Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Review: Drawing the Line at the Big Ditch
Review: Drawing the Line at the Big Ditch
Jul 4, 2025 11:01 PM

When I was in college, a popular refrain from many academics was to explain the rise of the “Right” or conservatism in the American South as a dynamic brought about because of race. Books like Dan T. Carter’s The Politics of Rage: George Wallace, the Origins of the New Conservatism, and the Transformation of American Politics attempted to link the politics of George Wallace to Ronald Reagan’s brand of conservatism. And if you are suspicious of that theory because Wallace was a New Dealer there is even an explanation for this lofty leap in a book by Joseph Lowndes titled From the New Deal to the New Right: Race and the Southern Origins of Modern Conservatism.

Books like these dismiss the more obvious causes like migration from the Frost Belt to the Sun Belt, the rise of the “New Left,” and a surge of evangelicals participating in the political process. The reason I mention these works is because they share a striking similarity to Adam Clymer’s new book Drawing the Line at the Big Ditch: The Panama Canal Treaties and the Rise of the Right. Clymer has his own explanation for the rise of conservatism on a national scale, the Panama Canal Treaties. It is true that the Panama Canal issue was a pivotal issue that helped to rescue the insurgent Reagan primary campaign against Gerald Ford, but Clymer supposes if Reagan had lost in North Carolina in 76, where his back was up against the wall, he would have never ran for president again or won in 1980.

Odd statements like “His [Reagan] five-minute mentaries had a good number broadcast outlets, and an audience estimated at 20 million listeners a week, but they never stirred national notice” reinforce Clymer’s misunderstanding of Reagan. Reagan’s appeal was both national and popular, and Reagan was already deeply entrenched in the conservative grassroots movement. His radio addresses were highly effective in selling conservatism to mainstream audiences. Those that listened to him knew he of course wasn’t a single issue minded leader and his career wouldn’t end or be extended with the Panama Canal Treaties.

The Panama Canal fiasco however was a powerful and visible symbol for the decline of American might and influence around the globe after retreat from Vietnam. Reagan and other conservative politicians capitalized on the unpopularity of giving it away while the Soviets were flexing their might across the world. But in its symbolism attacking the canal giveaway represents, especially in regards to Reagan, Cold Warriors frustrated with the overall policy of American retreat and détente, which was magnified all the more under Jimmy Carter’s watch.

Clymer does cite some credible evidence that the canal issue brought grassroots conservative organizations together to raise money, but that was for a short time and other issues like the Equal Rights Amendment surely did the same. Clymer notes:

David Keene, then an ACU board member and subsequently its long-term chairman, observed in 2007 that the Canal issue was a double edged sword. He explained, ‘The canal issue was a great boon for us. It raised a lot of money. Afterwards, there was a letdown and it almost destroyed us.’

Clymer’s overarching point is that the Panama Canal issue transformed the Republican Party into a more conservative party. He also claims that Democrats e more conservative nationally because of the canal issue, a statement many may like to challenge.

Clymer also identifies five conservative Republican Senators who won their seats in 1980 campaigning against the Canal Treaty. But he even undercuts his own premise by noting the Democrat incumbents who lost their Senate seats were probably too liberal for the districts they represent and other issues in those campaigns were often just as formative, if not more so, like high unemployment and inflation to name a few. Ultimately Clymer laments the Panama Canal as a divisive issue because he sees it as a major downfall in the politics of consensus building and the rise of hot button issues like abortion, gun control, and same-sex marriage. Clymer bemoans with his own example:

It is not a long conceptual leap from suggesting that a McIntyre or Church [Democrat Senators defeated in 80] is a dupe of the Soviets designs on the Canal to Saxby Chambliss’s 2002 ads suggesting that Senator Max Cleland, a triple amputee from Vietnam was soft on terrorists, Saddam Hussein, and Osama bin Laden because he voted against the Bush administration on some elements of the bill creating the Department of Homeland Security.

While his book does a respectable job in tracing the canal issue through several presidential administrations and the debate in Congress, Clymer’s conclusions about the canal in relation to the ascendancy of conservatism is over – reaching and incoherent. Much of his evidence seems to contradict his own premises. One is forced to wonder if Clymer came up with the thesis and title before he started the actual research. Those interested in the rise of conservatism would be much better served reading Alfred S. Regnery’s recent book Upstream: The Ascendance of American Conservatism.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Bible Verse of the Day
  1 John 1:5-7 In-Context   3 We proclaim to you what we have seen and heard, so that you also may have fellowship with us. And our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son, Jesus Christ.   4 We write this to make ourSome manuscripts your joy complete.   5 This is the message we have heard from him and declare...
Bible Verse of the Day
  Matthew 24:42-44 In-Context   40 Two men will be in the field; one will be taken and the other left.   41 Two women will be grinding with a hand mill; one will be taken and the other left.   42 Therefore keep watch, because you do not know on what day your Lord will come.   43 But understand this: If the owner...
Bible Verse of the Day
  Daily Verse Reflection   Commentary on Proverbs 22:4   (Read Proverbs 22:4)   Where the fear of God is, there will be humility. And much is to be enjoyed by it; spiritual riches, and eternal life at last.   FAQs about the Daily Bible Verse   Why is reading a daily Bible verse important?   Reading a daily Bible verse helps you focus on God's word,...
Bible Verse of the Day
  Daily Verse Reflection   Commentary on John 15:1-8   (Read John 15:1-8)   Jesus Christ is the Vine, the true Vine. The union of the human and Divine natures, and the fulness of the Spirit that is in him, resemble the root of the vine made fruitful by the moisture from a rich soil. Believers are branches of this Vine. The root is...
Bible Verse of the Day
  Daily Verse Reflection   Commentary on Jeremiah 17:5-11   (Read Jeremiah 17:5-11)   He who puts confidence in man, shall be like the heath in a desert, a naked tree, a sorry shrub, the product of barren ground, useless and worthless. Those who trust to their own righteousness and strength, and think they can do without Christ, make flesh their arm, and their...
Bible Verse of the Day
  FAQs about the Daily Bible Verse   Why is reading a daily Bible verse important?   Reading a daily Bible verse helps you focus on God's word, offering spiritual guidance and encouragement for the day ahead.   How can I incorporate daily Bible reading into my routine?   Set aside a few moments each morning or evening to read and reflect on a verse....
Bible Verse of the Day
  Daily Verse Reflection   Commentary on Psalm 71:1-13   (Read Psalm 71:1-13)   David prays that he might never be made ashamed of dependence upon God. With this petition every true believer may come boldly to the throne of grace. The gracious care of Divine providence in our birth and infancy, should engage us to early piety. He that was our Help from...
Differences Between Sephardic and Ashkenazi Kiddush Cups
The Sephardic and Ashkenazi Kiddush cups have distinct differences in design and symbolism, reflecting the unique cultural and historical contexts of each Jewish tradition. This article explores these differences, shedding light on the significance of Kiddush cups in Jewish practice.
Bible Verse of the Day
  Daily Verse Reflection   Commentary on John 10:10-18   (Read John 10:10-18)   Christ is a good Shepherd; many who were not thieves, yet were careless in their duty, and by their neglect the flock was much hurt. Bad principles are the root of bad practices. The Lord Jesus knows whom he has chosen, and is sure of them; they also know whom...
Bible Verse of the Day
  FAQs about the Daily Bible Verse   Why is reading a daily Bible verse important?   Reading a daily Bible verse helps you focus on God's word, offering spiritual guidance and encouragement for the day ahead.   How can I incorporate daily Bible reading into my routine?   Set aside a few moments each morning or evening to read and reflect on a verse....
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved