Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
‘Mockingjay, Part 1’: More than Meets the Eye
‘Mockingjay, Part 1’: More than Meets the Eye
Mar 16, 2025 5:49 PM

“Mockingjay, Part 1,” the first film installment of the finale to Suzanne Collins’ massively popular young adult trilogy, The Hunger Games, has dominated the box office in its opening week and over the Thanksgiving weekend. As Brooks Barnes reported for the New York Times, “The No. 1 movie in North America was again ‘The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1,’ which took in an estimated $56.9 million from Friday to Sunday, according to Rentrak, a box-office tracking firm. Domestic ticket sales for ‘Mockingjay’ now total a hefty $225.7 million….”

While some would criticize the series for lack of depth, “Mockingjay, Part 1,” offers more than just a shallow cast of good guys vs. bad guys, acting as a window into the messy realities of tyranny, class, and freedom.

The Hunger Games books and films have generated some controversy, as Kenneth R. Morefield noted in Christianity Today, “Would it surprise you to learn that Suzanne Collins’ Hunger Games trilogy has been one of the ten most frequently challenged or banned books in schools and libraries for three of the last four years?” But Morefield isn’t convinced such worries are warranted: “did you know my thesaurus lists sixteen synonyms for ‘innocuous’?”

He goes on, however, to add his own assessment of the franchise’s artistic merit:

You can make some legitimate artistic criticisms of The Hunger Games. But when you get right down to it, those criticisms basically boil down to the fact that it isn’t highbrow.

Well, neither was Star Wars, the franchise The Hunger Games most resembles. Both are about rebellions against a non-descript political tyranny. Both are driven by love triangles that ground the epic stakes in human emotions. Both boast better actors than we’re used to seeing in these kinds of movies. Both sparingly but effectively use villains who scare us because of just how much they terrify our heroes. Mostly, though, both are thinly plotted serials that serve as an excuse for linking together battles, escapes, rescues, and romance.

I should be clear that Morefield does not really consider this a fault, mending the film as a conversation starter for connecting with the young adults in one’s life enthralled with Collins’ fiction. I would second that. Yet — and perhaps this is only a small quibble — I would not describe the films and books as “thinly plotted serials.” (I have my own criticisms, but they fall more on “Part 2.”)

Morefield’s contention seems to be that pelling elements of “Mockingjay” ultimately exist for the aesthetic of violence, suspense, sexual tension, and adventure. I would rather contend the opposite. The “battles, escapes, rescues, and romance” serve the deeper themes by bringing them down from ivory tower abstraction into an extreme plicated existential reality. To use Morefield’s example of Star Wars, one could argue this is precisely the difference between the original trilogy and the more recent prequels: for the former the action served grander themes; for the latter all semblance of depth was sacrificed for bells and whistles.

Consider the themes of tyranny and class dynamics in The Hunger Games, a subject that I reflected on last year with reference to “Catching Fire.” In “Mockingjay,” which like past films in the series does an excellent job of bringing these themes more to the forefront than their source material, we see again a clear rejection of “us vs. them,” class warfare dynamics in favor of greater nuance plexity.

Which brings me to Effie Trinket (played by Elizabeth Banks). Effie epitomizes the shallow lifestyles of Capitol denizens. Her audacious cosmetics, fabulous hairstyles, and loudly colored wardrobe represent a clearly disordered love in her life. She buys into the drama of the Hunger Games like everyone else, seeming to mourn more that she would lose one of her few victors to fawn over in the Quarter Quell in “Catching Fire” than that one of them, in fact, would lose life itself.

Yet despite her shallow exterior and admittedly unspectacular intellect, there is more to Effie than meets the eye — encapsulating the fact that there is more to The Hunger Games than aesthetics as well. Sure, she’s bad at caring for the citizens of the districts, but she’s good at trying. She does her best to show solidarity with Katniss (Jennifer Lawrence), Peeta (Josh Hutcherson), and Haymitch (Woody Harrelson) by giving them all gold trinkets (pun intended?) to wear together before the Quarter Quell.

In “Mockingjay,” she first appears when former gamemaker Plutarch Heavensbee (Philip Seymour Hoffman — memoria aeternitatis) enters her room in District 13 to ask her to help prep Katniss for the propaganda videos they intend to film to rally support throughout Panem. She refers to her room as her “cell,” though Plutarch reminds her she is not, in fact, a prisoner. Yet, as she puts it, she has been “condemned to this life of jumpsuits” — skewering the conformist dress of the militaristic District 13. All shallow, right?

As the conversation continues, another side of es to the fore. Plutarch scolds her that the revolution is happening and there is no going back to the extravagant life she once had, calling her, “replaceable,” just like everyone else. But Effie counters that certainly Katniss, who the rebellion so wants to be their mockingjay, is not replaceable, and neither is she. Her self-worth may be inflated, but she also hints at the error of Plutarch’s way of thinking: no person is replaceable, an inherent dignity violated year after year by the Hunger Games themselves.

And, in fact, it is precisely for her supposed shallowness that Plutarch wants her help. As it turns out, fashion does matter — perhaps not as much as Effie thinks it does, but certainly more so than District 13 acknowledges. As Elizabeth menting on her character, put it,

I think beauty has moved nations; I mean — it moved Odysseus to cross the oceans. Beauty is very important; it is very inspiring…. It’s human nature to respond, I think, to beauty. And also, self-adornment has been with us … forever and ever, throughout time, and so — these are things that Effie believes in, and I don’t think they’re frivolous, and I don’t think they’re superficial. I think they actually matter.

I doubt fashion is quite what Dostoevsky meant by his claim, “Beauty will save the world,” but nevertheless Banks is onto something here. In the film Effie is merged with another character, Fulvia Cardew, Plutarch’s right hand adviser. Thus, while not absent in the book, in the film her development es far more prominent with added lines that, to me, were some of the movie’s best. She may not have been a double agent like Plutarch, but she is not a faceless drop in the shallow sea of the Capitol; she has her own gifts to offer — her fashion sense in particular — even if only reluctantly.

Commenting on France under Napoleon III, Lord Acton once said, “The victims of the imperial despotism are for the most part its instruments.” Panem has far more victims than the willing instruments of the Capitol, but nevertheless “Mockingjay” shows that even the Effies of the world, the symbols of self-serving tyranny, may themselves be tyrannized and worthy, too, of liberation. If we can look more than skin deep (passed, no doubt, copious layers of concealer), we might see even those we believe to be shallow or adversarial to possess the irreplaceable dignity of the image of God.

This is just one achievement of “Mockingjay,” and one of many great reasons to go see the film.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Presidential candidate Kamala Harris: We need to ban right-to-work laws
Speaking at a recent a Service Employees International Union (SEIU) event, Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris said there there is a need for “banning right-to-work laws.” It’s unclear how Harris plans to do this from the federal level, as Right to Work laws are state laws that guarantee a person cannot pelled to join or pay dues to a labor union as a condition of employment. “Kamala Harris wants to make absolutely sure that we know she’s an authoritarian,” says...
Rev. Ben Johnson: The socialist bizarro world of David Bentley Hart
When e across a think piece so catastrophically wrong as David Bentley Hart’s April 27 New York Times column, “Can We Please Relax About ‘Socialism’?” you marvel at the effort, intentional or not. Hart, an Eastern Orthodox theologian and, as the Times puts it a “cultural critic,” says he knows that, “in this country we employ terms like ‘socialism’ with wanton indifference to historical details and conceptual distinctions.” He’s right, but not in the way he thinks he’s right. After...
Religious toleration in a religious state
The concepts of toleration espoused by theologians in the officially religious states of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries deserve closer examination. So argue Tobias Dienst and Christoph Strohm in their introduction to Martinus Becanus’s 1607 treatise, On the Duty to Keep Faith with Heretics. Becanus (1563–1624), a Dutch Jesuit theologian who became court confessor to the Holy Roman Emperor, lived in and supported an officially Roman Catholic state, but this did not prevent him from developing a concept of religious...
Acton Line podcast: The moral hazard of student debt; Unraveling Islam
On this episode of Acton Line, Caroline Roberts speaks with Andrew Kloster, deputy director of the Center for the Study of the Administrative State at George Mason University, about the student debt crisis. Kloster claims that the student debt crisis is the greatest moral hazard of our Nation and explains how he sees the crisis panning out in the future. On the second segment, Acton’s director of research, Samuel Gregg, sits down with Mustafa Akyol, senior research fellow at the...
America doesn’t have a radically capitalist economy
Socialism, it seems, is back. But maybe the real question we should be asking is how far the United States has embraced various features of what might be called social democracy over the past 100 years. This is one of the points underscored in a well-written paper by the Heritage Foundation’s David Burton, entitled “Comparing Free Enterprise with Socialism” (April 30, 2019). Among other things, Burton also manages to: • bring clarity to the free markets versus socialism debate by...
Half of millennials would prefer to live in a socialist or communist country
Yesterday was May Day, a date which some people—mostly socialists munists—consider to be an observance of International Workers’ Day. Others believe instead of celebrating labor the day should be considered an international observance of Victims of Communism Day. Law professor Ilya Somin explains why we should use the day memorate the victims munist totalitarian tyranny: While the influence munist ideology has declined since its mid-twentieth century peak, it is far from dead. Largely munist regimes remain in power in Cuba...
The Federal Reserve as lender of last resort
Note: This is post #121 in a weekly video series on basic economics. If you heard a rumor that your bank was insolvent, asks economist Alex Tabarrok, what would you do? As Tabarrok says, a typical reaction is to panic. And if you can’t get your money out, your next step would likely be to try and get all of your cash in hand. The rumor could even be false, but if enough people responded as if it were true,...
Russia bans fake news: a lesson in unintended consequences
For months, French President Emmanuel Macron has asked European leaders to crack down on fake news. At last, someone has taken his advice. Last month, Vladimir Putin signed a law banning Russian websites from posting “fake news” stories. The government, of course, will be the arbiter of truth and falsehood. Coincidentally, the same day he signed a bill punishing websites that post stories insulting Vladimir Putin. The Moscow Times reported: The legislation will establish punishments for spreading information that “exhibits...
The dangers of Catholic anti-liberalism
Korey D. Maas, associate professor of history at Hillsdale College, has written a timely warning to American Catholics at Public Discourse titled, ‘The Coming Anti-Catholicism.’ Maas begins his essay with a recounting of the early history of American anti-Catholicism, its mitigation in the 1960s, and its troubling resurgence in recent years: bined effects of Camelot and the Council were to make political anti-Catholicism gauche almost overnight. Nobody, therefore, is surprised today when conservative Catholics and liberal non-Catholics alike respond to...
Noodles in Nigeria: When private business breeds economic development
In the West’s various efforts to alleviate global poverty, we continue to see the promotion of top-down solutions at the expense of bottom-up enterprises and institutions. Yet despite the setbacks and slowdowns caused by various governments and foreign aid, the entrepreneurs and workers on the ground aren’t sitting idly by. Across the developing world, people aren’t waiting for policies to change, conditions to improve, handouts to be given, or risks to evaporate. They are actively transforming their environments and creating...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved