Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Pro-democracy activist Jimmy Lai found guilty over Tiananmen Square Massacre vigil
Pro-democracy activist Jimmy Lai found guilty over Tiananmen Square Massacre vigil
Nov 14, 2024 8:53 PM

Lai and two co-defendants were convicted on charges related to their participation in the annual Tiananmen Square Massacre vigil, another Beijing-inspired blow to free speech and free assembly in Hong Kong.

Read More…

Hong Kong media tycoon and outspoken pro-democracy activist Jimmy Lai has been convicted for his involvement in a memorating the Tiananmen Square Massacre.

On Dec. 9, Lai, along with two other prominent Hong Kong activists, Gwyneth Ho and Chow Hang Tung, were found guilty of incitement and taking part in unlawful assembly.

According to the BBC, “more than two dozen politicians and activists have been charged” with unlawful assembly since the passing of Hong Kong’s wide-sweeping National Security Law (NSL) in June 2020, which muzzles and punishes any political opposition.

Lai, Ho, and Chow were the last to receive their verdicts, as they contested the charges. During the trial, the defense argued that the trio lit candles in a personal capacity at the vigil and had not incited others to participate.

The presiding judge, Amanda Woodcock, laid aside the defense as “frankly nonsensical,” while calling their participation “an act of protest against the police.”

The three convicted activists are set to receive their sentencing on Dec. 13, when they could be handed up to five years in prison.

Ho, a former Hong Kong reporter, now acts as a social activist in opposition to the city’s current totalitarian climate. Chow is a former lawyer and vice-chair of the now-disbanded Hong Kong Alliance of Democratic Movements in China—the group that organized the annual Tiananmen Square Massacre vigil.

Both Ho’s and Chang’s past career experiences, paired with their influential standing as passionate activists in opposition to the sitting Hong Kong government, makes them prime targets for silencing.

The Tiananmen Square vigil was an annual event held every June 4, marking the horrific 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre, where Chinese troops opened fire at unarmed student pro-democracy protesters, resulting in an estimated 1,000 people killed.

The 2020 vigil was banned for the first time in 30 years, with public officials citing COVID-19 regulations. Many activists ignored the ban, and tens of thousands participated anyway.

Before this year’s vigil, leaders continued to push COVID-19 restrictions, and a massive police force was sent to barricade main roads leading to Victoria Park, resulting in a memoration of the massacre.

Outside of banning the large crowds and roaring noise from protesters, the Hong Kong government has consistently attempted to erase even silent memorials of the massacre, like the sculpture The Pillar of Shame, which, in October, was removed from campus grounds by order of Hong Kong University.

Aiming to execute social uniformity through intimidation, the university urged the immediate removal of the statue or else it would be “deemed abandoned.”

Thursday’s ruling is a warning sign to Hong Kong citizens that their city, once a safe-haven for democratic ideals and a gold mine for economic opportunity, may be morphing into a reflection of Chinese society, where totalitarianism is the norm and human rights cease to exist.

Amnesty International, a nongovernmental organization focused on “human rights for all people,” said in a statement conveyed by ABC News: “The Hong Kong government has once again flouted international law by convicting activists simply for their involvement in a peaceful, socially distanced vigil for those killed by Chinese troops on 4 June 1989. The authorities have deemed the vigil ‘unlawful’ because the police did not approve it, but peaceful assembly does not need government approval. These convictions merely underline the pattern of the Hong Kong authorities’ extreme efforts to exploit the law to press multiple trumped-up charges against prominent activists.”

In October, Amnesty International withdrew operations from its base in Hong Kong, saying it could “no longer work freely without fear.”

Lai, who turned 74 last week, is a longtime friend of the Acton Institute. He was the recipient of Acton’s “Faith and Freedom” award in 2020 for his mitment to liberty and his safeguarding of moral and Christian convictions.

Lai was founder of the largest pro-democracy newspaper, Apple Daily, as well as its pany, Next Digital. The 26-year-old business was a prominent voice critiquing the Beijing government and thus was forced to close this past June after Hong Kong police raided its headquarters, seizing its documents and freezing its assets.

First arrested on Aug. 10, 2o20, and currently serving out prison sentences for other NSL-related charges, Lai has never lost hope in democracy and the good it promotes in any society, even though doing so could result in life in prison. From his jail cell, Lai has sent letters to past co-workers, encouraging them to “stand tall” and to “seek justice as journalists.”

The Hong Konger, the Acton Institute’s groundbreaking documentary, is set to be released in early 2022 and focuses on the life of Lai—a successful entrepreneur, outspoken journalist, and Catholic dissident—as well as his courageous efforts against Chinese influence in Hong Kong society.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Sin and Extreme Sports
You may know that a traditional way of interpreting the Ten Commandments involves articulating both the explicit negative prohibitions as well as the implicit positive duties. So, for example, the mandment prohibiting murder is understood in the Heidelberg Catechism to answer the question, “Is it enough then that we do not kill our neighbor in any such way?” by saying, “No. By condemning envy, hatred, and anger God tells us to love our neighbors as ourselves, to be patient, peace-loving,...
Religious Freedom in China
Do economic, political, and religious freedom go together? Rodney Stark, writing in his recent book The Victory of Reason, says that “It seems doubtful than an effective modern economy can be created without adopting capitalism, as was demonstrated by the failure of mand economies of the Soviet Union and China.” He also writes, There are many reasons people embrace Christianity, including its capacity to sustain a deeply emotional and existentially satisfying faith. But another significant factor is its appeal to...
‘We get Viagra. They get malaria.’
At least, the title of this post is typical of the mantra against the practices of drug panies, according to Peter W. Huber’s “Of Pills and Profits: In Defense of Big Pharma,” in Commentary magazine (HT: Arts & Letters Daily). Huber, a senior fellow of the Manhattan Institute, summarizes in brief the pany argument, and then goes on to examine what truth there is in such claims. He says of the difference between creating and administering drugs, “Getting drug policy...
The ‘Moral’ Minimum Wage Increase Hurts Teens and Minorities
Religious activists are stumping for a minimum wage increase as a way to help the disadvantaged. But do they understand the economics? Anthony Bradley observes that government-mandated pay hikes “actually hurt teens and low-skilled minorities in the long run because minimum wage jobs are usually entry-level positions filled by employees with limited work experience and few job skills.” Read the mentary here. ...
On Blogging
G. K. Chesterton on Journalists: “…there exists in the modern world, perhaps for the first time in history, a class of people whose interest is not in that things should happen well or happen badly, should happen successfully or happen unsuccessfully, should happen to the advantage of this party or the advantage of that party, but whose interest simply is that things should happen. “It is the one great weakness of journalism as a picture of our modern existence, that...
Krauthammer on Proportionality
“‘Disproportionate’ in What Moral Universe?” asks Charles Krauthammer in today’s Washington Post. He continues: When the United States was attacked at Pearl Harbor, it did not respond with a parallel “proportionate” attack on a Japanese naval base. It launched a four-year campaign that killed millions of Japanese, reduced Tokyo, Hiroshima and Nagasaki to cinders, and turned the Japanese home islands into rubble and ruin. Disproportionate? No. When one is wantonly attacked by an aggressor, one has every right — legal...
Will Chicago Mandate the “Everyday Low Price” too?
Chicago’s City Council passed a measure last week that mandates “big box” stores such as Wal-Mart, Best Buy and Lowe’s to pay workers — regardless of experience — a minimum wage of $13 an hour including benefits by 2010. See the opinion piece in today’s Wall Street Journal. The justification is to help poor people have a better standard of living. Is this another example of good intentions mixed with bad economics? This time I doubt the intentions are to...
The New Suburbanism
How many of you would like to live here? Tom Monaghan has received a lot of attention for his plans to create munity in Florida in conjunction with the founding of a new Roman Catholic university: “The panying town will provide single- and multi-family housing in a wide range of styles and prices, along mercial and office facilities to modate the businesses and organizations needed to support this major academic institution.” Here’s what Katie Couric had to say in an...
Coulter on Christianity and the Welfare State
In this Beliefnet interview conducted by Charlotte Allen, conservative firebrand Ann Coulter references the work of Acton senior fellow Marvin Olasky: Is it possible to be a good Christian and sincerely believe, as Jim Wallis does, that a bigger welfare state and higher taxes to fund it is the best way in plex modern society for us to fulfill our Gospel obligation to help the poor? It’s possible, but not likely. Confiscatory taxation enforced by threat of imprisonment is “stealing,”...
Isn’t the Cold War Over?
I’ve got an idea for a new . Titled, Hugo and Vladi, it details the zany adventures of two world leaders, one of whom (played by David Hyde Pierce) struggles to upkeep his image of a friendly, modern European diplomat while his goofball brother-in-law (played by George Lopez) keeps screwing it up for him by spouting off vitriolic Soviet rhetoric and threatening all of Western civilization with his agressive (but loveable) arms sales and seizures of private panies. It is...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2024 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved