Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
MTV’s Wack Morality
MTV’s Wack Morality
Jan 21, 2026 11:06 PM

On Dec. 3, MTV announced the launch of “A Thin Line,” a multi-year initiative aimed at stopping the spread of abuse through sexting, cyberbullying and digital dating. MTV says that the goal of the initiative is to empower America’s youth to identify, respond to and block the spread of the various forms of digital harassment. While MTV’s program deserves an honorable mention, the network misses the mark by ignoring plicity in glorifying mores associated with sexting, bullying, and dating abuse, failing to promote the family, and failing to enlist religious leaders.

“A Thin Line” rolled out the same week MTV and The Associated Press released a report citing the full scope of digital abuse by teens and young adults. According to the study, 50 percent of 14-to-24-year-olds have been the target of some form of digital abuse, 30 percent have sent or received nude photos of other young people on their cell phones or online and 12 percent of those who have sexted have contemplated suicide, a rate four times higher than that found among those who have refrained.

During the program launch Stephen Friedman, general manager of MTV, says “there is a very thin line between private and public, this moment and forever, love and abuse, and words and wounds. ‘A Thin Line’ is built to empower our audience to draw their own line between digital use and digital abuse.”

While it helpfully encourages teens to report abuse, MTV seems incapable of getting to the root of the problem: namely, the cultivation of prudence that orients a teen’s choices at the outset. Empowering an audience of teenagers is futile if teens are not encouraged to tap the wisdom of their parents.

Soliciting parental wisdom regarding appropriate cell-phone usage, accountability, and navigating the social morass of adolescence is a key to teens’ proper development. It is a parent’s joy and calling to do their best to instill moral wisdom and protect their children from evil. Sexting, bullying, and neurotic text messaging in dating relationships will remain a problem as long as teens are not aspiring to love what is good munity. The primary place where children are nurtured to this end is the family.

Parents themselves need to be encouraged to fulfill this responsibility. Many parents care more about their children’s financial success than they do about their character and integrity. Dr. Madeline Levine, author of The Price of Privilege, laments that while many teens are academically successful and fortable they lack moral agency and the “ability to act appropriately in one’s best interest.” By promoting parents merely as a place to report abuse after the fact, MTV is missing a huge opportunity to enrich the public good.

MTV should do three things. First, do all it can to empower its audience to involve parents before abuse starts instead of after the fact. MTV could do more to promote the virtues of healthy family life in its programming.

Second, cease the glorification of careless sexuality and interpersonal conflict by canceling shows celebrating the thin line between “love and abuse, and words and wounds.” Programs like “Jersey Shore,” “The Real World,” “The Hills,” and “My Super Sweet 16,” glamorize greed, envy, strife, deceit, malice, gossip, slander, and arrogance. MTV’s left hand profits from “thin line” programming while the right hand now condemns its own broadcasting ethos.

Third, MTV needs subversive innovation in order to broaden its partnerships. MTV’s current partners include Facebook, MySpace, LoveIsRespect.org, and others, but cell-phone practices are moral issues requiring the insights of religious wisdom. Interpersonal ethics is an area begging for the time-tested expertise of our munities and to ignore those institutions is to ignore the core foundations of civil society.

“A Thin Line” represents a new opportunity for MTV to demonstrate radical progressiveness. Instead, courageous moral leadership is traded off for band-aid solutions concerned only with consequences. Progressive institutions address real issues at their root causes. To be serious about confronting abuse, MTV needs to look in the mirror, and cooperate with rather than undermine the adults who are trying to impart the message of human dignity to the next generation.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Rev. Sirico: Respect others’ rights, but also their values
A new column by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, president and co-founder of the Acton Institute, was published today in the Detroit News. This column will also be linked in tomorrow’s Acton News & Commentary. Sign up for the free weekly Acton newsletter here. +++++++++ Faith and policy: Respect others’ rights, but also their values FATHER ROBERT SIRICO If such an award were to be given for the Most Contentious Religious Story of 2010, the two main contenders would undoubtedly be...
The Daily Show Takes on a Union
The Daily Show exposes some union hypocrisy (HT). In the words of the union local head, es down to greed”: ...
A Lesson from Michigan: Time to End Crony Unionism
In this week’s Acton Commentary, I take a look at the prospects of “right-to-work” legislation in Michigan, “A Lesson from Michigan: Time to End Crony Unionism.” One of the things that disturbs me the most about what I call “crony unionism” is the hand-in-glove relationship between the labor unions and big government. We have the same kind of special pleading and rent seeking in this system as we do in crony capitalism, but the labor unions enjoy such special protection...
The Politics of Crony Unionism
Last week’s Acton Commentary and blog post focused on my claims about “crony unionism” and how the intimate relationship between Big Labor and Big Government corrupt both. Here’s another instance of the kinds of gross conflicts of interest produced by this relationship: It’s hard to see this as anything but partisan pandering on the part of the largest public sector union, the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). Meanwhile, the Washington Post asks, “Was politics behind the...
Work as if It Mattered
The conversations over the last few weeks here on work have raised a couple of questions. In the context of criticisms on the perspectives on work articulated by Lester DeKoster and defended by menter John E. asks, “…what is it that you hope readers will change in their lives, and why?” I want to change people’s view of their work. I want them to see how it has value not simply as a means to some other end, but in...
Explaining the New Democratic Logo
“The new Democratic logo is so bad that the intellectual rot in the official announcement went largely unnoticed.” The rest of my piece is here at The American Spectator. ...
Mandating Monolithic Medicine
Among the warnings sounded as the Democratic health care reform bill was being debated was that the federal insurance mandate included in the bill—even though not national health care per se—would essentially give the federal government control of the insurance industry. The reason: If everyone is forced to buy insurance, then the government must deem what sort of insurance qualifies as adequate to meet the mandate. This piece of Obamacare promises to turn every medical procedure into a major political...
Journal of Religion and Business Ethics
The latest issue of the newly launched Journal of Religion and Business Ethics is now available (vol. 1, no. 2). Check out the contents at their website. From the journal’s about page: “The Journal of Religion and Business Ethics is a peer-reviewed journal that examines the ethical and religious issues that arise in the modern business setting. While much attention has been given to the philosophical treatment of business ethics, this is the first journal to address the more inclusive...
Radio Free Acton: The Stewardship of Art, Part 2
Last week, we posted part 1 of our podcast on the proper Christian stewardship of art; for those who have been waiting for the conclusion, we’re happy to present part 2. David Michael Phelps continues to lead the discussion between Professors Nathan Jacobs and Calvin Seerveld, who previously debated this topic in the Controversy section of our Journal of Markets & Morality. The first portion of that exchange is available at the link for part 1; the remainder of the...
Envy: A Deadly (Economic) Sin
Victor Claar, Acton University lecturer and professor of economics at Henderson State University, will give a talk tonight in Washington, D.C., hosted by AEI, “Grieving the Good of Others: Envy and Economics.” If you are in the area, you are encouraged to attend and hear Dr. Claar as well as two respondents discuss the topic of envy and its moral and economic consequences. Here’s a description of the event: Critics of capitalism often argue that this economic system is irretrievably...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved