Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Kellyanne Conway and America’s politically fractured families
Kellyanne Conway and America’s politically fractured families
Dec 1, 2025 2:39 PM

Kellyanne Conway likely gave her last public speech in her role as White House adviser on Wednesday night at the Republican National Convention. The Conway clan’s political divisions mirror the growing bitterness that has e ingrained in families nationwide as America es more politicized, more secular, and less tolerant of philosophical diversity.

The Conway family’s carnage has played out painfully on social media. Kellyanne Conway distinguished herself as a pollster before guiding Donald Trump’s successful presidential campaign. She has served as one of his closest, and longest-serving, advisers. Her husband, George, a prominent NeverTrump Republican lawyer, took the couple’s political differences public on Twitter so stridently that Kellyanne called his behavior “a violation of basic decency, certainly, if not marital vows.” Their 15-year-old daughter Claudia – a self-described “radical agnostic liberal/leftist” – won media adulation for attacking her parents online. She charged her mother with being plicit” in the death of Herman Cain, posted screenshots of the family’s private texts, and accused both parents of “physical abuse.”

Kellyanne announced Sunday that she will step away from her post at the end of the month to give her family “less drama, more mama” – perhaps the first time a White House official actually resigned over family issues. George likewise withdrew from The Lincoln Project’s anti-Trump efforts. The news prompted Claudia to boast, “Look what I did” and tweet that she’s still seeking legal emancipation from her parents.

She has, in effect, substituted politics for her family. At one point, Claudia Conway literally asked her political hero, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, to “adopt me.” Alas, she is not alone. Nearly one-quarter of people who voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016 said they stopped talking to a friend or relative because of politics. Others have cut family gatherings short or skipped them altogether to avoid political clashes.

As everyday life has e politicized, and virtual munities” replace reality, political differences take on perilous undertones. Fully 62% of Americans say they have opinions they are afraid to express publicly, according to a Cato Institute survey. Their fear is not misguided.

Antipathy toward people of opposing political views is the most explosive force in American civic life. Americans now discriminate against members of the other political party “to a degree that exceeds discrimination based on race,” researchers Shanto Iyengar and Sean Westwood found. Their survey revealed that 80% of partisans would award a scholarship to a less qualified member of their own party over a more qualified member of the opposing party. Should someone sneak through the academic vetting process, he’s still not safe. Cato found that 50% of strong liberals and a third of strong conservatives support firing someone who made a donation to the opposite party’s presidential campaign.

More alarmingly, viewpoint discrimination increasingly bleeds over into political violence. The Democracy Fund’s Voter Study Group found that 21% of Americans say that violence is justified if the other party wins the 2020 presidential election. In 2018, one-third of college students agreed that “physical violence can be justified to prevent a person from using hate speech or making racially ments.” The riots roiling America’s cities only activate the latent pool of political hatred engulfing society.

The deepening enmity and estrangement between family members has at least three causes.

First, secularization has deprived us of our identity and our neighbor of human dignity. Without an identity as a child of God, people seek meaning in something larger than themselves – often in politics – and forge their modern identityaround those views. Without a belief that all people are created in the image of God, those trying to thwart their political project e part of their secular demonology. And, contrary to Mick Jagger, nobody has sympathy for the devil.

Second, the politicization of all aspects of society inevitably breeds animosity. As Friedrich von Hayek wrote inThe Road to Serfdom, when the government tries to direct the economic decisions of a diverse nation “with widely divergent ideals and values,” even “the best intentions cannot prevent one from being forced to act in a way” he regards as “highly immoral.” Since each side would instrumentalize the government pel us to violate our moral values, we view everyone on the other side with hostility. The existence of big government is a near occasion of sin.

Third, the resurgence of socialism amplifies these trends. It extends the tentacles of government into every area of life and multiplies the occasions for strife. At the same time, socialism substitutes a temporal paradise and situational ethics for the kingdom of Heaven. As its counterfeit values displace authentic religious faith, socialism creates atheists. Impossible utopian egalitarianism rushes to fill the void left in a generation of hearts by the ebbing of religion.

Love, however, has not filled that void. The decision to cling bitterly to high-status opinions and social media affirmation encroaches on life’s most sacred vows. Harper’s Bazaar advised readers in 2017, “If your partner is a Trump supporter and you are not, just divorce them.” Even ties of blood and birth are not immune.

All of this is redolent of the most chilling analysis of the Scriptures. The Apostle Paul wrote that “perilous times” e “in the last days,” producing a generation that is “without natural affection” (II Timothy 3:3, see vs. mentator Matthew Henry explained:

Wherever there is the human nature, there should be humanity towards those of the same nature, but especially between relations. Times are perilous when children are disobedient to their parents (2 Tim. 3:2) and when parents are without natural affection to their children,2 Tim. 3:3. See what a corruption of nature sin is, how it deprives men even of that which nature has implanted in them for the support of their own kind; for the natural affection of parents to their children is that which contributes very much to the keeping up of mankind upon the earth. And those who will not be bound by natural affection, no marvel that they will not be bound by the most solemn leagues and covenants.

Dissolving the most intimate connections of family renders society inoperable. The family is the first and most foundational building block of civilization. St. Philaret of Moscow wrote that it is the Fifth Commandment “on which the good order, first of families and afterwards of all social life, depends.”

The words of holy people of the past, and our own aching relationships, tell us that politicizing every aspect of life holds corrosive – and potentially apocalyptic – consequences.

(Kellyanne Conway addresses the 2020 Republican National Convention on August 26, 2020. Photo credit: Susan Walsh / Associated Press.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Terrorists and your valentine have more in common than you think
What may seem a bizarre polarity—terrorism and dating—actually speaks to the calculations we all make when investing not just our money but our very selves into any activity. Read More… Economics is the study of human action; it’s the study of individuals making choices. As a result, we can use the “economic way of thinking” to understand the decisions people make when es to all types of behavior, including dating and marriage, Spring break and Vegas vacations, and, yes, even...
Saving men requires the leadership of laymen
Attempts to “save men” in the past, both for the church and from themselves, have often made things worse by making men more passive. It’s time for men in the pews to take control of their own healing. Read More… Progressives are finally waking up to the reality that men and boys are struggling in America. On January 27, Andrew Yang posted a Twitter thread observing that “there’s a crisis among American boys and men that is too often ignored...
House of Gucci is Ridley Scott’s “Basta!” to the commercialization of art
Starring Lady Gaga, Adam Driver, and Al Pacino, this mockery of elites as little more than decadent mafiosi may grab some Oscar nods, but The Godfather it isn’t. Read More… My first Oscars essay presented Wes Anderson, the Hollywood dandy’s Francophilia, The French Dispatch, and gentle criticism of liberal intellectual pretense. The 2022 Oscar contenders also include an examination of American Italophilia—veteran Ridley Scott’s House of Gucci, as full of today’s stars as Anderson’s movies are of yesteryear’s. Lady Gaga...
Is The Lost Daughter this generation’s A Doll’s House?
A fine performance by Olivia Colman and a Euro-style directorial debut by Maggie Gyllenhaal have garnered rave reviews, but this film about a mother abandoning her children is amazing in ways that should give pause. Read More… In Henrik Ibsen’s seminal play A Doll’s House, protagonist Nora Helmer, a hitherto devoted wife and mother, walks out on her husband and their three children, significantly slamming the door behind her in the last scene. The idea of a mother leaving her...
Joe Rogan is not a problem, but a mirror
The controversial podcaster has e a lightning rod for those who don’t want to be associated with unvetted ideas expressed by either him or his guests. Yet those ideas may not be novel as much as reflective of what the silent majority is already thinking. Read More… The Joe Rogan Experience is one of the world’s most popular podcasts and, for the past two weeks, the world’s most controversial. Launched in 2009 edian and martial arts enthusiast Joe Rogan, the...
A year after coup, Burmese people continue to resist brutal military rule
February 1 marked the one-year anniversary of the military coup that has seen widespread chaos and destruction in Burma. Nevertheless, a younger generation continues to fight for democratic ideals against terrible odds. Read More… A year ago Burma’s military staged a coup.The juntahas since killed at least 1,500 people and detained another 12,000, of whom nearly 9,000 remain in custody. A couple thousand sought by the regime are in hiding. TheUnited Nations estimatesthat 2,200 civilian homes and other buildings have...
Modesty for thee but not for me: Brian Sauvé, Beth Moore, and Ephesians 4
A recent Twitter engagement on the subject of Christian women and modesty is the perfect jumping off point for a larger discussion of what it means to be modest, and obsessed. Read More… For those of us who have dealt pulsive behavior or addiction in our families or our own lives, there are clues—perhaps too seemingly unrelated for some to notice—that tip us off that someone might be engaged in an internal battle. Everyone remembers the Jimmy Swaggart saga. Once...
Reply to The New York Times: Online worship is still worship
A Lutheran pastor takes issue with a recent Times essay declaring that online religious services should end. But what does it mean to be church? And what does it mean to worship the God es to us wherever we are? Read More… I love watching men’s college basketball. Three e to mind that I’m so thankful to have seen on TV—Chris Jenkins’ buzzer beater to lift Villanova over North Carolina in 2016, Christian Laettner’s dagger to catapult Duke past Kentucky...
Ilya Shapiro’s ill-worded tweet and the crying game
When a Georgetown law mented on the relative merits of a potential SCOTUS pick, all hell broke loose. Black students demanded a form of “reparations” in response, including a room to “cry.” Have we reached peak “white guilt” yet? Read More… Ilya Shapiro, a Russian émigré, a serious scholar of the American Constitution, and formerly of the libertarian Cato Institute until he was scheduled on February 1 to begin running Georgetown’s Center for the Constitution, has found himself in a...
What message does NBC’s Olympics coverage send?
The network admits that diplomacy will not dissuade the CCP mitting atrocities against its people—but why assist in promoting a veneer of normalcy? Read More… The media world is not a principled one, and its decisions are often not moral in nature. Standards of coverage are rarely dictated by the metric of right versus wrong but by popular versus unpopular—determined more by what’s likely to attract viewership than what certain subsets of the viewing public may deem the right thing...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved