Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Licorice Pizza is the L.A. fairy tale we didn’t know we needed
Licorice Pizza is the L.A. fairy tale we didn’t know we needed
Mar 18, 2025 8:12 PM

Filmmaker Paul Thomas Anderson has managed the impossible: a love story wise as serpents but innocent as doves. And no sex!

Read More…

My series on cinematic nostalgia continues—after Wes Anderson’s Francophilia, Ridley Scott’s Italian farce, and Spielberg’s Puerto Rican fiasco, here’s a California story: Paul Thomas Anderson’s ninth feature film, Licorice Pizza, the only Hollywood movie made last year with some reason to be remembered. It’s a story about the ’70s, Hollywood, and the confusion of love in post-’60s America. It also mocks the pretense on which Hollywood thrives and suggests innocence is preferable to celebrity.

Paul Thomas Anderson is, like Wes Anderson, a Hollywood darling Hollywood cannot quite believe deserves honor—six of his movies have gathered him 11 Oscar nominations (three for Licorice Pizza) and another 17 for everyone else involved in his movies. As of this date, he has won nothing. His major e from Europe—the Golden Bear in Berlin for Magnolia and the Silver Bear for There Will Be Blood, the Best Director prize in Cannes for Punch-Drunk Love, and the Silver Lion Best Director in Venice for The Master.

Hollywood does not quite like the very things European festivals love. Anderson’s movies are full of Americana, and he’s especially attentive to the crazy parts of the American desire for freedom and therefore the great distinction between how small any American is parison to the vastness of America. But he’s insufficiently pious in his liberalism, insufficiently moralistic in his presentation of American history. In Europe, they love an artist, though their judgment is not always sound. In Hollywood, artists have to sneak past the preference for polished mediocrity.

Licorice Pizza opens with a look at a confident, amusing 15-year-old boy, Gary, flirting with a confused, contemptuous 20-something girl, Alana. Since it is dangerous to be a confident young man or even boy in America nowadays, this is a very striking introduction and already shows how useful nostalgia can be artistically. Moreover, the boy is played by Cooper Hoffman in his debut, son of Philip Seymour Hoffman, perhaps the most lamented actor of his generation in light of his sudden death and who appeared in a number of Anderson’s movies, and recalls enough of his father to earn him sympathy.

Anderson uses this for a surprising purpose: He wants the boy to show that go-get-’em attitude that made Americans what they are, which he believes we still secretly love and perhaps need to recapture. Just get a look of that kid—business is on his mind before he can even grow a mustache! Once a child star, Gary’s life should have been warped by Hollywood but isn’t. He grew up too fast and is large for his age, and plain, and ignores the fashionable things required for celebrity. He’s also determined to make himself a success rather than be admired. He acts quickly on business ideas and has mastered the strange language of deference, imposition, and promise that makes a businessman persuasive to investors, customers, and, of course, their very selves.

A free man already, Gary is eager to be his own boss, so he starts two businesses, selling water beds and then a pinball arcade, no doubt the prelude to a bright future. Another hilarious touch suggests what a strange country America is: He has hired his own mother to help run a PR business. Much of this side of the movie has to do with desire and how advertising transformed American business, including of course by using celebrity. You can imagine how one advertises waterbeds.

But the movie is mostly about love, the way modern Americans discover themselves; business is also part of adulthood, but love counts more. It’s based on a kind of freedom—often enough, love defies habit or convention. The boy meets an older girl in this case. Love also requires a kind of equality—he’s very forward, she’s incredibly angry. He’s as good at ignoring offenses as she is at fending off advances, and she’s as defensive as he is thick-skinned. Their friendship, then business partnership, and even their budding romance are somehow a dare, each unable to believe the other can be serious or more than a dream. Anderson has achieved something considered impossible before: He has made a romance about modern America that plausibly avoids sex. Indeed, we can say he has snuck a edy by our feminist liberal elites by writing an angry girl character.

Singer Alana Haim plays this character. This is also her feature film debut, and she seems perfectly cast for the San Fernando Valley in the ’70s. She has the post-hippie normal girl look, somehow both proud and unpretentious, and she oscillates between an inspiring quality that has to do with her smile and a plainness Anderson likes to insist on by keeping the camera rolling a few seconds more than we are used to. Like the joke in the movie goes, she’s very Jewish just as that became an attractive novelty with Barbra Streisand. All told, she’s plain and her face doesn’t distract from her strange drama.

Licorice Pizza is more about her than about the boy she’s considering dating, unsurprisingly— modern artists are more fascinated with women, who are both more natural and more politicized than men. Alana learns to get over the temper she’s inherited from her father, so as to figure out her life; she grew up in the ’60s and received no guidance. She’s going nowhere for lack of ambition, works dead end jobs, and has no real friends. Her pride makes it impossible for her to love ordinary, clueless young men or obey even her family, and she almost es a political activist in a moment of crisis! It turns out, however, that women’s liberation would be just enough to destroy any chance she has at happiness. She tries out various boyfriends, she learns what’s available to her, but she cannot resist bination of loyalty and optimism Gary offers her. At first she enjoys the safety of his boyish affection and, like his mother, es his business partner. But once together, the story turns to the picaresque, and they have to take care of each other; he learns about the difficulties he has to e and she realizes she’s stuck among people driven crazy by success, celebrities, politicians, etc. Thus, she begins to appreciate how normal he is in his blindness to the all-American troubles driving her crazy: He’s romantic, but simply doesn’t understand anything about women, since the modern language of equality conceals anything subtle or politically incorrect. He needs a lot of help, but then again so does she—although she drives trucks, she’s in peril of falling apart in face of risk.

Their love is possible across the age difference because America is going nuts, but it is also threatened for that reason—it goes against every fashionable idea about reckless self-obsession. I’d go further and congratulate Anderson for restoring a kind of innocence to American nonsense. Since the couple are still both young, their tantrums and their fights are more forgivable and less mad than if they had been adults. They also learn to treat each other better, and their breakups seem e from helplessness rather than vanity. Unsurprisingly, the girl wants to be romanced; she longs for some kind of beauty, not mere business acumen, but the boy has no idea what that might be. Perhaps she can be less demanding and more willing to gentle his condition. Anderson has in fact snuck an entire marriage story past his admirers, since Alana and Gary are friends, business partners, and lovers, and it is done with such lack of self-importance that it will surely be ignored.

I’ll end with an apology for betraying the artist’s choices by attracting attention to those things he has understated or concealed. I take rather seriously the critic’s duty to follow the lead of the artist, but I fear there’s no way around it if this movie is to have an attentive audience. I mend Licorice Pizza to everyone who wants to see innocent young people avoid falling into vice and cruelty. For a movie about the 1970s, in L.A. of all places, this means it’s a fairy tale!

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Liberalism needs natural law
The great British political thinker Edmund Burke regarded what some call “liberalism” today as prehensible, unworkable and unjust in the absence of mitment to natural law.A similar argument can be made in our own time, says Acton research director Samuel Gregg: Without natural law foundations, for instance, how can we determine what is and isn’t a right other than appeals to raw power or utility, neither of which can provide a principled case for rights? Or, on what other basis...
Socialism is dead (Part 2): What’s wrong with the market-based evolution of socialism?
I spent my previous postexplaining that orthodox socialism is effectively dead and what remains is really different variations on societies that effectively accept the market as the standard frame. Here, I would like to explain, in part, why the Bernie Sanders approach to market-based socialism (after the death of socialism) is not the right way forward. As I stated in the previous post, this Americanized “socialism” is definitely of the half-hearted variety. Strong socialism would mean government ownership of the...
What can economics teach us about moral ecology?
In exploring the various connections between morality, theology, and economics, we routinely long for philosophers and theologians who understand economics, just as we crave economists who understand the bigger picture of self-interest and human destiny. That sort cross-disciplinary dialogue and mutual understanding can be beneficial, but for economist Peter Boettke, it can also serve as a distraction. In an article for Faith and Economics, Boettke argues that economics as a scienceoffers plenty of tools for “moral assessment,” and that economists...
Justice Scalia explains why the ‘living Constitution’ is a threat to America
A majority of Americans—55 percent—now say the U.S. Supreme Court should base its rulings on what the Constitution “means in current times,” while only 41 percent say rulings should be based on what it “meant as originally written,” according to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center. Not surprisingly, the divide is mostly along partisan lines. According to Pew, nearly eight-in-ten Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents (78 percent) now say rulings should be based on the Constitution’s meaning in current...
Dalio’s animated adventure in common grace-infused wisdom
Ray Dalio is a fascinating character. Founder of the“world’s richest and strangest hedge fund,”he’s been dubbed the “Steve Jobs of investing” and “Wall Street’s oddest duck.” He’s currently #26 on Forbes list ofrichest people in Americaand Time magazine once included him on their list of the world’s 100 most influential people. In 2011, Dalio outlined his personal philosophy on life and business in a self-published 123-page PDF called “Principles.” (It was re-released as a book in 2017 and e the#1Amazon...
The (just) price of salt (and cancer drugs)
A recent episode of the very fine podcast EconTalk reminded me of one of the more remarkable episodes during my time here at the Acton Institute involving our internship program. The EconTalk episode is about the price of cancer drugs, and the various factors that go into the often astronomical prices of the latest cancer-fighting drugs. These can run up to an in excess of $300,000 per year. A question implicit in the discussion is whether such high costs are...
Church and politics: Necessary definitions and distinctions
A few weeks ago The Gospel Coalition ran a review of Jonathan Leeman’s book, Why Nations Rage: Rethinking Faith and Politics in a Divided Age. A snip: Leeman’s analysis is guided by a few central convictions. One is represented in Psalm 2 and the title itself. He explains, “History’s greatest political rivalry, it would seem, is between the nations of the earth and the Messiah.” Another guiding insight is that all of life is religious, including politics. This is true...
The miracle apple: Co-creative lessons from the fall of the Red Delicious
In the Age of Information, much of our work now takes place in the realm of the “intangible”—creating and trading products and services that can feel somewhat obscure or abstract. Even still, in our technological, data-driven world, we should remember that we are cooperating withnatureandco-creating with our Creator. From the social-media giants to the sawmills, from the blockchain banks to the barbershops, we are using our God-given intellect and creativity to transform a mix of matter and information into something...
How geography affects economic growth
Note: This is post #78 in a weekly video series on basic economics. You could fit most of the U.S., China, India, and a lot of Europe, into Africa. But if pare Africa to Europe, Europe has two to three times the length of coastline that Africa. Why does this matter? As this video by Marginal Revolution University explains, geography can have profound effects on a nation’s economic growth. (If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d...
Bernie Sanders is not a socialist. Socialism is dead.
I recently gave a presentation to students about foreign aid in the developing world. I tried to explain that many ing to the conclusion that what is really necessary is to establish conditions suitable for a market-based society. In other words, there must be a transparent administration of justice, the predictable rule of law, private property rights, ease in doing business, a real lack of arbitrariness, etc. Both as I prepared and as I spoke, however, I realized that some...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved