Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Religious Liberty and the Regulatory Road to Serfdom
Religious Liberty and the Regulatory Road to Serfdom
Apr 28, 2026 5:52 PM

Perhaps for the first time in American history, orthodox and traditional Jews, Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and others may need to form a new alliance in order to defend their religious liberties in an America that’s increasingly less tolerant of principled diversity.

Religious and cultural progressives, secularists, and militant atheists pose a significant threat to religious freedom all in the name of “fairness.” What is not “unfair” is that munities are not free to not embrace cultural morality. In ing years, fairness will be forced upon traditional religious groups by progressives (secular and religious) to destroy religious liberty. munities that hold to classical teachings will not necessarily have their freedom directly undermined by a single President, specific laws in Congress, or maybe not even judicial activism, but primarily by the unchecked power of government regulatory agencies who operate essentially as our fourth branch of government.

Government regulatory agencies, like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Federal Housing Administration (FHA), Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Center for Disease Control (CDC), U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), and hundreds of others, are free to interpret and apply federal law without accountability to America’s legislative process. Congress has no control over any of the regulations issued by these agencies. It is the lack of due process that will render these agencies so dangerous in ing years for those who hold to the traditional practices and beliefs. These agencies are free to interpret the law as they see fit without having to answer to anyone in the process.

Regulatory coercion is often missed because it functions behind the scenes. Federal agencies coerce by withholding certifications, accreditation, “approvals,” and licenses to legally operate often, giving groups two options: ply with the regulations, or (2) lose the ability to legally operate. For example, since universities have to be accredited by a regional agency of the Department of Education in order to grant legitimate degrees, schools ply with whatever e from Washington, D.C. in order to participate in the federal loan program. Any actions interpreted to fall outside of the regulatory vision could jeopardize accreditation and/or federal availability for students.

As the social mores of America continue to shift away from those of religious traditionalists, the verdict is out on whether or not religious organizations and institutions will be able to keep their non-profit status, their licenses to operate, and so on if they do ply with ideologically driven government mandates regarding sexuality, marriage, religious hiring, end-of-life issues, abortion, and so on. If recent actions by the Obama Administration are a vision into the future, there is much to be concerned about. We have already seen religious liberty flair up with the government’s attempt to coerce institutions pliance with Health and Human Services mandates regarding contraception and employer-provided health insurance. Christians have had to fight in federal courts all over America just to opt out of the mandate on the basis of their religious liberty to not embrace the cultural norms. These agencies simply have too much unchecked power.

Thomas Sowell is helpful here as well:

The real danger to us all is when government not only exercises the powers that we have voted to give it, but exercises additional powers that we have never voted to give it. That is when “public servants” e public masters. That is when government itself has stepped over the line. . . Someone once said, “any government that is powerful enough to protect citizens against predators is also powerful enough to e a predator itself.” And dictatorial in the process.

No American government can take away all our freedoms at one time. But a slow and steady erosion of freedom can plish the same thing on the installment plan. We have already gone too far down that road. F.A. Hayek called it “the road to serfdom.”

Here’s the bottom line: The installment plan to undermine religious liberty will likely be through these hundreds of federal regulatory agencies. If religious leaders, across the faith spectrum, do not lock arms they could all stand to lose their freedom to fully participate in America’s pluralistic society. If that happens serfdom will be America’s future.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Explainer: What you should know about civil asset forfeiture
Earlier this week, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced the Justice Department would be reinstating the Equitable Sharing Program, a controversial policy related to civil asset forfeiture. Several states have been making it more difficult to apply such forfeitures so this allows state and local law enforcement to explicitly circumvent state forfeiture restrictions. Here’s what you should know aboutcivil asset forfeiture. What is civil asset forfeiture? Civil asset forfeiture (hereafter CAF) is a controversial legal tool that allows law enforcement officials...
Evaluating Trump’s tax reforms
In April, the Trump administration provided a broad outline of proposed reforms, including simplifying tax brackets, eliminating the marriage penalty, and creating child care deductions. The National Catholic Register recently published an article on the reforms, focusing on its effect on the family. Rev. Robert Sirico, co-founder and president of the Acton Institute, provided his thoughts on Trump’s plan: “A refundable tax credit, instead of a direct subsidy from the government, is more in line with the principle of subsidiarity,”...
Review: A visually powerful tribute to The Dunkirk Spirit
In a new blockbuster film, director Christopher Nolan faithfully captures for the big screen the frantic chaos and desperation of the Allied forces at Dunkirk in 1940. It is another vivid reminder that, as so many throughout history have reminded us, “War is hell.” Those who know their history understand that on the French beaches of the Strait of Dover, the Allied forces are thrown once again into another world conflict, this time to protect Western freedom and its democratic...
How did money-lending stop being a sin?
“Moneylending has been taboo for most of human history,” notes Alex Mayyasi. “So how did usury stop being a sin and e respectable finance?” Today, a banker listening to a theologian seems like a curiosity, a category error. But for most of history, this kind of dialogue was the norm. Hundreds of years ago, when modern finance arose in Europe, moneylenders moderated their behaviour in response to debates among the clergy about how to apply the Bible’s teachings to an...
Maximizing profit under competition
Note: This is post #42 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. In petitive market, pany can’t control how much they charge for goods and services. So how do firms maximize profits when they don’t control prices? In this video by Marginal Revolution University, Alex Tabarrok defines profit, including how to calculate total revenue and total cost, and covers costs, variable costs, marginal revenue, and marginal cost. (If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d mend...
New teaching program aims to revive Catholic education
For the past decade, Catholic education has been on the decline. Data from the 2016-2017 National Catholic Education Association Report shows that since 2006, the number of Catholic schools has decreased by 14 percent and the number of students attending Catholic school has decreased by 17.6 percent. Perhaps Teach for Christ can help reverse this trend. The name may ring a bell, as it bears resemblance to the existing program Teach for America. However, Teach for Christ, which will be...
Work too much? You might have the ‘Proletariat Touch’
Two weeks ago, a group of scholars from around the world gathered in Notre Dame, Indiana for Holy Cross College’s Labor and Leisure Conference. Among the many present was scholar Joseph Zahn, who presented his paper, “The Status of Leisure in the Human Person: Whether Leisure is a Virtue?” With levity in his voice, Zahn began: “Writing a paper on leisure without leisure is a difficult, if not utterly futile, task.” Set to begin his doctoral studies in philosophy at...
Did the Reformation lead to ‘economic secularization’?
In his famous work, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Max Weber attempted to draw a clear link between the Protestant Reformation and the rise of capitalism, focusing mostly on the Puritans and their (faulty) connections between spiritual significance and economic prosperity. But while Weber may have offered some significant observations on the developments of his day, his overall theory has long been dismissed and discredited on a number of grounds, whether historical, theological, or economic. “Weber missed...
The kind of ‘tolerance’ the West needs
In the modern lexicon, “tolerance” stands alongside “equality” as an unquestioned and absolute good, a cornerstone of transatlantic values. True tolerance has brought the West unparalleled prosperity. But what kind of “tolerance” should we advance, and what other cultural concepts must support it? In a new essay for Religion & Liberty Transatlantic,Josh Herring examines “The foundation of true tolerance.” He begins with the triumph of tolerance in public discourse: In The Ethics of Rhetoric, University of Chicago rhetorician Richard Weaver...
The most effective way to reduce child poverty
A vital fact lies buried in the recent IFS study on e inequality: the most effective way to alleviate poverty. This was true even though the IFS study, and UK government statistics, don’t actually measure poverty but rather inequality. Maybe it’s best to say the IFS study contains the secret to reducing both phenomena. Whichever metric one uses, according to the IFS report the most effective way to reduce that number is through work. The UK government defines “poverty” as...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved