Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Keep The Covenant on Your Moviegoing Radar This Memorial Day
Keep The Covenant on Your Moviegoing Radar This Memorial Day
Jul 12, 2025 12:10 AM

When politicians let you down and high principles are abandoned, it’s good to be reminded that there is a group of dedicated Americans for whom Semper Fi is not a cliché but a credo.

Read More…

This Memorial Day, there is one movie in theaters that addresses directly the experiences of veterans. While American families are entertained by the Super Mario Bros. movie, now a billion-dollar proposition worldwide, people who prefer more true-to-life action can see the movie I mend, Guy Ritchie’s The Covenant, which has barely made any money, even though it’s an exciting, gripping experience, and it’s got a star, Jake Gyllenhaal.

The story is very simple: Gyllenhaal plays special operations Sgt. John Kinley, in charge of a small unit in Afghanistan in 2018, tasked with destroying Taliban IED factories. IEDs accounted for a very large minority of American deaths in recent wars, and there seemed to be no way to stop them. It meant that American troops operated in what the late international relations professor Angelo Codevilla called “replenishing mine fields.”

Sgt. Kinley understands this and mitted to protecting his troops in this terrible situation. Of course, to operate in Afghanistan, he needs interpreters. When he loses his interpreter to a bomb attack, along with one of his men, he recruits a new one. Ahmed (played by Dar Salim) is a man with a past who also has his own grudge against the Taliban, and the two find it difficult to work together because they are both strong willed. Fighting together, they e to see each other petent and trustworthy, until they are caught in a trap in a deadly firefight.

At first, Sgt. Kinley is mand, because firepower counts most; but soon they are in far too much trouble to shoot their way out, and the interpreter Ahmed takes control, because he knows the lay of the land and the people—Afghanistan is his country, after all. Indeed, Ahmed, ends up saving Sgt. Kinley’s life, heroically taking him to safety after he gets wounded, facing harrowing dangers while hunted by Taliban death squads.

The second part of the movie has to do with the debt Sgt. Kinley believes he incurred thereby. Once he recovers in body and mind from his wounds, discharged from the military and again a civilian in the bosom of his family, he faces the prospect of going mad trying to help Ahmed get the visa he was promised for risking his life to work for the American military. The bureaucracy and the feeling of helplessness lead Sgt. Kinley to take matters into his own hands.

Of course, this is not just a petent thriller—it also deals with a real and recent issue. The American government did make promises to interpreters who put their lives on the line, yet after the ignominious retreat from Afghanistan, they were left stranded. American veterans who feel honor bound to such men try and do what’s right, often stymied by bureaucracy. The shame and suffering of such a predicament explain perhaps why we look away.

But we risk losing some of our understanding and memory of the nobility of the men who served in the Middle Eastern and Central Asian wars if we do not contemplate such examples of the dedication of men who fight for a cause together and face danger and death together. If the idea that democracy could be spread by war is now deemed overly idealistic (to say the very least), then at least military equality between men at war is real and praiseworthy. The Covenant, as the title indicates, is dedicated to that rare experience, and it thus honors men much better than the politicians who mismanage such wars, which is why I mend it.

I also mend star Jake Gyllenhaal’s work more broadly. He has recently e the most interesting actor in Hollywood. He reminds me of Nicolas Cage, who was the most interesting actor of the 1990s, because his performances and choices regarding movies and directors revealed the drama of American pop culture after the Cold War, not just the trends, the momentary popularity, or the pursuit of glamour.

Starting about a decade back, when he made End of Watch with director David Ayer in 2012 and Enemy with Denis Villeneuve in 2013, Gyllenhaal shed his boyish career and started embodying the agony of men in our times. To give only two more examples, Dan Gilroy’s Nightcrawler (2014) eviscerated the moral ugliness of the media, and fashion designer Tom Ford’s Nocturnal Animals (2016) became the best movie about the horror of abortion.

All these movies have mon a suspicion that below the surface of American life lie secrets that we would find too disturbing to contemplate. For one example, industries that make our everyday experience what it is, from the police to the media, don’t themselves fit into our ordinary lives but involve dark necessities and moral questions that test souls. Indeed, they could lead ordinary men to madness or worse for the sake of something no more momentous than our middle-class way of life.

The Covenant seems only partly to fit this pattern. It has mon with Gyllenhaal’s other movies an insistence on agonized manliness handled by a director of some renown, in this case Guy Ritchie, who doesn’t quite fit into Hollywood. Such artists, like the agonized manly characters themselves, can’t find a way to win honors without ing part of a corrupting industry.

But The Covenant is not about the darkness hidden in the quotidian experiences of middle-class America. It seems to have nothing of the uncanny or sordid about it. It’s about what’s known or expected to be shocking and deadly—war. But it does fit the pattern of the other films in a way, because it is also about the military, and about the moral and political fallout of the Afghanistan retreat. Indeed, it’s a story set in 2018, during the collapse of the effort to pacify that country, which had started with a righteous fury against the terrorists who attacked the United States on 9/11.

Hence, The Covenant is a reflection on American politics in the 21st century, the War on Terror, and the way it became, after years of setbacks or failures, an item on the news, something boring or even embarrassing in the background of other more pressing national troubles and the busy goings on of our private lives, and eventually forgotten. Do we have troops in other countries now? Sure, some, somewhere, we can’t say for what purpose or what they are doing and what they are suffering. But we should know that they are there, serving America, and The Covenant reminds us of that fortable fact.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Faith, Funding, and Substance Abuse
Why might there be “increasing participation by religious organizations in offering substance abuse treatment funded by federal government vouchers”? Perhaps because, at least in part, “A program’s faith element relates to the people they serve and the type of help they provide, as programs with more explicit and mandatory faith-related elements are likely to be substance-abuse programs.” Thus, the more explicitly faith-filled substance abuse programs will increasingly face a special temptation to take federal funds for such purposes. And this...
One More Reason the Government Shouldn’t Subsidize Ethanol
Excerpts from Clifford Krauss’ article in the New York Times (cross-posted at )… The ethanol boom of recent years — which spurred a frenzy of distillery construction, record corn prices, rising food prices and hopes of a new future for rural America — may be fading. Only last year, farmers here spoke of a biofuel gold rush, and they rejoiced as prices for ethanol and the corn used to produce it set records. panies and farm cooperatives have built so...
Pentecostalism, Poverty, and the Global South
Related to last week’s post about Reformed education and Pentecostalism, I point you to this post by Rod Dreher, who discusses his interview with Josiah Idowu-Fearon, the Anglican Archbishop of Kaduna state in Nigeria. Dreher relates the following: Pentecostalism is growing like wildfire, but there’s less to it than you might think. He said that in many cases, people are drawn to the emotional experience, and can tell you exactly when they gave their life to Jesus — but can’t...
Two Perspectives on Climate Change
These two brief essays provide a good juxtaposition of two perspectives that view immediate and mandated action to reduce carbon emissions as either morally obligatory or imprudent. For the former, see Vaclav Havel’s, “Our Moral Footprint,” which states rhetorically, “It is also obvious from published research that human activity is a cause of change; we just don’t know how big its contribution is. Is it necessary to know that to the last percentage point, though? By waiting for incontrovertible precision,...
C.S. Lewis vs. Sigmund Freud
Awhile back, I finished reading Armand Nicholi’s book, The Question of God: C.S. Lewis and Sigmund Freud debate God, Love, Sex, and the Meaning of Life. Dr. Nicholi is an associate professor of psychiatry at Harvard and has taught a seminar on Freud & Lewis at Harvard for the past 35 years. The course eventually led to this book and a PBS series by the same name. The book is an interesting read for anyone modestly interested in one or...
Mugabe: Rotten from the Start
An interesting article in the Los Angeles Times detailing how badly wrong Robert Mugabe’s supporters in the West have been from the very beginning (requires “free” registration; may I suggest BugMeNot?): From the beginning of his political career, Mugabe was not just a Marxist but one who repeatedly made clear his intention to run Zimbabwe as an authoritarian, one-party state. Characteristic of this historical revisionism is former Newsweek southern Africa correspondent Joshua Hammer, writing recently in the liberal Washington Monthly...
Clarence Thomas Interviews
You are probably aware by now that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has published a memoir. The interview-avoiding judge has lately been giving, as Kathryn Jean Lopez puts it, “a lifetime of interviews.” Given the controversy surrounding his public life since his nomination to the Court, not much remains to be said about him, good or bad, that has not already been said. Suffice it to say that I draw attention to him now because: 1) My own view is...
Patterson Stops Too Short In Jena Six New York Times Piece
Orlando Patterson, professor of sociology at Harvard University, penned a challenging piece on Jena 6 and our current racial tensions. I have learned much from Patterson over the years. For example, he was the first person to help me realize that we often confuse issues of race and class in America by assuming the race as the single variable accounting for the cyclical plight of poor blacks. In a September 30th New York Times op-ed piece Patterson rightly says that...
Positive Freedom and Paternal Government
A quote from T. H. Green, refuting the view that the law’s “only business is to prevent interference with the liberty of the individual,” construed as doing what you like as long as it does not infringe on others’ rights to do what they want. Green writes: The true ground of objection to ‘paternal government’ is not that it violates the ‘laissez faire’ principle and conceives that its office is to make people good, to promote morality, but that it...
The Uniqueness of Christian Ecology – Abundance
"Here is a boy with five small barley loaves and two small fish, but how far will they go among so many?" [John 6:9] Among all the many good things going on last weekend in Boise, I (and a few others) noticed something a bit disconcerting. The way many of the topics were covered shows how prone Christians are to being consumed by doom and gloom messages of scarcity and lack and overpopulation and an "ever smaller earth." While it’s...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved