Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Marriage as Cornerstone: How the Family Is a Foundation for Flourishing
Marriage as Cornerstone: How the Family Is a Foundation for Flourishing
Jan 15, 2026 9:43 AM

With the expansion of economic freedom and the resulting prosperity, we’ve reached an unprecedented position of personal empowerment and vocational choice. This is a e development, and it can be seized for good in any number of ways. But it es with its own risks and temptations.

As with any surface-level “freedom,” unless we seek God first and neighbor second, our action willquickly be steered by pleasure, pride, pursuit of power, or plain old personal preference — leading to shackles that may be looser, but remain shackles nonetheless. Such illusions are nothing new, and lurk no matter what the sphere of our stewardship. But if modernity has wielded a tangible, visible blow to one area in particular, it’s that of the family.

Over the last few decades, marriage has increasingly been misunderstood, and our misaligned approaches tobusiness, education, and politics haven’t helped. Rather than a basic starting point, a foundation of a flourishing society, the family has e just another optional perk in the worship of narrow self-fulfillment.

“Oh that? It’s not for me. Not now.”

As a result, marriageis increasingly seen as a mere contractual arrangement, a 50-50 partnership for the purposes of personal pleasure rather than duty and sacrifice. In turn, culture and family have “evolved” accordingly. Fewer and fewer people are getting married, and those who do are doing so later and later and having fewer and fewer kids, if any at all.Divorce is routine. The basic definition of marriage isconstantly questioned.

What does this mean for the rest of society? What does the erosion and the continued implosion of this core institution mean for the other important spheres that we increasingly prioritizebefore it?

Many shrug at suchdevelopments, to be sure, even as others go so far as to viewit as a sign of “progress.” Folks are now “liberated” to pursue their own “dreams,” they’ll say, empowered to “live life!” before (or without ever) “tying themselves down.”

Surely some are called to abstain or pared tothe standard metrics of the past.But when we look at the reasons for these changes, people are far more likely to point to their pocketbooks than their prayer closets. When we go further, observing God’s design for the family from the beginning, we begin to see that such widespread shifts in both attitudes and action mean thatsomething is a bit more amiss than we realize. Is God really guiding all or most of humanity in this brave new direction — to “reach for our dreams” in business, education, and art without first realizing some of the sacrificial stuff of which dreams are made?

In their new book, Marriage Is: How Marriage Transforms Society and Cultivates Human Flourishing, Eric Teetsel and Andrew Walker point at this very problem, offering pelling definition and defense of the Christian family in response. Arguing that the family, properly understood, is foundational for a flourishing society, they warn that we ought not be so passive to the current shifts and pressures to such a vital institution.

The book touches on a range of arguments, but one of its key strengths is its consistent challenge to the currentstatus quo (as outlined above). “It used to be that marriage was understood as the beginning of family, and family the foundation of society,” they write. Now, however, our priorities are shifting, and we are ing ever fortable placent with basing our personal visions and decisions about family in what we want for ourselves. “While enjoying and appreciating the benefits of the world we inherited, we ought not turn a blind eye to the costs,” they remind us.

Marriage is a central part of the human story, they continue, and the God-man story, at that. We have eobsessed with carefully constructing our man-made missions to save the world, when we often forget that God gave many of us a clue to all this from the very moment we entered the world. Through our own mother and father, through the nurture we find in what Herman Bavinck calls the “school of love,” we all have a glimpse at one of civilization’s core transformative forces. And yet, by the time modernity teases us with college plans, career aspirations, and bloated materialistic priorities, how quick we are to forget.

We toss it aside as something that es after we’ve done x, y, or z, rather than as something we may need to do before allof that. And our story — one that ought to stretch before and beyond our earthly exile — suffers in turn.Teetsel and Walker focus an entire chapter on this element of “story,” outlining where things went off course, and how predictable the new “script” has e.

The economic and technological prosperity of the last two hundred years has reduced the incentives to have large families. Fewer families rely on agriculture, the infant mortality rate is down while life expectancy is up, and government social programs like Social Security and Medicare reduce the responsibility younger generations have for their elders. Changing views about women’s role in society and increasing opportunity for work outside the home, coupled with the explosion in forms and access to reliable contraception, further edited the historic script. Economic opportunity and the sudden availability of leisure time for the masses attributed to the rise of individualism and materialism.

In succeeding generations, many have failed to teach children the role marriage plays as a civil institution, surrendered the virtue of abstinence before marriage, questioned the necessary contributions of moms and dads, bailed on marriages that ceased to provide them with their shallow sense of happiness, and viewed children as the ultimate accessory to round out an otherwise full life.

This is evident everywhere, but we see it increasingly driven and promoted by the educated and affluent, or those who hope to be so:

As young, smart, and talented entrepreneurs flock to [urban] hubs to be a part of the action, they exchange their former priorities for new norms. This life script looks very different: graduate from college, obtain an unpaid internship at the most prestigious firm in your field, go to graduate school, rent a room in a house with five or six peers, date for fun and practice for eventual marriage, climb the professional ladder, get married, get a dog, work for 5 to 10 years to establish financial stability, then—once everything else is in place—have a child….

This is the new normal for educated, affluent Americans in major urban centers, where a lifestyle of self-centeredness and materialism dominates at the expense of marriage, family, prudence, and responsibility…

University of Virginia sociologist Bradley Wilcox and colleagues succinctly summarizes this data, explaining that where marriage was once seen as a cornerstone in life, the Millennial generation understands marriage as a capstone once professional, financial, and other personal goals have been achieved. Millennials believe they can live happily ever after after they have gotten other things squared away.

To be clear, the takeaway here isn’t that we should malign people’s dreams and personal aspirations. Quite the contrary. This isn’t just about marriage and kids, but ties back to thatoriginal concern. This is about a debasement of and a distraction from our most basic allegiances and priorities.

We as a society have lost a sense of what it means to be truly successful in terms of both tangible and transcendent permanence. We have lost a sense of what it means to be joyful vs. passively content. We have lost what it means to build a life that supports and furthers and contributes to not only our own temporary whims and hedonistic impulses, but tothe flourishing of humanity and, for Christians, the Gospel.

“God is doing something through marriage,” Teetsel and Walker write. “He’s continuing humanity. He’s providing an institution for humanity that allows for it to take care of itself.While marriage will not save you, God has a plan to.”

We must not allow the family to be diminished as a “capstone” to personal achievement. God designed it as a “cornerstone” for true human freedom — an anchor and foundation from which those who are called to marry and have children will find increased fulfillment and vocational clarity, not less.

As Evan Koons writes in his letter on the Economy of Love:

“We learn our nature of love not in grand gestures to save the world, but in the normal, everyday struggle to love, to encourage, to bless those beside us. In family, our character is formed and given to the world.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Mexican politics and the economy
I have argued on this site that the last thing America needs is European style government-by-demonstration, and that the massive street demostrations over illegal immigration perhaps were a signof the Left’s intention to import exactly that style of guerilla theater politics into America. Now Mexico seems poised to illustrate that point: the free market candidate for president is leading the pack. According to the WSJ, but the two leftist parties are threatening to disrupt society and dispute the election if...
Mexican politics and the economy, part II
Writing in the San Diego Union Tribune, Ruben Navarette explains how the Mexican economy and corruption are related to the U.S. immigration problem. After talking with a Mexican born, U.S. citizen, Navarette observes: In Mexico, the elites take pride in the fact that Mexicans abroad send home nearly $20 billion a year. But for González, that figure is a national embarrassment – an advertisement of a government’s failure to provide sufficient opportunity for its own people. So Navarette presses him:...
Danger + opportunity = crisis?
In a recent interview with Giant magazine (June/July 2006, “Citizen Gore,” p. 56-57, text available here) about his new movie “An Inconvenient Truth,” former Vice President Al Gore answered a few questions. When asked what he would say to President Bush about climate change if he could: I’d say that this climate crisis is really a planetary emergency, and that he ought to take it out of politics altogether. The civil rights issue really took hold when Dr. King defined...
Get to know Jim Wallis
Entry #2 in Joe Carter’s Know Your Evangelicals Series is Jim Wallis, editor of Sojourners magazine and founder of Call to Renewal. The one-sentence summary? “While Wallis appears to be a genuine and passionate Christian he would do well to base his political views a bit more on the Bible and a bit less on leftist ideology.” Acton’s Jay Richards reviewed Wallis’ recent book, God’s Politics: Why the Right Gets It Wrong and the Left Doesn’t Get It, in the...
The digital collide
According to published reports, market mechanisms, and petition, are plishing what many decriers of the “digital divide” have long contended only big government could do. The AP, via , reports, “Middle- and working-class Americans signed up for high-speed Internet access in record numbers in the past year, apparently lured by a price war among panies.” The study, provided by the Pew Internet & American Life Project, found that broadband subscription “increased 40 percent in households making less than $30,000 a...
‘I don’t get no respect!’
Rodney Dangerfield is famous for saying, “I don’t get no respect!” plaint is shared in the laments that I often hear from academics, that electronic journals are not afforded the same respect as print journals. I explored some of the reasons for this as well as some of the results that have implications for journal publishers in an article published last year, “Scholarship at the Crossroads: The Journal of Markets & Morality Case Study,” Journal of Scholarly Publishing 36, no....
Taking stock of the Bush presidency
Rev. Robert A. Sirico joined host Sean Herriott for an interview on Relevant Radio’s Morning Air this morning. They discussed the current state of the Bush Presidency, the President’s view of moral absolutes, and the relationship between religion and politics in America. You can listen to the interview by clicking here (4.5 mb mp3 file). ...
Skeptical of the convert
I have to admit I was skeptical myself of Gregg Easterbrook’s self-proclaimed “long record of opposing alarmism” regarding global warming. To be sure, a bit of my own research showed that Mr. Easterbrook has long opposed alarmism, just not of the global warming variety. In this June 2003 Wired magazine article, “We’re All Gonna Die!,” Easterbrook debunks a number of apocalyptic myths, including the dangers of germ warfare, runaway nanobots, supervolcanoes, and shifting magnetic poles. He does include “Sudden climate...
America’s 12th graders dumbing down in science
“Last week, the Department of Education reported that science aptitude among 12th-graders has declined across the last decade.” Anthony Bradley explores some of the root causes for why science education continues to falter in schools across the country. Bradley asserts that the typical American now views education as a means for fortable lifestyle rather than a means to knowledge about the world. The purpose of education, instead of producing knowledge and insight into the workings of nature and society, is...
Mr. Kim, tear down this wall
Among the oppressed peoples of the world, none has suffered more than the North Koreans. The utter lack of freedom—religious, political, economic—in the dictatorship has long been known. Erasing any doubt, unprecedented information concerning the nation’s prison system was revealed a couple years ago by the U.S. Committee for Human Rights in North Korea. Those searching for a ray of hope—anything—were heartened by news that North and South Koreas had agreed to construct a rail link, the first such transportation...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved