Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Populism vs. capitalism: The myth of the market as a ‘tool’
Populism vs. capitalism: The myth of the market as a ‘tool’
Nov 27, 2024 2:37 AM

Tucker Carlson’s recent rant on the corrosive grip of cultural elites and pro-market conservatism has led to a bounty of intra-movement debate and introspection, ranging from loud “amens!” to loud “nay, nevers!” to critiques of resentful populism to more nuanced efforts to weigh and reconcile the legitimate tensions at play.

But as we explore the plicated arguments about how and whether we can or should use the levers of government to insulate families munities from “market forces,” it may be helpful to pause and consider what we actually mean (or ought to mean) when we discuss “market capitalism,” not to mention what’s actually at stake beyond the material stuff.

In an effort to do so, Jonah Goldberg puts his finger on a piece of passing rhetoric in Carlson’s monologue, which has unfortunately mon in the cultural vocabulary: the free market is simply a “tool,” a human system that requires top-down hacks, upgrades, and well-engineered human intervention.

“Market capitalism is a tool, like a staple gun or a toaster,” Carlson says in his monologue. “You’d have to be a fool to worship it. Our system was created by human beings for the benefit of human beings. We do not exist to serve markets. Just the opposite. Any economic system that weakens and destroys families is not worth having. A system like that is the enemy of a healthy society.”

For those of us who believe that “market capitalism” represents more of a manifestation than a “system,” such a notion is highly plete—not because we bow at its altar, but because we appreciate its contribution to all else, including to the strength of the munity life, and civil society.

Yet such contributions are not measured only according to a populist’s value sheet of post-war factory jobs and economic predictability. As Goldberg goes on to explain, the mitment here is not to materialistic machinery, stock-market wizardry, or any series of economic forts, or conveniences. mitment is to economic liberty and its inherent value to flourishing individuals, families, munities.

“Economic liberty is a right, too,” Goldberg writes. “Just because the free market looks like a ‘tool’ from the vantage point of some policymakers and other elites gazing at society from olympian heights doesn’t mean my right to buy and sell what I want isn’t a right too.”

But the “tool” analogy also falls short in its distraction from the intangible and social aspects of free and open exchange. Again, far from being some cold, banker-controlled machine—a “toaster”—the market is, at its simplest, an ever-evolving and ever-adapting web of human relationships bent toward creative service to our neighbors. We can say these relationships are simply a “means to an end,” but this, too, overly narrows and distorts our cultural imaginations when es to what we’re actually engaged in, leading to the very es that Carlson is trying to avoid.

How we behave and engage in those relationships is critical, to be sure, and it ought to be oriented toward something (and Someone) well beyond the material outputs. But restoring that sort of cultural mindset e from reform-con incentive structures or tech-school subsidies, however helpful or productive such solutions may be. It e, first, from a rejection of the blindly utilitarian and materialistic world that a growing number of “conservative populists” prefer to imagine.If we succumb to the myth of the market as merely a “tool,” we are bound to adopt the fruits of those materialistic assumptions.

Working within a context of true economic freedom, we don’t just create, innovate, collaborate, and serve our neighbors because doing so gets us a profit or desired metric of GDP. We do so because it’s part of our social and spiritual natures as human persons. We do it becauseit unites us to the grand family of humankind.

Once we recognize and embrace this truth about “market capitalism”—that its core value is not material prosperity but economic liberty, and that economic exchange is profoundly social munal in nature—we begin to see that our responses to a changing world ought to flow every which way, from market to family, family munity, and back and forth and back again.

That doesn’t mean that the tensions aren’t real or that riding them will be easy. As Yuval Levin explains in his own response to Carlson’s monologue, the challenges are profound:

Markets and a traditional moral order characterized mitments to family, munity, and country can also be in very great tension with one another.

The market values risk-taking and creative destruction that can be very bad for family munity, and it rewards the mon cultural denominator in ways that can undermine traditional morality. It seeks the largest possible consumer base in ways often hostile to national boundaries and loyalties. Modern markets can also encourage consolidation in ways that are very far from friendly to civil society.

Traditional values, meanwhile, discourage the spirit petition and self-interested ambition essential for free markets to work, and their adherents sometimes seek to enforce codes of conduct that constrain individual freedom and refuse to conceive of men and women first and foremost as consumers.

These are serious challenges and tensions, but they will not be e by making enemies of that which can be reconciled. They will not be resolved by taming pro-market dogma or forcefully tipping the political-economic teeter-totter from a fanciful scenario of free-range banker-elites to a fanciful utopia of over-regulated pencil-pushers and government-protected industries.

Adaptations, integrations, and reconciliations will need to take place, but at the points where economic, social, and spiritual flourishing overlap and intersect. We will need to set our sights toward a holistic vision of human flourishing, one that recognizes the necessity of economic liberty, family stability, and a virtuous, service-oriented society—all woven closely together.

Our aims and efforts around the restoration of the American family and broader civil society are noble and necessary. They simply need to be fused together with a broader vision of what the free market actually is—not a tool for us to hack, but a liberty for us to inhabit, aligning those efforts with the restoration of all else.

Image: Tucker Carlson, Gage Skidmore(CC BY-SA 2.0)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Aquinas’ Lessons for Economists
Prof. Harry Veryser stars in a new video from ISI that explores some of the lessons about private property, rights, responsibilities, and stewardship that can be gleaned from the thought of Thomas Aquinas. For a much more in-depth exposition of the connections between and lessons from Aristotle, Augustine, and Aquinas, check out John Mueller’s Redeeming Economics (ISI, 2010). For more, check out a slate of review essays on Mueller’s book published in Research in the History of Economic Thought &...
7 Figures: Lotteries in America
At The Atlantic, Derek Thompson providessome depressing numbers related to lotteries in America. Here are seven figures you should know from his article: 1. Americans spend more on lottery tickets than on sports tickets, books, video games, movie tickets, and recorded music bined — $70 billion on lotto games in 2014. 2. In five states, people spend more than $600 dollars per person per year on lottery tickets. 3. The poorest third of households buy half of all lotto tickets....
How To Turn The American Dream Into A Nightmare
If one decides to destroy the American Dream, there are a few steps that would be necessary. Put Big Government in charge. The average American can’t figure out his or her own dreams, let alone what it would take to make them a reality.Tell Americans that without the government, the American Dream is hopeless.Produce a lengthy document about the American Dream. Leave out the word “freedom,” let alone the idea of freedom.Let people know that “freedom” (without actually using the...
Religious Shareholders at the Climate-Change Dance
It’s prom season, the time of year when plenty of high school kids eagerly anticipate an invitation to the year’s biggest formal event. It’s no different for the member organizations of religious shareholder activist groups As You Sow and the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility. Both groups have their tuxedos pressed and dresses tailored for this summer’s highly anticipated climate encyclical from Pope Francis, the progressive left’s version of netting either Kate Upton or Ryan Gosling as prom dates. In...
There’s No First Amendment Exception for ‘Hate Speech’
“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” That line was written in 1906 by Evelyn Beatrice Hall to describe Voltaire’s attitude towards a fellow rival French philosopher. For the next hundred years that line was often quoted to express a particularly American ideal of toleration and the importance of free speech. But something changed over the past few decades. Certain offensive speech has been deemed not only utterly indefensible,...
How Capitalism Humanized the Family
Capitalism is routinely blamed for rampant materialism and consumerism, accused of setting society’s sights only on material needs and wants, and living little time, attention, or energy for muchelse. But what, if not basic food, shelter, and survival, was humanity so preoccupied with before the Industrial Revolution? As Steve Horwitz arguesin a preview of his ing book, Hayek’s Modern Family, our newfound liberty and accelerated activity in the Economy of Creative Service has actually freed us to devote moreto other...
The ‘Least of These’ Is Not The Poor
There are a lot of phrases that people assume are in the Bible that are not only not in the text but may not even be biblical (cleanliness is next to godliness, God helps those who help themselves, etc.). There are also a number of biblical ideas that are in the Bible but are attributed to the wrong passage. mon example is use of the biblical phrase “least of these” (Matt. 25:40, 46) to refer to our fellow citizens who...
Tim Keller on How Churches Can Form Fully Christian Workers
In a new video from Made to Flourish, Tim Keller offers practical guidance to ministers and churches on how they canbetter disciple their peoplewhen es to work and stewardship: There are a lot of very non-Christian philosophies that are dominating a lot of areas of work, and if a Christian isn’t discipled, they’re just going to go along with the spirit of the age. They also will probably be getting less joy of their work. They may actually not be...
Religious Liberty Benefits Everybody
Twenty years ago, religious freedom was an issue that almost everyone agreed on. But more recently, support for religious liberty has tended to divide the country along political lines. Most conservatives still consider it the “first freedom” while many liberals believe religious freedom is less important than advancing a progressive agenda and promoting their understanding of “equality.” What gets lost in the discussion, as Jordan Lorence of Alliance Defending Freedom notes, is that sooner or later everyone benefits from religious...
Are Churches Failing The Poor?
For those in poverty, or those simply facing tough times, churches are often places they turn to for help. It may be organized aid: soup kitchens and food pantries. It may be a gas card given to a single mom who is struggling to get from one pay day to another. But if that es with merely a handout, and no spiritual support, is the church failing the poor? Ross Douthat says so. In his May 16 column for The...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2024 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved