Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Religious Liberty and the Regulatory Road to Serfdom
Religious Liberty and the Regulatory Road to Serfdom
Apr 30, 2026 7:06 AM

Perhaps for the first time in American history, orthodox and traditional Jews, Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and others may need to form a new alliance in order to defend their religious liberties in an America that’s increasingly less tolerant of principled diversity.

Religious and cultural progressives, secularists, and militant atheists pose a significant threat to religious freedom all in the name of “fairness.” What is not “unfair” is that munities are not free to not embrace cultural morality. In ing years, fairness will be forced upon traditional religious groups by progressives (secular and religious) to destroy religious liberty. munities that hold to classical teachings will not necessarily have their freedom directly undermined by a single President, specific laws in Congress, or maybe not even judicial activism, but primarily by the unchecked power of government regulatory agencies who operate essentially as our fourth branch of government.

Government regulatory agencies, like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Federal Housing Administration (FHA), Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Center for Disease Control (CDC), U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), and hundreds of others, are free to interpret and apply federal law without accountability to America’s legislative process. Congress has no control over any of the regulations issued by these agencies. It is the lack of due process that will render these agencies so dangerous in ing years for those who hold to the traditional practices and beliefs. These agencies are free to interpret the law as they see fit without having to answer to anyone in the process.

Regulatory coercion is often missed because it functions behind the scenes. Federal agencies coerce by withholding certifications, accreditation, “approvals,” and licenses to legally operate often, giving groups two options: ply with the regulations, or (2) lose the ability to legally operate. For example, since universities have to be accredited by a regional agency of the Department of Education in order to grant legitimate degrees, schools ply with whatever e from Washington, D.C. in order to participate in the federal loan program. Any actions interpreted to fall outside of the regulatory vision could jeopardize accreditation and/or federal availability for students.

As the social mores of America continue to shift away from those of religious traditionalists, the verdict is out on whether or not religious organizations and institutions will be able to keep their non-profit status, their licenses to operate, and so on if they do ply with ideologically driven government mandates regarding sexuality, marriage, religious hiring, end-of-life issues, abortion, and so on. If recent actions by the Obama Administration are a vision into the future, there is much to be concerned about. We have already seen religious liberty flair up with the government’s attempt to coerce institutions pliance with Health and Human Services mandates regarding contraception and employer-provided health insurance. Christians have had to fight in federal courts all over America just to opt out of the mandate on the basis of their religious liberty to not embrace the cultural norms. These agencies simply have too much unchecked power.

Thomas Sowell is helpful here as well:

The real danger to us all is when government not only exercises the powers that we have voted to give it, but exercises additional powers that we have never voted to give it. That is when “public servants” e public masters. That is when government itself has stepped over the line. . . Someone once said, “any government that is powerful enough to protect citizens against predators is also powerful enough to e a predator itself.” And dictatorial in the process.

No American government can take away all our freedoms at one time. But a slow and steady erosion of freedom can plish the same thing on the installment plan. We have already gone too far down that road. F.A. Hayek called it “the road to serfdom.”

Here’s the bottom line: The installment plan to undermine religious liberty will likely be through these hundreds of federal regulatory agencies. If religious leaders, across the faith spectrum, do not lock arms they could all stand to lose their freedom to fully participate in America’s pluralistic society. If that happens serfdom will be America’s future.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Bill McKibben, Climate-Change Opportunists, and the Pope’s Encyclical
I recently enjoyed a brief back-and-forth with 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben in which he claimed that I accused him of lacking religious faith. That most assuredly was not the case. I told him so, but also stood by my initial assertion that he and other environmental activists are cherry-picking Pope Francis’ Laudato Si for religious and moral firepower on climate-change while ignoring those elements that are core Roman Catholic teachings with which they disagree. Let’s look at Mr. McKibben’s religious...
Book Review: ‘Under the Same Sky: From Starvation in North Korea to Salvation in America’
North Korea has been cut off from the rest of the world for nearly 70 years and few people outside of its borders – especially in the West – have a realistic picture of how life really goes on. Yes, we know it’s a horrible place, essentially a giant concentration camp, but how do North Koreans live their lives? Joseph Kim’s memoir, with contributions from Stephan Talty, Under the Same Sky: From Starvation in North Korea to Salvation in America...
Addis Ababa: The Next Discussion on Poverty and Development
A new stage is set for an old conversation. This week marks the Third International Conference on Financing for Development (FFD3) held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Bringing in representatives of almost 200 countries, it has drawn attention from the anti-poverty crowd across the globe. Whether they are members of NGOs, churches, celebrities, or politicians, many concerned about the developing world have their ears turned to Ethiopia. FFD3 isn’t the first conference of its kind. The original summit took place in...
Senator Scott’s Passionate Speech on School Choice
Last week Senator Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) proposed an amendment to the reauthorization of No Child Left Behind bill that would allow Title I funds–the funds the federal government allocates to districts with high-poverty populations–to follow students out of their assigned district schools to schools of choice. Democrats in the Senate (joined by six Republicans) successfully fought to keep the portability amendment as well as school vouchers out of the legislation. As Think Progress explains, the White House and Senate...
Economy of Wonder: Buzz Aldrin Takes Communion in Space
Today marks the 46th anniversary of the day we landed on the moon, and as we look back on that monumental moment, it’s worth remembering the efforts taken by one astronaut topause and recognize hiscreator. Prior to the lift-off of Apollo 11, Buzz Aldrin spoke with his pastor about finding the “right symbol for the first lunar landing.” After some discussion, they agreed it was munion service, and the scripture passage he’d use would be John 15:5: “I am the...
Video: Jayabalan on Pope Francis and Economic Globalization
Kishore Jayabalan, director of the Istituto Acton in Rome, talked to Voa News yesterday about the flaws in Pope Francis’s pronouncements on free markets and globalization, as articulated in the recent encyclical Laudato Si’. “When the pope says that this economy kills, that this economy destroys the environment, I’m not quite sure what economy he’s talking about,” said Jayabalan. Read the full article here. ...
New Issue of the Journal of Markets & Morality (18.1)
Our most recent issue of the Journal of Markets & Morality has now been published online and print issues are in the mail. Volume 18, no. 1 is a special issue. Guest editor Shirley Roels details the origins of the contributions in her (open access) editorial: To highlight the 2013–2014 English publication of the first volume of [Abraham] Kuyper’s mentary mon grace, the Calvin College Business Department organized an October 2014 symposium, which was co-sponsored by the Acton Institute. Faculty,...
Did America Invent Religious Tolerance?
Allowing people to think what they want about God and religious beliefs is a considered a cornerstone of a liberal society. But religious toleration hasn’t historically been considered a prized virtue. In fact, as Larry Schweikart says, it’s a historical aberration—an ideological revolution created by the Puritans and pre-1776 Americans. ...
What if we redistributed all profits to workers?
A plaint by the political left is that the CEOs of panies earn too much money. The implication is not, however, that the “excess” money should be distributed to the shareholders (who actually own pany). Instead, the ideais that “fairness” requires that much of theprofitthat normally goes toward the CEO’s pay should be redistributed to the rest of pany’s employees. But what if we took it a step further: What if we redistributed all corporate profits to workers? What if...
Jeb Bush Says Work Harder; Americans Respond By Complaining
During a recent interview, presidential candidate Jeb Bush outlined his economic plan, which included a goal of achieving 4 percent economic growth. As for how we might achieve thatgrowth, Bush went mita grave and sinful error, daring implythat Americans might need to work a bit harder: My aspiration for the country —and I believe we can achieve it —is 4 percent growth as far as the eye can see,” he told the newspaper. “Which means we have to be a...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved