Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
On Banning ‘Make A Difference’
On Banning ‘Make A Difference’
Jan 19, 2026 12:07 AM

One of my dreams is to meet the person responsible for introducing the charge to young adults to “go out there and make a difference.” Youth and young adults are pressured and challenged to go “make a difference” but making a difference has never been clearly defined or quantified anywhere. For a few years now I have refused to tell my students to “go change the world” or “go make a difference.” Do those phrases really mean anything?

In light of this, I was naturally confused by Neal Samudre’s article over at Relevant Magazine titled “6 Things Holding You Back From Making a Difference.” The six things fort, entitlement, apathy, money, time, and yourself. That is, we are often fortable with our current circumstances. We often feel like we deserve to have whatever we desire. We lose interest in the things that matter outside of ourselves. We often reduce life to making money. We waste a lot of time. And, finally, we talk ourselves out of getting personally involved in important issues.

Ok, great. I get that. In fact, these are all part of the human condition that keeps us from doing all the regular things mands, like loving God and loving neighbor. My suspicion, however, is that the main “thing” holding young people back from “making a difference” is that they are being sent out on a mission that has no real meaning or a mission that is solely defined by one’s individual, and likely narcissistic, interpretation.

Samudre opens by saying, “As a child, I used to dream of changing the world. But now, I no longer treat that dream as a reality.” I believe this happens to many young adults because such dreams cannot be realized. Samudre continues,

We all want to be world changers, but many of us give up on the idea as childish and unrealistic. Maybe we think we can’t make much difference as one person, or our contribution will be too small. We can placent, settling into our normal routines and giving up on the idea that we can really make an impact.

But recently I began changing my perspective on things. I realized that it is only a choice not to make a difference in the world, and an idiotic one at that. There are no real circumstances truly hindering us from making a difference, whether it’s in the lives of two people or 2 million, whether through giving of our time, talents, money, influence or whatever else.

Again, what do phrases like “world changer,” “make an impact,” and “make a difference” mean? I have no idea. If you send a young adult on a mission to go “make a difference” it is like sending them out to sea without a map or navigational equipment. A mission without a map does nothing but cause anxiety and stress.

It seems that Jesus, alternatively, teaches something more concrete and real. When missioned his people to be certain kinds of people and to do certain things he also provided a guide to navigate how to do that, and a scale to measure what that looks like: the Scriptures themselves. I am left wondering why mission to love is not enough for us to say to young adults? The mandment is to love God and love neighbor (Matt 22:36-40) and there is nothing more challenging and life-giving than that mission. Why do we need to tell young people to “go make a difference”?

Perhaps young adults are paralyzed by the notion of making a difference because the aphorism provides no direction. Maybe the apathy Samudre sees is actually confusion. Maybe the wasted time is simply not knowing what to do. Besides, “making a difference” and “changing the world” are actually up to God. Christians missioned to lose themselves in “whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy” (Phil 4:8). And God, in the mystery of his economy, works it all out to fulfill his agenda, not ours.

I wonder, then, if it might be best to drop these supererogatory phrases altogether and stick to calling people to love. That’s right, it may be time to ban the use of “making a difference.” In the end, my response to Samudre is that there is only one thing, not six, possibly keeping people from “making a difference” and that is telling them something as meaningless as that in the first place.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Ineffective Compassion?
Writers on this blog have pointed to a lot of examples of passion when es to charity and public policy. But what can passion, or maybe just a passion, look like? The Lieutenant Governor of South Carolina Andre Bauer made ment saying government assistance programs for the poor was akin to “feeding stray animals.” I’m not highlighting ment just to bash Bauer and you can watch the clip where he clarifies ments. He continues in a follow up interview by...
Psychologists confirm: Power corrupts
The Economist reports on a new study by psychologists that looks into the problem of abuse of power. The researchers attempt to “answer the question of whether power tends to corrupt, as Lord Acton’s dictum has it, or whether it merely attracts the corruptible.” These results, then, suggest that the powerful do indeed behave hypocritically, condemning the transgressions of others more than they condemn their own. es as no great surprise, although it is always nice to have everyday observation...
Recall Aristide to Haiti? No way.
Jean-Bertrand Aristide, the ex-president of Haiti who has lived lavishly in exile as a guest of the South African government for the past six years, recently announced he was ready to go back and help Haiti rebuild from its catastrophic earthquake. Allowing the former despot Aristide — a long time proponent of liberation theology — back into the country would be the worst thing we could do to Haiti right now. The American government must resist any move by Aristide...
Latin America: After the Left
This week’s mentary: The left is in trouble in Latin America. Sebastián Piñera’s recent election as Chile’s first elected center-right president in decades owes much to the inability of the center-left coalition that governed Chile after 1990 to rejuvenate itself. Yet across Latin America there is, as the Washington Post’s Jackson Diel perceptively observes, a sense that the left’s decade of dominance is unraveling. Future historians may trace the beginning of this decline to the refusal of Honduras’s Congress, Supreme...
Fear the Boom and Bust — rappin’ with Hayek and Keynes
From Econstories.tv: In Fear the Boom and Bust, John Maynard Keynes and F. A. Hayek, two of the great economists of the 20th e back to life to attend an economics conference on the economic crisis. Before the conference begins, and at the insistence of Lord Keynes, they go out for a night on the town and sing about why there’s a “boom and bust” cycle in modern economies and good reason to fear it. Lyrics sample (written by John...
The Audacity of the Savior State
The current issue of Touchstone magazine features an impressive cover essay by Douglas Farrow, Professor of Christian Thought at McGill University in Montreal, Quebec. In “The Audacity of the State,” Farrow uses the biblical Ichabod motif to examine the crumbling pillars of the family and church, which when properly respected form critical foundations for a flourishing society. In their place, writes Farrow, is the “savior state,” which “presents itself as the people’s guardian, as the guarantor of the citizen’s well-being....
Forgive us our deficits
This week’s mentary: As 2010 unfolds, many countries are confronting a public deficit crisis of disturbing proportions. Since 2008, countless politicians have underscored that a cavalier attitude to debt on the part of Main St. and Wall St. contributed significantly to the recent financial crisis. It’s therefore ironic to observe these contemporary preachers of thrift plunging developed economies into an abyss of public liabilities. In 2009, for example, the Obama Administration spent more money on new programs in nine months...
A Reminder
Children are not the property of the state: A Christian family from Germany have been granted political asylum in the US after facing the threat of prison for home schooling their children. Uwe and Hannelore Romeike, who are evangelical Christians, were forced to flee Germany as they wished to educate their five children at home. Home schooling is still illegal in Germany under laws introduced during the Nazi era. The German law means that parents who choose to home school...
A ‘reckless’ Green Patriarch?
Over at the American Orthodox Institute’s Observer blog, Fr. Hans Jacobse takes Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew to task for jumping on the global warming bandwagon: We warned the Ecumenical Patriarch that endorsing the global warming agenda was reckless. Anyone with eyes to see saw clearly that global warming (since renamed “climate change” — a harbinger that the effort might freeze over) was a political, not scientific, enterprise calculated to centralize the control of the economies of nation-states under bureaucracies. New evidence...
Bernanke bad for limited government and the little guy
This week’s reappointment vote for Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has created some strange bedfellows in Washington. A muddled middle of Republicans and Democrats supports the Keynesian’s reappointment, but the real odd couples are among the opposition. For different if overlapping reasons, free market proponents and far-left figures such as democratic-socialist Bernie Sanders of Vermont are both convinced that Bernanke has done much to hurt our economy, particularly those in the bottom half of our economy. Desmond Lachman of The Enterprise...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved