Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
New UK Report Slams CCP in Jimmy Lai Case
New UK Report Slams CCP in Jimmy Lai Case
Apr 18, 2026 2:24 PM

A parliamentary group has denounced the loss of press freedom in Hong Kong, even as the Chinese Communist Party insists freedom fighters like Lai are “doomed to fail.”

Read More…

As 75-year-old Jimmy Lai languishes in prison, the Hong Kong government, pressured by the Chinese Community Party (CCP), is dedicated to ensuring that the country’s most famous freedom fighter fails to win any further support for his cause. Lai’s story has spread across the world, and the regime currently holding Lai in solitary confinement is realizing that the key to suppressing basic human rights in Hong Kong is to attack the credibility of Lai’s advocates.

Jimmy Lai has spent more than 800 days in prison for the crime of taking part in Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement in 2019 and 2020. Held in 35-pound handcuffs, the former entrepreneur has gone from a mere jailed rebel to the major face of resistance to the CCP’s terrible influence in a once-free Hong Kong. Lai’s fight for freedom has even earned him a Nobel Prize nomination. Most recently, Lai’s story has hit the ears of a worldwide audience courtesy of the U.K.’s All-Party Parliamentary Group, which released a report on the status of both Lai and broader media freedom in Hong Kong. It decries Lai’s treatment and the silence of Parliament on the unfolding situation in Hong Kong, especially in regard to the draconian CCP-enforced National Security Law (NSL), which Lai supposedly violated.

Lai, a dual Hong Kong and British citizen, faces a lifetime in prison on charges of conspiracy and foreign collusion, actions spurred by his production of the pro-democracy newspaper Apple Daily, shuttered in 2021 during the Beijing-backed enforcement of the NSL. This crackdown is the highlight of the parliamentary group’s excoriation of the CCP’s actions against Lai and his fellow democracy advocates.

“[CCP] authorities have weaponised the law as part of a campaign to smear Jimmy Lai’s reputation to justify the way in which he has been targeted by Hong Kong authorities,” the report reads. To the report’s authors, Lai’s predicament is more than an illustration of Hong Kong’s growing authoritarian rot—it’s also a failure of the British government: “The British Government may not have pletely silent on these developments, but its utterances have been barely a whisper.” The report calls for the United Kingdom to treat Lai as a political prisoner and apply further sanctions against China to secure his release.

The CCP has responded in smear fashion, deeming the group’s remarks an exercise in “fact-twisting” despite being largely sourced from legal documents and official State Department reports. “As always, the media can exercise their right to monitor the HKSAR Government’s work,” CCP advocates argued in response to the U.K.’s accusations of media censorship. “Their freedom menting on and criticising government policies … remains uninhibited as long as they are not in violation of the law.” The CCP did not mention that its own National Security Law makes such violations virtually impossible.

To Beijing’s mouthpieces, the e of the Lai trial is all but inevitable—Jimmy Lai and the pro-freedom voices who stand against him are “doomed to fail.” As Lai remains in prison, fighting against direct CCP attempts to withhold legal counsel, it’s difficult to see a positive end in sight without increased awareness of deteriorating conditions in Hong Kong. One can only hope that reports like the one out of the U.K. will give Lai and his team the visibility they so desperately need.

The Hong Konger, the Acton Institute’s new documentary, tells the story of Jimmy Lai’s heroic struggle against authoritarian Beijing and its erosion of human rights in Hong Kong. The film premiered worldwide at on April 18, 2023. Stream it now.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Unintended Consequences and Wind Turbines
With the surge in oil prices, there’s renewed interest in alternative energy options. Numerous countries have gradually taken steps to promoting renewable or clean energy technologies, and it seems the United States is drifting more towards favoring alternative energy options as the Obama Administration is looking at banning off shore drilling along the continental shelf until 2012 and beyond. However, before we move farther down this road, a critical analysis of the pros and cons is a must. A more...
Abortion and Intergenerational Justice
I’m not sure I have ever really encountered the term intergenerational justice before this discussion over “A Call for Intergenerational Justice,” at least in any substantive way. This unfamiliarity is what lay behind my initial caveat regarding the term, my concern that it not be understood as “code for something else.” The Call itself provides a decent definition of the concept, or at least of its implications: “…that one generation must not benefit or suffer unfairly at the cost of...
Taking His Name in Vain: What Would Jesus Cut?
Ray’s post pointed to something that’s been bugging me about Jim Wallis’ “What Would Jesus Cut?” campaign. As with the “What Would Jesus Drive?” campaign (“Transportation is a moral issue.” What isn’t these days?), Wallis’ campaign assumes the moral high ground by appropriating the Holy Name of Jesus Christ to advance his highly politicized, partisan advocacy. Jesus es an advertising slogan. And what is implicit here is that those who oppose Wallis are somehow at odds with the Gospel of...
Budgets, the Church, and the Welfare State
In this mentary, which will appear tomorrow, I summarize and explore a bit more fully some of the discussion surrounding evangelical and religious engagement of the budget battles in Washington. One of my core concerns is that the approaches seem to assume too much ongoing and primary responsibility on the part of the federal government for providing direct material assistance to the poor. As “A Call for Intergenerational Justice” puts it, “To reduce our federal debt at the expense of...
Shane Claiborne’s Budget Babbling
Writing for the Huffington Post, Shane Claiborne is also asking “What Would Jesus Cut?” I’m still opposed to the whole notion of reducing Christ to budget director, as my earlier post points out. But Jesus as Secretary of Defense of the United States or rather, Jesus as secretary of peace as proposed by Congressman Dennis Kucinich is equally unhelpful. Mark Tooley, president of IRD, has already weighed in on Shane Claiborne’s not so brilliant drafting of Jesus for president. As...
Audio: Dr. Carl Trueman on Christians and Politics
If you weren’t able to make it to Derby Station on Wednesday for our latest Acton On Tap event, have no fear: we’re pleased to present the full recording of the evening’s festivities featuring Dr. Carl Trueman of Westminister Seminary via the audio player below. If you’re unfamiliar with Dr. Trueman or his work, check out Jordan Ballor’s introduction right here. Considering that the PowerBlog’s focus over the past few days has been on how Christians are approaching the debt...
Opposing Views: America’s Debt Crisis and ‘A Call for Intergenerational Justice’
Last week’s issuance of “A Call for Intergenerational Justice: A Christian Proposal on the American Debt Crisis” has occasioned a good bit of discussion on the topic, both here at the PowerBlog and around various other blogs and social media sites. It has been interesting to see the reaction that ments about the Call have generated. Many have said that I simply misunderstood or misread the document. I have taken the time to reread the document and do some reassessment...
Archbishop Chaput: The American experience and global religious liberty
A brilliant assessment of where we are. (HT: American Orthodox Institute Observer). Subject to the governor of the universe: The American experience and global religious liberty March 1, 2011 – Most Rev. Charles J. Chaput, O.F.M. Cap., Archbishop of Denver, addressed the Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs at Georgetown University. A friend once said – I think shrewdly — that if people want to understand the United States, they need to read two documents. Neither one is...
A Response to ‘What Would Jesus Cut?’
Jim Wallis and a number of other Christians involved in politics are trying to gain attention for the question, “What would Jesus cut?” The answer to this question is supposed to be as obvious as it is in other moral contexts. For example, would Jesus lie about the useful life of a refrigerator he was selling for Best Buy? No way. Would he bully a kid into giving away his lunch money? Not a chance. Would you find him taking...
‘A Call for Intergenerational Justice’ and the Question of Economic Growth
While there is much to applaud in the Center for Public Justice and Evangelicals for Social Action’s “A Call for Intergenerational Justice,” the lack of discussion of the problem of economic growth is troubling. I believe Don Peck is correct when he writes in The Atlantic: If it persists much longer, this era of high joblessness will likely change the life course and character of a generation of young adults—and quite possibly those of the children behind them as well....
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved