainland China are not afraid of being reduced to poverty, of being put into prison, of shedding their blood. Their greatest suffering is to see themselves betrayed by ‘family.’” He’s right. For a moment let’s put ourselves in the...
From ideology to imagination: How Russell Kirk brought me back to conservatism
This is the third in a series celebrating the work of Russell Kirk in honor of his 100th birthday this October. Read more from the serieshere. As a young college student entering the fray of campus debates, I became enthralled with a particular variety of libertarian thought. Though once a conservative, I began to pack my brain with the likes of Bastiat, Mises, Hayek, and Rothbard. I grew confident in my opinions about policy and was proud of the ideological...
Are you more rational than the market?
Note: This is post #96 in a weekly video series on basic economics. The stock market is prone to certain anomalies. There’s the Monday Effect (where stocks fall more on Mondays), the January Effect (which says that stocks surge higher in that month), and the Momentum Effect (where past stock performance predicts future performance, at least a bit). Can’t a savvy investor take advantage of these anomalies to “beat” the market? Probably not. “Despite its flaws, the market is still...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved