Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Mr. President: You Underestimate Americans
Mr. President: You Underestimate Americans
Dec 27, 2025 6:40 AM

On Friday, President Obama was speaking at Rhode Island College. There was a lot of press given to his remarks about women who choose to stay at home to raise their children (it was a doofus remark), but I believe his entire speech was one in which he underestimates Americans.

I know that many of you are working while you go to school. Some of you are helping support your parents or siblings.

Well, yes, Mr. President, that’s what we do. Many of us choose to support our families, our parents, our siblings. We choose not to rely on the government, but to work hard not only for ourselves but for those we love. We believe it is our responsibility.

So earlier today, I met with a group of women business owners and working moms, and Lisbeth and your president here, and they were sharing stories that probably sound familiar to a lot of people — studying for finals after working a full shift; searching for childcare when the babysitter cancels at the last minute; using every penny of their savings so they can afford to stay home with their new baby.

Yup, it’s tough. But that’s nothing new. My parents shared both babysitting shifts and building skills when they, my aunt and uncle worked to build houses and work. When my family’s house burned down, my father and uncle would work at their full-time jobs, and then rebuild our house until it got too dark to swing a hammer. And then they’d do it again the next day.

When my own family was young, my sister took care of my kids while I taught for a few years. When her husband left her with three children to raise, they moved in with us. She worked; I stayed at home with my kids and hers.

Moms and dads deserve a great place to drop their kids off every day that doesn’t cost them an arm and a leg. We need better childcare, daycare, early childhood education policies. In many states, sending your child to daycare costs more than sending them to a public university.

What we really need is tax breaks for parents. We pay an enormous amount to the federal government to pay for things like free birth control for everybody. The number of people on food stamps has exploded; we are paying for that. The government is a machine that eats as much money as we’ll feed it. And we are the forced to work for its substantial and growing appetite.

And sometimes, someone, usually mom, leaves the workplace to stay home with the kids, which then leaves her earning a lower wage for the rest of her life as a result. And that’s not a choice we want Americans to make.

I thought that is what America is all about: being free to make moral choices. If you want to stay at home to raise your children (whether it’s mom or dad being at home), that’s great. If you choose to work, that’s okay too. We are also free to debate, kindly, with each other as to which choice is best for our children and our families. Mr. President, it is not your place, as political leader of our country, to lessen our choices. It is your job to broaden our choices. Trust us to make the choices that are best for us, even if it means we knowingly choose to create a career plan that has us learning a lower wage.

Mr. President, you underestimate Americans. We are smart, savvy and willing to work hard. We learned from our parents, our grandparents and our mentors. We are fine with hard work. We just want that hard work to benefit ourselves and our families. Let us keep our money, let us make our own choices, let us profit from our hard work.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
50 Key Quotes from the Supreme Court’s Same-Sex Marriage Ruling
The Supreme Court issued its ruling today on the case of Obergefell v. Hodges, legalizing same-sex marriage in all 50 states. (You can find our explainer article on the case here.) Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court, which was joined by Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan. Justice Roberts filed a dissenting opinion, in which Scalia and Thomas joined. Scalia also wrote an opinion that was joined by Thomas. Thomas also filed a dissenting opinion that was joined by...
Beyond environment, encyclical emphasizes pope’s commitment to family issues
Paul Kengor, professor of political science at Grove City College, wrote an article published on Crisis Magazine‘s website today demonstrating that although the secular left has championed Laudato Si’, the text goes beyond environmental issues to show the pope’s mitment to family and marriage. The secular left, of course, loves this encyclical. As I write, the farthest reaches of the left, People’s World, house organ of Communist Party USA, has two articles singing atheistic hosannas to the bishop of Rome....
Bruce Walker: On Charleston and Climate Change
In The Morning Sun, a Central Michigan newspaper, frequent PowerBlog contributor Bruce Walker discusses the connection between the Charleston shootings and the recent papal encyclical: The Charleston shooting rampage is a terrible reminder that very real evil manifests itself in this world, presumably performed in the name of all that is malevolent. The sickness that devalues innocent human lives over something as arbitrary as pigmentation to the point the violent taking of those lives somehow makes sense can be only...
Explainer: What You Should Know About the Supreme Court’s Same-Sex Marriage Ruling
What was the same-sex marriage case that was decided by the Supreme Court? The Supreme Court issued its ruling on the case of Obergefell v. Hodges, which is consolidated with three other cases—Tanco v. Haslam(Tennessee);DeBoer v. Snyder(Michigan);Bourke v. Beshear(Kentucky). These cases challenged two issues concerning whether the Fourteenth Amendmentmust guarantee the right for same-sex couples to marry. What issues was the court asked to decide? The two issues that were answered in this case are: 1.Does the Fourteenth Amendment require...
Mark Tooley Gives Evangelical Perspective on the Encyclical
Mark Tooley, President of the Institute on Religion and Democracy, reacts to the recent encyclical from an evangelical perspective: The climate change issue is portrayed by the activists as being a moral issue and they put themselves forward as defenders of the oppressed and the poor around the world. But, in fact, it is the poor, especially the extreme poor, who are the most arguably in need of increased access to what, at this point, only fossil fuels can provide....
Forty Key Quotes from ‘Catholicism, Ecology and the Environment: A Bishop’s Reflection’
The following e from Dominique Rey’s book Catholicism, Ecology and the Environment: A Bishop’s Reflection, published in 2013 in the Acton Institute Christian Social Thought Series. 1. The current ecological crisis is first of all metaphysical. A confused understanding of the depth of being of things and a lack of respect for reason stands in the way of a correct understanding of the relationship between God and the world. 2. A distinctly Christian ecology must be theological and based on...
Kishore Jayabalan reacts to the eco-encyclical on EWTN
Kishore Jayabalan, director of Istituto Acton in Rome, appeared on EWTN News Nightly last week to talk about the environmental encyclical and the pope’s emphasis on personal virtue and Christian stewardship. On Thursday, mented that the poor will actually be hurt if people consume less, highlighting the need to connect sound economics to poverty alleviation plans: And on Friday, he discussed the pontiff’s emphasis on personal responsibility and virtue, which he said sets Francis apart from most environmentalists: ...
Alejandro Chafuen analyzes Laudato Si’
As an economic leader brought up in Argentina, Alejandro Chafuen, president of Atlas Network, gave his perspective on Pope Francis’s eco-encyclical at Acton University last week: ...
Samuel Gregg: Pope Francis’ Overreach Plagues the Encyclical
Samuel Gregg, director of research at the Acton Institute, recently wrote for The Federalist that the overreach by the Pope into a wide range of environmental issues plagues the text of the encyclical: Neither the pope nor the teaching authority he exercises is required ment on every imaginable subject discussed in the public square, whether it is air-conditioning’s environmental impact, contemporary threats to plankton, the effect of synthetic agrotoxins on birds, or how dams affect animal migration (and, yes, all...
Explainer: What You Should Know About the Obamacare Ruling (King v. Burwell)
In a significant victoryfor the Obama administration, the Supreme Court voted in a6-3 decisioninKing v. Burwellthat the Affordable Care Act authorized federal tax credits for eligible Americans living not only in states with their own exchanges but also in the 34 states with federal exchanges. Here is what you should know about the case and the ruling. What was the case about? At the core of the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare), the Court noted, were three key reforms: (1)...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved