Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Obama Administration Orders Colleges to Implement Unconstitutional Speech Codes
Obama Administration Orders Colleges to Implement Unconstitutional Speech Codes
Jan 28, 2026 3:50 PM

Not content to trample only the religious freedom side of the First Amendment, the federal government has decided to ignore the free speech side too.

As the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) reports, the U.S. Departments of Justice and Education have joined together to mandate that virtually every college and university in the United States establish unconstitutional speech codes that violate the First Amendment and decades of legal precedent.

Ina letter sent yesterday to the University of Montanathat explicitly states that it is intended as “a blueprint for colleges and universities throughout the country,” the Departments of Justice and Education have mandateda breathtakingly broad definition of sexual harassment that makes virtually every student in the United States a harasserwhile ignoring the First Amendment. The mandate applies to every college receiving federal funding—virtually every American institution of higher education nationwide, public or private.

The letter states that “sexual harassment should be more broadly defined as ‘any e conduct of a sexual nature'” including “verbal conduct” (that is, speech). It then explicitly states that allegedly harassing expression need not even be offensive to an “objectively reasonable person of the same gender in the same situation”—if the listener takes offense to sexually related speech forany reason, no matter how irrationally or unreasonably, the speaker may be punished.

Eugene Volokh, a law professor at UCLA School of Law, says that this is telling universities to institute speech codes:

And not just any old speech codes: Under these speech codes, universities would be required to prohibit students from, for instance,

1. saying e” “sexual or dirty jokes”

2. spreading e” “sexual rumors” (without any limitation to false rumors”

3. engaging in e” “circulating or showing e-mails of Web sites of a sexual nature”

4. engaging in e” “display or distribution of sexually explicit drawings, pictures or written materials”

5. making e” sexual invitations.

This is not limited to material that a reasonable person would find offensive. Nor is limited to material that, put together, creates a “hostile, abusive, or offensive educational environment.” (I think even speech codes that would have these requirements are unconstitutional, but the speech codes that the government is urging would in any event not have these requirements.) Every instance of such material of a “sexual nature,” under the government’s approach, would be “sexual harassment” and would need to be banned.

For the past few decades, campus speech codes have been used not to protect students but to force them to conform to politically correct standards. This latest move by the Obama administration will not only make the situation worse but will make it impossible to determine what sorts of speech can and cannot be said on campus.

As Greg Lukianoff, president of FIRE say, “The federal government has put colleges and universities in an impossible position with this mandate. With this unwise and unconstitutional decision, the DOJ and DOE have doomed American campuses to years of confusion and expensive lawsuits, while students’ fundamental rights twist in the wind.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Five ways the West gets African development all wrong: Ibrahim Anoba
World leaders have converged on Africa in recent days, but their development plans may do more harm than good. And increasing foreign aid may be their worst proposal yet, writes Ibrahim B. Anoba in a new essay for Acton’s Religion & Liberty Transatlantic website. “Limiting the power of the government and its cronies, and tempering bureaucratic overreach with a firm respect for individual rights, are prerequisites for economic progress,” writes Anoba, acting executive director of theAfrican Liberty Organization for Development....
Radio Free Acton: Inside the studio of a violin maker; Upstream on the film ‘Andrei Rublev’
On this episode of Radio Free Acton, award winning news anchor Anne Marie Schieber visits the studio of Matthew Noykos, a violin maker in Grand Rapids, MI, to learn more about his craft and discuss how he finds purpose and fulfillment in his everyday work. Then, on the Upstream segment, Bruce Edward Walker speaks with Robert Bird, author of two books on Russian filmmaker Andrei Tarkovsky, about Tarkovsky’s film “Andrei Rublev,” which was recently re-issued by The Criterion Collection. Check...
Freer markets, freer press: Study explores the connections between economic liberty and press freedom
At a time when so-called “democratic socialism” is rising in prominence, we are accustomed to hearing about the patibility of socialism and political freedom. Not only is the dismantling of economic patiblewith democracy—we are told—but it is essential to its survival. “Moving towards socialism involves subordinating the economic power of capitalists to the social power of the people,” write Mathieu Desan and Michael McCarthy in a recent essay for Jacobin. “…Only when the private decisions that have massive public implications...
A Jewish perspective on market, justice, and charity
“Not a day goes by when there’s not some concern raised about the state of the economy and how people are faring,” says Curt Biren in this week’s Acton Commentary. “While recent economic growth has been promising, wage growth is lackluster, many say.” The middle class is shrinking. There’s too much e inequality, and the list goes on. These concerns are pelling. Who wouldn’t like to see more opportunity and more growth? People yearn for the good life, to experience...
Can you (or anyone) beat the stock market?
Note: This is post #94 in a weekly video series on basic economics. When even professional stock pickers are not able to consistently beat the market, you probably shouldn’t invest your life savings on the the hot stock tip from your brother-in-law. Why is it, though, that no one seems to be able to outperform the crowd? The reason, as economist Tyler Cowen explains, is information. In this video by Marginal Revolution University, Cowen explains the efficient market hypothesis, the...
The failure of ‘Homo Economist’
When Pope Francis denounced “libertarian individualism” last year, few people could find a flesh-and-blood example of the philosophy as articulated by the pontiff. However, the gimlet eye of Stream editor John Zmirak may have found a related species in a creature he identifies as Homo Economist – a theoretical person who contrasts pletely with the human person as viewed by advocates of constitutional government, ordered liberty, faith, and adherence to the precepts of natural law. In the pope’s accounting, libertarianism...
Why we must protect the religious liberty of social institutions
Note:This article is part of the ‘Principles Project,’ a list of principles, axioms, and beliefs that undergirda Christian view of economics, liberty, and virtue. Clickhereto read the introduction and other posts in this series. The Principle: #4F — Social institutions have religious liberty that must be protected. The Definitions: Religious liberty — The freedom to believe and exercise or act upon religious conscience without unnecessary interference by the government. (Source) Social institutions —Groups of persons banded together mon purposes having...
Philadelphia ends ‘policing for profit’ program
The News: The city of Philadelphia ended a four-year lawsuit involving what critics said was “policing for profit.” According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, “Philadelphia officials on Tuesday pledged to reform the city’s civil forfeiture program, which had been used to seize thousands of homes and vehicles and millions of dollars in cash from criminal suspects — and in some cases from people never charged with a crime.” The Background:Civil asset forfeiture is a controversial legal tool that allows law enforcement...
C.S. Lewis on ethics and conscience
The lighthouse of Christianity shines because it is based on the reality of an objective and universal Moral Code that we mysteriously know and have broken, said C.S. Lewis. It is this truth which makes Christianity’s offer of forgiveness, and its gift of supernatural help towards keeping that Moral Code, so incredible. In this video, Lewis shows that conscience is not an invention of civilization or of great human teachers but is as old as Adam and Eve, and has...
5 Facts about Jewish High Holy Days
The Jewish holiday of Rosh Hashanah ended last week, and the holy day of Yom Kippur ends tonight at sundown (see also: FAQ: What is Yom Kippur?). Here are five facts you should know about the High Holy Days on the Jewish calendar: 1. In Judaism, the High Holy Days (sometimes referred to as “high holidays”) may refer to (1) the ten days starting with Rosh Hashanah and ending with Yom Kippur, known as the Days of Repentance or theYamim...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved