Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Mother May I?
Mother May I?
Dec 31, 2025 3:32 PM

At last week’s Acton on Tap, I discussed the economic teachings of the Heidelberg Catechism, beginning with the divine origin of material blessings as expressed in Lord’s Day 50, which explores the fourth petition of the Lord’s Prayer, “Give us this day our daily bread.” The catechism emphasizes God as “the only source of everything good,” echoing the classical Christian understanding of God as the fons omnium bonorum, a Latin phrase meaning the font or source of all good things. This formula appears in many places, notably in the work of John Calvin.

The conclusion from such an understanding is, as the catechism puts it, that we are “to give up our trust in creatures and trust in you [God] alone.” So even though the bread we normally consume each day is brought to us by the work of others, including farmers, millers, and bakers, we are to look beyond these secondary means to the origin of all good things, giving thanks to him.

In his guide to the Heidelberg Catechism, the Rev. Cornelis Vonk provides us with a powerful image connecting the divine origins and the human means by which our material blessings normally are provided. Vonk writes,

Someone might nonetheless ask, “How can we ask the Lord for bread when it is already prepared and ready on our table?”

We see the same thing when a child takes an apple from a bowl on the table, after first asking, “Mother, may I take an apple?” The child does this even though those apples were purchased for him. But Mother is the owner. In the same way, before we enjoy a finely furnished meal, we acknowledge our heavenly Father as the owner by saying, “Please.”

The Lord’s Prayer is a way of gratefully acknowledging that God has provided for our material needs, most often through the work of our neighbors, and asking in faithfulness that such provision continue.

It’s natural to take some of these kinds of teachings and apply them to everyday circumstances, as Vonk does so helpfully here. In my own case, I often encounter my children desiring things, even something as simple as their daily bread. But I have had to work to teach them, and still have to do so almost daily, to ask for things properly. Thus, when my son says, “I’m hungry,” usually I will not respond, or if I do I will acknowledge his statement like this, “Hi, Hungry, my name is Jordan. Nice to meet you.” The statement “I’m hungry” is not a question. It is not, in the formula of the Lord’s Prayer, a petition.

Of course my son means something like, “I’m hungry and I would like for you to feed me.” But he needs to be taught to ask for things properly, and in the same way our heavenly Father teaches us in the Lord’s Prayer to ask for things properly, out of the right motivations and in the right spirit.

Most of the time when my son wants something, I am only to happy to provide it. I begin with a disposition towards giving him good gifts. As Jesus teaches, “If you then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him!” The Holy Spirit, of course, is the best gift of all.

But sometimes my son expresses his wishes in a way that prevents me from fulfilling that desire. I have to wait for him to ask in the right way and out of the right motive before I can give him what he wants. And sometimes his rudeness prevents me from doing so at all. I often tell him that he has to enable me to provide for him by asking for things in the right way. “Help me help you,” I tell him. Otherwise, I run the risk of instilling bad manners, ungratefulness, and a sense of entitlement.

Likewise, God desires that “all these things will be given to you as well,” but has also taught us to desire them properly and in an ordinate way. First we must seek his kingdom and his righteousness. First we must ask for our daily bread and in so doing, as the catechism puts it, trust in God alone.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Strength in Checking In
As an older teen and early twenty-something I hated checking in. I thought telling others where I was or what I was up to was a sign of dependence and immaturity. In my invincible state of mind, I did not see the dangers and pitfalls of pletely on my own. I saw our natural human need to look out for each other as a weakness and not the strength that it is. Allowing others a window into our lives by...
The Vocation of the Politician
This morning the online publication Ethika Politika, the journal of the Center for Morality in Public Life, published my response to a previous article by Thomas Storck on natural law and political engagement. In his article, Storck contents that though the natural law exists as a rationally accessible, universal standard of justice, due to the disordered passions of our fallen condition political engagement on the basis of natural law is all but fruitless. Instead, he mends a renewed emphasis on...
Lawlessness Keeping India in the Dark
Earlier this month, India experienced the worst blackout in global history. Over 600 million people—more than double the number of people in the U.S. and nearly one in 10 people in the world—were left without power. The crisis highlights the fact that corrupt governance and lawless institutions can keep even an entrepreneurial people in the dark: Along with a lack of investment in infrastructure, the crisis also had roots in many of India’s familiar failings: the populist tone of much...
Gregg: A Book That Changed Reality
Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg is featured in The American Spectator today with an article titled, “The Book That Changed Reality.” The piece lauds Catholic philosopher, journalist and theologian Michael Novak’s groundbreaking 1982 book, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism. Called his magnum opus, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism synthesized a moral defense of capitalism with existing cultural and political arguments. Gregg notes this ments on the book’s timely publication and lasting influence: From a 2012 vantage point, it’s easy to...
Education and Incentives
I have written on several recent occasions about the role of incentives in education, both for teachers and for students (see here, here, and here). Yesterday, David Burkus, editor of LDRLB, wrote about a recent study by Harvard University economic researchers on the role of incentives in teacher performance. Interestingly, they found that incentives (such as bonus pay) are far more effective if given up front with the caution that they will need to be returned if the teacher’s performance...
Irony of Ironies: Samuel Gregg on Vatican II and Modernity
Samuel Gregg, Acton’s Director of Research, has an article in Crisis Magazine entitled ‘Irony of Ironies: Vatican II Triumphs Over Moribund Modernity‘. Challenging the incoherence of modern thought, Gregg remarks Another characteristic of late-modernity is the manner in which moral arguments are increasingly “settled” by appeals to opinion-polls, choice for its own sake, or that ultimate first-year undergraduate trump-card: “Well, I just feel that X is right.” For proof, just listen to most contemporary politicians discussing the ethical controversy of...
Another Reason We Can’t Afford the Affordable Care Act
In addition to internal logical inconsistencies which raise serious concerns of long term economic sustainability regarding the Affordable Care Act (ACA), recently analyzed by John MacDhubhain, Robert Pear reports in the New York Times over the weekend how confusion over certain ambiguities in the law (ironically over the meaning of the word “affordable”) would end up hurting some of the people it is precisely designed to help: working class families. Pear writes, The new health care law is known as...
Acton Commentary: Spiritual Competition and the Zero-Sum Game
In this week’s Acton Commentary, “Spiritual Competition and the Zero-Sum Game,” I examine a plaint against the market economy: that it engenders what Walter Rauschenbusch called “the law of tooth and nail,” petitive ethos that ends only when the opponent is defeated. In the piece, I trace some of the vociferousness of such claims to the idea of economic reality as a fixed or static pie: The moral cogency of the argument petition is enhanced in a framework where the...
Metaphysical Business
Work is at the core of our humanity, says Anthony Esolen, and our ownership of what we produce precedes laws demanding that we give it back to munity” in the abstract. “You didn’t build that!” is probably the mostpreposterousstatement I have ever heard from an American politician. A high bar to clear, no doubt, but let me justify the choice. It puts the effect before the cause. Suppose someone were to say, “If it weren’t for cities, there wouldn’t be...
Miller on ‘Christ and the City’
Acton Research Fellow and Director of Media Michael Matheson Miller will be featured on Christopher Brooks‘ “Christ and the City” radio program this evening at 5:00 p.m. EST. Brooks is the pastor of a Detroit church and his program, which airs from 4 – 6 p.m., addresses matters of faith from a variety of perspectives. Miller will be joining the program to discuss PovertyCure, an Acton educational initiative, and the PovertyCure team’s recent trip to Haiti. Follow this link to...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved