Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Let the Hustlers Hustle
Let the Hustlers Hustle
Mar 7, 2026 8:13 AM

My latest for Acton Commentary. I’m also adding a couple of videos from Hotep and the Institute for Justice.

Let the Hustlers Hustle

By Anthony Bradley

If necessity is the mother of invention, then there is nothing worse than quenching the entrepreneurial spirit of people seeking to improve their situation by imposing arbitrary third-party constraints. America’s unemployment problems linger because hustlers cannot hustle.

For many, “hustling” connotes business activity that is shady, or even illegal. But in the munity it mon to use the term to describe the entrepreneurial spirit that drives people to take risks to meet one’s needs and to provide legitimate services through creative enterprise in the marketplace. The latter view is the one taken by indie Hip-Hop mogul Hotep, who has created Hustler University as an effort to redeem hustling as a way to create space for economic empowerment. Clients include the NAACP, the Urban League, Clemson University, the National Education Association, Illinois Public Schools, and Morehouse College.

Hotep defines a “hustler” as “an enterprising person determined to succeed, [a] go-getter.” Participants in Hustler University are exposed to the idea that human beings were made to be innovative and creative and “to manifest our dreams into creation,” says Hotep. Among the Hustler’s 10 Commandments that Hotep aims to teach today’s entrepreneur are the aphorisms “your network is your networth,” “the early bird gets the worm,” and success is “where opportunity meets preparation.”

Hotep offers helpful direction, but for independent-minded hustlers to succeed and thereby benefit both themselves and munities, they need an environment that provides them opportunities to work freely. While there are many factors that keep entrepreneurial spirit dormant such as laziness, the absence of mentors, and skill deficiencies, one of the greatest obstacles is the mass of regulations generated by federal, state, and local governments.

The Institute for Justice recently released a report describing how government regulations prevent entrepreneurs from taking off. In Houston, for example, hustling a mobile food truck business is nearly impossible. For starters, a would-be mobile food entrepreneur must obtain a license from the City of Houston Department of Health and Human Services. Potential hustlers must submit, in-person, two sets of plans that satisfy a 28-point checklist. During the government truck inspection, the vendor must provide extensive documentation including an itinerary and route list. He is required to pay $560 in fees, which includes $200 for the installation of an electronic tracking device. Operators must also disclose their menu, including every ingredient used as well as its origin, and how each dish is prepared. Even worse, a form must be filled out for each ingredient. This is just a sampling of the regulations in one city. Similarly daunting tangles of red tape exist in every jurisdiction in America, preventing entrepreneurs from starting and maintaining small businesses.

It’s clear that this regulatory regime especially hurts small businesses, the primary source of new jobs. Mark Crain, William E. Simon Professor of Political Economy at Lafayette College, conducted a study several years ago describing the disproportional burden imposed by federal regulations on small business. Crain found that firms with fewer than 20 employees spend 45 percent more per plying with federal regulations than do larger firms. Small firms spend 67 percent more per employee on pliance than larger firms do, pared to the panies, more than 4 times as much ($3200 vs. $700) per employee ply with environmental regulations.

The black unemployment rate currently (January 2011) stands at 15.7 percent. Hispanics are a little better at 11.9, but both lag whites at 8 percent. The last thing we need are burdensome government regulations preventing hustlers from hustling. Whether intentionally job-killing or not, these types of government regulations dampen the entrepreneurial spirit of people who are trying to improve their situation and make contributions to the civic good by providing services that people need. Based on employment figures, these regulations arguably affect blacks and Hispanics disproportionately.

If America is really serious about addressing abysmal unemployment rates, federal, state, and local governments would do well to take the handcuffs off of hustlers and free them from the regulations that keep them from creating wealth. In other words, get government out of the way and let the hustlers hustle!

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Welcoming the stranger: The dignity and promise of Afghan refugees
To view our Afghan neighbors as a “cost” or “drain” on American society is to reject their dignity as human persons made in the image of God. Read More… The Taliban has rapidly retaken Afghanistan, just weeks before the final withdrawal of U.S. troops. With the country bracing for another wave of oppression, thousands of Afghans have fled to the airport in Kabul, hoping to escape the return of sectarian violence and tyrannical rule. Social media was soon filled with...
Strong families are good for the economy – and vice versa
Families benefit when the economy of their state or nation is robust and free, and economies also benefit when its participants embody civic and moral values. Read More… Families and free market economies: On the surface, they seem unrelated. We associate family with game nights, holiday traditions, and cute baby photos, while the economy is associated with the stock market, cold-hearted businessmen, and bloated corporations. What these stereotypes fail to recognize is that the health of the family, as a...
Chinese Communist Party announces plans to increase film censorship in Hong Kong
The amendments fall under Hong Kong’s Film Censorship Ordinance and require an official state-approved censor, who judges which movies endanger National Security. The law will also operate retroactively, and movies that were previously allowed to be screened could have the CCP’s approval revoked. Hong Kongers whose movies fall under the ban list could face up to three years in prison and a fine of HK$1 million ($128,400 USD). Read More… Hong Kong officials announced Aug. 24 plans to amend a...
Afghanistan I fought for lacks foundation for freedom
A sustainable government and flourishing society can only be built under the right conditions. Acknowledging the dignity of the human person, the importance of subsidiary social institutions, mitment to the rule of law and an embrace of mercial society are necessary, but they were absent in Afghanistan, largely because of Afghanistan’s violent modern history. Read More… I deployed to Afghanistan in 2010. Eleven years later, I watched the Taliban devastate all the progress we fought for. Afghanistan’s chaos and the...
Finding meaning in the menial
Human beings are rational, free, social, creative, incarnate, and sacred. A proper understanding of human labor will take all of these facets into account. Read More… In the opening pages of Roald Dahl’s acclaimed children’s book Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, we meet the Bucket family, which includes young Charlie, his parents, and his four grandparents. The book relates that “life was extremely fortable for them all,” which isn’t surprising given that Mr. Bucket, the sole breadwinner for the family,...
An approach to land conservation conservatives should get behind
In restricting land purchases by environmentalists, conservatives undermine the power of property rights as a path to conservation. It shouldn’t be that way. Read More… Some sects of environmentalists are well known for disrupting and interrupting land transactions for the cause of conservation, using whatever legal and regulatory means necessary to control, coerce, or prevent concerted human development. It’s bative legacy that has left many of their critics wondering: If land conservation is of such utmost importance, why not just...
Hong Kong activists accuse Jimmy Lai of pushing sanctions against China as part of plea deal with Chinese Communist Party
Lai’s lawyers deny the claims. In a recent Bloomberg article, journalist Chloe ments on the immense pressure the NSL places on its defendants in a quasi-fair-trial, saying: “The law’s broad wording, long sentences and restrictions on jury trials put pressure on defendants to plead guilty before facing a panel of judges specially vetted by Lam.” Read More… Two convicted Hong Kong activists Aug. 20 pinned jailed media tycoon Jimmy and his former top aide Mark Simon as the “masterminds” in...
How America’s ‘creative class’ learned to love conformity
Rather than using their power and privilege to preserve freedom and diversity, America’s educated upper class has coalesced around all-or-nothing advocacy, hoping the state does the heavy lifting of social harmonization. Read More… In 2000, columnist David Brooks wrote Bobos in Paradise, hailing the dawn of a new phase in America’s longstanding story of meritocracy. The “bobos” were a peculiar breed — part bohemian, part bourgeoisie — blurring class divides in a way that would introduce a new form of...
Jimmy Lai: Mogul, pro-democracy activist, and Communist China’s biggest target in fight to suppress free speech
Lai mented notably munist government tactics, saying, “If they can induce fear in you, that’s the cheapest way to control you and the most effective way and they know it. The only way to defeat the way of intimidation is to face up to fear and don’t let it frighten you.” Read More… Lai Chee-Ying, also known as “Jimmy Lai,” is a successful Hong Kong entrepreneur, media mogul, and democratic activist who fled, young and penniless, to Hong Kong from...
Hong Kong group behind large pro-democracy protests disbands
The 19-year-old civil rights group CHRF was behind Hong Kong’s annual July 1 protests from 2003 to 2019; a memorating “Handover Day,” where the responsibility and sovereignty of Hong Kong was transitioned from the United Kingdom to the People’s Republic of China. In 2020, Hong Kong officials banned the event, citing its violation of COVID regulations and the new NSL that had been put into effect just the night before. Read More… The Civil Human Rights Front, or CHRF, a...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved