Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Ladies: Give Us Your Most Productive Years, We’ll Hold Your Eggs For You
Ladies: Give Us Your Most Productive Years, We’ll Hold Your Eggs For You
Apr 8, 2025 8:59 PM

This story has so many things wrong with it, I hardly know where to start. Apple and Facebook have both announced that will now offer egg-freezing – for non-medical purposes – for their employees (which runs at least $10,000, plus a $500 to $800 annual storage fee.)

For panies, it means two things. One, there is a demand from their employees for such an offer. Second, panies themselves see some benefit to this. What it sounds like is this: “It’s really not practical or productive for people to try to both work and parent during the ages when they’ll be most useful as a worker, so let’s just take care of that issue. Work, work, work…try and e a parent later.”

Here are facts about egg-freezing:

In order to retrieve eggs for freezing, a patient undergoes the same hormone-injection process as in-vitro fertilization. The only difference is that following egg retrieval, they are frozen for a period of time before they are thawed, fertilized and transferred to the uterus as embryos.

It takes approximately 4-6 weeks plete the egg freezing cycle and is consistent with the initial stages of the IVF process including:

2-4 weeks of self-administered hormone injections and birth control pills to temporarily turn off natural hormones (this step can be skipped if there is urgency, such as prior to cancer therapy).

10-14 days of hormone injections to stimulate the ovaries and ripen multiple eggs.

Once the eggs have adequately matured, they are removed with a needle placed through the vagina under ultrasound guidance. This procedure is done under intravenous sedation and is not painful. The eggs are then immediately frozen. When the patient is ready to attempt pregnancy (this can be several years later)the eggs are thawed, injected with a single sperm to achieve fertilization, and transferred to the uterus as embryos.

Does it work? Depends on how old the woman is when her eggs are frozen, when the eggs are retrieved, and then there’s the issue of fertilized eggs (or what many of us call human beings) that don’t get “used.”

It all just seems a little…creepy, and frankly, very unfriendly towards women. “Give us the most productive years of your life, work-wise; we’ll hold onto your eggs for you.” Never mind that these are the same years when women are biologically-oriented to wanting to have children. Nope, es first. “We’ll take care of that whole work-family balance thing. Go ahead and give us 12-hour days.” Seems a bit like indentured servitude. “Work for us for X amount of years and we’ll reward you with your own eggs for your semi-retirement.”

Mackenzie Dawson at the New York Post is certainly uneasy about this.

It is all this work that makes it hard for so many Americans to pursue meaningful personal lives in the first place.

Until we address the national problem of overwork, these types of perks are just symbolic window dressing.

Relationships don’t just magically happen after you check off all your other goals. Life is messy.

Then there is this ethical objection from Ronald Bailey that:

…centers on claims that this technique furthers the medicalization mercialization of women’s bodies. Of course, it is women who are choosing voluntarily to take advantage of this technology. They must believe that it can benefit them and further the development of their life plans.

Children are not “convenient.” They do not know how to follow schedules, nor do they understand a parent’s job. They are demanding, needy, wholly dependent beings. It alarms me that both people and corporations believe that a child and a family is something to be “fit into” a career, a life plan, a schedule, a corporate policy. One doesn’t schedule children in the same way one schedules a holiday or summer vacation. Kids get fevers, throw up at school, break their legs playing football. They want a parent to show up for their band concert, dance recital and hockey play-off. They don’t care about meetings, deadlines and business trips.

If a parent or pany thinks that children are to be conveniently planned and scheduled around work, I worry for the child, the family, and the culture that will create.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Envy and Economics
“Charity rejoices in our neighbor’s good,” said Thomas Aquinas, “while envy grieves over it.” Unfortunately, grieving over our neighbor’s good has e a dominant part of recent economic discussions e inequality,” the “Buffett rule,” the “99%”). Journalist Matt Lewis recently talked to talked to Dr. Victor V. Claar about the rise of envy in economics. You can listen to the audio below. Related: Dr. Claar recently gave a talk on “Envy: Socialism’s Deadly Sin” Acton On Tap (you can listen...
The Paradox of Public Education
Schools are controlled by the government, but they serve munities with niche needs, says Paul T. Hill, founder of the Center on Reinventing Public Education. Is there a way that education be publicly funded but privately managed? Public education struggles with two conflicting facts. First, public schools are small craft organizations that require close teamwork and constant adaptation to the unpredictable development of students. Second, they are government agencies always subject to constraints imposed through politics and legal processes. In...
How Some Courts and Legal Theorists Misrepresent the Rational Status of Religious Beliefs
While preparing for a book chapter on the topic of political philosophy and religious beliefs, Francis Beckwith “read and reread scores of court cases and academic monographs.” What he discovered is that judges and legal theorists are often embarrassingly ignorant about the rational status of religious beliefs: The legal theorists I read all claim to be experts in law and religion, and their works appear in law reviews published by prestigious universities. And yet, I could not find in them...
Finding the Proper Balance Between Subsidiarity and Solidarity
Subsidiarity has es shorthand for smaller government, while solidarity is now shorthand for expansive government. But as Msgr. Charles Pope explains, there is more nuance to the terms than the reductionist slogans suggest: Precise meanings have been lost – The problem that has emerged is that Catholics, and others, have taken these terms into the political arena and, as might be expected, these rather careful and nuanced Catholic terms have been reduced more to slogans, and are fast losing their...
Acton Commentary: Bread First, Then Ethics
My ongoing reflection on the Hunger Games trilogy from Suzanne Collins continues with today’s Acton Commentary, “Bread First, Then Ethics.” This piece serves as a sort of follow-up to an mentary, “Secular Scapegoats and ‘The Hunger Games,'” as well as an essay over at First Things I wrote with Todd Steen, “Hope in the Hunger Games.” In this mentary, I examine the dynamic of what might be understood to reflect Maslow’s hierarchy of needs as depicted in the Hunger Games...
Sergius Bulgakov’s “Religious Materialism” and Spiritual Hope
Yesterday in First Things’ daily “On the Square” column, Matthew Cantirino highlighted Sergius Bulgakov’s theology of relics, recently translated by Boris Jakim. Cantirino writes, Even today, it must be admitted, the subject of relics is an often-overlooked one in theology, and especially in popular apologetics. To the minds of many the topic remains a curio—a mild embarrassment better left to old ladies’ devotionals, or the pages of Chaucer. Yet, for Bulgakov, this awkward intrusion of the physical is precisely what...
Government Cannot Create Happiness
Robert J. Samuelson on why getting the government involved in the happiness movement will make us all miserable: We ought to leave “happiness” to novelists and philosophers — and rescue it from the economists and psychologists who think it can be distilled into a “science” and translated into pro-happiness policies. Fat chance. Government can often mitigate sources of unhappiness (starvation, unemployment, disease), but happiness is more than the absence of misery. If we could manufacture happiness, we could repeal the...
Belief in God Strongest in U.S., Israel, and Catholic Countries
A new reportabout the depth of people’s belief in God reveals vast differences among nations, ranging from 94 percent of people in the Philippines who said they always believed in pared to only 13 percent of people in the former East Germany. Yet the surveys found one constant—belief in God is higher among older people, regardless of where they live. The studies covered 18 countries in”1991 (counting East and West Germany andNorthern Ireland and Great Britain separately), 33 countries in...
Q&A with Acton
Have you always wanted to interact with one of Acton’s staff members? Do you have questions or ideas related to Acton’s foundational principles that haven’t been answered? Do you want the chance to participate in an intellectual discussion organized by Acton? If you answered yes to any of these questions, then this is your chance! On Tuesday April 24 at 6:00pm ET, we will be organizing an AU Online Q&A session with Dr. Stephen Grabill, director of Programs and International...
How Profit Ensures that New Yorkers Will Be Able to Eat Idaho Potatoes
How do potatoes from Idaho end up in supermarkets in New York City? As economist Walter Williams explains, its because of the power of the profit motive. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved