Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
LeBron James repeats communist China’s party line
LeBron James repeats communist China’s party line
Jan 20, 2026 1:26 PM

In last week’s Acton Commentary I expressed my hope that LeBron James wouldn’t just shut up and dribble in the wake of NBA appeasement and a coordinated sports media blackout regarding the protest movement in Hong Kong. As an NBA all-time great, plished businessman, and outspoken activist he was uniquely positioned to stand up for Hong Kong even if it meant standing up to the NBA, team owners, munist regime in China, and the NBA’s Chinese sponsors. I had not anticipated the possibility that what he would say would be far worse than his silence:

“I don’t want to get into a [verbal] feud with Daryl Morey, but I believe he wasn’t educated on the situation at hand, and he spoke,” James said before theLos Angeles Lakersplayed theGolden State Warriorsin a preseason game at Staples Center. “And so many people could have been harmed not only financially, physically, emotionally, spiritually. So just be careful what we tweet and say and we do, even though, yes, we do have freedom of speech, but there can be a lot of negative es with that, too.”

What Daryl Morey had tweeted was a simple expression of solidarity with the Hong Kong protest movement, “Fight For Freedom. Stand With Hong Kong.” Morey has since deleted the tweet replacing it with a painful-to-read struggle session. While Golden State Warriors Point Guard Steph Curry feigned ignorance of China’s well known human rights abuses and Warriors coach Steve Kerr drew a dubious moral equivalency between gun violence in America and human rights abuses in China, LeBron James went one step further claiming that Morey himself “wasn’t educated” about the situation in China echoing the sentiments of Brooklyn Nets owner Joe Tsai. Which is to say, he munist China’s party line.

Embed from Getty Images

While missioner Adam Silver went to great pains to say this wasn’t about money, LeBron James leads his list of potential harms from an expression of solidarity with the Hong Kong protest movement with the financial, followed by the physical, emotional, and spiritual. This concern for people harmed is limited to NBA players to the exclusion of the Hong Kong protesters who daily face threats to their very lives. Whatever emotional harm to NBA players has been the result of a since deleted tweet pales parison to the despair experienced by the people of Hong Kong, some of which have even been driven to take their own lives. As to spiritual harm, parison is so incredulous as to beggar belief.

When James states that with freedom of speech, “…there can be a lot of negative es with that, too,” he is right but carefully leaves unsaid that any threats to the financial, physical, emotional, or spiritual well-being of NBA players are posed by munist regime in China itself. If even the mildest form of expression of solidarity can provoke the People’s Republic of China to such draconian action as to imperil the well-being of NBA players, why play in China at all?

James quickly took to Twitter to try and manage the public relations disaster which ensued after ments, stating,

My team and this league just went through a difficult week. I think people need to understand what a tweet or statement can do to others. And I believe nobody stopped and considered what would happen. Could have waited a week to send it.

An hour later Boston Celtics Center Enes Kanter, who at great personal riskhas been an outspoken critic of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, tweeted:

-Haven’t seen or talked to my family 5 years

-Jailed my dad

-My siblings can’t find jobs

-Revoked my passport

-International arrest warrant

-My family can’t leave the country

-Got Death Threats everyday

-Got attacked, harassed

-Tried to kidnap me in Indonesia

FREEDOM IS NOT FREE

It was not a tweet or statement which made LeBron’s week difficult, but a totalitarian regime which he is too cowardly to confront. There are costs to such confrontation and those costs are not merely financial. Hopefully one day LeBron James can e educated about the situation at hand. Perhaps he can learn from the example of Enes Kanter that freedom is not free.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Special Discounts for CLP Followers
We are pleased to give a 30% discount off of Christian’s Library Press books at the Acton Book Shop for a limited time for those who follow us on Twitter or like us on Facebook. If you already follow us, please send us a direct message on Twitter and we will send you the discount code (those who “like” us on Facebook can see the code automatically!). This discount will allow you to purchase such books as Wisdom & Wonder:...
Leery of Federal Disaster Relief Help?
In the Spring 2011 issue of Religion & Liberty, I wrote about the Christian response to disaster relief, focusing on Hurricane Katrina and the April 2011 tornadoes that munities in the deep South and Joplin, Mo. in May. Included in the story is a contrast of church relief with the federal government response. From the R&L piece: In Shoal Creek, Ala., a frustrated Carl Brownfield called the federal response “all red tape.” The Birmingham News ran a story on May...
Theonomists, Reconstructionists, and Dominionists, Oh My!
At the Daily Beast yesterday, Michelle Goldman Goldberg muses on the movement of “the ultra-right evangelicals who once supported Bachmann” over to Ron Paul. This is in part because these “ultra-right evangelicals” are really “the country’s mitted theocrats,” whose support for Paul “is deep and longstanding, something that’s poorly understood among those who simply see him as a libertarian.” (Goldberg’s piece appeared before yesterday’s results from Iowa, in which it seems evangelical support went more toward Santorum [32%] than Paul...
Secularism and Tyranny
In part 1 of “Secular Theocracy:The Foundations and Folly of Modern Tyranny,”David Theroux of the Independent Institute outlines a history of secularism, tracing plex relationship between religion and the spheres of society, particularly church and government. “Modern America has e a secular theocracy with a civic religion of national politics (nationalism) occupying the public realm in which government has replaced God,” he argues. One of the key features necessary to unraveling the knotty problems surrounding the idea of secularism is...
The Church as Social Laboratory
I opened my recent Patheos piece on Christians and the “Occupy” protests by noting the proclivity for some leaders to seek cultural relevance by uncritically embracing political movements and trends. This shows that it is mon temptation to allow worldly perspectives and ideologies to determine the shape of our faith rather than the other way around. A good example of this uncritical stance toward the Occupy movement appears in a Marketplace report from last week, “Preaching the Occupy gospel —...
The Civil War in Religion & Liberty
2011 kicked off the 150th anniversary of the American Civil War. At the beginning of 2011, I began seeing articles and news clippings memorate the anniversary. While not a professional historian, I took classes on the conflict at Ole Miss and visited memorials and battlefields on my own time. I must give recognition to Dr. James Cooke, emeritus professor of history at the University of Mississippi, for his brilliant and passionate lectures that awakened a greater interest in the subject...
Preview of JMM 14.2: Modern Christian Social Thought
The fall 2011 issue of the Journal of Markets & Morality has now been finalized and will be heading to print. It is a bit overdue, but this issue is one of our largest ever, and it includes a number of noteworthy features on the special theme issue topic “Modern Christian Social Thought.” As I outline in the editorial for this issue (PDF), 2011 marked a number of significant anniversaries, including the 120th anniversaries of Rerum Novarum and the First...
America’s Real Inequality Problem
David Deavel’s review of Mitch Pearlstein’s From Family Collapse to America’s Decline: The Educational, Economic, and Social Costs of Family Fragmentation has been picked up by First Things and Mere Comments. Deavel’s review was published in the Fall 2011 issue of Religion & Liberty. In his review, Deavel declared: His [Pearlstein] new book, From Family Fragmentation to America’s Decline, laments this inability of many to climb their way up from the bottom rungs of society. But rather than fixating on...
Libertarianism + Christianity = ?
Reflecting on the GOP presidential campaigns and the Iowa caucus, Joseph Knippenberg has voiced serious concern on the First Things blog regarding patibility of Ron Paul’s libertarianism with traditional Christian social and political thought. As this race continues, this may be a question of fundamental importance, and I expect to see more Christians engaging this issue in the days and months e. Indeed, as Journal of Markets & Morality (JMM) executive editor Jordan Ballor has noted in his editorial for...
#Occupy: The New New Pentecost?
Source: Wikimedia Commons, Photography by shakko Over at the Sojourners blog, Harry C. Kiely boldly considers whether the Occupy movement can be considered “the New Pentecost.” However, there are a myriad of problems with parison. First and most importantly, from a Christian point of view, there already has been a “New Pentecost.” It is found in Acts 2. The Christian Pentecost was the fulfillment of the Jewish Pentecost. The giving of the Law (which the Jewish memorates) found its fulfillment...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved