Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Prince Harry’s two-child policy?
Prince Harry’s two-child policy?
Apr 2, 2025 8:28 AM

Although the British monarchy lost most of its formal power, it still exercises a number of functions in society: symbol of unity and continuity, devoted servant, and good example. Prince Harry put this last activity in peril when he said he would have no more than two children.

When Prince Harry mentioned having children in an interview with Jane Goodall in the ing issue of Vogue magazine, she jokingly scolded His Royal Highness, “Not too many!”

“Two, maximum!” he replied.

Goodall warned that, without dramatic action, climate change will lead to “people fighting over the last fertile land, the last fresh water,” and Prince Harry agreed that “we should be able to leave something better behind for the next generation.”

Alarmist predictions about overpopulation have had a revival, since a generation has passed since Paul Ehrlich’s Cassandra cries came to nothing. The prince joined a wave of population scaremongering in the name of taming, or fleeing, climate change. In recent months, NBC News has implied that “science proves” we “should stop having” children, and Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) asked explicitly, “Is it OK to still have children?” A growing number of people seek to spare the earth of the estimated58.6 metric tonsof carbon emissionschildren produce annually.

By an act of divine providence, the royal announcement came the same week as the UK’s Office for National Statistics announced the birth rate in England and Wales has hit its lowest level since the ONS began keeping records, in 1938. Clearly, some couples have anticipated the royals’ behavior. The total fertility rate of 1.7 children lags behind the 2.1 children necessary to reach the replacement level – and therein lies the problem.

Leaving aside the issue of climate predictions (and their history of inconvenient errors), let’s assume everything that is forecast e to pass The experts have estimated the cost of the damage they believe will be caused by climate change. The IPPC found that if the governments around the world do nothing to lower CO2 emissions, which it calls “the no-policy baseline scenario,” it will cause “a global gross domestic product (GDP) loss of 2.6%” by 2100.

Compare that, momentarily, to the cost of a population bust. The IMF found that in the more developed countries, including the UK, the increase in public health spending alone“over 2015–50 is equivalent to 57 percent of today’s GDP, and the present discounted value (PDV) of the increase between 2050 and 2100 would be a staggering 163 percent of GDP.”

To those who would say this values finance at the price of the planet, I gently reiterate: The IPPC estimate expresses the cost of environmental damage in economic terms. The IPPC’s analysis of ecological harm is priced into this figure. It amounts to much less than the likely impact of population reduction. This does not include any other social cost from having fewer children.

The danger of the future is too low a birthrate, not too high.

A childless lifestyle causes a short-term economic boom, as couples spend their money on consumer goods. This increased consumption will largely offset the reduced carbon footprint of not having children; the model assumes that childless adults retain the same work and consumption patterns as they would with children.

But as the childless generation turns gray, the economy begins to slow, or unravel. Multigenerational pension systems exert a greater burden on a smaller base of workers. Productivity will fall, since a smaller cohort of workers cannot produce as much as a larger one. Since the nation has less disposable e, the economy will stall, and the nation’s industrial makeup will shift. The debt racked up by previous generations may begin to constrict the remaining share of the budget.

Naturally, the royal family will be insulated from the poor es of others heeding their virtue signaling. Coincidentally, most AmericansandEuropeans also say two is their ideal number of children. (Economist Bryan Caplan found that parents would maximize their happiness by having four children.) The couple’s mitment also harmonizes with the imperative for all royal couples to produce “an heir and a spare.”

The notion that this is mere posturing is amplified by the fact that the announcement also coincided with HRH and Markle, and at least 113 others, flying by private jet to Sicily to attend this year’s “Google Camp” on the topic of climate change.

This creates an ethical universe in which, as Joanna Rossiter writes in The Spectator,“you are moral not because of what you do but because of who you are… [R]ather than earn the public’s respect through national service, it’s simplyabout having a voice on the issue of the day.”

The royal couple will certainly not be considered moral based on the impact of their advice.

Perhaps the British would be more reticent if they knew declining birthrates may be tied historically to the advance of the French?

Thankfully, the Invisible Hand has supplied another role model: Prince William, Kate, and their three beautiful children.

May their tribe increase.

Pics / . Editorial use only.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Rev. Robert Sirico’s ‘Catholique et Libéral’ launched in Paris
The full-house at Paris Story theater brought together many ranks of French leadership from economics think tanks, businesses, human rights advocacies, and the Catholic Church. From left to right: David Briend (publisher), Rev. Robert Sirico (author), Emmanuelle Gave (interpreter), Jean-Philippe Delsol (IREF president), Charles Gave (preface author and president of Institut des Libertés) Recently, on September 6, Acton’s president and co-founder Rev. Robert Sirico launched his first trade press book in French Catholique et Libéral. Les raisons morales d’une économie...
Abp Justin Welby compared Amazon to leeches — but it built his church
In a recent speech, the Archbishop of Canterbury likened Amazon executives to leeches and ancient Aztec rulers who “ate the flesh of human sacrifices.” However, in reality Amazon has generated such prosperity for its shareholder, the Church of England, that it has financially built up the body of Christ. In a harsh address to the Trades Union Congress last week, Welby said that Amazon “leached off the taxpayer,” since its low tax bill proves “they don’t pay for our defence,...
Post-industrial economics: Studying human action in an age of intangibles
As pletes its transition into the Age of Information, economists are struggling to identify the drivers and develop their predictive models accordingly. Alas, as businesses continue to grow and evolve more rapidly, and as the corresponding systems continue to increase plexity, many economists still view individuals and businesses as mostly static and reactionary. “Mainstream economists treat the firm as if it were an inorganic particle that does nothing but react to forces around it,” writes economist Arnold Kling in National...
Radio Free Acton: Inside the studio of a violin maker; Upstream on the film ‘Andrei Rublev’
On this episode of Radio Free Acton, award winning news anchor Anne Marie Schieber visits the studio of Matthew Noykos, a violin maker in Grand Rapids, MI, to learn more about his craft and discuss how he finds purpose and fulfillment in his everyday work. Then, on the Upstream segment, Bruce Edward Walker speaks with Robert Bird, author of two books on Russian filmmaker Andrei Tarkovsky, about Tarkovsky’s film “Andrei Rublev,” which was recently re-issued by The Criterion Collection. Check...
How expert are expert stock pickers?
Note: This is post #93 in a weekly video series on basic economics. In his 1973 book, A Random Walk Down Wall Street, economist Burton Malkiel made a controversial claim: a blindfolded monkey, throwing darts at the financial pages, could select a basket of stocks that would do just as well as a set chosen by the pros. Economist Alex Tabarrok explains why that is true and why the first rule of smart investing is “ignore the expert stock pickers.”...
How Trump’s tariffs hurt Michigan industry
“President Donald Trump’s continued embrace of tariffs spells danger for Michigan,” says Tyler Groenendal in an op-ed for the Detroit Times. Groenendal, the foundation relations coordinator at the Acton Institute, says though Trump is noted for his “America First” refrain, his call for tariffs will ultimately hurt America the most: Michigan is particularly vulnerable to the consequences of protectionism. According to estimates by the U.S. Census Bureau of Economic Analysis, imports and exports accounted for 38.9 percent of the Michigan’s...
A crash course on how to interpret the U.S. Constitution
Today is Constitution Day, a holiday celebrated in America every year on September 17, the anniversary of the day the framers signed the document. The U.S. Constitution is arguably one of the most important legal documents in the history of the world. Because of this venerated status, though, many people assume that you need to be a Juris Doctor (J.D.) and an expert on recondite Constitutional law to understand how to read the document, much less interpret the Constitution. But...
5 Facts about hurricanes
Hurricane Florence has struck the Carolinas, dumping massive amounts of rain that could trigger catastrophic floods inland. Here are five facts you should know about these types of deadly storms: 1. A hurricane is a form of tropical storm that form over warm ocean waters in the eastern Pacific Ocean, Caribbean Sea, southern Atlantic Ocean, and Gulf of Mexico. When the winds of a tropical storm are less than 38 mph, it is called a tropical depression, and when the...
Stiglitz vs. Easterly: Leading economists debate the role of markets in reducing poverty
In a fascinating debate hosted by Reason Magazine, development economists William Easterly and Joseph Stiglitz discuss how to best fight global poverty, responding to a simple question: “Which is a better approach, freer markets or increased government action?” Easterly, a professor at New York University and author of the popular book, The White Man’s Burden, highlights the importance of freer markets, arguing they provide better incentives, better mechanisms for sharing knowledge, and, most importantly, better rights. Stiglitz, a Nobel laureate...
A Jewish perspective on market, justice, and charity
“Not a day goes by when there’s not some concern raised about the state of the economy and how people are faring,” says Curt Biren in this week’s Acton Commentary. “While recent economic growth has been promising, wage growth is lackluster, many say.” The middle class is shrinking. There’s too much e inequality, and the list goes on. These concerns are pelling. Who wouldn’t like to see more opportunity and more growth? People yearn for the good life, to experience...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved