Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Marriage as Cornerstone: How the Family Is a Foundation for Flourishing
Marriage as Cornerstone: How the Family Is a Foundation for Flourishing
Dec 3, 2025 8:37 AM

With the expansion of economic freedom and the resulting prosperity, we’ve reached an unprecedented position of personal empowerment and vocational choice. This is a e development, and it can be seized for good in any number of ways. But it es with its own risks and temptations.

As with any surface-level “freedom,” unless we seek God first and neighbor second, our action willquickly be steered by pleasure, pride, pursuit of power, or plain old personal preference — leading to shackles that may be looser, but remain shackles nonetheless. Such illusions are nothing new, and lurk no matter what the sphere of our stewardship. But if modernity has wielded a tangible, visible blow to one area in particular, it’s that of the family.

Over the last few decades, marriage has increasingly been misunderstood, and our misaligned approaches tobusiness, education, and politics haven’t helped. Rather than a basic starting point, a foundation of a flourishing society, the family has e just another optional perk in the worship of narrow self-fulfillment.

“Oh that? It’s not for me. Not now.”

As a result, marriageis increasingly seen as a mere contractual arrangement, a 50-50 partnership for the purposes of personal pleasure rather than duty and sacrifice. In turn, culture and family have “evolved” accordingly. Fewer and fewer people are getting married, and those who do are doing so later and later and having fewer and fewer kids, if any at all.Divorce is routine. The basic definition of marriage isconstantly questioned.

What does this mean for the rest of society? What does the erosion and the continued implosion of this core institution mean for the other important spheres that we increasingly prioritizebefore it?

Many shrug at suchdevelopments, to be sure, even as others go so far as to viewit as a sign of “progress.” Folks are now “liberated” to pursue their own “dreams,” they’ll say, empowered to “live life!” before (or without ever) “tying themselves down.”

Surely some are called to abstain or pared tothe standard metrics of the past.But when we look at the reasons for these changes, people are far more likely to point to their pocketbooks than their prayer closets. When we go further, observing God’s design for the family from the beginning, we begin to see that such widespread shifts in both attitudes and action mean thatsomething is a bit more amiss than we realize. Is God really guiding all or most of humanity in this brave new direction — to “reach for our dreams” in business, education, and art without first realizing some of the sacrificial stuff of which dreams are made?

In their new book, Marriage Is: How Marriage Transforms Society and Cultivates Human Flourishing, Eric Teetsel and Andrew Walker point at this very problem, offering pelling definition and defense of the Christian family in response. Arguing that the family, properly understood, is foundational for a flourishing society, they warn that we ought not be so passive to the current shifts and pressures to such a vital institution.

The book touches on a range of arguments, but one of its key strengths is its consistent challenge to the currentstatus quo (as outlined above). “It used to be that marriage was understood as the beginning of family, and family the foundation of society,” they write. Now, however, our priorities are shifting, and we are ing ever fortable placent with basing our personal visions and decisions about family in what we want for ourselves. “While enjoying and appreciating the benefits of the world we inherited, we ought not turn a blind eye to the costs,” they remind us.

Marriage is a central part of the human story, they continue, and the God-man story, at that. We have eobsessed with carefully constructing our man-made missions to save the world, when we often forget that God gave many of us a clue to all this from the very moment we entered the world. Through our own mother and father, through the nurture we find in what Herman Bavinck calls the “school of love,” we all have a glimpse at one of civilization’s core transformative forces. And yet, by the time modernity teases us with college plans, career aspirations, and bloated materialistic priorities, how quick we are to forget.

We toss it aside as something that es after we’ve done x, y, or z, rather than as something we may need to do before allof that. And our story — one that ought to stretch before and beyond our earthly exile — suffers in turn.Teetsel and Walker focus an entire chapter on this element of “story,” outlining where things went off course, and how predictable the new “script” has e.

The economic and technological prosperity of the last two hundred years has reduced the incentives to have large families. Fewer families rely on agriculture, the infant mortality rate is down while life expectancy is up, and government social programs like Social Security and Medicare reduce the responsibility younger generations have for their elders. Changing views about women’s role in society and increasing opportunity for work outside the home, coupled with the explosion in forms and access to reliable contraception, further edited the historic script. Economic opportunity and the sudden availability of leisure time for the masses attributed to the rise of individualism and materialism.

In succeeding generations, many have failed to teach children the role marriage plays as a civil institution, surrendered the virtue of abstinence before marriage, questioned the necessary contributions of moms and dads, bailed on marriages that ceased to provide them with their shallow sense of happiness, and viewed children as the ultimate accessory to round out an otherwise full life.

This is evident everywhere, but we see it increasingly driven and promoted by the educated and affluent, or those who hope to be so:

As young, smart, and talented entrepreneurs flock to [urban] hubs to be a part of the action, they exchange their former priorities for new norms. This life script looks very different: graduate from college, obtain an unpaid internship at the most prestigious firm in your field, go to graduate school, rent a room in a house with five or six peers, date for fun and practice for eventual marriage, climb the professional ladder, get married, get a dog, work for 5 to 10 years to establish financial stability, then—once everything else is in place—have a child….

This is the new normal for educated, affluent Americans in major urban centers, where a lifestyle of self-centeredness and materialism dominates at the expense of marriage, family, prudence, and responsibility…

University of Virginia sociologist Bradley Wilcox and colleagues succinctly summarizes this data, explaining that where marriage was once seen as a cornerstone in life, the Millennial generation understands marriage as a capstone once professional, financial, and other personal goals have been achieved. Millennials believe they can live happily ever after after they have gotten other things squared away.

To be clear, the takeaway here isn’t that we should malign people’s dreams and personal aspirations. Quite the contrary. This isn’t just about marriage and kids, but ties back to thatoriginal concern. This is about a debasement of and a distraction from our most basic allegiances and priorities.

We as a society have lost a sense of what it means to be truly successful in terms of both tangible and transcendent permanence. We have lost a sense of what it means to be joyful vs. passively content. We have lost what it means to build a life that supports and furthers and contributes to not only our own temporary whims and hedonistic impulses, but tothe flourishing of humanity and, for Christians, the Gospel.

“God is doing something through marriage,” Teetsel and Walker write. “He’s continuing humanity. He’s providing an institution for humanity that allows for it to take care of itself.While marriage will not save you, God has a plan to.”

We must not allow the family to be diminished as a “capstone” to personal achievement. God designed it as a “cornerstone” for true human freedom — an anchor and foundation from which those who are called to marry and have children will find increased fulfillment and vocational clarity, not less.

As Evan Koons writes in his letter on the Economy of Love:

“We learn our nature of love not in grand gestures to save the world, but in the normal, everyday struggle to love, to encourage, to bless those beside us. In family, our character is formed and given to the world.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Media Alert: Rev. Sirico on Your World with Neil Cavuto
Rev. Sirico will be on Fox News’ “Your World with Neil Cavuto” at 4:20 EST to discuss the school shooting in Newport, Connecticut. ...
Two Christian Views on Right to Work
MLive asked Rev. Robert Sirico and Peter Vander Meulen, a coordinator of the Christian Reformed Church in North America’s Office of Social Justice, ment on Michigan’s new Right to Work law. Meulen says that the change won’t have much impact on the state’s economy but will adversely affect relations between Republicans and Democrats on “just budget priorities” such as Medicaid and energy: In one fell swoop, with a policy that doesn’t have much effect, we have just trashed an entire...
Film Review: Honor Flight
The history of America is filled with heroic tales of courage and sacrifice. At the outset of World War II, most of the world was under tyranny. Sixteen million Americans served the country during World War II. Four hundred thousand of those Americans died in the war. They made history at places like Wake Island, Guadalcanal, Okinawa, Salerno, Normandy, and the Ardennes. Most of the men who freed the world from Nazi and Imperialist Japanese aggression have now passed from...
On the Importance of Definitions
I recently asked the question at Ethika Politika, “Which Capitalism?” (also the title of my article), and I followed it up with a related question here regarding the relationship between distributism and capitalism (is the former a form of the latter?). In addition, Jordan Ballor reflected last week on the different orientation of definitions of capitalism and socialism, observing, “One definition [i.e. capitalism] is focused on structure, the other [i.e. socialism] is connected with moral ideals.” On a related note,...
Ikaria and the Inseparability of Individual and Communal Flourishing
The New York Times has a fascinating profile on Ikaria, a Greek island located about 30 miles off the western coast of Turkey. With roughly 8,000 inhabitants, the island is known for its slow and relaxed lifestyle, munities, and healthy citizenry. As Ikarian physician Dr. Ilias Leriadis says in the article: “Have you noticed that no one wears a watch here? …We simply don’t care about the clock here.” Brendan Case offers a good summary of the article at Call...
Be Fruitful, Multiply, and Grow the Economy
In one of the most memorable mid-1990s episodes of The Simpsons, the curmudgeonly misanthrope Charles Montgomery Burns achieves a lifelong dream: Since the beginning of time, man has yearned to destroy the sun. I shall do the next best thing: block it out. While Mr. Burns had no use for our nearest star, the other residents Springfield were dismayed by the citywide sun-block. They understood, as Steve Martin once said, that “A day without sunshine is like, you know, night.”...
‘Markets Don’t Make Capitalism’
Earlier this week Dylan Pahman reflected on the question, “Which capitalism?” He helpfully explores the nature of capitalism and the importance of definitions. This conversation reminded me of a point made by Michael Novak during his conversation with Rev. Sirico earlier this year at Acton University. In the Q&A session, he argues that it is essential to understand the nature of what distinguishes capitalism from other economic systems: Novak says that “markets don’t make capitalism,” but rather that “enterprise, invention,...
Wealth and Political Rhetoric in Ancient Christian Perspective
Last Thursday, NPR ran an interesting piece by Alan Greenblat that featured the perspective of several of the nation’s rich (read: annual household e over $250,000) in relation to President Obama’s determination that the Bush era tax increases end for the nation’s rich as part of any deal related to the looming “fiscal cliff.” The article features a variety of perspectives, but I would like to reflect upon one particular section of that article here. Greenblat writes, [Mark] Anderson recognizes...
Media Alert: Rev. Sirico on Ave Maria Radio
Rev. Sirico will be on Ave Maria Radio’s “Kresta in the Afternoon” at 4 pm EST to discuss Right to Work laws and Catholic teaching on unions. ...
Two Catholic Views on Right to Work
On Friday I linked to MLive’s presentation of two Christian views on right to work. In that article, Rev. Sirico argued in favor of the legislation since it advances the freedom of workers. On the opposing side was Peter Vander Meulen of the Christian Reformed Church. Meulen didn’t argue against the morality of the law, but plained that it led to further political polarization and harmed the potential for bipartisan support on issues that “make life better for the large...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved