Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Minigolf and carnival rides: The profane conquers the sacred
Minigolf and carnival rides: The profane conquers the sacred
Dec 16, 2025 3:22 PM

Luc Plamondon’s Le Temps des cathédrales, the opening number of the 1998 musical Notre-Dame de Paris, ends on a somber note somewhat at odds with the rest of the song:

But it is doomed, the age of the cathedrals.

The horde of barbarians

Is at the city gates.

Let them enter, these pagans and these vandals.

The end of this world

Is foretold for the year two thousand

Is foretold for the year two thousand.

I won’t pretend to know exactly what Plamondon had in mind with this. That last stanza is certainly a bit haunting. But I thought of it this week because of two stories concerning Anglican cathedrals in merrie olde England.

A few weeks ago Rochester Cathedral made its medieval nave into a minigolf course as part of a “play and pray” initiative intended to draw a younger crowd to the cathedral. And just today Norwich Cathedral opened a carnival ride inside the nave of the cathedral, which they laughably claim is not a gimmick. All in the name of attracting people. Attracting people is essential, of course, but even more essential is that we have a right sense of what we should attract them to.

For at least the last 60 years there has been a vocal wing trying to make the church cater to secular fads under the pretense that this will attract people. So many churches put on ill-fitting trappings or accept every progressive trend es along, since we have to be ing” and “tolerant.” It has often e very hard, impossible really, to distinguish between a church and a doctrine-free, feel-good NGO. Of course we are called to show love and acceptance, but though love is accepting of the person it can never leave truth behind, or else it can’t be real love. The truth will set us free. The Church has to offer a challenge, a sense of the sacred, an acknowledgement of the truth that is present – even if the truth is hard for some to swallow. Especially if it’s hard to swallow.

If e to church and aren’t offered anything different and deeper than what they see in the world, there’s no reason for them e. As Sam Guzman writes in this recent post, “I would even go so far as to say that if our religion isn’t weird to the world, then we have to some degree or another lost our faith. When our worship is a closed circle, when it turns towards man and man’s desires, it immediately begins to die.”

When the church tries pete with the world on the world’s terms, it always loses. Where has this brought us, after all? Church attendance has not grown, to say the least. People will e for that, and if they do, slides and golf and pop music won’t do them any good. No one needs a church that’s made in the image and likeness of the world. The world already knows that image, and no churchy imitation of it is ever going to measure up. The church is called – obligated – to bring something beyond that; otherwise there is no reason for it to exist. That’s why church attendance has been trending down and not up, despite all the efforts to make religion more “accessible” and trendy. The distinction between the sacred and the profane is gone – the sacred has so conformed itself to the profane that people can’t see it anymore. And when they can’t see the sacred, the church’s raison d’être is no longer.

What does this have to do with Acton, then? My point is this: we can’t build a society sustained by religious principles if we’re watering down those principles. Rev. Gavin Ashenden, former chaplain to the Queen, has already spoken out against Norwich’s tawdry show, for instance: “For such a place, steeped in mystery and marvel, to buy in to sensory pleasure and distraction, is to poison the very medicine it offers the human soul.” A church empty of content yields an empty society, and empty societies do not flourish.

Victor Hugo wrote in The Hunchback of Notre Dame – on which the 1998 musical I cited is based – of the ravages of “fashion” on Paris’s cathedral: “Upon the face of this old queen of our cathedrals, beside each wrinkle we always find a scar. Tempus edax, homo edacior. Which I would willingly translate thus: Time is blind, but man is stupid.” Harsh words, to be sure, but not without merit. The April fire at Notre-Dame makes Hugo’s words almost painfully concrete and offers a striking counterpoint to the recent misadventures in England. The fire was devastating, to be sure, but from the perspective of faith I would say that misplaced minigolf and tacky carnival attractions are even more devastating. Fire attacks the physical structure, but irreverent gimmicks attack the buildings’ very nature. Calling them barbarians would be a little harsh in this context, but someone is at the city gates, and now they’ve brought slides, hip slogans, smoke machines and minigolf clubs.

The age of the cathedrals doesn’t have to end. But it’s up to us to restore it and keep it alive.

Cathedral. Gary Ullah, Wikimedia Commons. CC BY 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
7 Figures: How young Americans view socialism, communism, and capitalism
The Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation recently released its annual report on U.S. attitudes towards socialism. Here are seven figures you should know from the survey: 1. The percentage of millenials who are unfamiliar with: Mao Zedong (42 percent), Che Guevara (40 percent), Vladimir Lenin (33 percent), Karl Marx (32 percent), Vladimir Putin (18 percent), Joseph Stalin (18 percent). 2. Among those familiar, at least a quarter have favorable impressions of Guevara (37 percent), Marx (34 percent), and Lenin (25...
Economic freedom and economic harmony
This is a guest post by Philip Booth, Professor of Finance, Public Policy and Ethics, St. Mary’s University, Twickenham; Academic and Research Director, Institute of Economic Affairs. Booth will be speaking in London on Dec. 1 at Acton Institute’s The Crisis of Liberty in the West conference (register here). This post is based on remarks prepared for delivery at the United Kingdom Government Foreign and Commonwealth Office conference on Preventing Violent Extremism by Building Inclusive and Plural Societies, Oct. 19-20....
C. S. Lewis on selfishness vs. self-interest
C.S. Lewis wrote much about the tension between self-interest and selfishness, offering renewed clarity on these topics, says Art Lindsley. To Lewis, there is a huge difference between self-interest and selfishness, and there is a proper place for self-interest in our lives: When Lewis first came to faith, he did not think about eternal life, but focused on enjoying God in this life. Lewis later said that the years he spent without the focus on heavenly rewards “always seem to...
Explainer: What did the presidential candidates say about the economy?
Last night Chris Wallace moderated the third and final debate of this presidential season. mentators have remarked that it was the most substantial policy debate of the year. But because of the interruptions and recriminations, it can be difficult to ascertain exactly what each candidate was proposing. Below I’ve summarized the actual policy statements made by each candidate about the economy, and included the verbatim text of their remarks from which the summary is taken. In the summaries (the sections...
Video: Benjamin Domenech on the rise of American populism
On October 13, the fall 2016 Acton Lecture Series continued with a timelyaddress from Benjamin Domenech, publisherof The Federalist and host of The Federalist Radio Hour, who spoke on the rise of Americanpopulism. Domenech looks at the history of populism in America, from Andrew Jackson toWilliam Jennings Bryan, and traces that strain in American politics straight through to the rise of Donald Trump.According to Domenech, the roots of the current populist uprising in America can be traced to the failure...
A ‘Hillbilly Elegy’ for family and civil society
While the federal government’s “war on poverty” achieved some progress towards meeting basic material needs, says Ray Nothstine in this week’s Acton Commentary, it has no answers to the deeper dilemma of dependency and hopelessness faced by many Americans. One book that highlights the problem and that is receiving considerable attention this year is J.D. Vance’s “Hillbilly Elegy.” Vance uses his own story to depict a crisis of culture among the white working class, especially in Appalachia. When President Lyndon...
How to explain the entitlement crisis to an 8-year-old
During tonight’s presidential candidate debate, Trump and Clinton should (but almost surely won’t) address America’s entitlement crisis. If they need some help to explain it to the public they can use this video, based on Nicholas Eberstadt’s book, A Nation of Takers, which provides a Seussian tale about the dangerous dependency of entitlements and the importance of liberty. ...
How to read a supply curve
Note: This is the sixthpost in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. Last week we took a deeper look into the demand curve, examining how to read the demand curve, how demand curves shift, and consumer surplus. This week we want to take a closer look at the supply curve and what it reveals to us. And in this next video from Marginal Revolution University we consider the factors that shift the supply curve. How do technological innovations, input...
Hurricane Matthew: disaster relief becoming the permanent model
Hurricane Matthew e and gone, but it has left one country, Haiti, in ruins. Just like in the aftermath of many disasters, we will see a flood of emergency aid and disaster relief pour into this country; Many have good intentions and a strong desire to help. This is a good thing. It’s important that people rally around each other in times of need. The problem arises when this es the permanent model. This is the core theme of a...
Few Americans who work full-time are in poverty
“No one in America should be working 40 hours a week and living below the poverty level,” said Joe Biden last year, “No one. No one.” That’s a sentiment I share with the vice president. And the good news is that almost no one who works 40 hours a week lives below the poverty level. That’s the finding of the latest report on e and poverty from the Census Bureau. For those aged 18 to 64 who work full time,...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved