Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Minimum wage, minimum liberty
Minimum wage, minimum liberty
Dec 10, 2025 3:47 PM

Taking their cue from Seattle, cities and states are implementing minimum wage increases all over the country. Late last year, voters in Washington approved an increase in the statewide minimum wage that will raise it to $13.50 per hour by 2020. Three other states have also approved increases, including the typically conservative Arizona, where by 2020 the minimum wage will increase to $12 per hour.

Yet such policies rely on a fundamental abridgment of employer and employee freedom, leading to an abridgment of opportunity, in turn.

In a new study published by the National Bureau of Economic Research, we see a strong affirmation of that general principle. Commissioned by the city of Seattle to gauge the effects of the city’s progressive minimum wage increases, the study concludes that for low-wage and entry-level workers the costs of the hike outweigh the benefits by a factor of three to one.

The results seem to confirm what conservative economists have long said about artificial minimum wage hikes. Namely, that the group who is supposed to benefit most — those on the low end of the wage spectrum — end up instead with lower wages or lost jobs. But while the paper may not prove this conclusively, it’s likely to have an impact not only on Seattle, but on other states and cities considering proposed increases to the minimum.

The new research seems to conflict with some past studies on the effects of the minimum wage on employment rates. One such study, published in 1994 by David Card and Alan B. Krueger in The American Economic pared employment changes in fast-food restaurants between New Jersey and Pennsylvania while New Jersey enacted an increase. Card and Krueger concluded that particular hike, from $4.25 to $5.05 (almost 19%), had no negative effect on employment rates.

However, according to Max Ehrenfreund, the new study finds different results by broadening the scope of the data. “Economists might not readily dismiss the new study as an outlier, however,” Ehrenfreund writes. “The paper published Monday makes use of more detailed data than havebeen available in past research, drawing on state records of wages and hours for individual employees.”

As the Washington Post reported: “The paper is likely to upend a debate that has continued among economists, politicians, businesses and labor organizers for decades. In particular, the results could exacerbatedivisions among Democrats, who are seekingan economic agenda to counter President Trump’s pitches forprotectionism, reduced taxes and restrictions on immigration.” For more details on the study, see Joe Carter summary and Dylan mentary.

What these states and cities will ultimately realize is that employers wanting to stay in business only have three options when faced with mandatory minimum wage laws. Either they (1) freeze hiring, causing employment rates to drop; (2) hire employees with higher skill sets, marginalizing teens and entry-level workers from the job market; or (3) increase prices, passing along the costs to the market.

This diminishes freedom from the other end, too, limiting the range of options that are available for the very employees it’s supposed to help. If my retail job in high school had paid $15 an hour, I would have been priced out of the market by someone older and more responsible, with more skills and knowledge. I would have lost that opportunity to learn how to e a bit more responsible myself, all because prices were not allowed to serve as a signal of actual preferences in free and open exchange

Ultimately, aside from its pragmatic effects the most frightening effect of a state-mandated minimum wage is the abridgment of individual liberty it inevitably entails. After all, if I’m willing to work for $10 an hour and the government says that would be illegal, they have essentially taken away my liberty to negotiate for myself.

When the state, which exists to protect the rights of individuals, es an agent that inhibits personal liberty, we shouldn’t be surprised that the most vulnerable among us will be the ones who suffer the most.

Image: Fibonacci Blue,Strike and a protest march for a $15 minimum wage in Dinkytown, Color,CC BY 2.0

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
From Steadfast Conservatives to the Faith and Family Left: Highlights from Pew Research’s Political Typology Survey
In discussions of political issues, the American public is too often described in a binary format: Left/Right, Republican/Democrat, Red State/Blue State. But a new survey by the Pew Research Center takes a more granular look at our current political typology by sorting voters into cohesive groups based on their attitudes and values: Partisan polarization – the vast and growing gap between Republicans and Democrats – is a defining feature of politics today. But beyond the ideological wings, which make up...
Justice Alito: ‘For-Profit’ Businesses Pursue More Than Material Gain
In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court just announced its ruling in favor of Hobby Lobby, holding that, “as applied to closely held corporations, the government’s HHS regulations imposing the contraceptive mandate violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA).” The full opinion, written by Justice Samuel Alito, can be read here. Although there is still much to digest, and although the majority opinion still leaves quite a bit of room for related battles to continue, it’s worth noting...
Calvin Coolidge’s warning against an entrenched bureaucracy
As we read about the increase of scandal, mismanagement, and corruption within our federal agencies, it is essential once again to revisit the words of Calvin Coolidge. Recent actions at the IRS, Veterans Administration, and the ATF gunwalking scandal all point to systemic problems e from an entrenched bureaucracy. As more and more of the responsibilities of civil society is passed over to centralized powers in Washington, federal agencies have exploded with power and control, leading to greater opportunities for...
A Cultural Case for Capitalism: Part 11 of 12 — The Challenges
[Part 1 is here.] Economic freedom does generate certain challenges. The wealth that free economies are so effective at creating brings with it temptation. Wealth can tempt us to depend on our riches rather than on God. The temptation can be resisted, as we see with wealthy biblical characters like Abraham and Job. But it’s a challenge the church should be mindful of, helping its members cultivate a balanced view of money and of our responsibility and opportunities as stewards...
Using Drones for Good
Drones, or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), have been a prominent and controversial topic in the news of late. Today, the Washington-based Stimson Center released its mendations and Report on US Drone Policy. The think tank, which assembled a bipartisan panel of former military and intelligence officials for the 81-page report, concluded that “UAVSs should be neither glorified nor demonized. It is important to take a realistic view of UAVs, recognizing both their continuities with more traditional military technologies and the...
Video: Rev. Sirico on Hobby Lobby Ruling
Earlier today, Rev. Sirico spoke with WSJ Live’s Mary Kissel about the contraceptive mandate ruling, religion’s place in the public square, and the historical context of the Supreme Court’s decision. Watch below: ...
What You Should Know About the Contraceptive Mandate Decision
This morning the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling on the Health and Human Services (HHS) contraceptive mandate (see here for an explainer article on the case). The Court ruled (5-4) that that employers with religious objections can opt out of providing contraception coverage under the Affordable Care Act. Here are six points you should know from the majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito: 1.The “Hobby Lobby” decision is really a collection of three separate lawsuits. Although the focus...
Finding Meaning in Blue-Collar Work
Over at the Patheos Faith and Work Channel, Larry Saunders shares about his journey from pastor to grocery-store clerk to blue-collar factory worker to current MBA student in search of a white-collar job, offering deep and personal reflections on faith, work, and meaning along the way. When he became a United Methodist pastor, Saunders enjoyed certain aspects of what he calls the “white collar work of ministry,” finding “a strong correlation between my personal sense of vocation and my gifts.”...
Video: Rev. Sirico on Pope Francis and the Mafia
Earlier today, Rev. Robert Sirico spoke with Fox News’ Lauren Green on ‘Spirited Debate’ about Pope Francis’ decision to municate members of the Italian mafia. From Heard on Fox: “Italy has e increasingly more secular and that has impacted the secularity of the mafia – they don’t have the kind of dramatic religious ties that they might have had at one time … the stuff of which movies portray,” said Sirico. He added, “they [the mob] have an appearance of...
Key Quotes from the Hobby Lobby Decision
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito wrote the majority (5-4) opinion in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby. The decision was decided in large part because it aligns with the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, a law that passed the U.S. Senate 97-3 and was signed by President Bill Clinton in 1993. The law is intended to prevent burdens to a person’s free exercise of religion. At the time, it had wide ranging bipartisan support and was introduced in the House by current U.S....
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved