Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Manna and the land: God’s methods of miraculous provision
Manna and the land: God’s methods of miraculous provision
Dec 11, 2025 4:53 PM

Throughout the Bible, we see miraculous moments of God’s immediate provision. He provides manna and quail for the Israelites in the wilderness (Ex. 16). For Elijah, he uses ravens to deliver bread and meat and later supplies daily meal and oil (1 Kings 17). He provides wine for the wedding at Cana (John 2). He multiples loaves and fishes among Jesus’ disciples to feed a crowd of five thousand (Matthew 14).

Yet if God is able to intervene and provide to the needy through these sorts of immediate, awe-inducing miracles, why are they not the norm across the economic order? If God is truly concerned with meeting human needs, why does material poverty continue to persist?

As Chris Horst reminds us, God is not confined to meeting our needs through miracles of the immediate. He uses multiple methods and mechanisms to spread his love and abundance in the world, and each brings its own mystery, value, and contribution, whether to our individual spirits and souls or our relationships and activities across society.

Focusing specifically on the example of manna, Horst notes how, as a miracle, it illuminates something striking about the grace and generosity of God. “This provision of manna was not dependent upon the attitudes or beliefs of the recipients,” he writes. “Manna was a daily reminder of God’s unconditional love. No matter how little [the Israelites] trusted, no matter how far their hearts wandered, no matter what… the manna kept showing up. Every morning, for decades, God demonstrated no-strings-attached generosity.”

But this was not God’s only way of providing for His people. One day, the manna would cease, and when it did, the Israelites would still see God’s grace and generosity manifest, but in different ways. The manna came every day for forty years until the Israelites“came to a habitable land”in Canaan. “The manna ceased the day after they ate of the produce of the land,” we read later, “and there was no longer manna for the people of Israel, but they ate of the fruit of the land of Canaan that year.”

When the Israelites came to a stable and habitable place, God changed His approach, and the Israelites responded, in turn. Instead of only looking upward, they were to also look to the land and to each other. They were to focus on cultivating the creation around them, making it fruitful and then sharing in those fruits together.

As Horst explains:

passion did not stop when the manna dried up, but it did look different than it did before.For a specific time, God did give his people manna. God also gave His people land, and with the land, an invitation to put their hands to work and cultivate it, to provide for what their families needed. This, not the manna, was what God’s people longed for and prayed for—to have a place and a livelihood to call their own. And God invites us to do the same, showing us how we should care for each other.

God’s people in the wildernessand inthe Promised Land enjoyed the dignity of participating in God’s good provision. As they harvested manna and later harvested the bounty of their fields, they worked and tasted the gifts of their Creator. And God called them to extend that same provision to their neighbors.

It’s a truth that ought to sit at the center of our theology of work. We were never meant to sit and wait and plead for ravens or manna as our normative strategy for self-sufficiency and cultural witness. We were meant to cooperate with nature and collaborate with our neighbors—creating and trading and exchanging and bearing witness to our Creator through the abundance that will surely follow.

As Gene Veith explains in Working for Our Neighbors, this method of creative service and human exchange is no less miraculous, and no less a reflection of God’s grace passion, than heavenly bread appearing out of nothing.“God’s normal way of working in the world is through means” Veith explains. “He does not have to use means, and he is capable of working immediately. He can heal with a miracle, just as he once provided the children of Israel their daily bread—the manna of the wilderness—without farmers and bakers. But God’s normal way of operating is through human beings. This is because he desires us to serve one another.”

This is why, as Veith reminds us, Martin Luther described vocation as “a mask of God”:

God is milking the cows through the vocation of the milkmaid, said Luther. He is hidden in vocation. We see the milkmaid or the farmer or the doctor or the pastor or the artist. But, looming behind this human mask, God is genuinely present and active in what they do for us.

And similarly, as we carry out our various vocations, we too are masks of God. Evangelicals often talk about what God is doing in their lives. Vocation encourages reflection on what God is doing through our lives.

This needn’t mean that we sideline or dismiss the manna(or the possibility of manna) in our everyday lives. God can and does provide in such a way, sometimes to the point where the spectacular feelsmundane and ordinary. (Just imagine the monotony of getting manna in the wilderness, every day for 40 years.)

But we also ought to embrace and elevate the land—the miracle and the mystery of sowing and tending and reaping and exchanging. It brings the same weight of divine significance, if we’d only open our eyes to see it, aligning our hearts and hands, in turn.

“Just as God is working through the vocation of others to bless us, he is working through us to bless others,” Veith writes. “In our vocations, we work side by side with God, as it were, taking part in his ceaseless creative activity and laboring with him as he providentially cares for his creation.”

Image: Gathering of the Manna, Antonio Tempesta (1600), Public Domain

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Bridging Income Inequality: The Subsidiarity Of Friendship
There is a lot of talk about “closing the gap” and ing e inequality.” Some of it is pure socialism: Redistribute! Redistribute! Others look for ways to create jobs and help people create new financial opportunities for themselves. But what about the simple gift of friendship? At The American Conservative, Gracy Olmstead suggests that friendship can bridge e gaps, and creates safety nets for people in ways government and even private agencies cannot. We all have close friends and family...
Liberals Acting Illiberally
“Liberal: not bound by traditional ways or beliefs.” A “liberal” then, would be a person who is open-minded, ready to listen to another point of view. “I’m not bound to any traditions; I’m open-minded. I am liberal.” Yet, recently, liberals are showing they are as close-minded as the “conservatives” they claim have it all wrong. For instance, Mozilla’s Brendan Eich was forced out as pany’s leader (despite pany’s strong stance on tolerance) because he had contributed to a pro-traditional marriage...
Mozilla’s Brendan Eich and Progressive Bullies
Last week was one of mixed blessings for those engaged in the U.S. political process. On the positive side, the U.S. Supreme Court – by a 5-4 margin – struck down overall limits on campaign contributions. Unfortunately, the pendulum swung in the opposite direction for Brendan Eich, co-founder and chief executive officer of Mozilla, who resigned after the Los Angeles Times disclosed his $1,000 contribution in support of California’s 2012 Proposition 8. Eich’s unfortunate circumstances bring to mind the many...
No, the Pope doesn’t need distributism (because nobody does)
Pope Francis needs distributism, argues Arthur W. Hunt III in the latest issue of The American Conservative. Hunt says that Americans and popes alike can embrace a humane alternative to modern capitalism: In the midst of their scramble to claim the new Pope, many on the left missed what the Pontiff said was a nonsolution. The problems of the poor, he said, could not be solved by a “simple welfare mentality.” Well, by what then? The document is clear: “a...
The Hegemonic Misandry Continues: ADHD
Cultural progressives often talk about something called “hegemonic masculinity.” By this progressives and feminists mean the standards we use to determine what an ideal man is in a particular culture. Michael Kimmel and Amy Aronson, in The Gendered Society Reader, describe American hegemonic masculinity this way: In an important sense there is only plete unblushing male in America: a young, married, white, urban, northern, heterosexual, Protestant, father, of college education, fully employed, of plexion, weight, and height, and a recent...
Mozilla’s Statement of Faith and the Altars of Conformity
Brendan Eich, Mozilla co-founder and creator of the JavaScript programming language, was recently appointed as Mozilla’s chief executive. Just one week later, however, he was pressured to resign. His iniquity? Donating $1,000 in support of Proposition 8, a measure whose basic aim was entirely consistent with the beliefs of Barack Obama at the time. To announce Eich’s departure, Mozilla quickly movedto clarify, offering a statement of faithof sorts, filled with all the right Orwellian flourishes: Mozilla believes both in equality...
Christ’s Preferential Option for Tax Collectors
During the 20th century, the option for the poor or the preferential option for the poor was articulated as one of the basic principles of Catholic social teaching. For example, in Octogesima Adveniens (1971), Pope Paul VI writes: In teaching us charity, the Gospel instructs us in the preferential respect due to the poor and the special situation they have in society: the most fortunate should renounce some of their rights so as to place their goods generously at the...
Mozilla: Mounting The Heads Of Conservatives On Their Walls
Mitchell Baker, executive chair of Mozilla, announced on pany’s blog that Brendan Eich, former Mozilla CEO has stepped down “for Mozilla and munity.” His sin: contributing $1000 in 2008 in support of California’s Prop 8, which upheld traditional marriage. Now, Mozilla is pany that takes great pride in their – ahem – tolerance and open-mindedness. Really. Mozilla believes both in equality and freedom of speech. Equality is necessary for meaningful speech. And you need free speech to fight for equality....
Todd Huizinga to Discuss Ukraine on WGVU
Acton’s Director of International Outreach, Todd Huizinga, recently discussed the situation in Ukraine with WGVU’s Patrick Center and Calvin College’s assistant professors of political science, Becca McBride. For West Michigan residents, the interview will be airing tonight at 8:30 PM on the WGVU Life Channel and then again Sunday morning at 10:30 AM on WGVU-HD. For some background on what’s been going on Ukraine, see the panel discussion, ‘Ukraine – The Last Frontier of the Cold War’. ...
7 Figures: Wages and Employment in America
[Note: This is the first post in ‘7 Figures’, a new, occasional series highlighting data and information from a variety of surveys and reports.] The U.S. Department of Labor recently released data from the Occupational Employment Statistics program, which provides employment and wage estimates by area and by industry for wage and salary workers in hundreds of occupation groups in America. Here are seven figures based on the report: 1. Retail salespersons and cashiers were the occupations with the largest...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved