Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Politics and the Experience of the Kingdom
Politics and the Experience of the Kingdom
Jan 1, 2025 2:16 AM

Fr. Alexander Schmemann

One of the blessings we can look forward to on election day in the United States is the certain knowledge that, at last, we’ll be able to turn on the radio or TV without having to endure the unrelieved assault of political advertising. There seems to be some strange metaphysical law of campaigning that encourages politicians to outrageously inflate the actual record of plishments, and outrageously enlarge the scope of hopeless promises, as the number of campaign days dwindle down.

This year, a panion blessing promises respite from all of the news stories that are generated by sending intrepid reporters out to — are you ready for this? — visit real churches in order to interview real Christians about their vote. One of the main news narratives this year is that President Bush’s Protestant Evangelical “base” is fracturing. We shall see.

In this election season, Christians are often voicing a deep disgust with politics. And there is plenty to be disgusted about. The temptation is to simply dismiss politics as a waste of time, a dirty business that people of faith have no need of. But that would be un-American. As Samuel Adams pointed out:

Let each citizen remember at the moment he is offering his vote that he is not making a present or pliment to please an individual — or at least that he ought not so to do; but that he is executing one of the most solemn trusts in human society for which he is accountable to God and his country.

Accountable to God for our vote? Most assuredly. But let’s keep this in perspective. The great Russian Orthodox theologian Fr. Alexander Schmemann pointed out that the “antinomical character” of the Christian faith has always generated a tension between the demands of the Kingdom of God and the earthly demands arising from a need for a government that serves humanity. Writing in “Church, World, Mission,” a collection of his essays published in 1979, the late Fr. Schmenann said that “to redeem the world or anything in the world, is then to place it in the perspective of the Kingdom of God as its end and ultimate term of reference, to make it transparent to the Kingdom as its sign, means and instrument.”

Fr. Schmemann cautioned against a dualistic view of the Church that sets it apart and above the concerns of the world. Rather, the world is the object of the Church’s “love, concern and action.”

Here’s the key thing:

The Church is not an agency for solving the innumerable “problems” inherent in the world, or rather, she may help solve them only inasmuch as she herself remains faithful to her nature and to her essential vocation: to reveal in “this world” that which by being “not of this world” is therefore the only absolute context for seeing, understanding and solving all human “problems.”

As to the “fundamental failure” of the Christian world, it should make us fully aware that there is but one essential sin, one essential danger: that of idolatry, the ever-present and ever-acting temptation to absolutize and thus to idolize “this world” itself, its passing values, ideas and ideologies, to forget that as the people of God “we have here no lasting city, but we seek the city which is e” (Heb 13:14). It is the “failure” of the “Christian world” that should make it possible for us to see through the “modern world” and the spiritual reality shaping it, to discern in it what is positive: the cry es from its Christian subconscious, and also what is negative: its truly demonic rebellion against God.

So, yes, get out and vote. It’s the faithful thing to do.

For more on Fr. Schmemann and his work, visit the web site dedicated to the ever-memorable Protopresbyter Alexander Schmemann.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
An Alternative Stimulus
Washington is all atwitter about the “Stimulus,” which is currently being pushed through Congress (without being read by most members). Acton’s own Michelle Muccio e up with a plan of her own, and did a bit of independent research to see if her proposal would find any support: ...
PBR: Something for Nothing
In response to the question, “What are the moral lessons of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)?” The ARRA makes clear that we have not learned one great moral lesson: You can’t have something for nothing. Or, among economists, there’s no such thing as a free lunch. I’m not even sure that anybody is seriously arguing that most of the items contained in this bill constitute “stimulus.” Congress can genuinely stimulate the economy in two ways: decreasing taxes and...
Acton Commentary: The Abracadabra Stimulus Plan
In this week’s Acton Commentary, Anthony Bradley exposes the “legislative incantations” designed to artificially create consumer demand (where none exists) via the stimulus bill. “Real needs must be permitted to create real demand, and thus truly sustainable jobs,” he writes. Read mentary at the Acton Institute website and share your feedback here. ...
PBR: Do We Need a New New Deal?
In response to the question, “What are the moral lessons of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)?” Perhaps the most effective historical trope in pushing through the massive stimulus package on Capitol Hill has been the notion that if only the New Deal of the 1930s hadn’t had to wait more than three years for the election of FDR, the Great Depression might have been avoided. But have you ever wondered why the Great Depression persisted for so long?...
PBR: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) is poised to be signed into law after weeks of wrangling. Since we know that “budgets are moral documents,” then spending and stimulus bills must be as well. So this week’s PowerBlog Ramblings question is: “What are the moral lessons of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)?” Ramble on… Ramblings: Do We Need a New New Deal?Something for NothingDangerous Deficit SpendingGovernmental Accountability and Transparency? ...
PBR: A Mainline Bailout
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” Under the Obama administration, the faith-based initiative will increasingly e a means to bailout flagging mainline and liberal denominations and ministries, who will have no problem modating their religious practices to secular standards. And in this we will see even clearer manifestation of the theocratic hopes of the religious left. ...
Roepke was right
In my Winter 2007 article on economic globalization for AGAIN Magazine, I quoted economist Wilhelm Roepke. (AGAIN is published by Conciliar Media Ministries, a department of the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Church of North America). Roepke: Economically ignorant moralism is as objectionable as morally callous economism. Ethics and economics are two equally difficult subjects, and while the former needs discerning and expert reason, the latter cannot do without humane values. In light of all that has happened with the U.S. economic...
An Economic Recovery for the Religious Left
Mark Tooley calls out “emerging church maestro” Brian Mclaren in a piece today in The American Spectator titled “A Real ‘Economic’ Recovery.” I was introduced to Brian McLaren in seminary when new students were required to read his books in introductory classes. Unfortunately, I was one of only a handful not impressed. He also lectured in person to a class I took, but honestly I don’t remember much about the lecture, except conservatives were generally denounced and “big oil” was...
PBR: Dangerous Deficit Spending
In response to the question, “What are the moral lessons of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)?” One of the gravest moral issues related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is the matter of dangerous deficit spending. Anybody plugged into our nation’s financial crisis is likely aware of the unsustainable spending path of not just the federal government, but individual states as well. Because many states have balanced budget amendments, they are not entitled to run deficits, so...
The Buckleyization of America
William F. Buckley, 1956: [I’d] sooner be governed by the first two thousand people in the Boston telephone directory than by the two thousand members of the faculty of Harvard University. Rassmussen poll results, 2009: Forty-four percent (44%) voters also think a group of people selected at random from the phone book would do a better job addressing the nation’s problems than the current Congress, but 37% disagree. Twenty percent (20%) are undecided. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved