Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY
/
Kitchen Redemption: An interview with Brandon Chrostowski
Kitchen Redemption: An interview with Brandon Chrostowski
Oct 4, 2024 3:19 PM

There are nearly 70 million Americans with a criminal record and more than 2 million currently incarcerated nationwide. Ohio alone houses 50,000 of these individuals, costing the state more than $1.3 billion annually. Most of these people struggle with finding a job once they return to society. Not enough employers want to hire a convict, especially not a convicted felon. Because of the many difficulties they face, one in three released prisoners (some 20,000 are released each year in Ohio) wind up back in prison within three years of being freed. Without job and life skills, many of these people don’t stand much of a chance in society. Edwins Leadership and Restaurant Institute in Cleveland, Ohio, is a nonprofit whose mission is to give formerly incarcerated adults the skills and support network they desperately need for successful reentry into productive employment. It offers a six-month program for former convicts to learn restaurant, leadership and entrepreneurial skills.

Brandon Chrostowski, founder and CEO of Edwins, was inspired to create the nonprofit after he received a second chance (see “Steak au poivre, cabernet sauvignon and second chances” in this issue). He began his career in the culinary world as a bus boy but worked his way up, apprenticing at Chicago’s famous Charlie Trotter’s and working for Paris’s longest-standing Michelin 3-star restaurant, Lucas Carton. He received an associate’s degree in culinary arts and a bachelor’s degree in business and restaurant management from the Culinary Institute of America. He recently spoke to Religion & Liberty’s associate editor Sarah Stanley at Edwins Restaurant in Cleveland.

R&L: Much has been made about your early brush with the law and how you found a mentor in a Detroit chef who opened a whole new world for you. Is Edwins a kind of way to scale up that gift you received?

Brandon Chrostowski: Exactly, yes. Simple as that. This is about learning a skill. It’s about building esteem. It’s about getting someone from where they are to where they want to be in the quickest way possible.

Talk to us about the Edwins Second Chance Life Skills Center, the residential campus you’re building in Cleveland. How will that help those on the reentry path?

Well, it’s helping right now. We’ve got six guys moved in. One woman. It’s rocking and rolling. It gives someone plete pipeline from release to reentry in a healthy way. And there’s no homelessness in between.

The center provides housing and a job, the one-two punch. “How do I get a house? I need a job. If I can’t get a job, how do I get a house?” So we’ve taken that out of the equation. The idea is to drive this mission and this experience as deep as possible. We should be able to provide them with whatever we can possibly provide them with, including housing, life-skills training, a fitness center and a library. It includes an alumni house as well, so graduates who need to subsidize cost can go there and live. Yes, it brings the circle together.

You’re providing a structured environment, isn’t that it?

Yes, just as you control a restaurant. If you’re not in the industry, you don’t understand it. People look at it and think it’s chaos.

There’s nothing more organized than a restaurant. You know, we control the flow by the reservations, es in, who doesn’t. We control its order by the menu. So the kitchen dictates the menu in terms of what we can and cannot execute. It’s all totally controllable. And the same goes for someone’s return home. If you can help control where someone’s at on this side after school, during school, then you have more success in trying to get them to where they’d like to be. So it just helps guarantee a safe arrival at their goal.

At Edwins, from the first initial steps pletion of the program, only 40 plete. Is this because it takes a special type of person to go through this plete the program?

Yes, we ask a lot from them. First of all, we don’t say no to anyone. So there’s no cherry-picking. Some programs might say, “Hey, these are the five best out of ten,” and then pletion rate’s maybe 90 percent or whatever percent it may be. We don’t ask about previous offenses. We don’t care about previous education. It’s all about moving forward. So that being said, we’ll take on a class of 50 right now. We’ll start Monday. In the first three weeks, we intentionally squeeze. And what does that look like? e in at 9 a.m. and leave at 4 p.m. We ask them to memorize. We’re asking them to do things that are very fortable. And someone needs to fort in that fort. If they can’t, they’re not going to make it in a restaurant. So those first three weeks, we’ll easily weed out 30 percent of the students. After those three weeks, we don’t lose more than 10 percent. We present everyone an opportunity.

With a lot of support and structure.

We have tutors, and we’re offering every tool possible to help these men and women succeed, but if you don’t show up, you don’t show up on time, or if your ego gets in the way—you’re going to fold. So let’s find out now who’s ready and who’s not. But anyone who drops out can still apply in another two months. Every two months a new class starts. They can ing back. Maybe they’re not ready now. Maybe they just need to grow up a little e back later. Making the transition out of prison is not easy. In the restaurant, you’re making ten times more decisions a day at a quicker speed. We let someone settle in, go forward, and then when they’re ready e back and they’re in.

We see a major shift in prisoner reentry programs to job training and entrepreneurship, and it has been said that the best anti-poverty program is a good job. You have said that “if you work hard, you’ll always be employable.” Does that ring true in what you’ve seen at Edwins?

Restaurants are waiting to hire. If you can work hard and if you know something about your skill, you’re more than employable. You’re a leader. That’s why Edwins is also a leadership institute. We’re not trying to pump out bodies that can prep food. We’re looking for people who can lead in the kitchen.

The example I always give is about when I worked in France. I just bought a ticket and went to France and showed up at this guy’s restaurant. I did not speak the language, but I moved up because they realized, “This guy’s going to work hard. He’ll do anything we ask. He may not understand what we’re asking him, but he knows how to cook, and he does what he’s asked.” And it didn’t matter. Language did not matter. The same held true when I worked in Manhattan. When you have people who are immigrants, don’t speak the language, what do they do? They bang out what they need to bang out. Education, background, nothing matters in a restaurant except what you’re able to do in the here and now.

For those who find employment after leaving Edwins, is there any kind of support system to keep them on track?

Mostly the alumni will kind of check in with us. Nothing can replace that relationship you build with somebody. Nothing. Not a checkpoint, not an HR manager. Culture mitment and trust is all earned. So most of the time we don’t need to check in with our students. They’ll call us back and say, “Things are going well, and I’m doing this” or “I’m at a crossroads. Should I take this job or that job?” Even if they don’t call us up, we stay in contact with them. Every three months we’re on them. “What’s going on? What’s going on?” Yesterday afternoon we got a call. One of our graduates got thrown out of their place. So someone came and put them right into housing, and we’re sticking by their side until they get back on their feet. It’s a lifelong support system. We’re there when we need to be. We’re family.

Edwins has won broad financial support from foundations, philanthropists and churches. As you’ve grown and served more people, how have you been able to maintain the integrity of your original vision?

When a potential es and has their own idea for what should go on here, they don’t e donors. They can keep their money. I turned down $200,000 because someone wanted to have strings attached. “No, you don’t get it.”

We don’t take any state or federal money. Any donor who wants to have stipulations and new rules isn’t really e. Now restrictions are different. So if someone’s giving us money that’s restricted to students’ education, that means instructors and salary. That means pots and pans. Some people say I want it to go just to housing. No problem.

It’s taken me 10 years to get here, from 2004 to 2014 to build this. It could have taken four years if I would have cut corners. We had a vision and were able to stick to it. But sometimes sticking to your ethics will cost you a lot of time. But now look, es in this door, they get a fair and equal opportunity. They need a home, that’s available. That’s all because of doing it slow, steady and promise.

I know you chose the hospitality industry for this program very specifically. Ohio restaurants take in $16 billion in sales each year. More than half a million Ohio residents are employed in this industry, which is a growing one. However, do you see the Edwins model as something that could be used in other industries? If so, which ones?

Absolutely. This is the first time in U.S. history that grocery market sales have fallen second to restaurant sales. Seven out of ten jobs in Ohio are centered around food, whether it’s farming, agriculture, a restaurant or food processing. It’s huge. There’s always going to be a job in this industry. But going back to other industries, right now I’m working with a pany. So we’re building a curriculum. I’ve tried working with a pany. They didn’t have the infrastructure to make this happen. I’m working with the county government. The county would like to take this model and inject a little bit of it into the county landscape. So whether that’s people working in construction or on roads or in the county hall, there’s a possibility we can bring this concept to that arena.

There’s not going to be another Edwins restaurant. I don’t want another restaurant. Franchising won’t happen. To be able to touch every person, to have excellent results, to be the best in the world— that’s something.

But we do want to drive our skills deeper, so we’re opening up a fish shop. A meat shop would be next after the dorms. We’re teaching a student how to butcher. We’re also decreasing our cost of goods 30 percent. This is all possible. But the last thing I ever want to do is another restaurant.

So how do you spread the word to panies, other careers and just build this curriculum out to their specs? It doesn’t cost anybody anything. So I could work with you for a day and say, “Hey, without changing what you do, here’s a way you can mentor someone and teach them what you know in three months, six months, whatever.” But the point is you build out an pany, existing culture, existing success, and then you find out what makes it successful. And beneath it, you build a subheading, beneath that you try to get accreditation locally, nationally, that can help someone take this and then go elsewhere. It’s super simple.

Another place I’d like to get to is education. And manufacturing. The big five in Cleveland are education, hospital, manufacturing, banking and hospitality.

You put a lot of emphasis on “all the little lessons of humility and hard work” in what you do. Do these old-school virtues still apply in America in the 21st century?

Anyone who has those basic virtues, if you want to call them that, or basic values has an edge. They are the ones leading and building. Very often the worker bees are the ones who don’t have those values and are attracted to something so pure that they’ll work for it. To truly embody it, those are the leaders today. There’s a reason. You know, there’s no TV show, no music video, nothing that’s going to replace hard work. Nothing’s going to replace trust. And nothing’s going to replace someone sacrificing for someone else. There’s nothing that will replace that. But it’s all based on keeping a very clear vision of what’s right and what’s wrong and trying our best to keep it that way.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY
Up from the Liberal Founding
During the 20th century, scholars of the American founding generally believed that it was liberal. Specifically, they saw the founding as rooted in the political thought of 17th-century English philosopher John Locke. In addition, they saw Locke as a primarily secular thinker, one who sought to isolate the role of religion from political considerations except when necessary to prop up the various assumptions he made for natural rights. These included a divine creator responsible for a rational world for...
Spurgeon and the Poverty-Fighting Church
Religion & Liberty: Volume 33, Number 4 Spurgeon and the Poverty-Fighting Church by Christopher Parr • October 30, 2023 Portrait of Charles Spurgeon by Alexander Melville (1885) Charles Spurgeon was a young, zealous 15-year-old boy when he came to faith in Christ. A letter to his mother at the time captures the enthusiasm of his newfound Christian faith: “Oh, how I wish that I could do something for Christ.” God granted that wish, as Spurgeon would e “the prince of...
Creating an Economy of Inclusion
The poor have been the main subject of concern in the whole tradition of Catholic Social Teaching. The Catholic Church talks often about a “preferential option for the poor.” In recent years, many of the Church’s social teaching documents have been particularly focused on the needs of the poorest people in the world’s poorest countries. The first major analysis of this topic could be said to have been in the papal encyclical Populorum Progressio, published in 1967 by Pope...
Lord Jonathan Sacks: The West’s Rabbi
In October 1798, the president of the United States wrote to officers of the Massachusetts militia, acknowledging a limitation of federal rule. “We have no government,” John Adams wrote, “armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, and revenge or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net.” The nation that Adams had helped to found would require the parts of the body...
Mistaken About Poverty
Perhaps it is because America is the land of liberty and opportunity that debates about poverty are especially intense in the United States. Americans and would-be Americans have long been told that if they work hard enough and persevere they can achieve their dreams. For many people, the mere existence of poverty—absolute or relative—raises doubts about that promise and the American experiment more generally. Is it true that America suffers more poverty than any other advanced democracy in the...
C.S. Lewis and the Apocalypse of Gender
From very nearly the beginning, Christianity has wrestled with the question of the body. Heretics from gnostics to docetists devalued physical reality and the body, while orthodox Christianity insisted that the physical world offers us true signs pointing to God. This quarrel persists today, and one form it takes is the general confusion among Christians and non-Christians alike about gender. Is gender an abstracted idea? Is it reducible to biological characteristics? Is it a set of behaviors determined by...
Conversation Starters with … Anne Bradley
Anne Bradley is an Acton affiliate scholar, the vice president of academic affairs at The Fund for American Studies, and professor of economics at The Institute of World Politics. There’s much talk about mon good capitalism” these days, especially from the New Right. Is this long overdue, that a hyper-individualism be beaten back, or is it merely cover for increasing state control of the economy? Let me begin by saying that I hate “capitalism with adjectives” in general. This...
Jesus and Class Warfare
Plenty of Marxists have turned to the New Testament and the origins of Christianity. Memorable examples include the works of F.D. Maurice and Zhu Weizhi’s Jesus the Proletarian. After criticizing how so many translations of the New Testament soften Jesus’ teachings regarding material possessions, greed, and wealth, Orthodox theologian David Bentley Hart has gone so far to ask, “Are Christians supposed to be Communists?” In the Huffington Post, Dan Arel has even claimed that “Jesus was clearly a Marxist,...
Adam Smith and the Poor
Adam Smith did not seem to think that riches were requisite to happiness: “the beggar, who suns himself by the side of the highway, possesses that security which kings are fighting for” (The Theory of Moral Sentiments). But he did not mend beggary. The beggar here is not any beggar, but Diogenes the Cynic, who asked of Alexander the Great only to step back so as not to cast a shadow upon Diogenes as he reclined alongside the highway....
How Dispensationalism Got Left Behind
Whether we like it or not, Americans, in one way or another, have all been indelibly shaped by dispensationalism. Such is the subtext of Daniel Hummel’s provocative telling of the rise and fall of dispensationalism in America. In a little less than 350 pages, Hummel traces how a relatively insignificant Irishman from the Plymouth Brethren, John Nelson Darby, prompted the proliferation of dispensational theology, especially its eschatology, or theology of the end times, among our ecclesiastical, cultural, and political...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2024 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved