Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
‘Oil and Gas a Winning Game for Investors’ — and the Poor
‘Oil and Gas a Winning Game for Investors’ — and the Poor
Apr 4, 2025 12:43 PM

It could be argued that Exxon is actually an pany, but it’s still an pany that knows where its bread is buttered. Oil and gas is the winning game for pany, not solar.

Thus wrote Jeff Siegel this week on the Energy & Capital website. Siegel was referring to Exxon Mobil Corporation’s thumping of shareholder resolutions by As You Sow, the Interfaith Center for Corporate Responsibility and other religious groups intended to push ExxonMobil into naming an environmental scientist to the board and issue a report on the environmental impact of pany’s hyraulic-fracturing operations. Another study to be pitched on the growing pile of fracking reports issued regularly by industry and regulators?

Siegel is as clearheaded a liberal writer as e across on these matters. He writes:

Again, I don’t see the benefit here for shareholders.

Those who oppose fracking have plenty of this data, anyway. So to mandate such a report seems like a waste of time, particularly if the report indicates no negative side effects. You think anyone who opposes fracking would believe anything included in that report?

Interestingly, according to Politico, some of these proposals were the result of a growing rift between Exxon and the Catholic Church.

pany recently sent a representative to lobby the Vatican over an encyclical Pope Francis plans to deliver this summer on the impact of climate change. Exxon reportedly fears that such an encyclical could damage its business.

Exxon has nothing to fear.

It’s not as if the more than 1 billion Catholics in the world are going to stop driving their cars just because the Pope is railing against climate change.

Just as shareholders shouldn’t waste their time trying to turn Exxon into a pany, Exxon shouldn’t waste its time kissing up to the Vatican. It doesn’t matter.

The bottom line is that the demand for oil and gas is going to be here for a very long time.

Yup! Siegel is right on the money – if you want more renewable energy, feel free to invest in it as it is offering pretty good returns at the moment. But attempting to force Big Oil to e Big Solar? I’ll let Siegel explain:

[T]he real reason ExxonMobil doesn’t invest in renewable energy is because renewable energy isn’t what Exxon does.

Exxon is an oil and pany, and when folks criticize the oil giant for not investing in renewable energy, I just shake my head.

Would you ask McDonalds (NYSE: MCD) why it doesn’t invest in organic, grass-fed beef?

Would you ask Ford (NYSE: F) why it doesn’t invest in bicycles?

Would you ask GameStop (NYSE: GME) why it doesn’t invest in basketballs and footballs?

Precisely. But try telling that to the nuns, priests and other religious of the Birkenstock and granola crowd. ICCR and AYS have adopted a two-fold strategy of stranding assets in the ground, and using all the money that would’ve been spent on locating and extracting oil, gas and coal to develop solar, wind and geothermal, and divestment (see here and here) altogether.

Whereas Siegel depicts the folly of the former, the Manhattan Institute’s Steve Malanga portrays the financial foolishness of the latter. In the most recent issue of MI’s City Journal publication, Malanga wrote:

“I’ve been involved in five divestments for our fund,” CalSTRS [California State Teachers’ Retirement System] chief investment officer Chris Ailman told his board earlier this year. “All five of them we’ve lost money, and all five of them have not brought about social change.”

For several decades, California’s pension funds have been subjected to a dizzying array of social-investment prerogatives. A 2011 Mercer Consulting study found that CalPERS [California Public Employees Retirement System] investment officials had to follow 111 different investment priorities relating to the environment, social conditions, and corporate governance. Many of these directives have proven calamitous to the two funds’ bottom lines. Eight years after CalSTRS and CalPERS divested their portfolios of tobacco stocks in 2000, a study found that the move cost CalSTRS $1 billion and CalPERS about $750 million in foregone profits. CalPERS also ditched investments in developing countries such as Thailand and India, because board members objected to labor standards in these countries. A 2007 report found that avoiding investments in developing counties cost CalPERS about $400 million.

Divestment advocates, no strangers to moral preening, claim that they’re employing the same tactics that hastened the end to apartheid in South Africa. Malanga, however, states:

The analogy between South Africa under Apartheid and panies is strained, to say the least. The world was able to isolate South Africa because few major industrialized countries depended heavily on its economy. But fossil fuels are pervasive throughout the world, and the energy they produce drives the economies of most nations. More than 80 percent of the energy the world uses es from fossil fuels, while only 9 es from alternative energy sources (including nuclear). Even under the most optimistic scenarios, it will be decades before countries can end their reliance on fossil fuels, so the demand for them, and the profits they generate, will attract investors around the world, regardless of whether endowments and government-controlled funds divest of their shares in these firms.

And follows with this:

More important in ing years will be technological advances that allow cleaner energy from fossil fuels. The rapid shift in the United States to natural gas—which emits nearly 50 percent less carbon dioxide than coal when burned—has already helped the United States cut its greenhouse gas emissions by 10 percent since 2005. Meanwhile, some 1 billion poor around the world await electricity, and coal will likely fire their dreams.

Does it really need to be repeated after this? It’s clear that what really works in the best interests of the world’s poor and impoverished – and the rest of us, including investors – is cheap, plentiful and reliable fossil fuels.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Hurricane relief – Small organizations to the rescue
In the wake of overwhelming need of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, thankfully a number of us are voicing irritation with the inquiry, “How important do you think that faith-based organizations are to helping people”? Before ANY organization — government agency of any kind or national nonprofit — made a move, faith organizations had already moved. In San Antonio, where several Russian students were among New Orleans evacuees, Victory Fellowship, a faith-based, privately funded substance abuse treatment program, simply did the...
Questions about the Red Cross
The Remedy, the Claremont Institute‘s blog, links to an article in the Los Angeles Times by Richard M. Walden, head of Operation USA, that raises concerns about how the Red Cross spends the money it receives for specific disasters. Walden levels some important and serious charges against the Red Cross, and may or may not be convincing depending on if you approve of the Red Cross’ fund-raising precedents and other activities. But Walden is undeniably right is when he raises...
Fab labbing, Fu-Fu, and the ovine entrepreneur
The BBC reports today a great illustration of human creativity and the intersection of technology and subsidiarity. MIT has set up what they called Fab Labs (Fabrication Labs) in what many might consider the least likely places for technological invention. These Labs consist of basic tools and software than enable people in sometimes remote and rural locations to invent and fabricate the technology they need in their daily work. MIT professor Neil Gershenfeld: In a world of Fab Labs, you...
Journalism professor calls for Helter Skelter
In 1969 Charles Manson and his gang set out to ignite a race war that pitted the wealthy white establishment against underprivileged blacks. The apocalyptic battle would be called “Helter Skelter,” after the Beatles’ song written by Paul McCartney. The white Manson reasoned that America’s angry black population would eventually win this war; at which time he and his group would emerge from their Mojave Desert hideout to assume leadership over what he perceived to be an inferior race. es...
Submerged subsidiarity
Because too much has already been said about the recent gulf hurricanes, I won’t put in my two cents. I will, however, direct the reader to the most insightful take on this situation that I have yet to stumble across. As you read it, think again about the importance of the definitions of the words we use, such as ‘responsibility’ and ‘authority’ as are discussed in the mentioned article. ...
The nose of a camel: The federal government and education
Federal involvement in education has grown steadily throughout the nation’s history, encroaching on what is still viewed by American’s as mostly a state and local responsibility. Kevin Schmiesing looks at a new book that examines U.S. education policy, the red tape and bureaucracy that has resulted, and the opposition to federal control that arose from parochial school administrators. Read the full text here. ...
Spendthrift republicans
A wonderful piece by Deroy Murdock today on NRO. Though most fiscal conservatives understandably vote Republican, the record substantiates the theory that spending is less responsible when Congress is dominated by one party—either party—than when each party has enough votes to frustrate the other. Others have drawn attention to the problem of Republican pork, but Murdock does so in an especially devastating way. ...
The right pass at the right time
If you haven’t heard of this story yet, read about what Notre Dame head football coach Charlie Weis did this past weekend. His expression passion for a dying boy, 10-year-old Montana Mazurkiewicz, transcends sports. Weis honored a promise to Montana despite the fact that he is a first-year coach in the big business of college football, in what might be the most scrutinized and storied programs in the country. In a personal visit to the boy last week, in addition...
Breathing with one lung?
Bishop Hilarion (Alfeyev) of Vienna and Austria, the Russian Orthodox Church’s representative to the European Union, is once again urging a Roman Catholic-Orthodox alliance bat secularism, liberalism and relativism in Europe — and lands outside it. “The social and ethical teachings of the Catholic and Orthodox Churches are extremely close, in many cases practically identical,” Bishop Hilarion said. “Why, then, should we not be able to reveal our unity on all these major issues urbi et orbi?” Since the election...
CAFTA, prudence, and volleyball
After receiving some responses to a previous post (CAFTA/Culture of Life: Enemies?), I thought I would post the the exchange with my most recent dissatisfied critic. Here’s to volleying! (I have edited the emails for confidentiality.) Mr. Phelps, It was with great interest that I recently read your blog entry “CAFTA/Culture of Life: Enemies?” as for some strange reason it recently appeared on the Google Alerts. I found it amusing how you worked John Paul’s teachings in without actually quoting...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved