Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Laudato: ¿Si or no?
Laudato: ¿Si or no?
Jul 18, 2025 7:59 PM

Since the publication of the encyclical Laudato Si by Francis, a long-unheard rumble has been growing across the world public opinion. He is an expert in making himself heard, so we might as well rest it as it is, because Francis would be pleased. Our readers, however, are used to our fixing troubles, so we will once again meet the subjective claim of the market.

The Laudato Si embraces three aspects: a theological aspect, an economic aspect, and a scientific aspect.

The primary aspect, also the specific realm of the teachings of the Church, is the theological one. Here lies a matter that has remained partly unseen or, better, unheard in the midst of the voices stirring, either in anger or in praise, about the Laudato.

As we all known, in the Genesis, God vests man with the power to ruleover the land. But this dominus may be understood in two senses: rule as a symbol of the dignity of human nature, created in God’s image and likeness, over non-human things, or rule as the master rules over his slave.

Now, what Francis teaches is that man’s bond with nature must be in the former sense. He thus frames the ecological issue within a Judeo-Christian perspective, where there is no pantheism between God and nature, where the earth is not a “mother” who replaces the creating Father. No; man is not the offspring of nature, but rather, of God, and given his natural dignity, man is ontologically superior to nature. But both (man on the one side, and the land and the rest of the living creatures on the other) are brethren in creation, and as such, their relation must not be Cain’s, but Abel’s; a harmony, though, that was lost in the original sin.

That being said, Francis reminds us of something that in philosophical terms may be expressed as follows: the relation between man and nature must e down to an instrumental rationality, where what matters is only the relation existing among ends, means, results and efficiency. Not that there is anything bad in this, on the contrary, it is often necessary to plan and evaluate, yet in the brotherly relation where the self relates to the other, the other is not a mere instrument.

Now, nature is not strictly a You, but under a Christian perspective, neither is it a mere thing enduring a slavery relation to an arbitrary master: man. Through saints such as Saint Francis and Fray Martin of Porres and their endearing relation with all created nature, God has presented us a symbol that does not restrict itself –as has been intended so many times- to a sweet tale story for children. They exhibit a sensibility towards all living creatures that must be embraced by every Christian: a brotherly relation implying neither submission of nature by man nor arbitrary ruling of nature, or one reduced to a rationalistic planning –daughter of the Enlightenment. Such brotherly relation is one of harmony, were nature may indeed serve man’s need, but not man’s arbitrariness, destruction or cruelty. Such sensibility towards nature as a sister in harmony is not new in terms of Christian sensibility, even though Francis is now reminding us of it, and its social implications do not lie in any given system; rather, they rest on changing habits as to consumption and-or protection of nature surrounding us.

This is simply what is most important about the encyclical.

Next, there are the economic and scientific issues. How much market or state are necessary to protect the environment, or the hypotheses and diverse empirical testing concerning global warning, pletely debatable issues on which any Catholic may speak their own mind, not because they are arbitrary issues, but because the social and natural sciences involved in them have a contingency margin that does not implicate the teaching of the Church, or Catholicism as such. From this perspective, Instituto Acton, exercising the legitimate liberty enjoyed by every believer around these matters, has always insisted on free market having much to offer in caring for the environment, above all through the internalization of negative externalities and the privatization of state public assets, all of it through a sharper definition of property rights. Interesting that authors advocating for a free society, such as Hayek and Feyerabend, would strongly criticize, at the core of their work, that same instrumental rationality that the School of Frankfurt has always steadily criticized. The constructivist rationalism, criticized by Hayek, and the union between state and science, criticized by Feyerabend, have led to a rationalistic planning that has strongly influenced what Mises calls interventionism and is now termed “crony capitalism”, a collusion between the state and private players, the latter being protected by the former, delaying the advent of new market alternatives involving clean energies, such as solar energy.

Therefore, ¿Laudato YES or NO? Because in the Christian perspective of ecology, obviously YES. In debatable matters, yes, no, nor, whatever (resorting to a thorough examination and prudence) may be argued. But always upholding a significant fundamental coincidence, beyond all the noises and fuss sought by our lively Pope.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Did 2,362 Millionaires Get Unemployment Checks in 2009? (Answer: Yes they did.)
The Congressional Research Service (CRS), a group that works exclusively for the U.S. Congress, issued a report with one of the greatest titles I’ve ever seen on a government document: Receipt of Unemployment Insurance by e Unemployed Workers (“Millionaires”) Now the first nine words are nothing special, typical policy-wonk speak. But whoever added in the word “millionaires” with scare quotes and parentheses is a genius. Most people would have been nodding off around the word “Insurance” but seeing millionaires (that’s...
On Call with Dr. Pamela Casson
Dr. Pamela Casson, a pediatrician in Colorado Springs, knows what it means literally to be “On Call.” This week she shares with us in this video interview with Jon Hirst how she sees God working through her in her work with families, children and the world around her. Thank you Pamela for giving us an inside look at how you see your work as blessing the world. ...
Dodd-Frank: The Other Serious Threat
At least es at us head on. The greater legislative threat may be the one that most Americans have never heard of. Economist Scott Powell and Acton friend Jay Richards explain in a new piece in Barron’s: While Obamacare received more attention, the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, also known as Dodd-Frank after its Senate and House sponsors, … unleashed a new regulatory body, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, to operate with unprecedented power. Dodd-Frank became law in...
Stop Apologizing for Our Liberties
You cannot apologize to a fanatic, says Lee Harris. It only serves to convince him that he was right all along: The last few weeks have witnessed a peculiar and disturbing spectacle: An American administration that has spent a great deal of time and energy apologizing for our liberties—in particular, for what many would regard as the foundation of all our other liberties, namely, the freedom to express our minds as we see fit. This signature freedom, of which Americans...
Counting the Profit of a Third Party Choice
Joe Carter recently highlighted the discussion at Ethika Politika, the journal of the Center for Morality in Public Life, about the value of (not) voting, particularly the suggestion by Andrew Haines that in some cases there is a moral duty not to vote. This morning I respond with an analysis of the consequences of not voting, ultimately arguing that one must not neglect to count the cost of abstaining to vote for any particular office. One issue, however, that I...
How were people On Call in Culture 165 years ago?
What is so special about 1837? That was the year Abraham Kuyper was born. September 29th is his 165th birthday. So we thought we would go back to 1837 and see how people were being On Call in Culture back then. We don’t know if they were all believers on a mission to bless the world, but by seeing what was going on 165 years ago, we hope you are encouraged to engage your world in 2012! How did people...
Rev. Sirico on Life, Work, and Human Flourishing
J.Q. Tomanek of Ignitum Today interviewed Rev. Sirico about life, work, human flourishing, and his new book, Defending the Free Market: JQ Tomanek: Back in the day, holiness was misinterpreted as a cleric or religious life thing. How can a lay Catholic practice their faith? What are some ways to sanctify our work as lay Catholics? Is “ora et labora” just a monk thing? Reverend Sirico: Yes, religious people are often tempted to e so “heavenly minded they are no...
Is it really ‘aid’ if it goes to relatively wealthy nations?
Alan Duncan, an aid minister in the UK, says his government is “forced” to hand over large amounts of money to the EU’s foreign aid budget, but has no say in how the money is spent. The problem is that much of the $2 billion+ “aid” money (one-sixth of the British budget) goes to projects such as making a Moroccan water park more eco-friendly, an art project in St. Petersburg, and building a hotel and plex in Barbados. Britain’s International...
Markets and culture: A time to play, a time to pray
Faced with the prospect of a professional athletic career, a nearly-half million dollar salary, and a perfect lady, what’s not to like? Apparently, for Grant Desme, it was the noise and unrest of the world. Can a culture of life and the noise and tumult of the marketplace co-exist? Rev. Robert Sirico, reflecting on this, says they can, so long as it is not a place where: [C]apitalism…places the human person at the mercy of blind economic forces…What we propose,...
Want to Help the Poor? Promote a Free Market in Health Care
Want to help the poor? Promote a free market in health care. That’s the argument made by John C. Goodman, author of the new book Priceless: Curing the Healthcare Crisis. Timothy Dalrymple recently talked with Goodman about the best approach for restoring free-market pricing mechanisms into the market for medical care and health insurance: Aren’t there some people, however, who have little of money and lots of time, and would prefer to wait in order to receive cheaper care? There...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved