Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Religious Liberty and the Regulatory Road to Serfdom
Religious Liberty and the Regulatory Road to Serfdom
Apr 5, 2026 8:01 PM

Perhaps for the first time in American history, orthodox and traditional Jews, Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and others may need to form a new alliance in order to defend their religious liberties in an America that’s increasingly less tolerant of principled diversity.

Religious and cultural progressives, secularists, and militant atheists pose a significant threat to religious freedom all in the name of “fairness.” What is not “unfair” is that munities are not free to not embrace cultural morality. In ing years, fairness will be forced upon traditional religious groups by progressives (secular and religious) to destroy religious liberty. munities that hold to classical teachings will not necessarily have their freedom directly undermined by a single President, specific laws in Congress, or maybe not even judicial activism, but primarily by the unchecked power of government regulatory agencies who operate essentially as our fourth branch of government.

Government regulatory agencies, like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Federal Housing Administration (FHA), Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Center for Disease Control (CDC), U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), and hundreds of others, are free to interpret and apply federal law without accountability to America’s legislative process. Congress has no control over any of the regulations issued by these agencies. It is the lack of due process that will render these agencies so dangerous in ing years for those who hold to the traditional practices and beliefs. These agencies are free to interpret the law as they see fit without having to answer to anyone in the process.

Regulatory coercion is often missed because it functions behind the scenes. Federal agencies coerce by withholding certifications, accreditation, “approvals,” and licenses to legally operate often, giving groups two options: ply with the regulations, or (2) lose the ability to legally operate. For example, since universities have to be accredited by a regional agency of the Department of Education in order to grant legitimate degrees, schools ply with whatever e from Washington, D.C. in order to participate in the federal loan program. Any actions interpreted to fall outside of the regulatory vision could jeopardize accreditation and/or federal availability for students.

As the social mores of America continue to shift away from those of religious traditionalists, the verdict is out on whether or not religious organizations and institutions will be able to keep their non-profit status, their licenses to operate, and so on if they do ply with ideologically driven government mandates regarding sexuality, marriage, religious hiring, end-of-life issues, abortion, and so on. If recent actions by the Obama Administration are a vision into the future, there is much to be concerned about. We have already seen religious liberty flair up with the government’s attempt to coerce institutions pliance with Health and Human Services mandates regarding contraception and employer-provided health insurance. Christians have had to fight in federal courts all over America just to opt out of the mandate on the basis of their religious liberty to not embrace the cultural norms. These agencies simply have too much unchecked power.

Thomas Sowell is helpful here as well:

The real danger to us all is when government not only exercises the powers that we have voted to give it, but exercises additional powers that we have never voted to give it. That is when “public servants” e public masters. That is when government itself has stepped over the line. . . Someone once said, “any government that is powerful enough to protect citizens against predators is also powerful enough to e a predator itself.” And dictatorial in the process.

No American government can take away all our freedoms at one time. But a slow and steady erosion of freedom can plish the same thing on the installment plan. We have already gone too far down that road. F.A. Hayek called it “the road to serfdom.”

Here’s the bottom line: The installment plan to undermine religious liberty will likely be through these hundreds of federal regulatory agencies. If religious leaders, across the faith spectrum, do not lock arms they could all stand to lose their freedom to fully participate in America’s pluralistic society. If that happens serfdom will be America’s future.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Mini-Grants on Free Market Economics
Are you a professor interested in free market principles? Do you know of one? The Acton Institute is offering mini-grants between $1,000-$10,000 for faculty at colleges, universities, and seminaries in the United States and Canada. The purpose of these mini-grants is to enhance the effectiveness in the teaching and scholarship of market economics. In the past, these mini-grants were only available for business and economics faculty at Christian schools, but this year any faculty (in the U.S. and Canada) working...
How Puritans Became Capitalists
In his book,Heavenly Merchandize, Mark Valeri, professor of church history at Union Presbyterian Seminary, finds that the American economy as we know it emerged from aseries of important shifts in the views of Puritan ministers: IDEAS:You’re saying that the market didn’t rise at the expense of religion, but was enabled by it? VALERI:You need to have a change in your basic understanding of how or where God works in the world before you can envision different economic behaviors as morally...
You Can’t Separate Stewardship from Economics
As Christians continue toturn their attentionto the intersection of faith and work, it can be easy to dwell on such matters onlyinsofar as theyapplyto ourindividual lives. What is our purpose, ourvocation, and our value? How does God view our work, and how ought we to render it back tohim? What is the source ofour economic action? These questions are important, butthe answers will inevitably point us to a more public (and for some, controversial) context filled with profound questions of...
Video: Arthur C. Brooks Outlines The Formula For Happiness
The 2015 Acton Lecture Series continued on January 29th with a presentation by American Enterprise Institute President Arthur C. Brooks, who delivered a great talk on whatreally leads to happiness in life. In an era when Americans are finding less and less satisfaction with their nation while enjoying great pared to much of the rest of the world and overall human history, what can we do to regain our confidence in the American enterprise system that has lifted much of...
A Parable for the Entrepreneur
In this week’s Acton Commentary, “A Parable for the Unemployed,” I provide a brief survey of the biblical view of work, concluding with reference to the parable of the workers in the vineyard in Matthew 20. As I argue, this parable “might just as well be called the parable of the jobless. It teaches us to wait patiently and expectantly for ways that we can be of service to God through serving others.” Or as the Theology of Work mentary...
Samuel Gregg: The Anglosphere As Actor On The World Stage
Samuel Gregg, Acton’s Director of Research, asks whether or not the Anglosphere nations (Britain, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, and the United States) continue to be a viable political force in the world today at the Library of Law and Liberty. Gregg begins with his unique Anglosphere experience: Given that I am of Scottish and English descent, grew up in Australia, did my doctorate in Britain, and now live and work in America, I am about as much a product of...
Why Keep Funding Ineffective Government Programs?
Head Start doesn’t work. More people than ever are now on food stamps. Medicaid is staggering under the weight of its own bloat. Why are we continuing to fund bad programs? This is what Stephen M. Krason is asking. Such programs keep expanding: There has been a sharp increase in the food-stamp and Children’s Health Insurance programs. Obama has proposed more federal funding for Head Start and pre-school education generally, job training for laid-off workers, and Medicaid. In fact, the...
Why Government Money Alone Can’t Fix Poor Schools
The largest initiative bat poverty by funding public schools has occurred in Camden, New Jersey, the poorest small city in America. New Jersey spends about 60 percent more on education per pupil than the national average according to 2012 census figures, or about $19,000 in 2013. In Camden, per pupil spending was more than $25,000 in 2013, making it one of the highest spending districts in the nation. But as notes, all that extra money hasn’t changed the fact that...
Affordable Energy Drives Basic Needs in the Developing World
“Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day,” wrote Maimonides. “Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.” With all due respect to Maimonides, much has happened since the 12th century. Among those changes is inexpensive, plentiful energy which powers refrigeration, which frees a man from the burden of fishing every day and allows him to engage in other worthy pursuits. That is only if the progressive crusade to strand fossil fuels...
Explainer: President Obama’s FY2016 Budget
What is the President’s budget? Technically, it’s only a budgetrequest—a proposal telling Congress how much money the President believes should be spent on the various Cabinet-level federal functions, like agriculture, defense, education, etc. (A PDF of the 150 page document can be found here.) Why does the President submit a budget to Congress? The Congressional Budget Act of 1974 requires that the President of the United States submit to Congress, on or before the first Monday in February of each...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved