Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY
/
Productivity and Potential
Productivity and Potential
Oct 5, 2024 1:34 PM

R&L: You have led an incredibly productive and active life, from the early civil rights movement to now working to strengthen the black family. What motivates you?

Perkins: I don’t like to see human potential wasted, and that’s what happens when people are left behind, either because the system excludes them or because they have failed to adopt solid values. I spent 22 years, from 1962 to 1980, in rural Mississippi, and prior to that I lived in California. But I had little basic moral training. I grew up with my grandmother, but her sons were bootleggers and gamblers. I would like to give people something I did not have.

R&L: What do you think it was in your own life that instilled values in you?

Perkins: I believe it was my first job, hauling hay at the age of eleven. I realized the gain that e from hard work and from owning a business. I was inspired early to believe in economic development. I have applied those same values my whole life.

R&L: How do you help promote values?

Perkins: In every project we have, our interest is in getting to core issues, including the importance of work, responsibility, and rest. Our work is what brings us our joy when we have an expectation of celebration. Further, I believe in a strong connection between work and property. Individuals should own the means of production if they are to have a chance at long-term prosperity.

Some people have been led to believe that the means of production should be owned by the state, but that did not work in Russia, Eastern Europe, or China. The political apparatus in any society does not produce. It can only set up the rules of the game. Ultimately, resources have to be in the hands of the people, whether through private ownership or a lease agreement.

R&L: As an ordained minister, how do you see the role of the church in urban life?

Perkins: The church’s role ought to be to nurture the spirit and the values of family and ethics, of work and responsibility. That should be the first message we proclaim. The pastoral role is to encourage people because they are members of the congregation, of the parish, to nurture them in those values. In the inner city today, that is not happening. At times, the church itself must e a model and might even have to start an enterprise.

R&L: How is what you are describing different from the situation we see today?

Perkins: Contrast these methods with governmental welfare programs. The government takes the responsibility away from the person and the family. It makes people dependent on political forces and bureaucracies. All these programs take us away from depending on ourselves, upon our kin, and upon our family. Instead it makes us dependent on a system. That system can’t produce economic development. Only entrepreneurs can create economic development. In terms of charity, ideally, we should have to call on our families first in time of need. That creates a bond between family members and between generations. Government programs weaken those bonds.

R&L: Do you think government adds unnecessary burdens to business?

Perkins: Absolutely. These days, it seems everyone has something bad to say about business. But it provides us with all our goods and services, and also all our jobs and job opportunities. What’s wrong with that? That should be encouraged, not discouraged through regulation. That’s why I believe in free enterprise. At the same time, there is room for government regulation to prevent monopolies from ing a threat to liberty and economic growth.

R&L: The Koreans and other Asians are very successful in the inner city. Why do these groups make it, and why does it create such a sense of resentment?

Perkins: First, they have a strong will to succeed, which is what others lack. Second, e with families with strong values that put long-term goals ahead of short-term selfishness. Third, they are willing to serve the consumer by providing goods and services–they don’t think it is somehow beneath them to do that.

They also have the advantage of not being on welfare. Welfare programs discourage work. No person or family on welfare is going to start a business. It saps creativity and initiative. Too often, welfare recipients depend on the government check instead of on each other. It leads husbands to devalue their wives and the children. The welfare system has broken up the family by insisting on a need for dependent children.

R&L: People say that blacks cannot be responsible for themselves, given their history in dealing with racial injustice. Do you agree?

Perkins: That’s where the forgiving grace of es in. A person must learn to forgive others, the way a husband and a wife, or two brothers can forgive each other and make up. Hatred is a noose that first holds us back, and then eventually kills us.

R&L: Tell me about your own religious faith.

Perkins: I learned much from my Catholic brother and friend, Father A. J. McNight, but I am an ordained Baptist minister. My entire public ministry has been ecumenical. I believe in the truths of the faith, the forgiveness of sin, the Virgin Birth, the Incarnation. The church has always been my home, in spite of my ecumenical appeal.

Religious faith must be an essential part of the development of the munity right now. It is absolutely essential. At my Foundation, we try to foster this through our publication Urban Family. The church must be a munity that reinforces moral values. Storefront churches used to play the role that the current welfare state has taken over–caring for single mothers, ing the family that those children did not have. munity of the church came about spontaneously, not by government design. It was the product of a people with faith in God and rightly ordered lives. That is what we need to recapture.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY
Jesus and Class Warfare
Plenty of Marxists have turned to the New Testament and the origins of Christianity. Memorable examples include the works of F.D. Maurice and Zhu Weizhi’s Jesus the Proletarian. After criticizing how so many translations of the New Testament soften Jesus’ teachings regarding material possessions, greed, and wealth, Orthodox theologian David Bentley Hart has gone so far to ask, “Are Christians supposed to be Communists?” In the Huffington Post, Dan Arel has even claimed that “Jesus was clearly a Marxist,...
Creating an Economy of Inclusion
The poor have been the main subject of concern in the whole tradition of Catholic Social Teaching. The Catholic Church talks often about a “preferential option for the poor.” In recent years, many of the Church’s social teaching documents have been particularly focused on the needs of the poorest people in the world’s poorest countries. The first major analysis of this topic could be said to have been in the papal encyclical Populorum Progressio, published in 1967 by Pope...
How Dispensationalism Got Left Behind
Whether we like it or not, Americans, in one way or another, have all been indelibly shaped by dispensationalism. Such is the subtext of Daniel Hummel’s provocative telling of the rise and fall of dispensationalism in America. In a little less than 350 pages, Hummel traces how a relatively insignificant Irishman from the Plymouth Brethren, John Nelson Darby, prompted the proliferation of dispensational theology, especially its eschatology, or theology of the end times, among our ecclesiastical, cultural, and political...
C.S. Lewis and the Apocalypse of Gender
From very nearly the beginning, Christianity has wrestled with the question of the body. Heretics from gnostics to docetists devalued physical reality and the body, while orthodox Christianity insisted that the physical world offers us true signs pointing to God. This quarrel persists today, and one form it takes is the general confusion among Christians and non-Christians alike about gender. Is gender an abstracted idea? Is it reducible to biological characteristics? Is it a set of behaviors determined by...
Conversation Starters with … Anne Bradley
Anne Bradley is an Acton affiliate scholar, the vice president of academic affairs at The Fund for American Studies, and professor of economics at The Institute of World Politics. There’s much talk about mon good capitalism” these days, especially from the New Right. Is this long overdue, that a hyper-individualism be beaten back, or is it merely cover for increasing state control of the economy? Let me begin by saying that I hate “capitalism with adjectives” in general. This...
Mistaken About Poverty
Perhaps it is because America is the land of liberty and opportunity that debates about poverty are especially intense in the United States. Americans and would-be Americans have long been told that if they work hard enough and persevere they can achieve their dreams. For many people, the mere existence of poverty—absolute or relative—raises doubts about that promise and the American experiment more generally. Is it true that America suffers more poverty than any other advanced democracy in the...
Spurgeon and the Poverty-Fighting Church
Religion & Liberty: Volume 33, Number 4 Spurgeon and the Poverty-Fighting Church by Christopher Parr • October 30, 2023 Portrait of Charles Spurgeon by Alexander Melville (1885) Charles Spurgeon was a young, zealous 15-year-old boy when he came to faith in Christ. A letter to his mother at the time captures the enthusiasm of his newfound Christian faith: “Oh, how I wish that I could do something for Christ.” God granted that wish, as Spurgeon would e “the prince of...
Lord Jonathan Sacks: The West’s Rabbi
In October 1798, the president of the United States wrote to officers of the Massachusetts militia, acknowledging a limitation of federal rule. “We have no government,” John Adams wrote, “armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, and revenge or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net.” The nation that Adams had helped to found would require the parts of the body...
Adam Smith and the Poor
Adam Smith did not seem to think that riches were requisite to happiness: “the beggar, who suns himself by the side of the highway, possesses that security which kings are fighting for” (The Theory of Moral Sentiments). But he did not mend beggary. The beggar here is not any beggar, but Diogenes the Cynic, who asked of Alexander the Great only to step back so as not to cast a shadow upon Diogenes as he reclined alongside the highway....
Up from the Liberal Founding
During the 20th century, scholars of the American founding generally believed that it was liberal. Specifically, they saw the founding as rooted in the political thought of 17th-century English philosopher John Locke. In addition, they saw Locke as a primarily secular thinker, one who sought to isolate the role of religion from political considerations except when necessary to prop up the various assumptions he made for natural rights. These included a divine creator responsible for a rational world for...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2024 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved