Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
One narrative to rule them all?
One narrative to rule them all?
Dec 11, 2025 5:24 PM

There is no one experience of the COVID-19 pandemic. National experiences vary wildly between New Zealand and Italy. Business experiences differ, as well. Pier 1 is going out of business, while Walmart sales have jumped. In West Michigan restaurants have expanded their distribution to grocery stores, while yoga studios have brought their teaching online. Some people are working harder than ever, while others are barely keeping it together. At a time when both prudent political leadership and scientific research are necessary, both are being confused. There is no one neat story which ties together all of these threads. The national media are in crisis and increasingly frustrated, as exhibited by this revealing tweet by CNN Senior Media Reporter Oliver Darcy:

Fox can’t get its story straight: While one host zings Trump for taking hydorxychloroquine, another host encourages its use. While one medical contributor calls it “highly irresponsible,” another says it’s “reasonable.” What are viewers to believe?

— Oliver Darcy (@oliverdarcy) May 19, 2020

Long-running internecine media feuds, emblematic of the degradation of mass media as they are, are merely the smoke set off by the burning desire for one, all-consuming narrative. This disordered desire stems from a failure to appreciate the truth which Johann Goethe so eloquently observed:

Born is the poet ‘tis said; and we add, the philosopher also.

For it is certain that truth has to be formed to be seen.

Ten years ago, in the wake of the last financial crisis, the economist Tyler Cowen gave a wonderful TEDx Talk which he began by saying, “I was told e here and tell you all stories, but what I’d like to do is instead tell you why I am suspicious of stories, why stories make me nervous.” He cautions us that while stories are necessary for us to make sense of the world, give our lives meaning, and establish connections with others, they always act as a kind of filter. When we think in terms of stories, what we are actually doing is telling ourselves the same thing over and over.

Some stories, such as those e to us through our religious tradition, deserve to be told again and again. This is how they shape us and transform our lives by their truth. Other stories, such as those told over mass and social media, can be dangerous in that they plex events and ideas or serve as apologies for the ideologies of this present age. Cowen reminds us that we are easily seduced by stories, and St. Paul warns Timothy of precisely this sort of temptation:

But evil people and charlatans will go from bad to worse,deceiving others and being deceived themselves.You, however, must continuein the things you have learned and are confident about. You knowwho taught youand how from infancy you have known the holy writings, which are able to give you wisdom for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus (II Timothy 3:13-15).

The only story we need to get straight is the story that really matters. Grounded in that story, the greatest ever told, we can deepen our understanding of ourselves and our world. Mass and social media can provide us with information that can aid our understanding, but we should never uncritically accept or believe the stories by which they relay that information. This is precisely how the Sage Patañjali defines ignorance in the Yoga Sūtras (II.5): “Mistaking the transient for the permanent, the impure for the pure, pain for pleasure, and that which is not the self for the self: all this is lack of spiritual knowledge.”

Those unrooted in religious tradition can easily e entrapped by the stories presented in mass and social media. In his talk, Cowen observes that “non-fiction is the new fiction.” Narratives packaged in the latest best-seller, news article, or tweet act as secular talismans. In a time of crisis—when so much is unknown and when new information is constantly emerging—it is important not to get too attached to the stories we tell ourselves in mass and social media, and turn instead to reflect on the surer ground of faith and conscience as we try in our own ways and contexts to serve God and neighbor.

hunt. CC BY-SA 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
No, the Pope doesn’t need distributism (because nobody does)
Pope Francis needs distributism, argues Arthur W. Hunt III in the latest issue of The American Conservative. Hunt says that Americans and popes alike can embrace a humane alternative to modern capitalism: In the midst of their scramble to claim the new Pope, many on the left missed what the Pontiff said was a nonsolution. The problems of the poor, he said, could not be solved by a “simple welfare mentality.” Well, by what then? The document is clear: “a...
7 Figures: Wages and Employment in America
[Note: This is the first post in ‘7 Figures’, a new, occasional series highlighting data and information from a variety of surveys and reports.] The U.S. Department of Labor recently released data from the Occupational Employment Statistics program, which provides employment and wage estimates by area and by industry for wage and salary workers in hundreds of occupation groups in America. Here are seven figures based on the report: 1. Retail salespersons and cashiers were the occupations with the largest...
Christ’s Preferential Option for Tax Collectors
During the 20th century, the option for the poor or the preferential option for the poor was articulated as one of the basic principles of Catholic social teaching. For example, in Octogesima Adveniens (1971), Pope Paul VI writes: In teaching us charity, the Gospel instructs us in the preferential respect due to the poor and the special situation they have in society: the most fortunate should renounce some of their rights so as to place their goods generously at the...
Liberals Acting Illiberally
“Liberal: not bound by traditional ways or beliefs.” A “liberal” then, would be a person who is open-minded, ready to listen to another point of view. “I’m not bound to any traditions; I’m open-minded. I am liberal.” Yet, recently, liberals are showing they are as close-minded as the “conservatives” they claim have it all wrong. For instance, Mozilla’s Brendan Eich was forced out as pany’s leader (despite pany’s strong stance on tolerance) because he had contributed to a pro-traditional marriage...
Bridging Income Inequality: The Subsidiarity Of Friendship
There is a lot of talk about “closing the gap” and ing e inequality.” Some of it is pure socialism: Redistribute! Redistribute! Others look for ways to create jobs and help people create new financial opportunities for themselves. But what about the simple gift of friendship? At The American Conservative, Gracy Olmstead suggests that friendship can bridge e gaps, and creates safety nets for people in ways government and even private agencies cannot. We all have close friends and family...
Todd Huizinga to Discuss Ukraine on WGVU
Acton’s Director of International Outreach, Todd Huizinga, recently discussed the situation in Ukraine with WGVU’s Patrick Center and Calvin College’s assistant professors of political science, Becca McBride. For West Michigan residents, the interview will be airing tonight at 8:30 PM on the WGVU Life Channel and then again Sunday morning at 10:30 AM on WGVU-HD. For some background on what’s been going on Ukraine, see the panel discussion, ‘Ukraine – The Last Frontier of the Cold War’. ...
Mozilla: Mounting The Heads Of Conservatives On Their Walls
Mitchell Baker, executive chair of Mozilla, announced on pany’s blog that Brendan Eich, former Mozilla CEO has stepped down “for Mozilla and munity.” His sin: contributing $1000 in 2008 in support of California’s Prop 8, which upheld traditional marriage. Now, Mozilla is pany that takes great pride in their – ahem – tolerance and open-mindedness. Really. Mozilla believes both in equality and freedom of speech. Equality is necessary for meaningful speech. And you need free speech to fight for equality....
Mozilla’s Statement of Faith and the Altars of Conformity
Brendan Eich, Mozilla co-founder and creator of the JavaScript programming language, was recently appointed as Mozilla’s chief executive. Just one week later, however, he was pressured to resign. His iniquity? Donating $1,000 in support of Proposition 8, a measure whose basic aim was entirely consistent with the beliefs of Barack Obama at the time. To announce Eich’s departure, Mozilla quickly movedto clarify, offering a statement of faithof sorts, filled with all the right Orwellian flourishes: Mozilla believes both in equality...
Mozilla’s Brendan Eich and Progressive Bullies
Last week was one of mixed blessings for those engaged in the U.S. political process. On the positive side, the U.S. Supreme Court – by a 5-4 margin – struck down overall limits on campaign contributions. Unfortunately, the pendulum swung in the opposite direction for Brendan Eich, co-founder and chief executive officer of Mozilla, who resigned after the Los Angeles Times disclosed his $1,000 contribution in support of California’s 2012 Proposition 8. Eich’s unfortunate circumstances bring to mind the many...
The Hegemonic Misandry Continues: ADHD
Cultural progressives often talk about something called “hegemonic masculinity.” By this progressives and feminists mean the standards we use to determine what an ideal man is in a particular culture. Michael Kimmel and Amy Aronson, in The Gendered Society Reader, describe American hegemonic masculinity this way: In an important sense there is only plete unblushing male in America: a young, married, white, urban, northern, heterosexual, Protestant, father, of college education, fully employed, of plexion, weight, and height, and a recent...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved